Additional Child Tax Credit, Americans Abroad: IRS Is Watching Closely
Americans living abroad claiming the ACTC face complex tax rules. IRS audits of expat filings ... More claiming the ACTC are on the rise. IRS Is educating its agents about what to look for to catch invalid claims.
The Additional Child Tax Credit can provide taxpayers up to $1,700 per qualifying child in 2025 as a refundable credit. The ACTC not only reduces the amount of tax owed but can also result in a refund from the IRS if the credit exceeds the tax liability. Non-refundable credits can only reduce a taxpayer's tax bill to zero. Refundable credits, like the ACTC, can generate a payment if the credit is greater than the amount of tax owed.
For U.S. citizens and resident aliens living abroad, claiming the ACTC is complicated by Internal Revenue Code Section 911, which governs the Foreign Earned Income and Foreign Housing Exclusions. These are significant benefits for overseas taxpayers. The challenge lies in IRC Section 24(d)(3) governing the ACTC which prohibits taxpayers who elect any exclusion under Section 911 for a taxable year from claiming the ACTC.
The IRS is intensifying scrutiny of expat filings claiming the ACTC due to frequent errors and overpayments. Recently, the IRS issued an International Practice Unit specifically addressing the ACTC for U.S. persons abroad. The IPU educates IRS agents on identifying improper ACTC claims, including those involving Section 911 exclusions.
The ACTC is the refundable portion of the Child Tax Credit for each child under the age of 17. Among other requirements, eligibility requires a U.S. citizen or resident alien child with a valid Social Security Number issued before the filing deadline, with the taxpayer providing at least half the child's financial support.
The CTC phases out at higher modified adjusted gross income levels, and the ACTC requires at least $2,500 in earned income not excluded from U.S. taxation. The ACTC equals 15% of earnings that exceed the $2,500 refundability threshold, up to the maximum amount of the refundable credit ($1,700 per child in 2025). Due to the phase out limits, the ACTC won't help taxpayers with high income levels. Nonethless, it can provide a significant financial boost to other taxpayers, especially those with several children.
Assuming certain qualification tests are met, IRC Section 911 provides valuable benefits to taxpayers living and working abroad. It allows expats to exclude up to $130,000 of foreign-earned income in 2025. In addition, it permits the exclusion of certain employer-provided housing costs. The law governing the ACTC states that the ACTC 'shall not apply to any taxpayer for any taxable year if such taxpayer elects to exclude any amount from gross income under section 911 for such taxable year.' Thus, because of the prohibition set out in section 24(d)(3), electing either the FEIE or Foreign Housing Exclusion, or both, will completely disqualify the taxpayer from claiming the ACTC.
To claim the ACTC, expats must forgo Section 911 exclusions entirely. Many will be able to use the Foreign Tax Credit, instead. The FTC offsets the taxpayer's U.S. tax liability on a dollar-for-dollar basis with foreign taxes paid. This keeps the foreign earned income taxable and preserves eligibility for the ACTC. The FTC will not be helpful for taxpayers residing in a foreign country that does not impose an income tax or equivalent (e.g., the United Arab Emirates, or the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia).
Making the choice requires careful planning. Once a taxpayer elects to use the FEIE or foreign housing exclusion, that choice remains effective for all later years unless the taxpayer revokes it. This means the taxpayer must continue to make the same choice each subsequent year or he will be considered to have revoked the Section 911 exclusion election. Switching to the FTC after having made the Section 911 election will be treated as an implied revocation. After a revocation, a taxpayer cannot re-elect use of any Section 911 exclusions for a five- year period without first obtaining IRS approval.
The IRS has heightened oversight of expat CTC and ACTC claims due to widespread errors that resulted in many overseas taxpayers receiving improper payments. The recent IRS IPU addressing the CTC and ACTC for U.S. persons abroad outlines what agents should look for including verifying income, whether the claimed credits exceed the limitations, taxpayer residency, whether the taxpayer is a U.S. citizen, proper tax filing status, and child eligibility. The recent release of the IPU serves as a warning that IRS audits of expatriate tax returns claiming CTC and ACTC are likely to increase.
IRS audits looking for improper ACTC claims made by taxpayers living overseas will likely be on the ... More rise.
In preparation for a possible audit, taxpayers should ensure they have retained necessary tax records. For example, records for at least 3-years regarding income, child support, and foreign tax payments. Given they live and work in a foreign country, such taxpayers most likely have foreign financial accounts. This means they should have records covering 5-years for FBAR-related non-U.S. financial accounts. Increased audit risks are on the horizon; it is best to be well prepared beforehand.
In the meantime, taxpayers may wish to consult their tax advisors to make sure of eligibility before claiming the CTC or ACTC. Once confirmed, the overseas taxpayer can file Form 1040 with Schedule 8812 accurately, leveraging the automatic extension to June 15, 2025, for 2024 returns (or October 15 with Form 4868).
For Americans living abroad, claiming the ACTC involves navigating a maze of tax rules. Electing any Section 911 exclusion whatsoever prevents access to this valuable credit. Choosing the Foreign Tax Credit instead in order to maintain ACTC eligibility requires careful planning within a complicated global tax landscape.
With the IRS' recent release of an International Practice Unit dedicated to educating its agents about the possible invalidity of ACTC claims by U.S. persons living overseas, expats need to proceed very cautiously. The possibility of audits and close regulatory watch means taxpayers must be prepared to demonstrate compliance and should now be reviewing records to make sure all is in order.
Get my take on tax matters around the globe.
Reach me at vljeker@us-taxes.org
Visit my US tax blog www.us-tax.org It is an invaluable guide in all areas of U.S. international tax. Stay informed of legislative developments, tax reform and all things international tax (including ACTC developments with the IRS). Keep ahead of U.S. tax changes impacting your life, family or business.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
4 Ways Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Will Change How You Plan for Retirement
President Donald Trump's signature legislation, dubbed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' includes plans for tax cuts, green energy cuts, Medicaid cuts and more. It also contains new retirement account provisions that could affect how Americans plan for their golden years. Be Aware: Read Next: As the landmark bill makes its way from the House to the Senate, here's a look at what you need to understand about how it can affect how you plan for retirement. Many Americans would receive a break on their taxes owed if the bill is passed. This means they would be able to channel more money into retirement savings accounts. 'Retirement planning fundamentally comes down to having sufficient resources to make work optional,' said Brett Horowitz, principal and wealth manager at Evensky & Katz / Foldes Financial Wealth Management. 'The proposed extensions of the Tax Cuts & Jobs Act provisions, combined with new deductions for tip income, overtime pay and seniors over 65, could significantly improve retirement outcomes for Americans.' Those who benefited from the cuts in the original Tax Cuts & Jobs Act will continue to enjoy these cuts, allowing them to continue saving for retirement as they had been. 'With many TCJA provisions set to expire at the end of 2025, the House Republican proposal to make these extensions permanent may provide the certainty we need for effective long-term planning,' Horowitz said. 'Retirement modeling depends on clear inputs and stable variables,' he continued. 'The less uncertainty in tax policy, the more accurately we can project success rates. When these changes take effect — pending Senate approval — we'll be able to deliver much better news to clients about their retirement timeline.' Horowitz believes if Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' does not ultimately pass, it could negatively affect Americans' abilities to save for retirement. 'There's a profound psychological difference between telling someone they can retire earlier than expected versus having to extend their working years,' he said. 'The former energizes people about their financial future; the latter can feel overwhelming. These tax provisions create the conditions where more Americans can realistically achieve comfortable retirement.' Learn More: Savvy long-term investment strategies should take taxes into account, so changes to tax laws can shift these strategies. 'Smart investing isn't actually about chasing the highest gross returns — it's about maximizing what clients actually keep after taxes and expenses, and this tax bill addresses some issues there,' Horowitz said. 'While we can control costs through low-fee funds, tax efficiency requires a more nuanced approach that varies by everyone's personal circumstances. 'Higher tax rates push us toward tax-free municipal bonds and tax-efficient ETFs in taxable accounts, while we place tax-inefficient investments in retirement accounts,' he continued. 'This 'tax location' strategy can significantly impact net returns, even if it means accounts perform differently.' 'Two provisions in the Tax Cuts & Jobs Act have created the most anxiety for our clients — the SALT deduction cap and estate tax exemptions,' Horowitz said. 'Both are getting significant relief under the current proposal.' The proposed increase in the SALT deduction cap means retirees will face less of a penalty if they choose to spend their golden years in a state with higher income taxes. 'The SALT deduction increase from $10,000 to $40,000 will reshape where people choose to live and retire,' Horowitz said. 'We've already seen migration patterns shift dramatically since 2017, with high-tax states losing residents to states like Florida and Texas. This change reduces the penalty for living in high-income-tax states, though it doesn't eliminate the advantage of no-tax states entirely.' Estate planning strategies would also change for many Americans if the bill were to pass. 'On the estate side, the current $13.99 million exemption was set to drop to $7.14 million in 2026 — a reduction that had wealthy clients scrambling to implement complex gifting strategies and trust structures,' Horowitz said. 'The proposed permanent increase to $15 million per person, or $30 million for couples, provides enormous relief for families in that middle tier.' This is particularly important because of state-level complications, Horowitz continued. 'Take New York, where you could face no federal estate tax, but still owe state estate taxes on estates between $7.16 million and $13.99 million,' he said. 'The interplay between federal and state rules makes domicile planning critical.' The 'One Big Beautiful Bill' should make estate planning less complex for many people. 'For clients who've already implemented sophisticated estate planning strategies, those structures remain valuable,' Horowitz said. 'But for families with estates under the new thresholds, this eliminates the pressure to make rushed gifting decisions or create complex trusts simply to avoid tax cliffs.' Overall, Horowitz believes the bill will make retirement planning easier. 'The permanent nature of these changes — assuming they pass — finally gives families the certainty to make long-term decisions about where to live, how to structure their wealth and when to implement estate planning strategies,' he said. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard 10 Genius Things Warren Buffett Says To Do With Your Money 5 Types of Cars Retirees Should Stay Away From Buying This article originally appeared on 4 Ways Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Will Change How You Plan for Retirement Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Miami Herald
41 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Forget Tesla, Ford is eyeing even bigger EV rivals
When most Americans think of electric vehicles, the first brand that comes to mind is Tesla. The brand revolutionized the EV market in the U.S. by making the first mass-market EV with broad commercial appeal. Until recently, Tesla has dominated the U.S. market, but in recent years, its market share has dropped from 70% to 43.4% in the first quarter of 2025. Related: Ford reports another blowout sales month, but trouble could be ahead Now, newcomers from legacy car brands like General Motors and Ford are gobbling up market share as they look to knock Tesla from the top spot. U.S. electric vehicle sales volume jumped 11.4% year over year in the first quarter to 294,250 vehicles sold. This jump was led by GM, which doubled its EV sales from a year ago, while Ford EV sales were up only modestly. Battery electric vehicles reached 7.5% of all new car sales in the first quarter, an improvement from a year ago, but short of the 8.7% peak reached in Q4 2024. GM went from selling 457 EVs in Q1 2022 to nearly 32,000 in Q1 2025. After a disastrous start to the year, Tesla is basically back where it started in 2022 when it sold 129,743. Ford went from selling 6,734 to 22,500 over the same period, but its path has been anything but straight. The company has struggled with inconsistent sales and elusive profitability. However, Ford remains unbowed, and the company has its sights set on a much bigger prize than the U.S. car market. Image source: Olson/Getty Images Ford's electric vehicle division, Ford Model e, lost $5.1 billion in 2024. That was an increase from the $4.7 billion it lost in 2023. The company says it expects to lose $5.5 billion this year. But despite the daunting landscape, the company thinks it has what it takes to turn its fortunes around. Part of that strategy is making an affordable EV that can compete with Chinese models currently dominating the market. Lisa Drake, who leads Ford's EV industrial plan, recently spoke wth investors during a "candid dinner discussion" hosted by Bernstein lead automotive analyst Daniel Roeska. Related: Ford loses its last cheap vehicle to tariffs "Lisa Drake was explicit: Ford intends to match the cost structure of leading Chinese players. That means not just battery pricing, but full system cost from chassis and thermal systems to inverters and electronics," Roeska wrote, according to Axios. Ford will use its Advanced Electric Vehicle program to build an EV platform that will support eight different body styles, including trucks, crossovers, and possibly sedans. So Ford believes it can compete wth the BYDs of the world that dominate the Chinese EV market, which is much larger than the U.S. one. Ford has already announced that the first product will be a mid-sized pickup. But it will rely on an estimated $700 million federal tax credit this year that a Republican-led Congress could easily cancel. Ford released its May car sales report on Tuesday, June 3. The company reported a 16.3% increase in May sales to 220,959, mainly due to its biggest, most gas-guzzling models. Ford SUVs saw a 23% sales increase to 83,000, led by the Explorer, which had over 20,500 sold in the month. Meanwhile, Ford Trucks saw an 11.2% increase to 121,354 units sold. Overall, Ford has sold 930,925 vehicles to date, a 6.1% year-over-year increase, despite the specter of tariffs upsetting the whole apple cart. However, one area for the company that wasn't in the green was electric vehicle sales. More Ford news Popular Ford newcomer overtakes Jeep in a key areaFord CEO Jim Farley has a strong take on tariffsFord loses its last cheap vehicle to tariffs Ford sold 25% fewer electric vehicles this month than last, accelerating a declining sales trend for a segment of the company's brand that had been experiencing growth. The Mustang Mach-E was the lone electric vehicle model to see sales growth, with an 11% increase to 4,274. In fact, the Mach E is inching toward overtaking its non-electric brother in sales. Mustang sales were down 3% in the month to just over 5,000 sold. Related: Ford CEO Jim Farley has a strong take on tariffs The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Starving The Watchdog—Budget Cuts To IRS-CI Undercut Crime Fighting
WASHINGTON, DC - FEBRUARY 13: A sign for the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is seen outside its ... More building on February 13, 2025 in Washington, DC. Members of Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) arrived at the Internal Revenue Service to begin examining the agency's operations. (Photo by) The Department of Government Efficiency's proposal to cut up to 25% of IRS staffing earlier this year is a textbook case of false economy. Among the casualties in the fiscal pruning is the IRS Criminal Investigation division—one of the few federal agency divisions that, rather than costing money, regularly recovers more money than it spends. In 2024 alone, CI helped claw back $9.1 billion in fraudulent proceeds—with a budget of less than $800 million. Raw numbers only tell part of the story, as IRS-CI plays a central role in dismantling financial networks behind everything from international drug trafficking and terrorism to pandemic fraud and offshore tax shelters. Workforce and budget cuts don't just shrink the IRS ranks, they weaken law enforcement, threaten ongoing tax compliance, and ultimately make it easier for the wealthiest criminals to operate with impunity. Efficiency, it turns out, isn't just about firing employees. High ROI Law Enforcement Taken as a whole, IRS-CI is one of the federal government's most cost-effective investments. According to a recent Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) report, CI's budget grew to $779 million by 2023, a modest increase by the standards of Washington. In return, taxpayers received a 90% conviction rate, over 2,600 investigations initiated, more than $1.2 billion in asset seizures, $1.7 billion in restitution, and $9 billion in uncovered fraud. The numbers speak for themselves: CI returns many multiples of its cost to the Treasury, even before accounting for intangible returns like any effects it may have on deterrence. The policy logic here should be self-evident—an agency that pulls in more than it costs should be the last place to target when looking for cost-saving cuts. All the same, CI now finds itself on the chopping block—not because it underperforms but, apparently, because its ongoing success isn't politically expedient. IRS-CI Reach IRS Criminal Investigation is deeply embedded in some of the current administration's highest priorities. CI agents don't merely pore over tax returns, looking for inappropriate business expense deductions, they infiltrate cartels, track terror financing, and expose shell companies laundering money through global financial networks for all manner of ills. In 2023, CI helped root out fentanyl trafficking networks linked to the Sinaloa cartel and Chinese money laundering firms. These aren't abstract wins that IRS-CI happened to play some bit part in—they're real-world enforcement actions with direct implications for both safety and national security. Despite playing a central role in bipartisan enforcement priorities, from counter-narcotics and sanctions evasion to terrorism, CI is now facing a hiring freeze and looming cuts. Unless the pursued efficiency is on behalf of criminal elements, the proposed reductions risk contravening the administration's policy priorities. IRS-CI As Signal The IRS doesn't audit every return and, even when artificial intelligence reaches its zenith, it likely never will. What holds the tax system together isn't the omnipotence of the auditor, but the shadow of the audit—the perception that cheating is risky and noncompliance has dire consequences. Ultimately however, paying taxes is more than a legal obligation, it's a form of social signaling. People comply not just to avoid known penalties, but to affirm their identity as law-abiding citizens in good standing. That behavior is heavily conditioned, if in an attenuated sense, on the visible strength of enforcement. Folks pay their taxes so long as they believe others are paying their fair share and that not doing so would be socially frowned upon. Remove any of those premises and the argument for being honest on your returns falls apart. With every staffing and funding cut, the signal begins to fade. This isn't just a shift in bureaucratic priorities—it's the start of a feedback loop that potentially ends in compliance collapse. As enforcement wanes, high- Outlook Slashing IRS-CI resources might make for a cleaner budget line in 2026, but it's the epitome of short-term thinking. The coming rollback risks coming just as enforcement was regaining traction after years of cuts. In recent years, CI began targeting high-income tax evaders more aggressively, including a campaign in 2024 that brought in $1 billion from 1,600 millionaires. These are complex cases that require skilled agents, time, and resources. Scaling back now sinks not only future collections, but past expenditures made to spool up investigative momentum. The same administration calling for tougher action on drug cartels and foreign adversaries is proposing cuts to the unit that leads financial investigations into those bad actors. This isn't just fiscal negligence—it's reckless incoherence.
