Crypto Bulls Just Got Their Macro Wake-Up Call: Here's Why
Strict editorial policy that focuses on accuracy, relevance, and impartiality
Created by industry experts and meticulously reviewed
The highest standards in reporting and publishing
Strict editorial policy that focuses on accuracy, relevance, and impartiality
Morbi pretium leo et nisl aliquam mollis. Quisque arcu lorem, ultricies quis pellentesque nec, ullamcorper eu odio.
An unprecedented surge in the Philadelphia Federal Reserve's May Manufacturing Business Outlook Survey has jolted global risk markets and given crypto asset traders their clearest macro catalyst of the year. The Future New Orders diffusion index leapt by forty-plus points, a move that Julien Bittel, head of macro research at Global Macro Investor (GMI), called 'literally' historic.
Crypto Bulls Can Rejoice
Bittel's commentary on X framed the print with statistical precision: 'Philly Fed data for May dropped yesterday – and the Future New Orders index just made history. Literally. … Expectations for new orders posted the largest monthly spike ever recorded – going all the way back to the index's inception in May 1968. A staggering +4.3 standard deviation move. He underlined the shock with a comparison few macro watchers will forget: For perspective: that's an even bigger move up than the downside collapse during the depths of the 2008 Global Financial Crisis (-4.1σ). Let that sink in…'
Philly Fed Future New Orders | Source: X @BittelJulien
Bittel then set the surge in a broader narrative that has animated his research since late last year. 'Q1 growth was weak. The reason is straightforward – financial conditions tightened sharply in Q4. The dollar ripped, bond yields surged… a classic tightening phase,' he wrote.
Related Reading
The proximate trigger, in his telling, was 'businesses panic‑loading inventories ahead of Trump tariffs, and markets front‑running the inflation narrative.' Those dynamics, he argued, are a replay of Donald Trump's first term: 'We've highlighted repeatedly: this had all the hallmarks of Q4 2016 during Trump's first term. Just like early 2017, that tightening spilled over into slower growth momentum in Q1.'
Where 2017 began with doubt and ended in a synchronous global boom, Bittel believes 2025 is rhyming. 'Those Q1 headwinds have flipped into Q2 tailwinds,' he insisted. 'Everything flows downstream from changes in financial conditions… Purchasing managers' expectations are shifting – and shifts in thinking eventually translate into action. Sentiment shifts first. Action follows. It always does. Bullish.'
The crypto market responded muted. Bitcoin reclaimed the $104,000 level in early‑European trade, but lost it later on. Ether steadied near $2,600, and high‑beta layer‑one tokens such as Solana and Avalanche moved in tandem.
Related Reading
Giancarlo Cudrig, head of markets at Immutable, said the scale of the shock is less important than how under‑positioned investors are for an upside growth surprise. 'An upside economic shock like this – +4.3σ on new orders – is rare. But the bigger story is market positioning. Asset prices are not prepared. The melt‑up is the asymmetric risk. Now it's being repriced.'
Independent analyst Market Heretic struck a similar note on X: 'When this dropped, markets didn't even blink. Because the shift's already in motion. This wasn't news, it was confirmation. That's the real tell, when markets shrug off a four‑sigma upside shock. It means the turn is already upon us – and it's just getting started.'
Read More Whales Hoard $90 Million In Bitcoin: A Sign Of What's To Come?
For crypto investors, the implications are immediate. A softer dollar and retreating real‑yield expectations reduce the opportunity cost of holding non‑yielding assets, while the early phase of a reflationary turn historically favours high‑beta exposures. Bittel's own playbook is unambiguous: 'Sentiment shifts first. Action follows.' As long as that chain reaction continues, the crypto bulls appear to have both math and momentum on their side.
At press time, the total crypto market cap stood at $3.28 trillion.
Total market cap, 1-week chart | Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com
Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' is getting more expensive as the world's attention is on Iran
The long-awaited summer collision course for President Trump's economic agenda is here and now competing for attention with geopolitics. The competing storylines are playing out — just in parallel — after a weekend where the president's "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" saw a new higher price tag and the removal of key provisions in developments that were fully overshadowed by a weekend attack on Iran. Trump's priorities for taxes and the debt ceiling — not to mention tariffs — still face key deadlines in the weeks ahead even as foreign affairs takes center stage. On Saturday evening, shortly after the attacks on Iran commenced, Congress's Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) even released an analysis that made official how recent changes to Trump's tax-cut bill in the Senate are likely to increase the package's price tag by hundreds of billions of dollars. The group found that Senate's changes on the tax front — once economists untangled a key budget gimmick — mean the bill will potentially add about $4.2 trillion to the deficits in the years ahead if passed as is. The bill is also undergoing a close examination by the Senate parliamentarian who is moving section-by-section and has already deemed some provisions — such as a defunding of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) as well cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) — are not in line with Senate reconciliation rules. And more changes are likely coming this week that could increase the price tag and political pressure even further as key Republicans are still saying they will vote no, throwing into doubt a GOP goal of final votes within days. It all could also have near-term economic impacts. Brian Rehling, Wells Fargo head of global fixed income strategy, said in a recent Yahoo Finance Live appearance that developments in the bill could be 'more consequential' to things like interest rates for the time being over even signals from the Federal Reserve. These developments come just weeks before Trump and the Republican's self-imposed deadline to get the bill signed into law by July 4. Senate Majority Leader John Thune has said that means the Senate will need to pass this bill this week to keep the timeline on pace. The weekend's Joint Committee on Taxation analysis was focused specifically on the Senate Finance Committee's tax proposals and offered a headline number that would appear to be good news for fiscal hawks: It found the projected cost of the revised bill comes to about $441 billion over the coming decade. But that calculation came using an accounting maneuver known as a "current policy" baseline that allows the bill to be calculated assuming current tax levels stay the same. That means Congress can say the cost of extending expiring provisions in the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is free, at least for accounting purposes. Republicans defend the practice, with Senate Finance Committee chair Mike Crapo offering that it 'more accurately reflects reality.' But the bottom line is that these zeroed out tax extensions are projected to add about $3.8 trillion to the national debt — versus the scenario of Congress doing nothing. "Ignore the $441 number, which is both trying to hide the cost of extensions and gimmick some specific policies to make them look cheaper," offered Marc Goldwein of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget following the release. Andrew Lautz of the Bipartisan Policy Center also offered a detailed breakdown of the differences brought by the assumptions — such as how it makes the approximately $2.1 trillion in costs from extending individual tax rates cuts look instead like they instead come to $83 billion. Both Goldwein and Lautz and others say the full price tag that should be considered is a total impact to the nation's debt of $4.2 trillion over the next decade. The new price tag projections also come as the Senate parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, is going through the bill line by line to see if it complies with the Senate's strict reconciliation rules. It's part of a wonky Senate process — known colloquially as a 'Byrd bath' after a rule enshrined by Robert Byrd of West Virginia — that sets limits of what can be fast tracked and what is subject to the normal 60-vote threshold. MacDonough has already analyzed the Banking and Commerce and Judiciary and Homeland Security committee portions of the bill and found a series of provisions must be taken out. Pieces that appear set to be removed from the bill so far include one that would have placed a funding cap on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) as well as others that cut the SNAP program. The apparent removal of cuts to the SNAP program around state matching funds could have a significant fiscal impact, with those provisions previously estimated to save roughly $128 billion. One other closely watched provision by the tech community — to cut broadband funding for states that regulate artificial intelligence — has been allowed to stay in but still faces political opponents pushing to have it struck from the package. It's a series of rulings that Republicans contend aren't yet final but appear set to change the makeup of the overall package. "The Byrd Rule is enshrined in law for a reason, and Democrats are making sure it is enforced," said top Democratic Senator on the Budget committee, Oregon's Jeff Merkley, in a statement. And even more significant changes could be coming in the days ahead with the parliamentarian scheduled to next take a pass as the Senate Finance committee's portion of the bill. That where the biggest ticket items reside like tax provisions as well as Medicaid cuts. Ben Werschkul is a Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Senate Readies Tax Bill for Vote as Holdouts Threaten Delay
(Bloomberg) -- President Donald Trump's tax-and-spending agenda is nearing a climactic vote in the Senate this week in the wake of air strikes on Iran, which risk embroiling the US in a prolonged Middle East conflict. Bezos Wedding Draws Protests, Soul-Searching Over Tourism in Venice One Architect's Quest to Save Mumbai's Heritage From Disappearing NYC Congestion Toll Cuts Manhattan Gridlock by 25%, RPA Reports Trump's $4.2 trillion tax-cut package, partially offset by social safety-net reductions, does not yet have the support it needs to pass the Senate. Fiscal hawks seeking to lower the bill's total price tag are at odds with Republicans worried about cuts to Medicaid health coverage for their constituents and phase-outs to green energy incentives that support jobs in their states. Finessing a deal to line up the votes will require focus — and a bit of arm-twisting — from Trump, who is juggling both a pivotal week for his domestic agenda alongside a highly uncertain situation in Iran following the US strikes. Trump on Sunday, as US officials and foreign leaders were still digesting what the attacks on Iranian nuclear sites will mean for Middle East stability, urged members of his party to swiftly pass the tax bill. 'Great unity in the Republican Party, perhaps unity like we have never seen before. Now let's get the Great, Big, Beautiful Bill done. Our Country is doing GREAT,' Trump said on social media. Senate Republicans plan to begin the multi-step process to vote on Trump's tax and spending cut bill mid-week, setting up final passage in the latter half of the week or over the weekend. That timeline would allow the House to vote on the latest version next week and meet Trump's goal of enacting his signature bill by July 4. Meeting that ambitious deadline will require senators to quickly negotiate resolutions to a series of thorny policy issues that have divided Republicans for weeks. Senate Majority Leader John Thune must balance demands by fiscal conservatives for deeper spending cuts with qualms from moderate Republicans concerned the bill goes too far in making people ineligible for Medicaid and cutting funding for rural hospitals. Renewable energy incentives continue to divide the party as well, with some conservatives pushing for a faster phase-out of tax breaks for wind, solar, nuclear, geothermal and hydrogen. Other senators are angling to keep the breaks in place for projects that have already begun. Lisa Murkowski, a GOP holdout in the Senate, told MSNBC on Monday she would prefer to focus on good policy rather than meeting an 'arbitrary' deadline. Florida Republican Byron Donalds, a key Trump ally in the House, also suggested the July 4 date could slip. 'The biggest factor is differences between the House and the Senate,' he said on Fox Business. 'We may not hit July 4, but we should be able to do it pretty quickly.' Senators are in talks with some of their House counterparts over the state and local tax, or SALT, deduction. The Senate bill would keep the current $10,000 cap in place, while the House-passed version would raise it to $40,000. Several House members from high-tax states, including New York, New Jersey and California, have threatened to block the bill if it doesn't include a $40,000 SALT cap. The Senate has some negotiating room to increase the SALT cap. The bill, per Senate rules, can lose up to $1.5 trillion over a decade. But a new estimate from the non-partisan Joint Committee on Taxation, found the legislation only costs $441 billion over ten years — after deploying a budget gimmick that assumes the $3.8 trillion cost of extending Trump's first-term tax cuts cost nothing. Rules Battles Democrats are locked out of the deal-making, with Trump able to pass his agenda on Republican votes alone. But they have been able to use arcane Senate rules to successfully challenge and strike some provisions from the bill if the Senate parliamentarian declares the measures aren't sufficiently related to taxes, spending or the budget. The parliamentarian blocked a provision that would make it harder for judges to hold Trump administration officials in contempt for failing to abide by rulings. Democrats were able to eliminate measures that would curb some Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits. Provisions to strip funding from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and cut Federal Reserve employee salaries were also tossed out. Late Sunday Democrats announced Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough had thrown out provisions related to the federal workforce, including a plan scaling back civil service protections for federal workers and a measure that would allow the president to eliminate agencies without approval from Congress. She also ruled that a provision forcing the US Postal Service to sell off all its electric vehicles must be removed from the bill. USPS in 2021 inked a $482 million contract with Oshkosh Defense to deliver as many as 165,000 electric vehicles over ten years. The parliamentarian has permitted Republicans to use the bill to pressure states not to regulate artificial intelligence by denying them funding for broadband Internet projects. That's a watered-down version of a House proposal that would have blocked states from issuing AI regulations. That plan drew bipartisan criticism for overstepping states' authority. Democrats are also seeking to remove the Section 899 'revenge tax' on companies domiciled in countries with 'unfair' tax regimes. That provision has stoked fears on Wall Street of capital flight from the US. That parliamentarian ruling could be released as soon as Monday. The tax bill is the core of Trump's economic agenda combined into a 'big, beautiful bill.' The Senate version makes permanent individual and business tax breaks enacted in 2017, while adding new breaks for tipped and overtime workers, seniors and car-buyers. The bill would allow hundreds of billions of dollars in new spending for the military, border patrol and immigration enforcement. To partly pay for the revenue losses, the bill imposes new work and cost-sharing requirements for Medicaid and food stamps while cutting aid to students. The measure would also avert a US payment default as soon as August by raising the debt ceiling by $5 trillion. --With assistance from Cailley LaPara and Jamie Tarabay. (Updates with Murkowski, Donalds and USPS vehicle detail) Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028? Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros The US Has More Copper Than China But No Way to Refine All of It Can 'MAMUWT' Be to Musk What 'TACO' Is to Trump? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Politico
41 minutes ago
- Politico
Legislative Branch spending bill takes aim at key government watchdog
House Republicans are aiming to slash funding for the nonpartisan watchdog for waste, fraud and abuse within the federal government by nearly half in the next fiscal year, according to spending bill text released Sunday night. The House Appropriations subcommittee funding Congress and its support agencies, led by chairman David Valadao (R-Calif.), is set to mark up their fiscal 2026 measure Monday evening, with the full committee set to act Thursday. The Legislative Branch bill would provide $6.7 billion — $51 million below the current funding level, which was set in fiscal 2024. Per tradition, the House bill does not touch any Senate funding. 'Chairman Valadao's bill puts the American people first — in strengthening the institutions that represent them, protecting effective governance, and safeguarding taxpayer dollars,' said House Appropriations Committee Chair Tom Cole (R-Okla.) in a statement. The deepest cuts in the bill are to the Government Accountability Office, an arm of Congress that would see a $396.5 million reduction from current levels to $415.4 million. GAO has served as the nation's chief investigator of wrongdoing at federal agencies for more than a century, but has been fighting for months as Republicans in Congress and the Trump administration have attempted to undercut its legal conclusions and independence. Now, they are attempting to shrink the agency into submission as it pursues nearly 40 investigations into whether the White House is illegally withholding, or 'impounding,' money Congress had previously approved. Also tucked into the bill is a major policy change that would eliminate the GAO's ability to bring civil action against the executive branch over impoundments of funds. 'GAO's work makes it possible for the legislative branch to hold government accountable,' said Daniel Schuman, executive director of the American Governance Institute. 'Congress needs independent expert advice, which is exactly what GAO provides.' Also on the chopping block is the Library of Congress, which is another legislative branch agency also engaged in a power struggle against intrusion by the Trump administration. The bill allocates $767.6 million for the Library of Congress, which is $84.5 million below the current funding level and $133.7 million below the FY26 request. 'This bill does nothing to safeguard against the growing levels of executive overreach into legislative branch agencies,' said Rep. Adriano Espaillat (D-N.Y.), the top Democrat on the legislative branch subcommittee. Some other key provisions in the GOP-written bill include: Capitol Police: The Capitol Police would see a $84.4 million boost to their funding under the bill, bringing the total to $891 million. Some lawmakers had asked for an increase in office funding for use for security, but the bill flat-funds the Members Representational Allowance, which can be used for some member security purposes. Member Pay: The bill would continue the member pay freeze that has been in effect since 2013, halting automatic cost of living increases that members of Congress are supposed to get under law. Gay marriage: The bill includes language that prohibits discrimination against any person who 'speaks, or acts' in accordance with a 'sincerely held religious belief, or moral conviction, that marriage is, or should be recognized as, a union of one man and one woman.'
