Government buys Citywest Hotel for €148m as part of long term asylum strategy

The Government has approved the purchase of the Citywest Hotel and convention centre for €148.2 million, the Justice Minister said.
Jim O'Callaghan said that it would be 'far cheaper' to own the facility in west Dublin instead of paying private providers for the services and accommodation. He said it would be used as a screening centre where applications for asylum will be processed.
He said it was in line with the commitment in the programme for government to own 14,000 accommodation units for asylum seekers.
He said there are no 'immediate' plans to expand the number of places at Citywest, which is currently being used as a reception centre for asylum seekers and Ukrainian refugees.
'Over a period of four years, we believe we'd be in the position where we would have got our money back in terms of the investment. Over a longer period of time, if you compare what we're spending in the private sector from the amount of money we'll be spending in terms of a state owned entity, over a period of about 25 years, we'll be looking at a saving of €1.25 billion.'
Locals from Saggart protested outside Leinster House last week over government plans to buy the Citywest facility. They raised concerns about losing the amenity of the hotel complex and about demand for services.
Minister of State Colm Brophy said that local representatives would be engaged with so that the local community are informed. He said the decision was being made on a 'value for money' basis and that if it is directly owned by the State, it can save around 50% of the operating costs.
'Very importantly, the purchase of Citywest will not result in any immediate increase in numbers,' he said. 'The plan with Citywest is very simply, to develop the asset and make sure that we have the ability, particularly under the Migration Pact, to have a state-of-the-art processing facility whereby people's applications can be cleared within 13 weeks from when they arrive in the country.'
He added: 'Citywest has actually been working very effectively in terms of having an Ipas centre there, having Ukrainians also present, and having a range of services and facilities which have been working effectively and successfully for many, many years. We are not planning on changing those numbers.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Irish Independent

2 hours ago

• Irish Independent

Eoin O'Malley: CityWest deal shows the State is in the asylum business for the long haul, but the opposite approach is working for Denmark

The Danes are pursuing a 'zero refugee' policy and is sending out a strong message about how tough its rules are Today at 21:30 If we were to choose a monument to Irish policy failure, we could do worse than to pick the Citywest Hotel. The Government last week authorised the purchase of the hotel in Saggart, Co Dublin, to become a state-owned International Protection Accommodation Service (IPAS) centre for asylum-seekers. Citywest was built by businessman Jim Mansfield, who borrowed heavily to expand it to become one of the largest hotels in Europe. It became host to some large events. All-Ireland champions partied there after victory. It was where the Fianna Fáil faithful gathered when the party was in its heyday. The faux-Georgian hotel seemed to symbolise Celtic Tiger excess and hubris.

Irish Independent

2 hours ago

• Irish Independent

The Sunday Independent's View: Time is running out for the Government to get a grip on housing

For the Government, it offers an opportunity for reflection as it nears the halfway stage of its own first year. What has been achieved since coming into office again in January? The administration has been accused of seeming less like a new broom than a threadbare old brush; not so much sweeping clean as brushing the country's problems under a rug to be tidied up later. But defenders of the Fianna Fáil/Fine Gael-led Coalition would no doubt argue it has been faced with a series of obstacles since the start of the year, most notably the still unresolved threat of tariffs from Donald Trump. There is also the worsening international ­situation, which last week saw Ireland join other countries in pulling embassy staff from Iran as the conflict with Israel continues. These, however, are matters with which all our partners are having to deal. It is no excuse for not dealing robustly with domestic matters. The legislation programme for the summer term of the Oireachtas lists a number of bills as a priority, including the Defence (Amendment) Bill which will remove the so-called triple-lock on Irish troops serving abroad, as well as measures tackling air pollution, cyber security and terrorism. All important matters, no question about it. The logjam in planning and services is well documented But none directly addresses the deepest issue confronting the country: that is, of course, the lack of supply, and crippling cost, of housing. Last week there was more bad news as the Central Bank revised downward its forecast for the number of houses that will be built between now and 2027 — also the midway point of the 34th Dáil, a date which the Government may find itself careening towards at an alarming pace. This year, it now expects 32,500 homes to be built, well short of what is needed to make a significant dent in the target of 300,000 by 2030. The logjam in planning and services is well documented. Historically, it has often felt as if Irish bureaucracy stymies rather than stimulates innovation. No wonder we lag far behind comparable EU states when it comes to infrastructure. The apparent lack of urgency to break through these roadblocks remains a bigger concern. The Government already seems to have ­retreated into explaining rather than doing, as if seeking to justify in advance the failure to meet its own target, which it has already accepted is inevitable. The appointment of the former HSE chief ­executive as chair of the newly revamped An ­Coimisiún Pleanála may make a difference. If anyone has experience of cutting through red tape, it is Paul Reid. Health is another area where much-needed change sadly comes a cropper. Ministers must act swiftly to hand him the power to green-light the infrastructure projects needed to house an estimated population of six million by 2040. No other achievements by this Government will be worth a penny candle if the crisis in housing does not ease dramatically. The summer recess is set to begin less than a month from now, on July 18. When TDs and senators return in September, all eyes will be on the presidential election and it will be the winter solstice before we know it. It is still not too late to get a grip on housing, but it soon might be if more time is wasted.

Irish Independent

2 hours ago

• Irish Independent

AIB likely to quadruple chief executive Colin Hunt's pay package to €2m after government exit

The sale of the State's final 2.06pc stake has freed the bank from the Government-imposed salary cap on banker pay. It is likely that AIB will look to bump up Hunt's pay – and also add in a equivalent share allowance to at least match that of Bank of Ireland CEO Myles O'Grady. O'Grady is paid a basic rate of €950,000 before his pension or bonus at Bank of Ireland, which divested from State ownership in 2022. That compares to the €500,000 basic wage that his AIB counterpart receives. After pension and bonuses are included, Hunt is currently paid just over €600,000 a year. 'To be fair, a salary of €500,000 for the CEO of the largest bank in Ireland is not competitive. It's well below market rate,' said banking analyst John Cronin of SeaPoint Insights. 'Bank of Ireland pays Myles O'Grady €950k and it pays CFO Mark Spain €600k. So I would say that the CEO and CFO of AIB will go to those levels at least pretty quickly. It's hard for the general public to get their heads around pay packages above €500k "They'll probably keep CEO pay just below €1m. It'd be a surprise if they didn't match Bank of Ireland, and they might go around €25,000 more,' he said. Now that the Government has sold its stake and the salary cap at the bank has been removed, industry sources believe AIB is also likely to add a lucrative fixed share allowance to Hunt's package – effectively matching O'Grady's deal. Bank of Ireland's top executives currently get a fixed share allowance of 50pc of salary, introduced after the State sold its final shares in the bank in 2022. That fixed share allowance is expected to rise to 100pc next year. ​'It's hard for the general public to get their heads around pay packages above five hundred grand and why a CEO has to be paid a million,' admitted another industry source, adding that Hunt was seen as unlikely to seek work with banks in London or elsewhere. 'I'd think he would probably attach a huge amount of value to living here, from a family point of view. He's also in the middle of every significant macroeconomic debate in Ireland because of his position – and I wouldn't underestimate the value he attaches to that. 'But if you want to hang on to that management team and keep them together, then you have to compete in the marketplace. And now they have the freedom to compete. "It would be kind of dysfunctional to have a banking market where one big bank can pay double what the other big bank pays, when they're more or less doing the exact same thing,' said the source. Cronin feels the pay cap should never have been introduced. 'I get that it worked politically. But you have to pay people properly to do a job. They could move to another smaller bank and get paid twice the amount and more. The danger is you get runaway cost-inflation across the sector "There is no doubt shareholders saw an ongoing retention risk in relation to the management team and they were not happy about that.' Cronin said bankers are disappointed that Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe did not remove the ban on variable performance-related bonuses above €20,000. 'My own view is that he should, but I can totally understand why he didn't. The danger is you get runaway cost-inflation across the sector. 'But the problem is that it creates cynicism within the sector, where people say that it's OK for the top guys to get paid properly, but not everyone else. And it can drive fixed-pay inflation, which is less ideal from a cost flexibility standpoint.'