Pigeon management plan to be rolled out in three more town councils
SINGAPORE: A pigeon management plan introduced in several town councils in a pilot programme in 2024 will be extended to three more areas.
The next phase will be rolled out in Jalan Besar, Marsiling-Yew Tee and Nee Soon town councils from June for a duration of six to nine months.
If successful, the plan will be scaled up across Singapore to help manage the pigeon population, said Senior Minister of State for National Development Tan Kiat How on Tuesday (May 20).
The initial pilot programme was implemented in three town council estates with large clusters of pigeons - Ang Mo Kio, Bishan-Toa Payoh and Tanjong Pagar.
The pilot, which was carried out from July 2024 to March 2025, saw the pigeon population in the three town councils decrease by about 50 per cent.
Pigeon-related feedback within the three town councils from October 2024 to March 2025 was also about 34 per cent lower than the expected average, NParks said in an update on Tuesday.
Actions such as surveillance were carried out at bird feeding hotspots, and NParks took enforcement action against 50 cases of bird feeding.
Direct population control measures were also carried out to bring down the pigeon numbers.
PIGEON MANAGEMENT PLAN
The National Parks Board (NParks) said it worked with several government agencies, residents and members of the public on the pigeon management plan, which focused on population control, public education and community stewardship.
Measures included reducing human-generated food sources and direct population control, said NParks.
Under the pilot plan, NParks worked with the town councils to step up pigeon removal efforts, "with physical trapping and humane euthanasia to bring down the pigeon population at hotspots" within the areas.
NParks also advised the town councils on proper removal methods and developed a set of guidelines for the use of alpha-chloralose, a substance that kills birds.
NParks monitored feedback on illegal bird feeding and conducted surveillance, which included physical surveillance and the deployment of CCTV cameras at identified feeding hotspots, as well as enforcement against bird-feeding.
The National Environment Agency (NEA) and the Singapore Food Agency (SFA) also worked with the town councils as well as other stakeholders such as the hawkers' associations, managing agent, food establishment operators and cleaning contractors to improve refuse and food waste management at bin centres and food establishments.
These included ensuring non-spillage of trash between bin chutes and bin centres, as well as prompt clearance of food waste, trays and dirty crockery at tray return racks and refuse bins.
Engagement and public education sessions were also conducted by SFA and NParks.
During these sessions, SFA distributed educational materials on improving refuse management, housekeeping, and cleanliness practices.
NParks, meanwhile, informed the public on the need to maintain the cleanliness of the environment and to refrain from feeding pigeons.
It also collaborated with Active Ageing Centres to conduct sessions in the three town councils.
The sessions aimed to raise awareness among the elderly on the negative impacts of bird feeding, it said.
NParks reminded that it encouraged feeders to consider nature-based activities as alternatives to feeding pigeons.
"These include community gardening, which creates opportunities for them to be engaged socially with others, and birdwatching, where they can observe how wild birds forage naturally without human-generated food sources," it said.
It will continue working with agencies to understand the motivations of repeat offenders who feed birds.
NParks will also address misconceptions and discourage them from doing so.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
7 hours ago
- CNA
CNA938 Rewind - AI, Green Finance, and Cybersecurity are emerging areas to focus on for UK-Singapore collaboration
CNA938 Rewind British Navy's HMS Prince of Wales has made history as the first warship to dock at Marina Bay. The aircraft carrier comes as Singapore and the UK mark 60 years of diplomatic ties. Lance Alexander and Daniel Martin speak with the British High Commissioner to Singapore, Nikesh Mehta.
Independent Singapore
13 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
Is it now normal for helpers in Singapore to handle everything—from housework to parenting? Local asks
SINGAPORE: After noticing that many of her friends and siblings had become overly dependent on their domestic helpers, a Singaporean woman took to social media to ask: 'Is it alright to let your helper handle everything from children to house chores, etc?' She posted the question on the r/askSingapore subreddit on Friday (June 20), explaining that based on what she had seen among her friends and family, some helpers were being made to do far more than just housework. 'Their helper is doing every single thing for their family, from house chores to feeding, changing and bathing their babies. Always see them going out and going on vacations, clubbing, etc., while their helpers are taking care of their children and homes. Even when they're out for a family outing, their helpers are always around,' she said. On top of all that, she pointed out the pay didn't match the workload. A lot of these helpers were earning somewhere between $500 to $700 a month, which she felt was way too little considering everything they were expected to do on a daily basis. At the end of her post, she wrote, 'Is this considered normal in Singapore, or is it a little bit too much? I feel like, especially with infants and younger kids, parents should be around their children more.' 'Why have kids if you aren't willing to be a parent?' Opinions in the comments section were mixed. Some netizens felt that it's totally 'all right' and pretty 'normal' in Singapore for helpers to take on both household chores and childcare duties. For them, it wasn't so much about parents shirking their responsibilities, but more about having some extra support to cope with the demands of daily life. One netizen said, 'Every household has its own dynamics. As long as the helper has sufficient rest, don't think it's any of our business. Anyway, it's a free market. If the helper feels overworked and nothing changes after voicing out, they can always ask for a transfer.' Another wrote, 'Singaporeans work very long hours so that they can afford the domestic helpers, and less or no time on household chores.' A third remarked, 'It's definitely alright to, but not the most ideal arrangement.' However, a few others disagreed with this view, arguing that parents should not delegate all their responsibilities to the helper. One netizen commented, 'It's unreasonable (and honestly really exploitative) to expect someone to cook, clean, manage the household, and take care of all the kids' needs at $500-700 a month. If I became a stay-at-home mum and all of these responsibilities fell on me, I'd probably go mad.' 'Also, there's a certain level of judgment directed at parents who choose not to be hands-on. The helper is supposed to help you, not replace you. Why have kids if you aren't willing to be a parent?' MOM: Domestic helpers must receive proper rest and fair treatment Employers may assign their domestic helpers to carry out both household chores and childcare duties; however, the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) mandates that helpers must be given proper rest, fair treatment, and appropriate compensation. According to their guidelines, helpers are entitled to 'one rest day' per week and must be provided with 'adequate shelter, basic amenities, sufficient ventilation, safety, modesty, privacy, and adequate food.' Read also: 'I'm still her child and I have feelings too': Daughter says her mum favours siblings who give more money, even though she covers most family expenses Featured image by Depositphotos (for illustration purposes only)
Independent Singapore
13 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
Singaporean says he's not having kids due to high cost of living and climate change: 'Don't see much hope for this world'
SINGAPORE: With climate change worsening and the cost of living rising, some young Singaporeans are starting to question whether having children still makes sense. One man recently shared his personal reasons for choosing to stay child-free, sparking a wider conversation online. Posting on the r/SingaporeRaw subreddit on Sunday (June 22), he explained that he has been leaning towards not having children due to various concerns, including climate change, financial pressures, and the rapid rise of AI and automation. He noted that each year brings new temperature records, and the effects of global warming are becoming more obvious. At the same time, advancements in technology have made job security feel less certain, even for skilled workers. 'Basically don't see much hope for this world. Those people who keep saying environmental factor is not a concern you are too shallow. Don't you experience rising temps every year?' he continued. He also pointed out that getting around with kids has become more difficult. Cars have become a 'luxury' for many families, and public transport isn't much better. The MRT, he said, is often 'jam-packed like sardines'. Beyond the practical concerns, he added that the emotional rewards of parenthood often come with a reality check. While children may be adorable and 'cute' in their early years, he felt that this stage is short-lived, and the demands of parenting only grow over time. See also Jamus Lim Discusses Residents' Concerns Over Jobs and Rising Costs Seeking more insights, he invited others in the online community to share their reasons for choosing to have children or remain child-free. 'Ultimately there's no right or wrong in this and both sides are respected for making their decisions,' he said. 'I still have many friends choosing to have kids. Whenever I talked about these issues, they agree to the problems and they have no answers to them as well. Would like to discuss more here and hear more of the other side of the story as well.' 'I don't think everyone needs to have kids. It's a choice.' In the thread, quite a few Redditors agreed that raising kids in today's economy is tough. One even pointed out the upside of staying child-free, saying, 'You will save S$300-500k from costs of bringing up a kid. Think people kinda figured out kids are expensive not only in terms of cost but also time. I love kids though and it's easy to be a godparent or hand out with friends who have kids.' Another added, 'In Singapore, best not to have kids. Because parents and system are too competitive. From 3 yo start to enrichment and whatnot all the way to university.' Others approached the topic from a more philosophical or emotional angle. A few noted that if you really strip it down, there isn't a purely logical reason to have children. One commented, 'It's just pure instinct and selfishness, if you really break it down. I want kids so that they can take care of me when I'm old. I want more kids so that they have each other when I'm gone. I can pass my legacy down to them, and not donate to some randos. I like the idea of a happy family. I want kids so that the grandparents will be happy. Etc etc.' That said, not everyone agreed with the decision to skip parenthood. Some parents in the thread shared their own reflections, acknowledging that while having children doesn't always make sense, especially given the rising costs and pressures, it can still be one of life's most meaningful experiences. One shared, 'As a parent, all I can say is: if you overthink all the possible rational reasons not to have kids, no amount of argument and reasoning will change your mind. To put it crudely, there is no logical reason to have kids at all in our current world as it is.' They continued, 'Parenting is a special stage/side-quest in life. For the record, I'm not against living your whole life without experiencing parenting, nothing wrong with that, and I don't think everyone needs to have kids. It's a choice. If you have them, enjoy it for all it's worth, all the pains and joys.' See also Chaos during Khloe Kardashian's 36th birthday party More married Singaporeans are remaining child-free compared to 20 years ago Singaporeans these days have become increasingly cautious about starting a family, and the numbers reflect this growing trend. According to the Department of Statistics, 15 per cent of resident ever-married women (currently married, divorced, or widowed) aged between 40 and 49 had no children in 2024. This figure is more than twice the 7.1 per cent documented back in 2004. A report by Yahoo! also pointed out that this shift is largely driven by concerns about affordability. Many young Singaporeans feel that the rising cost of living and skyrocketing property prices make it difficult to start a family. On top of that, emotional readiness is also a growing concern. More young adults are aware of the time, responsibility, and long-term commitment that come with raising a child, and so they're now thinking more carefully before taking that step. Read also: 'I'm still her child and I have feelings too': Daughter says her mum favours siblings who give more money, even though she covers most family expenses Featured image by freepik (for illustration purposes only)
