Landlord defends actions after tenant slept in cupboard under stairs
A landlord who admitted a tenant slept in a cupboard under the stairs defended his action saying it kept the man off the street.
John Friel said that the discovery of the man staying in the cupboard had been described as 'Harry Potter style' and was a 'bit of a joke'.
But he said the reality was that the man needed somewhere to stay and the alternative was turning him out on the street.
Speak to East Lothian licensing sub committee this week Mr Friel, who has applied for House of Multiple Occupancy (HMO) licences for two houses on Haddington's Hope Park, said the tenant had been staying in one of the houses but had to move into the neighbouring property.
At the time, he said, he had no room available and the man was having problems with his employers.
He said: 'I let him stay in the cupboard under the stairs, I was helping him out, it was referred to as Harry Potter style at the time, it was a bit of a joke but the alternative was he would have been on the street and I didn't want that.'
In the Harry Potter books the orphaned title character initially lives in the cupboard under the stairs of his aunt's home.
The use of the cupboard was included in a report to the sub committee which raised a number of issues about the two houses.
The committee was told one of the properties had an HMO licence which expired over three years ago while the other did not have one.
Mr Friel told the committee he had been unwell for a time which had impacted on his ability to apply for the licensing and said he had been unaware the smoke alarm system in one of the properties was not up to standard.
The committee heard Mr Friel sent emails confirming the electrical work required to update the alarms had been carried out minutes before they met to discuss the licence applications on Thursday this week.
However fire watch commander Torquil Cramer told the meeting he would have to visit the house and confirm the system was in place before he could update them on the properties.
Among concerns raised by licensing officers to the committee were claims single beds were discovered in garden sheds at both properties, tenants paid in cash and enforcement action was ongoing over the change of use of the houses without permission.
It was also claimed Mr Friel had put 'pods' in a conservatory at the back of one property which was erected without planning permission, however the landlord said the insulated pods were intended to be used to breed dogs not for tenants.
The sub committee agreed to defer a decision on whether to grant licences or not until the next meeting to give fire officers time to inspect the properties and gather updates on outstanding issues.
By Marie Sharp Local Democracy Reporter
Like this:
Like
Related
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
4 days ago
- Spectator
JK Rowling's takedown of Boy George was a joy to behold
Few things are more delicious to watch than an uneven battle of wits – and it is hard to imagine a more uneven fight than one between Boy George and JK Rowling. 'Which rights have been taken away from trans people?', Rowling asked her followers on X this weekend. 'The right to be left alone by a rich bored bully!', Boy George responded. 'I've never been given 15 months for handcuffing a man to a wall and beating him with a chain,' wrote JK Rowling We waited with bated breath for the inevitable response from the Harry Potter author. When it came, it didn't disappoint. 'I've never been given 15 months for handcuffing a man to a wall and beating him with a chain,' wrote Rowling – a reference to when Boy George was jailed in 2009 for handcuffing an escort to his bed and inflicting what a judge called 'wholly gratuitous violence'. 'You yourself have been convicted of violent assault,' she said. 'The overwhelming number of people who commit crimes of violence are male, just like you. That's why I don't want to see men identifying into women's prison cells or any of the spaces mentioned above. Not all men are violent or predatory but enough are to make safeguarding necessary.' In just a few direct and fluidly cogent paragraphs, Rowling patiently detailed her actual objections to men crashing into women's spaces – and no doubt left Boy George regretting ever wading into this fight. Still, I'm glad he did. One of the great delights of recent years has been witnessing Rowling running out of monkeys to give. It's been bracing to witness the intellect that created an entire imaginary world out of thin air demonstrate another string to its bow. Most of us can do only one or two things passably well, and that's enough. When somebody can do one thing extraordinarily well, it's a sensation. Now we find that Rowling can do this too. It's thrilling. It is so refreshing to see someone 'schooled', as the youngsters say, in this case almost literally. What of George, the Goliath in this fight? And he is the Goliath, with almost all the public and private institutions still on his side. I'm all for rehabilitation, penitence and welcoming the sinner back into the fold. But it is astonishing that George's conviction for false imprisonment and assault has been forgotten. This fits in with my long-standing suspicion that we homosexual men just aren't taken very seriously, or at least not as seriously, no matter what we do, good or bad. We are festive and fun, hurrah, which is why we often appear festooned with streamers and tinsel. Don't worry, I'm not suggesting this is some terrible societal sin that needs to be rectified by copious municipal funds and even greater quantities of variegated bunting. I think it is more likely simply because a double standard inevitably applies to men's bad behaviour among themselves, compared to men's bad behaviour towards women. A man socking another man in the jaw, however hard, will always be less viscerally repulsive than a man socking a woman in the jaw. Yes, this is technically a sexist hypocrisy – but, as double standards go, it is a good one to have, I think. There is, however, a flip side to that equation. If George had done time for exactly what he did but the victim had been a woman, I doubt that he would be sniping away blithely from the moral high ground on social media. He would not have been ushered back in to the bosom of reality TV. The divide in George's soul – between his Hare Krishna 'war is stupid' mantras, exotic whole food fig-and-brown-rice recipes versus his snappy, snitty, salty persona – is rewardingly comic. But again, if the person he handcuffed and assaulted had been female, we would not find this mismatch such a big chuckle. One of the great qualities of the old gay culture was its telling of truths; in fact, George himself was once a proponent of this, casually puncturing all sorts of pomposities and pretences in the pages of Smash Hits. It was one of his delightful qualities. But, while Marilyn, Boy George's chum in 1980s gender-bending pop, has stayed true to that form, George switched when the milieu changed. As Rowling stated in her reply, the great non-conformist rolled right over for this palpable rubbish. Has George 'taken the L' from his drubbing, as the youngsters also say? It appears not. He has not even tried to make an actual case in reply to her points, so perhaps even he is aware that stringing a coherent argument together is not his strong suit. No, he's back to the Edina Monsoon-style 'I am yogically serene and above all temporal things, honest, I REALLY BLOODY AM, sweetie darling' schtick, which is unintentionally hilarious. On Monday he posted the gloriously Pooterish one-two, 'I am happy to say I hate nobody and that serves me very well. Even JK Rowling who is clearly a deeply unpleasant woman'. To show further that he REALLY DOESN'T CARE, he then hit back at her with the devastating riposte 'Turns out she's a Muggle!' I bet she's never heard that one before. 'Words are few I have spoken, I could waste a thousand years,' George once sang. Indeed.
Scottish Sun
4 days ago
- Scottish Sun
JK Rowling in bitter spat with Boy George as singer calls her ‘rich bored bully' over trans rights
JK'S CULTURE WAR JK Rowling in bitter spat with Boy George as singer calls her 'rich bored bully' over trans rights Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) JK Rowling has blasted Boy George for calling her a 'rich bored bully' – pointing out he once served time for whipping a male escort with a chain. The Harry Potter author posted a furious response on X after the Culture Club singer waded into a spat with another user who claimed Ms Rowling was 'the person maybe most responsible for the push to take away trans rights'. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 JK Rowling and Boy George have got into a bitter row on social media Credit: PA 2 The Culture Club singer branded the author a "rich bored bully" Credit: Getty When Ms Rowling asked the X user 'which rights have been taken away from trans people?', Boy George responded: 'The right to be left alone by a rich bored bully!' Ms Rowling posted a lengthy rebuttal in which she accused the Karma Chameleon singer, whose real name is George O'Dowd, of sneering at 'unenlightened plebs' who reject the notion that trans women are women. She added: 'I've never been given 15 months for handcuffing a man to a wall and beating him with a chain.' Boy George was jailed in 2009 for handcuffing an escort to his bed and inflicting 'wholly gratuitous violence' at a property in Shoreditch, east London, in April 2007. The court was told that the cocaine-fuelled attack on Audun Carlsen, a Norwegian man, had been 'premeditated and callous' and had left the victim 'traumatised'. Boy George had been found guilty at an earlier trial of false imprisonment and beating Carlsen with a chain with the help of another man, whom he had never identified. Ms Rowling rejected Boy George's claim that she was entitled. She pointed out that she had been poor and could empathise with women who relied on state-funded services, such as single-sex rape crisis, domestic abuse and homeless shelters. She said: 'You yourself have been convicted of violent assault. The overwhelming number of people who commit crimes of violence are male, just like you.' Ms Rowling has become one of the most outspoken campaigners for women-only spaces, becoming a target for criticism by transgender rights activists. Trans ruling victory hides a terrifying reality - for years, women have been demonised simply for pointing out biological fact The row broke out months after Supreme Court judges unanimously ruled that a woman is defined by biological sex under equality law.
Daily Mail
4 days ago
- Daily Mail
JK Rowling tells Boy George 'I've never handcuffed a man to a wall and beaten him with a chain' as she mentions his assault conviction in last salvo in trans row
A trans rights row between JK Rowling and Boy George escalated yesterday as the author mentioned the singer's conviction for beating a male escort with a chain. A heated exchange ignited on X after the 63-year-old popstar dubbed the Harry Potter author a 'rich bored bully'. In a lengthy takedown, Rowling accused the Culture Club star of sneering at 'unenlightened plebs' and quipped: 'I've never been given 15 months for handcuffing a man to a wall and beating him with a chain.' George, whose real name is George O'Dowd, served four months out of a 15-month jail sentence in 2009 after being found guilty of assault and the false imprisonment of male escort Auden Carlsen. He later said he was prosecuted on his own evidence after he told the police he handcuffed Carlsen. The Karma Chameleon hitmaker tearfully apologised in 2017 when he appeared on Piers Morgan 's Life Stories and described it as a 'psychotic episode'. 'I stopped him from leaving my apartment,' he sighed. 'It's terrible what I did, and I'm ashamed and sorry for what I did. It was wrong.' This morning George hit back at Rowling in another dig by suggesting she was a muggle - a character in the Harry Potter series who lacks any magical ability. Rowling yesterday pointed out she had spent many years in poverty which is 'why I understand the importance of single-sex spaces for women'. 'You yourself have been convicted of violent assault,' she said. 'The overwhelming number of people who commit crimes of violence are male, just like you. 'That's why I don't want to see men identifying into women's prison cells or any of the spaces mentioned above. Not all men are violent or predatory, but enough are to make safeguarding necessary.' The war of words between Rowing and George started in April and saw the author blast the Culture Club singer after he said that she could not tell the difference between a transgender woman and a biological man. George has expressed support for transgender people online, in line with other stars such as Tilda Swinton and Pedro Pascal, who recently branded Rowling a 'heinous loser' on Instagram. Responding to a tweet suggesting that Pascal - an outspoken supporter of trans rights - was a misogynist, the singer wrote: 'Stop this nonsense that if you don't agree with @jk_rowling you hate women. She hates men. This is where this truth lies. 'She cannot differentiate between a 'trans' woman and a biological male. Which is weird with her imagination?' But Rowling - who now tweets almost daily about what she has called 'sex-based rights' - fired back with an eye-rolling emoji and the retort: 'I do not hate men.' She wrote: 'I'm married to a man, George. I do not hate men. 'I simply live in reality where men - however they identify - commit 98 per cent of sexual assaults, and 88 per cent of victims are female. 'Trans-identified men are no less likely than other kinds of men to pose a risk to women or girls.' She did not elaborate on how many of those committing sexual assaults were thought to be trans. She then added: 'Accusing me of hating men because I don't think trans women should be given access to all women-only spaces does rather suggest that... you're well aware that these are, in fact, men.' Rowling has been vocal on the subject of trans people for several years; in 2018, a spokesperson explained that her 'like' of a tweet calling trans women 'men in dresses' had been a 'middle-aged moment'. And following the Supreme Court judgment on April 17, Rowling has consistently referred to transgender women as being 'men'. The ruling, on an appeal brought by campaign group For Women Scotland, concluded that the legal definition of a woman was that of a biological female, when interpreting the Equality Act. It has led to the Equality and Human Rights Commission overhauling its rules on single-sex spaces - meaning that even trans people with gender recognition certificates (GRC) are still considered to be their biological birth sex. MPs have pointed out that the judgment will likely lead to discrimination against those who do not appear traditionally male or female. Dawn Butler, Labour MP for Brent East, told Parliament on last Tuesday: 'I do not know whether anyone else in the House has butch lesbian friends and has been with them when they have been told to get out of women's toilets, but I have. 'It is not pleasant; it is not nice.' And the ruling likely means that transgender men - who are considered biologically female - will be required to use women's toilets, even if they appear male and have, for example, a beard.
