Income Tax Returns FY 2024-25 (AY 2025-26): Key differences between Form 16, 16A, and 16B

Tax filing season begins for the financial year 2024-25, and the assessment year 2025-26 has officially commenced, with salaried employees in India having received their Form 16 documentation.
There are new changes in Form 16 that have been announced in the Union Budget 2025 to improve transparency by giving a detailed explanation of compensation components, tax-exempt allowances, and deductions, as well as which salary perks are subject to taxation.
Form 16 is a TDS (Tax Deducted at Source) certificate provided by employers to salaried employees, allowing them to accurately submit their Income Tax Returns (ITR) and comply with tax requirements.
READ: ITR Filing Last Date FY 2024-25 (AY 2025-26): Updated deadline for filing income tax returns in India for salaried individuals, companies, and more
It's also important to note that employees who have changed employment throughout the fiscal year must obtain Form 16 from each employer.
Form 16, along with its two components: Form 16A and Form 16B, are certificates issued as proof that Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) has been collected and deposited with the government.
Employers give Form 16 to salaried employees for TDS on their salaries, whereas Form 16A is for TDS on non-salary income, like interest, commission, or rent.
Form 16B is for property deals under Section 194-IA of the Income Tax Act. The buyer hands this form to the seller after taking out TDS on the sale of immovable property.
Source: Clear Tax

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Business Standard

an hour ago

• Business Standard

Net direct tax collection dips 1.39% to Rs 4.58 trn till June 19 in FY26

Net direct tax collections from April 1 to June 19 in FY26 dipped by 1.39 per cent year-on-year to ₹4.58 trillion due to higher refunds, income tax relaxation for salaried individuals and the impact of increased capital expenditure by companies. Of this, non-corporate tax — which includes taxes paid by individuals, Hindu Undivided Families, firms, bodies of individuals, associations of persons, local authorities, and artificial juridical persons — grew marginally by 0.71 per cent on a yearly basis to ₹2.72 trillion during the same period. Net corporate tax during the same period declined by 5.13 per cent to ₹1.72 trillion, while securities transaction tax (STT) increased by 12.13 per cent to ₹13,013 crore, according to official data. According to Samir Kanabar, tax partner at EY, the marginal dip in net tax collections is mainly due to the tax relaxation extended to the salaried class in the Union Budget 2025. 'Since individuals are paying less tax, the government is receiving lower tax deducted at source (TDS) from salaries. On the corporate side, the fall in tax collection is partly because companies are getting large refunds and also because many of them have made big Capex investments,' said Kanabar. 'When businesses spend on setting up factories, buying machinery, or expanding operations, they get tax deductions under the Income Tax Act, which reduces their taxable income and ultimately lowers the corporate income tax they pay,' he added. Gross direct tax collections rose by 4.86 per cent year-on-year to ₹5.45 trillion, while refunds surged by 58.04 per cent to ₹86,385 crore during the same period. Of the total refunds, the major chunk comprised corporate refunds amounting to ₹76,832.08 crore, which grew by 67.31 per cent. According to experts, these refunds pertain to past years and may have been cleared now. Of the total gross direct tax, corporate tax amounted to ₹2.49 trillion, non-corporate tax contributed ₹2.82 trillion, STT totalled ₹13,013 crore, and other taxes stood at ₹259.61 crore. 'The growth in corporate tax collections appears to be broadly in line with expected profit growth. In the case of non-corporates, collections may have been impacted by lower bonus payouts and modest salary increments. As for refunds, these likely pertain to previous assessment years and may simply reflect bunching of processing activity towards the end of the first quarter,' said Madan Sabnavis, chief economist at Bank of Baroda. Meanwhile, advance tax collections registered moderate growth of 3.87 per cent in the first quarter of FY26, compared with last year's year-on-year growth of 27.34 per cent. Advance tax is paid by individuals and businesses in four instalments within specific due dates — June 15, September 15, December 15 and March 15. The non-corporate advance tax decreased by 2.68 per cent year-on-year to ₹33,928.32 crore till June 19 in FY26, while corporate advance tax rose by 5.86 per cent to ₹1.21 trillion during the same period. The Centre has estimated direct tax collections of ₹25.2 trillion for FY26. Net direct tax collection in FY25 grew by 13.57 per cent to ₹22.26 trillion, exceeding the initial budgeted target of ₹22.07 trillion.

Time of India

3 hours ago

• Time of India

Didn't report your crypto earnings? Income tax dept sending tax notices, conducting search & seizure for undisclosed income; know your options

Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What did the Income Tax Department do? Popular in Wealth 1. NPCI introduces real time PAN-Bank Account linking on income tax website; taxpayers may get faster income tax refunds Why are many people getting this type of notice? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What to do if you get this type of income tax notice? What is the Schedule VDA of the ITR? Hardware based crypto wallets can be seized during a search operation PIN, password, passphrase, and seed phrases. Wallet names and addresses. Unlike exchange-held crypto, hardware wallet holdings are not reported in 26AS or by intermediaries. If these wallets held assets are not declared in returns, it could be treated as unaccounted income or unexplained investment under Section 69A. If such wallets contained crypto obtained from foreign platforms or wallets (e.g., Binance, Metamask, etc.), Schedule FA disclosure becomes mandatory, and non-disclosure may attract penalty under the Black Money Act. Source of investment, identity of parties involved, and mode of acquisition; Proper classification (business income vs capital gains); Disclosures made to RBI and tax authorities for foreign-held assets or cross-border dealings.' The Income Tax department has sent bulk emails to numerous taxpayers who either haven't paid the correct income tax on their cryptocurrency dealings or have failed to report their cryptocurrency transactions in Schedule VDA virtual digital assets ) of the Income Tax Return ( ITR ). [1] Keep in mind that if you are using foreign crypto exchanges like Binance or others, then you need to file Schedule FA in addition to the VDA schedule in the ITR. Overlooking any of these requirements, could get you into trouble with the tax true that in the past similar bulk emails and notifications were sent out regarding unreported incomes, but this time things are different. The income tax department now has access to information and data about undisclosed crypto income even if the crypto transactions did not go through any Indian exchanges. Multiple experts told ET Wealth Online that their clients received this notice and in some instances, the tax department even conducted search and seizure operations and confiscated hardware-based crypto to give you some context, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), Solana (Sol) and others can either be stored in an crypto wallets provided by exchanges, or in hardware wallets like USB drives and floppy discs. Crypto wallets given by exchanges can be traced and tracked with some effort, but it's much harder to track hardware wallets since there is no information available even from the crypto exchanges where the transactions are taking on to know more about how the income tax department is cracking on both hardware and online crypto wallets for undisclosed crypto gains Sawana, Partner at Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan Attorneys, says: 'We have come across a few such notices. It appears to be a system e-mail which states that the transactions in crypto currencies on which tax has been deducted under Section 194S of the Income-tax Act, 1961, have not been declared in the income-tax return for FY 2023-24 (AY 2024-25). Therefore, this e-mail requires the taxpayers to update their income-tax returns and report transactions in crypto currencies.'Chartered Accountant Abhishek Soni, co-founder, Tax2Win, says: 'A few of our clients have received notices from the Income Tax Department regarding unreported crypto transactions. These notices are part of the department's recent campaign to identify and take action against individuals who failed to disclose income from virtual digital assets (VDAs) in their ITRs.'Priyanka Jain, partner, Vaish & Associates, says: 'In our case, directors of a company approached us when they got a tax notice for unreported crypto income and when their hardware based crypto wallet was seized by the tax department.'Jain shared a brief about what happened in her case. 'In our case, a search was conducted at the residential premises of the assessees and followed by a summons under Section 131(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, asking for detailed information related to crypto holdings, mining, transactions, wallet use, and disclosures made to tax and foreign authorities. The assessee responded with Income Tax Returns, bank statements and gains earned from gains from trading -offered under capital gains. Crucially, the assessee also submitted Zebpay and WazirX exchange statements for the period under search, reflecting a long trail of transactions. Despite these disclosures, the tax department remained unconvinced and further the department issued further follow-up notices. Also, the question with respect to discovery of crypto hardware wallet found during search were asked.'Soni says that the income tax department has used data from crypto exchanges and TDS (Tax Deducted at Source) returns. Once they got the data they analysed it and found mismatches between what taxpayers declared in their Income Tax Returns (ITRs) and the actual transaction data available.'This discrepancy has triggered alerts and emails to thousands of taxpayers for the financial years 2022–23 and 2023–24. In many cases, taxpayers were either unaware of the reporting requirements or mistakenly believed crypto earnings were beyond the tax net,' says Accountant (Dr.) Suresh Surana says many taxpayers have received this notice as this is part of the tax department's 'NUDGE' campaign. This NUDGE campaign is a step before the action is being taken. It's like the tax department has all the information they need to take action but is still giving you one more chance to come says: 'The Income Tax Department has recently issued notices to thousands of individuals as part of its 'NUDGE' campaign, which aims to encourage voluntary compliance through data-driven insights. These notices primarily target taxpayers who have failed to disclose or have under-reported income earned from crypto transactions. By leveraging data analytics, the department has identified discrepancies between the income reported in ITRs and the transaction data or TDS details provided by crypto exchanges.'In every virtual digital asset (VDA) or crypto transaction, if you have made any capital gains, you have to pay a flat tax rate of 30% and the only deduction you can take is for the cost of acquisition. Plus, any losses from these transactions can't be offset or carried reason the tax department sent out this notice is because they noticed many taxpayers either not reporting this income under Schedule VDA of their ITR or incorrectly claiming deductions, which led to these advisory notices being explains: 'Taxpayers who have received such notices should review their filed returns for the relevant years, gather complete transaction details, and, if necessary, file an updated return (ITR-U) under Section 139(8A) to correct any omissions. It is essential to pay the appropriate additional tax along with interest to avoid further scrutiny, penalties, or prosecution. Maintaining proper records such as TDS certificates, exchange statements, and transaction logs is also crucial for substantiating claims in case of any potential litigation.'Soni says in their client's cases, they have filed the ITR-U after mentioning the correct details of cryptocurrency transactions to ensure proper compliance and avoid any further VDA is a compliance schedule that every cryptocurrency user needs to fill even if they have not sold any crypto but bought and held from Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan Attorneys says: 'My advice would be to report such transactions in Schedule VDA to the income-tax return and claim the credit for taxes deducted at source. Non-reporting of such transactions may result in reopening of cases and penal consequences.'Soni says: 'For those involved in crypto trading or investments, it is essential to disclose all VDA income accurately in the ITR under the specific 'Schedule VDA' section. Even if the income is a loss, reporting it is mandatory.'Soni says: 'If crypto income was missed in past ITRs, one should consider filing an updated return under Section 139(8A) before the deadline. Responding promptly to any notice and maintaining detailed records of all transactions, wallet histories, exchange summaries, and TDS details is crucial to avoid penalties and scrutiny.'Jain says in her client's case, the most defining moment was the discovery of multiple hardware wallets during the search operation. These are private vaults controlled only by the says that this seizureled to a series of questions seeking access to:Jain shares why this is critical:Jain explains: 'Even without active usage, mere possession of undisclosed crypto wallets becomes a basis to question wealth accumulation, source, and tax treatment. This case is a cautionary tale showing that taxability in cryptocurrencies arises from digital trails like TDS, exchange logs, and even physical hardware wallets.'Jain says: 'Even if income has been declared under presumptive taxation or as capital gains, the burden of proof lies on the assessee to show:Jain adds: 'And most importantly, mere possession or mention of a wallet if not accounted for, can create a strong presumption of taxable holding.'

Economic Times

13 hours ago

• Economic Times

UAE rule, wary I-T to deter dodgy crypto deals

Mumbai: In the lane to launder money, the skill to move cryptos to control companies and properties in Dubai has been honed over the past few years. But treading that alley would soon become tougher. Dual, albeit unrelated, developments in India and the UAE would force money movers to devise new tricks. First, Income tax (I-T) officials, hunting for illicit homes of Indians over the past six months, now strongly suspect that some property purchases were made with cryptocurrencies; second, a new regulatory regime in the Middle East country, would soon end payment in cryptos, other than stable coins, to freely buy goods and services. "When Indian residents use crypto to purchase real estate, they bypass Indian banking channels and FEMA scrutiny. But, under the new UAE regulations (expected from August), merchants would no longer accept crypto directly. Only entities licensed by the UAE Central Bank would be allowed to convert stablecoins to AED after collecting full KYC. While this framework ensures the buyer's identity is recorded, it remains unclear whether such data would be shared under the India-UAE tax treaty," said Purushottam Anand, founder of the law firm Crypto raiding a leading UAE developer having roots in Mumbai and clients across India, a northern office of the I-T department found that more than 460 buyers in the 650-odd property deals have no record of having remitted money through banks to acquire the properties. According to findings which were shared with other I-T centres two months ago, the arm of the UAE realtor which brokered the deals was aided by a network of 86 sub-brokers who later shared details with the tax office. According to tax circles, some of the clients had paid in cryptos, probably under the belief it would go untraced. Earlier this year, the department had found that hundreds of mule accounts were opened by a few persons in Kerala to deposit cash, use the money to buy cryptos -either on local platforms or through peer-to-peer transactions-and then move the coins to other wallets before encashing the them in UAE, or buying assets like properties, or transferring them to third parties. "When digital assets move from exchanges to P2P platforms or private wallets, monitoring becomes difficult, creating opportunities for illegal activities such as ransomware attacks, laundering, tax evasion, and potentially terrorist financing. Although the exchanges are required to report 'suspicious transactions', including withdrawals, with the Financial Intelligence Unit-India, such risks can be further addressed through stricter enforcement of TDS provisions, i.e. Sections 194S or 195, ensuring tax compliance for all crypto transactions, whether conducted on or off exchanges. Additionally, specifying the reporting entities and the format for disclosures under Section 285BAA will improve traceability," said Ashish Karundia, founder of the CA firm Ashish Karundia & Co. 'PAYMENT TOKEN REGULATIONS' The new 'Payment Token Services Regulation' lays down the rules and conditions established by the UAE Central Bank for granting a licence or registration for payment token services-which include payment token issuance, token conversion, and token custody and transfer. Under the rules no merchant or anyone in the UAE selling goods or services can accept a virtual asset unless it's a dirham payment token issued by a licensed issuer. Also, a bank cannot act as a payment token issuer. UAE is working on Dirham-linked stable coin (like USDT or Tether which is pegged to the dollar)."This would have implications for India which has close economic and financial ties with the UAE. By bringing digital assets such as payment tokens under a structured licensing and anti-money laundering framework, the regulation adds a layer of safety and transparency to cross-border digital financial flows. For Indian individuals and businesses engaging in the UAE's digital economy, on one hand this means greater clarity, reduced risk of fraud, and alignment with global best practices; on the other hand, the clear prohibition on anonymous crypto instruments like privacy tokens reinforces the global trend toward traceable and regulated digital transactions. This is something India is also actively pursuing through its own financial intelligence mechanisms. This would deter transactions in property, high value luxury products bought by Indians in UAE using crypto tokens," said Siddharth Banwat, partner at CA firm Banwat & Associates dealers said the UAE rules are not entirely fool-proof as coins can be routed through platforms in multiple jurisdictions whose cooperation would be vital to spot the trail. But the very presence of licensed intermediaries collecting and storing information would deter money movers.