100 days of Trump: Migrants fret over deportation
SAN DIEGO: Rosalba Hernandez used to keep her children's birth certificates close at hand in case an earthquake struck her part of California. But since Donald Trump returned to the White House, it's more because she's worried about immigration raids.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
News about high-profile arrests and deportations have characterised Trump's first 100 days back in office, with his administration saying he is making good on campaign promises to clamp down on illegal immigration.
That has left undocumented people like Hernandez on edge.
"You don't live your normal life anymore," Hernandez, 46, told AFP in southern California, which she has called home for half her life.
Hernandez, now a mother of five, left Mexico with her eldest daughter in her arms more than two decades ago and arrived in the United States.
She was briefly detained under the first Trump administration in 2019, when immigration agents raided the supermarket where she worked.
The experience frightened her, but Hernandez, who now works in a restaurant, says she's never been as terrified as she has been in the past three months.
"You go to work but you don't know what's going to happen... you don't know if you're going to be able to go home or not," she said.
"With all the focus on deporting people, they don't care.
Even if you don't have a criminal record, you have the bad luck of passing by when they're making an arrest or waiting for someone," she added.
To reduce the risk of encountering agents, Hernandez now limits her outings only to what is strictly necessary -- and even then she is extra cautious.
When she goes to work or takes her children to school -- four of them are US citizens by birth -- she first checks for suspicious cars outside, or consults text chains involving friends, neighbors and non-governmental organizations.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
"When we see something irregular, we start notifying these organizations, and everything gets put on Facebook, in messages, on Instagram," she said.
Citizen Patrol
One of these sources of information is Union del Barrio, a group that patrols the streets of San Diego and Los Angeles before dawn to be on the lookout for potential raids.
"The goal is to see nothing, but if we see something, we inform the community," said Ron Gochez, a member of the organization.
"We do this every single day in some different area of Los Angeles. And we're on call 24 hours a day," he told AFP during a tour of south-central Los Angeles, a working-class area with a strong immigrant presence.
Activists gather at 5:30am to co-ordinate their patrol, looking for the kind of vehicle they believe Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents use.
"We're looking for primarily American SUVs, Ford, Chevy, etc.
Sometimes they also use pickup trucks or Dodge Challengers.
"We're looking for cars with tinted windows.... that could be sometimes double parked."
These patrols began more than two decades ago in San Diego, but increased in frequency this year with the return of Trump.
"The community is very scared," said Gochez, whose day job is teaching history in a public school.
"About 10 percent of my students have disappeared.
They just don't go to school anymore."
Gochez, 43, said he knew of at least one student whose family fled to El Salvador for fear of being caught up in raids.
Community life has also diminished, he says, with church attendance down, and quinceaneras -- coming-of-age parties for girls turning 15 -- becoming rarer.
At the end of each patrol, Union del Barrio posts images on social media so neighbors know if their area is free of raids.
This information is vital for people like Hernandez, who says she fears daily being separated from her children.
"If I have the opportunity to stay here, it's to help them get ahead and have a better future," she said.
"I don't want them to have to work sometimes up to 16 hours a day."
Despite the risk, Hernandez said she wasn't afraid of giving an interview and was not ashamed.
"I'm not saying anything that isn't true," she said.
"Like many people, I am working. We're not doing anything bad for this country.
"We all come to work, and our work contributes to the economy of this country."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
China Sides With Iran, Greenlights Hormuz BLOCKADE? Beijing's First Response As U.S. Seeks Help
/ Jun 23, 2025, 06:00PM IST United States' airstrike on the Iranian nuclear sites has triggered a massive global oil crisis scare. Tehran's parliament has decided to close the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global oil chokepoint. The strait accounts for 1/5th of the movement of oil containers across the world. According to reports, United States had urged China not to led the Ayatollah Khamenei-led regime to shut the strait. Will China heed to Trump's request after a bitter trade tariff war between the two superpowers?
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Did the US really wipe out Iran's nuclear sites? Reports say Trump may have been tricked by Tehran
Despite President Trump's declaration of a complete victory, the US airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities have yielded mixed results. While some sites sustained damage, particularly at Fordow, doubts remain about the extent of destruction to underground facilities. Concerns linger regarding Iran's potential relocation of enriched uranium, potentially hindering but not halting their nuclear ambitions. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Did the US really wipe out Iran's nuclear sites? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What do satellite images reveal about the damage? What do experts think about the attack? Has Iran secretly moved its highly enriched Uranium? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads How does this impact Iran's nuclear ambitions? FAQs US President Donald Trump announced with confidence that US airstrikes had destroyed Iran's main nuclear sites and called it a complete victory. However, expert opinions and satellite images present a different Saturday night, Donald Trump dispatched seven B-2 stealth bombers from the United States to destroy Tehran's nuclear program by dropping massive bunker-busting bombs on three enrichment facilities in Fordow, Natanz, and underground facilities may have survived, and enriched uranium may have been moved without anyone knowing. The attack may have slowed down Iran's nuclear plans, but it did not stop them, as per reports by CNN and of the Joint Chiefs Gen. Dan Caine said Sunday that a US submarine used Tomahawk cruise missiles to strike an Isfahan location where a US official estimates that approximately 60% of Iran's stockpile of already-enriched nuclear material is kept Isfahan facility was not hit by massive "bunker-buster" bombs dropped by B-2 bombers, in contrast to the other two Iranian facilities targeted in the operation, as per a report by the US used 12 bunker busters to destroy Iran's facility at Fordow, another underground location that contained centrifuges needed to enrich uranium, the facility's evident survival has prompted doubts about whether Trump's declared objective was even to commercial satellite imagery, the U.S. attack on Iran's Fordow nuclear plant seriously damaged, if not completely destroyed, the deeply buried site and the uranium-enriching centrifuges it contained, but experts said on Sunday that there was no proof of it. However, it is unknown how much damage has been done because the facility has layers of Technologies' satellite imagery from Thursday and Friday revealed "unusual activity" at Fordow, including a lengthy line of cars waiting outside one of the facility's Lewis, a weapons expert and professor at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies, has closely examined commercial satellite images of the strike sites and said the damage to the facility seems limited to aboveground structures.'They just punched through with these MOPs,' said David Albright, the head of the Institute for Science and International Security and a former U.N. nuclear inspector, in reference to the Massive Ordnance Penetrator bunker-busting bombs that the United States claimed it Eveleth, a satellite images specialist and associate researcher with the CNA Corporation, pointed out that it was impossible to confirm the destruction below ground. The hall that houses hundreds of centrifuges is "too deeply buried for us to evaluate the level of damage based on satellite imagery," he stated to Iran, prior to US attacks on its nuclear bases, the majority of its highly enriched uranium was smuggled to a hidden location. Iran claimed that it had moved its 400 kg stockpile, much of which was kept at Isfahan, and satellite photos showed convoys departing all three locations in recent days, as per a report by think that the majority of Fordow's 400 kg of 60%-enriched uranium was transferred prior to Operation Midnight Hammer, as per a report by The of 16 trucks snaking down a road near the entrance of the Fordow plant, obscured by rubble and dirt, was released by US defense contractor Maxar Technologies on June defense company TS2 Space reports that trucks, bulldozers, and security convoys swarm Fordow, where analysts observed a "frantic effort" to move shielding materials or intelligence analyst Ronen Solomon stated that transferring Iran's uranium would be "like having fuel without a car" and that they are unable to do much with it unless they develop a small-scale project that we are unaware of, as per The also warned that Iran might be concealing this and other nuclear components in places that Israel, the United States, and the U.N. nuclear inspectors are unaware would take years and rely on Tehran's capacity to restore essential equipment before Iran could produce a nuclear weapon, even though it might have the entirely; experts believe some deep underground facilities and uranium stockpiles were has the potential to rebuild, as key equipment and uranium may have been secretly relocated.
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Pakistan in political turmoil over Donald Trump's nobel bid after US and Israel bomb Iran's Fordow, Isfahan, Natanz facilities
Multiple political leaders and civil society voices in Pakistan have criticised the government's decision to nominate U.S. President Donald Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize. The criticism grew louder after the U.S., alongside Israel, carried out airstrikes on Iran's nuclear sites in Fordow, Isfahan, and Natanz. The nomination letter had already been submitted by Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar. It praised Trump's role in de-escalating tensions during the recent India-Pakistan conflict. However, opposition leaders now argue that the developments in Iran completely contradict the principles of peace. Political leaders strongly oppose government move Veteran JUI-F leader Maulana Fazlur Rehman openly condemned the nomination, calling Trump's actions the opposite of peaceful. Speaking at a gathering in Murree, he criticised the government's quick decision following Trump's lunch meeting with Chief of Army Staff Asim Munir. 'How can support for Israeli attacks be seen as a mark of peace?' he questioned. Former Senator Mushahid Hussain echoed this, accusing Trump of being influenced by Israeli leadership and labelling the Iran strike 'an illegal war.' He demanded that the nomination be 'reviewed, rescinded, and revoked.' PTI lawmaker Ali Muhammad Khan also responded with a direct call to 'reconsider,' highlighting U.S. complicity in Gaza. Statements continued to pour in from other political parties and public figures. PTI's think-tank head Raoof Hasan described the nomination as 'a source of shame,' while Afrasiab Khattak criticised what he called 'sycophancy' in diplomacy. Jamaat-i-Islami's Naeemur Rehman said the move hurt Pakistan's 'national dignity.' Public figures join chorus of disapproval Former diplomat Maleeha Lodhi stated that the nomination did not reflect public sentiment, while journalist Mariana Baabar remarked that the country's image had taken a hit. Author Fatima Bhutto questioned whether the nomination would now be withdrawn, summing up the mood on social media. With mounting criticism across political and public spheres, pressure is building on Pakistan's government to formally withdraw Donald Trump's Nobel Peace Prize nomination.
