Can Jewellery Continue to Outshine Fashion?
For aspirational Millennial shoppers, a handbag was often their first significant luxury purchase. Now, Gen-Z is increasingly eyeing jewellery as its first big splurge and buying handbags secondhand.
Jewellery is proving to be luxury's most resilient category amidst a broader downturn that has seen even fashion and leather goods stalwarts like Chanel and LVMH report falling sales. Last year, while the luxury market as a whole declined 1 percent, jewellery still managed modest growth of as much as 2 percent, reaching €31 billion ($35 billion), according to Federica Levato, senior partner at Bain & Company. High jewellery performed particularly well.
Though still much larger, the market for leather goods, by contrast, shrank about 3 percent to €78 billion.
'We're entering a trend of jewellery outperforming leather goods,' said UBS luxury analyst Zuzanna Pusz, who has been tracking the shift towards jewellery for years. 'Jewellery is not making the mistakes fashion is making.'
These mistakes include a lack of ingenuity as luxury fashion slumps under creative fatigue, quality concerns that are flooding social media — see the recent viral TikTok about Chanel's footwear — and exaggerated price hikes that have prompted a shopper backlash.
Jewellery, by contrast, is nailing luxury's values of quality, craftsmanship and customer service better than many fashion brands. The category's resilience was evident in Richemont's recent earnings, with the Swiss company's jewellery sales soaring 11 percent in the quarter.
'The appeal of Richemont's main jewellery brands, Cartier and Van Cleef & Arpels, remains clear and untarnished by the aggressive post-pandemic price increases implemented by other luxury brands,' wrote Bernstein analyst Luca Solca in a note following Richemont's results.
But jewellery is facing challenges that could dim its lustre. The tariffs unleashed by US president Donald Trump have ushered in widespread economic uncertainty that threatens to dampen luxury sales further while simultaneously hitting European brands selling in the US with levies of up to 50 percent, according to Trump's most recent threats. The Chinese market also continues to lag, and jewellery makers are watching as prices for gold — one of their most important raw materials — skyrocket. Goldman Sachs analysts have forecast that gold prices will reach record highs this year as investors flock to it as a haven from economic volatility.
Even with these headwinds, however, jewellery still seems set to continue outshining fashion.
'I've been saying that jewellery will outperform fashion since 2022 and that won't change anytime soon,' Pusz said. Why Jewellery Feels More 'Worth It'
One of the key reasons jewellery is gaining ground lies in its perceived value. As Pusz pointed out, fashion brands like Louis Vuitton and Chanel aggressively increased prices post-2020 — up to 10 percent or more — while jewellery brands like Cartier remained more restrained, with price hikes closer to 3 percent. As a result, a Cartier Love bracelet feels less expensive compared to a Chanel Classic Flap bag than it did a decade ago, suggesting a better price-to-value tradeoff in the minds of consumers.
Online chatter about the plunging quality of luxury bags, shoes and clothes hasn't helped their value proposition. Social media is now flooded with complaints about deteriorating craftsmanship, particularly in leather goods. Chanel, once considered a paragon of craft, has been slammed with criticism for declining quality, even as prices climbed. The author has shared a TikTok. You will need to accept and consent to the use of cookies and similar technologies by our third-party partners (including: YouTube, Instagram or Twitter), in order to view embedded content in this article and others you may visit in future.
Jewellery hasn't received the same rebukes online. At the same time, the big names in luxury fashion have been criticised for backing away from creative experimentation, but that isn't an issue jewellery is facing.
'There's been much more innovation and variation in SKUs in jewellery, also at lower price points, allowing aspirational consumers to buy as well,' said Pusz.
This increased accessibility has unlocked a wave of younger buyers, particularly in China and Europe. It isn't just women who are interested. More men are buying fine jewellery for themselves than in the past, opening up the category's customer base.
'We noticed men purchasing more items like bracelets recently,' said Raphael Gübelin, president of Swiss jewellery brand Gübelin. Tailwinds and Headwinds
The category has other winds blowing in its favour. Women's earning power continues to grow, for instance, and over the years women have purchased more jewellery for themselves rather than waiting to receive it as a gift. It's boosting both small and large names alike and sparking trends like jewellery stacking, layering, personalising and venturing into more playful options in terms of colour and shape.
Jewellery players aren't sitting back and waiting for consumers to come to them, however. A number are investing in hyper-local marketing, like when Tiffany & Co. featured German actress Nilam Farooq, speaking in German, in the campaign for their store opening in Düsseldorf.
'That shows commitment to the cities they're in, even when retail has struggled in the past. By investing and connecting locally, customers feel proud of their city being promoted by a jewellery brand with global recognition,' said Oisin James Deady, co-founder of creative agency Twelve AM that produced the Düsseldorf campaign and several other hyper-local promotional campaigns for Tiffany & Co. and other jewellery brands.
But the sector does face some challenges. The price of gold is up more than 25 percent since the start of the year, and, even if it hasn't had a huge impact on prices on the consumer end yet, the surging cost may pressure margins.
Still, Pusz notes that many brands — even Cartier — are exploring alternative materials like platinum, silver, and diamond-forward designs, noting that diamond and platinum prices have come down recently. Gübelin is similarly looking to options beyond gold.
'We have been much more experimental and creative with materials, like titanium, and are seeing a real surge in interest in colourful gemstones,' said Gübelin.
The Chinese customer is still a sore spot for luxury overall. Jewellery, however, is less affected than fashion-centric brands or heavily China-focused categories like watches. From a geographic standpoint, Richemont most recently saw double-digit growth across nearly all regions, even though Chinese demand is temporarily softer.
Perhaps more concerning for Switzerland-based Richemont are Donald Trump's fluctuating tariffs. Switzerland is currently subject to a 10 percent US tariff, but the levy could go up to 31 percent.
Richemont chief executive Johann Rupert has stated clearly, and repeatedly, that the company wants to avoid sharp price hikes. If jewellery is able to maintain its current pricing, it would help to further cement jewellery's value perception.
'I don't believe you should only increase prices because you are a luxury brand,' Gübelin said. 'You should fairly price your products. If prices go down, you should also adjust.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
32 minutes ago
- Politico
‘We can't wait forever': GOP frustrated but unwilling to act on Trump's TikTok extension
President Donald Trump's latest move to keep TikTok alive is yet again frustrating congressional Republicans, many of whom object to China's continued involvement in the popular app but just want to be done with the whole drama. 'Not my favorite thing,' Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), along-time proponent of the ban, deadpanned, when asked about the president's plan to issue another extension. He spoke a day before the White House confirmed Trump signed a 90-day suspension of enforcement of the law requiring TikTok to divest from ByteDance, its China-based parent company, throwing another lifeline to the short-form video app. By Friday, some House lawmakers registered a note of resigned irritation. The extension — Trump's third since the law went into effect on Jan. 19 — is a unilateral decision not envisioned in the bipartisan law passed by Congress and upheld last year by the Supreme Court. Rep. Darin LaHood (R-Ill.), a member of the House Intelligence and China committees, told POLITICO. 'The national security concerns and vulnerabilities are still there, and they have not gone away. I would argue they've almost become more enhanced in many ways.' But Trump's extension of the TikTok law largely boxed out Republicans in both chambers who have shown little inclination — beyond stern words — to prevent him from making these postponements almost routine. Many GOP lawmakers saw themselves as granting the president space to cut a promised deal while the White House deals with urgent priorities, like trade negotiations and the Israel-Iran conflict. 'In light of everything going on, I think he did the right thing,' Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.), a China hawk who voted for the ban, told POLITICO of Trump. 'I have concerns about all kinds of things — that [the extension] is on the list — but it's not at the top of the list.' Though Trump has promised his TikTok negotiations areclosely tied to trade talks with China, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent testified last week to a Senate panel that TikTok's sale was not currently a part of the negotiations with China, raising a further potential obstacle to Trump inking a deal in the near future. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), a close ally of the president and longtime national-security hawk said earlier in the week: 'The sooner we get that issue solved, the better,' without offering any ideas for further enforcement. 'I just want finality,' Senate Judiciary Chair Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) told POLITICO. 'I want some certainty and just know that the Congress isn't being played when we make a decision [that the app] be sold.' Another member of the House China Committee, Rep. Zach Nunn (R-Iowa), told POLITICO, 'No more extensions. It's time to follow through.' Rep. Dan Newhouse (R-Wash.), also a member of the China panel, noted in a post on X Thursday the law only allows one extension of the compliance deadline, adding, 'I was proud to support the ban of TikTok and believe the law should be implemented as written.' With their comments, the lawmakers echoed House China Chair John Moolenaar (R-Mich.), who in early June called for the U.S. to 'let [TikTok] go dark' to bring China to the table to negotiate. He reiterated that stance on Friday. 'Delays only embolden the Chinese Communist Party,' Moolenaar said in a statement to POLITICO. 'I urge the administration to enforce the law as written and protect the American people from this growing national security threat.' Still, observers say Republicans are not exercising their leverage to demand the White House enforce the law they helped write, for example by withholding funding or congressional oversight hearings. 'I keep reading that Republicans are 'frustrated' and 'impatient' about their TikTok law being ignored, but they should stop complaining to reporters and take it up with Trump,' said Adam Kovacevich, founder and CEO of the pro-tech Chamber of Progress. Among the Republicans being undercut by the president is his own secretary of state. Marco Rubio — who as senator was one of the loudest critics of TikTok's ties to China, and a huge backer of the app's ban — has been conspicuously silent as Trump has repeatedly granted more time to strike a deal for its sale. 'You have to decide what's more important, our national security and the threat that it poses to our national security,' Rubio told POLITICO in March 2023, as Congress was considering a ban. 'You have to weigh that against what you might think the electoral consequences of it are. For me, it's an easy balancing act. I mean, there is no balance. I'm always going to be for our national security.' A spokesperson for Rubio at the State Department did not respond to a request for comment. Democrats — even those who support keeping TikTok online — say Trump's approach is the wrong one. 'These endless extensions are not only illegal, but they also put TikTok's fate in the hands of risk-averse corporate shareholders,' Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) told POLITICO in a statement. 'This is deeply unfair to TikTok's creators and users. I'm prepared to work towards a solution, but Trump isn't coming to the table.'
New York Times
33 minutes ago
- New York Times
TikTok's Owner Wanted to Publish Books. Not Anymore.
When 8th Note Press launched in the summer of 2023, the small publisher had a big advantage over other new presses. It was started by the Chinese technology company ByteDance, the owner of TikTok, the wildly popular social media platform where viral endorsements can transform books into best sellers overnight. That was not enough, it seems, to build a successful publishing business. In late May, 8th Note Press began informing writers that it was shutting down and returning publication rights to the authors. News of the press's demise, which was reported earlier by the The Bookseller, came as a shock to authors who were swayed by the possibility that 8th Note could help engineer best sellers with elaborate marketing campaigns on TikTok. Instead, 8th Note has started taking down digital editions of their books, effectively unpublishing them. The literary agent Mark Gottlieb, who sold the debut novel 'To Have and Have More' to 8th Note, said the company was doing 'irreparable damage' to its authors by shutting down so haphazardly. While publishing imprints frequently come and go, the books and authors they publish are usually moved elsewhere within the parent company, rather than being taken out of circulation entirely. If a book is published then quickly disappears, it can be difficult to resell it to another publisher, Gottlieb said. 'They're wrecking careers in the process of doing this,' he said of 8th Note. 'If you're an author and this is your first book, what the history is going to show is that your book published and quickly went out of print.' 8th Note's precipitous fall was surprising, given its parent company's vast resources and reach. Just last year, the press seemed poised to expand. Last October, its executives announced a partnership with the publisher Zando to put out print editions of its books and distribute them to physical bookstores. The plan was to release 10 to 15 titles a year, with a focus on romance, romantasy and young adult fiction. Later, the imprint indicated to agents that it was expanding into science fiction and fantasy. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Miami Herald
40 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Report: Maserati Under Threat of Being Sold by Parent Company
According to a new report published by Reuters, the storied Italian performance powerhouse, Maserati, may be headed toward an uncertain future. The newswire states that "two sources familiar with the matter" told them that parent company Stellantis is exploring a potential sale of the Trident as part of a broader review of its massive portfolio of 14 distinct automotive brands. Discussions regarding Maserati began before Antonio Filosa was named the automaker's new CEO last month. Filosa's first day as CEO of Stellantis is Monday, June 23, where he will take the helm as Carlos Tavares's formal successor. Tavares, who led Stellantis from its inception, stepped down in December amid disappointing U.S. sales and inventory struggles and growing internal and external pressure to reassess the company's direction. Stellantis Chairman John Elkann has a plate and a half full when it comes to overseeing the company's wide range of global brands, which include the likes of Jeep, Dodge, Ram, Peugeot, and Alfa Romeo. The company is under pressure to streamline its operations and invest wisely. Stellantis is a publicly traded company listed on the stock exchanges of New York, Paris, and Milan, and financially savvy investors and analysts think that trimming down the 14-brand lineup could boost Stellantis' margins. Back in April, they brought in McKinsey & Co., a consulting firm based in New York, to examine the impact of new U.S. tariffs and explore options for Maserati and Alfa Romeo. According to the sources cited by Reuters, selling one or both brands is on the table, but any decisions are still in the early phases. In an emailed statement to Autoblog, a Maserati spokesperson provided the following statement: "A spokesperson for Stellantis stated: 'Respectfully, Maserati is not for sale.'" Additionally, a McKinsey spokesperson told Autoblog in a separate emailed statement that they "have no comment for this story." The timing of the Trident's review coincides with its efforts to position itself to navigate some significant industry challenges. Chinese brands and their affordable, tech-forward offerings are eating into the European market share. Like other European automakers, Stellantis is also trying to navigate the steep U.S. import tariffs recently imposed by President Donald Trump, which can greatly impact import brands like Maserati and the expensive motors it imports in smaller numbers. Unlike Stellantis brands like Dodge, Jeep, and Chrysler, no Maserati comes from a production facility in North America; all of Maserati's U.S. lineup is exclusively imported from Italy. Maserati's performance has been underwhelming, as it faces tough ground in its key markets. According to Maserati Chief Executive Officer Santo Ficili, about 35% to 40% of its customers are American. In 2024, Maserati posted an adjusted operating loss of €260 million ($298 million) as it sold just 11,300 units, with 4,819 of those cars reaching drivers in the United States. One of the sources who talked to Reuters said that Stellantis is starting to realize it has more brands than it can really focus on, adding that it needs to "set priorities" with the matter. They also report that some board members are split on this scenario: some think selling Maserati is the best move, while others worry that getting rid of its only luxury brand would hurt the company's reputation. This is not the first time that Maserati has been speculated to be sold. Notably, last year, comments from former Stellantis CFO Natalie Knight suggested that the Trident may be on the way out at the 14-brand automaker, which has sincebeen refuted. However, what we solidly know is that Maserati and Alfa Romeo's brand CEO said that it has a turnaround plan as soon as Filosa takes the helm on Monday, the 23rd. In a June 5 interview with Reuters, he not only denied that Stellantis was selling Maserati, but he also expressed optimism over the future of the Trident and that Filosa will back potential plans, which include new products on the horizon. "We have clear ideas about what we want to do, and we hope we can be ready very soon. Let's wait for Antonio to take up his job," Ficili told the newswire. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
