First-ever Global Shipping Emissions Levy Approved, But Pacific Push For Stronger Deal Fails

But a Pacific push for stronger deal failed at the International Maritime Organisation meeting in Londom last month.Shipping companies will soon have to pay for carbon emissions produced by its vessels for the first time, but the new deal agreed by the global maritime watchdog is still significantly lower than what was demanded by Pacific Island nations.
The shipping emissions framework was finalised by the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) at its meeting last month in London.
While it is yet to be ratified, a formal vote in October on its adoption is expected to be successful.
The IMO is the UN agency responsible for the safety and security of shipping and the prevention of marine and atmospheric pollution by ships in international waters.
Once implemented, the proposed global emissions scheme would subject ships to a charge on their greenhouse gas emissions.
After a certain threshold, that charge is increased, as set out by the finalised framework. Ships would also have the ability to trade carbon credits under the scheme.
Overall, the scheme is expected to generate about US$10 billion a year – a fraction of the $60b a year Pacific and Caribbean nations wanted in their own carbon levy pitch for the framework.
UCL Energy Institute's Dr Tristan Smith, a professor of energy and transport, told RNZ Nine to Noon that, while agreement on a global emissions scheme is significant and likely a world-first, it could have been more robust.
'In climate terms, and as a scientist, it's always frustrating because you know what needs to be done in order to keep us on the temperature goals that we've talked about in the Paris agreement,' he said.
However, achieving that in practice, he said, 'is always incredibly difficult because of the politics of climate negotiations'.
'We also had a particularly difficult time this year with the geopolitical situation, referring to the fact that the Trump administration has taken a strong anti-climate stance, which put the US in a very different position to how they were in previous administrations, and changed the dynamics of the IMO a bit.'
Membership of the IMO includes 176 states and more than 150 intergovernmental and non-governmental organisations.
Dr Smith said the end result of negotiations between various member parties on the proposed scheme resulted in a significantly lower carbon price for shipping emissions than what he believed was needed.
'In the final package, we've got about a $15 per ton of greenhouse gas emitted price that's coming in, and we thought that we needed somewhere between 100 and $150.
'It's a significant reduction, but it still exists and it's still a global agreement, which I believe makes it the first global carbon price.'
As recently as February, Pacific nations had proposed a more ambitious global shipping emissions scheme.
Not only had the agreed IMO framework failed to meet that, it had also failed in achieving the IMO's own greenhouse gas strategy which it revised in 2023.
Smith said Pacific nations wanted a much tougher scheme to effectively drive the transition of the shipping sector to a low carbon model by charging higher costs for greenhouse gas emitters.
'Their vision was to have this transition of the shipping sector driven by a carbon levy – a universal price on greenhouse gas emissions that charged for every ton of greenhouse gas emissions about $150.
'Then coupling that with a mandate that reinforced the fact that this was going to be driven by stringent regulation [like] a hard fine or a penalty if you weren't reducing your emissions and driving a very steep reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, reaching nearly full decarbonisation by 2040.'
Dr Smith said that 'steepness' in the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and 'power' through a heavy levy was missing.
He said that in turn had effectively hampered the rate at which decarbonisation of the shipping industry would likely occur.
'Because we could really subsidise some of the very expensive, or currently very expensive solutions…at the early stage of decarbonisation and really enable companies to have the confidence to invest in scale.
'But also use significant amounts of revenue to help low income countries, not just [small island developing states and least developed countries] like the Pacific island states, but also middle income countries, low income countries, which will need support as we go through the transition.'
He said these countries would need assistance to modernise and shift their their own shipping industries to a low-carbon model.
The cost of doing that, as well as the economic impacts of increasing transport prices, must be factored in, he added.
The finalised framework, which needs two-thirds of the IMO membership vote in October to be ratified, would cover all ships bigger than 5000 gross tons, such as largo cargo ships, in international waters if implemented.
Dr Smith believes that eventually it would also cover ships smaller than 5000 gross tons. At that point, all vessels that trade internationally would be captured by the shipping emissions scheme.
'It doesn't drive or change what national governments do with domestically operated ships. So coastal vessels servicing the coast of New Zealand, or ferries within New Zealand wouldn't be affected by this regulation. That's down to the national government to decide what to do,' he said.
'In some ways though, that exactly illustrates why it's such a significant agreement, because it's the missing emissions in international waters that no one was counting that are now, at least in a framework here.'
Dr Smith expectes the October vote on the final framework to be successful, despite previous opposition from several larger nations like Saudi Arabia, China, and Brazil.
Following that, the scheme was set to be fully implemented in 2027.
The UN said that timeframe would give 'the industry time to adapt to new requirements and invest in alternative fuels and technologies'.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

NZ Herald

29 minutes ago

• NZ Herald

Destiny Church's Brian Tamaki protests against foreign religions in NZ

Destiny Church leader Brian Tamaki is leading a march down Queen St, claiming 'the spread of non-Christian religions is now out of control' in New Zealand. The march started at 12pm in Aotea Square on Queen St. Story continues after live blog Load more Story continues 'It's time to take aim and launch a full assault - exposing Islam, the UN, and every foreign religion and ideology hijacking our country,' Tamaki claimed earlier in a press release. In November last year, Tamaki led a 'Make New Zealand Great Again' rally from Waikato to Auckland. Tamaki was condemned by the Prime Minister when his Destiny Church groups Man Up and Legacy stormed a children's library event in February last year. Jaime Lyth is a multimedia journalist for the New Zealand Herald, focusing on crime and breaking news. Lyth began working under the NZ Herald masthead in 2021 as a reporter for the Northern Advocate in Whangārei.

RNZ News

7 hours ago

• RNZ News

Christopher Luxon concludes China trip: 'No evidence' of collaboration with Russia, Iran or North Korea

Photo: Supplied / Dan Brunskill Christopher Luxon has wrapped up his trip to China, dismissing suggestions the superpower is working with Russia, Iran or North Korea to undermine the West - as alleged by NATO's top official. The prime minister says he also stressed to China's leaders that engagement in the Pacific must advance the region's interests, but refused to say whether the recent Cook Islands crisis was raised by either side. Speaking late Friday at New Zealand's embassy in Beijing, Luxon said he was leaving "very, very convinced" the bilateral relationship was in "a really strong place and in good heart". The comments followed a day of top-level meetings at the Great Hall of the People, capping a three-day visit to China, Luxon's first as prime minister. The prime minister and his officials now fly on to Belgium and then to the Netherlands, where he will attend the annual NATO summit. Photo: Supplied / Dan Brunskill Asked about NATO secretary-general Mark Rutte's recent warning that China is working together with Russia, Iran and North Korea, Luxon noted the "Dutch directness" - but indicated a "difference of opinion". "We haven't seen evidence of those four powers coordinating in a way, actively against the West," Luxon said. "We've seen bilateral associations, say, between Russia and North Korea, with respect to the war in Ukraine. We've seen bilateral arrangements between Iran and Russia as well, but we haven't seen evidence of a wholesale force." The rest of the delegation was now returning to New Zealand on the air force 757. Photo: Supplied / Dan Brunskill The talks came a day after revelations New Zealand suspended nearly $20 million in funding to the Cook Islands , after its agreements with China earlier this year. Luxon repeatedly refused to say whether that issue, or any other, was discussed behind closed doors. "We need to respect that they are private diplomatic conversations that need to be respected in the privacy of the sanctum." A media statement issued at the end of the trip said Luxon had raised "the need for engagement in the Pacific to take place in a manner which advances Pacific priorities". Pressed to clarify, Luxon said the concern had been well-canvassed: "Making sure that… all major powers that aren't part of the Pacific family… respect the centrality of the Pacific Island Forum." While none of China's leaders directly mentioned the Cook Islands crisis, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun earlier said China's cooperation with the Pacific nation "should not be disrupted or restrained by any third party". Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown on Friday labelled the funding pause "patronising" and pointed out he had not been consulted on any agreements New Zealand entered with China this trip . Luxon denied any double standard, but said he had "nothing more to add" on the subject. "I'm not going to get into it. I've spoken ad nauseam about the Cooks and the challenge." The prime minister's statement also said he raised "rising tensions in the Indo-Pacific" including the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait. Photo: Supplied / Dan Brunskill Before speaking to reporters, the prime minister took part in an official welcome ceremony at the Great Hall and then a sit-down with his counterpart, Premier Li Qiang. In opening remarks, Li spoke of global turbulence and the need for "mutually beneficial cooperation". He said he had been "deeply impressed" by Luxon's friendship and hospitality during his 2024 visit to Wellington. In response, Luxon said the international challenges made ongoing dialogue more important "even where we differ". The meeting ended with the signing of 11 agreements, promising cooperation in areas including customs, food safety, and tourism. Luxon - and the wider business delegation - then stayed on for a banquet dinner at the Great Hall. Earlier on Friday, Xi said the bilateral relationship had experienced "many ups and downs" but remained respectful and at the forefront of China's Western ties. Luxon meanwhile described the bilateral relationship as "long-standing" and of "great consequence" to New Zealand. "The world looks to China as a major global power to play a constructive role in addressing many of the challenges that are facing us all," he said. Speaking to RNZ before departure, Luxon said he had established "good rapport" with both leaders during their previous meetings. The prime minister last met Xi in November at the APEC summit in Peru . At the time, Luxon characterised their conversation as "warm, positive and constructive" but noted clear differences over the AUKUS defence pact and missile testing in the Pacific. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News

7 hours ago

• RNZ News

NZ's pause on funding is 'patronising'

Pacific politics 18 minutes ago Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown says pausing nearly 20 million dollars in development assistance is "patronising" and "inconsistent with modern partnership".