Land plots near Marymount, Caldecott and other MRT stations being readied for new homes

Multiple sites in Upper Thomson Road, near Marymount MRT station, are among those being prepared for new homes. ST PHOTO: MARK CHEONG
Land plots near Marymount, Caldecott and other MRT stations being readied for new homes
SINGAPORE – Thousands of new homes are set to be built within walking distance of MRT stations across the island, including in Marymount, Caldecott and Kallang.
The authorities are also priming sites near Upper Changi, Expo, one-north and Woodlands South stations for new homes, according to proposed amendments to the Urban Redevelopment Authority's (URA) Master Plan 2019 that were published on April 24 and May 7.
The URA masterplan is a statutory document that guides developments in Singapore for the next 10 to 15 years.
Three of the land parcels for new homes are in Upper Thomson Road, close to Marymount MRT station.
The first of these has an area of about 35,000 sq m, equivalent in size to just over five football fields.
This site was previously home to Lakeview Shopping Centre, which was completed by the Housing Board in the early 1970s and included a popular hawker centre.
HDB told the hawker centre's 168 stallholders and 134 shop tenants to leave by end-1999, as the area was earmarked for housing, The Straits Times reported in December 1997.
The site, however, has remained undeveloped for about two decades after the shopping centre was demolished in the early 2000s.
Ms Christine Sun, real estate company OrangeTee Group's chief researcher and strategist, said the site can yield 1,100 to 1,200 HDB flats, or 1,600 to 1,700 condominium units, based on its size and assigned gross plot ratio of 3.9. The plot ratio determines the maximum permissible floor area of developments.
Mr Nicholas Mak, chief research officer at property search portal Mogul.sg, said the site is more likely to be used for private housing, as it is surrounded by similar housing types – landed homes around Upper Thomson MRT station and Lakeview estate , a former Housing and Urban Development Company property that was privatised .
The second plot earmarked for housing in the area is separated from the Shunfu Gardens HDB estate by a canal, and measures roughly 13,500 sq m. It has been assigned a plot ratio of 1.8.
Ms Sun said this plot can hold 200 to 250 HDB flats, or 300 to 350 condo units.
A similar number of new homes can be built on the third plot in the area – located just south of the Lakeview estate, and between Upper Thomson Road and St Theresa's Home – she added.
This plot has an area of about 12,000 sq m , and has been assigned a plot ratio of 2.4 .
In Toa Payoh, a site that is about 78,500 sq m in size has been earmarked for residential use, with commercial amenities on the first storey. Its allocated plot ratio is 4.7 .
This site is right by Caldecott station, which is an interchange between the Circle and Thomson-East Coast MRT lines.
It was formerly partially occupied by industrial properties that were demolished in 2017, after being used by technology company Philips.
Analysts said the site can yield between 2,800 and 3,500 flats, or 4,000 to 4,200 condo units.
A 78,500 sq m site next to Caldecott MRT station (right) has been earmarked for housing, with commercial use on the first storey.
ST PHOTO: MARK CHEONG
Given the site's size, said Ms Sun, it can hold between four and six projects by private developers, two to three public housing projects, or a combination of both.
Mr Mak said that with a ground floor of developments on the site zoned for commercial use, it can serve as a town centre for residents of the Caldecott area.
He added that with the assigned plot ratio of 4.7, it is possible for future housing blocks on the site to have 50 storeys or more, giving residents an unblocked view of the greenery in the central catchment.
Mr Mak expects that the site will attract strong interest from private developers if it is sold for condo use, due to its development potential and proximity to Caldecott station.
National Development Minister Desmond Lee said in a Facebook post on May 15 that around 740 flats located on a separate plot near Caldecott station will be launched in the Build-To-Order (BTO) exercise in July.
About 500m from Kallang MRT, two plots next to the Kallang River are being prepared for new homes , with both assigned a plot ratio of 3.5, up from the current 2.8 .
One of these plots, which is adjacent to Boon Keng Road , has an area of about 11,000 sq m, while the other plot that is next to Kallang Road is about 23,500 sq m in size.
Mr Mak said the smaller plot can yield 350 to 400 flats or 450 to 480 condo units, while 720 to 820 flats or 950 to 1,000 condo units can be built on the larger plot.
Both Mr Mak and Ms Sun said that the plots will likely be used for public housing, as they are undesirable to private developers due to the neighbouring industrial area in Kallang Avenue, as well as the noise generated by trains running along the East-West Line.
They also noted that current homes in this area are largely public flats, including nearby HDB projects such as Kallang Trivista and Kallang Horizon.
Mr Mak said a significant number of homes built on the two sites are likely to have waterfront views, given their proximity to Kallang River.
Ms Sun added that flats built here will likely be Prime flats, as the nearby Verandah @ Kallang project was launched under the HDB's Prime Location Public Housing model.
Farther east, two housing sites that are close to Upper Changi MRT station on the Downtown Line and Expo station on the East-West Line are set to get their boundaries adjusted, with portions of the sites to be rezoned for road use.
Both currently have a plot ratio of 2.1, which remains unchanged in URA's proposed amendment.
The larger site, which is at the intersection of Simei Road and Upper Changi Road East, has an area of about 42,000 sq m. It can yield 700 to 750 flats or 1,000 to 1,200 condo units, Ms Sun said.
The smaller site, which is about 33,000 sq m in size, can yield 550 to 600 flats or 800 to 850 condo units, she added.
In 2022, the URA said that more public housing will be built around Upper Changi MRT station, to allow for more social mixing and to improve private estate residents' access to amenities.
A 380-unit BTO project next to the MRT station – the first new flats in Simei in more than a decade – is slated for launch in July. It will include amenities such as a supermarket and a pre-school.
Noting that there is a lack of land in Simei for other public housing projects, Mr Mak said the larger site is an obvious choice, should the authorities decides to inject more HDB homes in the area.
It is a draw for people who work in the nearby Changi Business Park, he added.
In Dover Road, a portion of a former Selective En bloc Redevelopment Scheme site is set to be used for new homes, with commercial amenities on the ground floor.
The site, which is about 13,500 sq m in size and has been assigned a plot ratio of 4.2 , sits within the area formerly occupied by Blocks 30 to 32 and 34 to 39 Dover Road , which were demolished between 2018 and 2019 .
The now-demolished Block 32 Dover Road, pictured in 2013.
PHOTO: ST FILE
Analysts said that the site can yield about 650 condo units, or between 440 and 560 flats.
Mr Mak said that given the site's relatively small size and high plot ratio, it is likely that it will be sold to a private developer to build a condominium.
He noted that other sites in and around one-north nearby that have been zoned for residential use, with commercial units on the first floor, are all privately developed.
This site is part of the upcoming Dover Knowledge District, which URA said in 2019 would be an extension of one-north that will offer 'vibrant integrated spaces to create exciting new jobs and learning opportunities, and support Singapore's long-term economic growth' .
Up north, more homes are set to be built near Woodlands South station, next to the Woodlands Health Campus site.
In a proposed amendment to its masterplan, URA rezoned the site, which is about 27,500 sq m in size, from a reserve site to housing use, and assigned it a plot ratio of 2.1 .
Analysts said it can yield 450 to 570 flats, or 650 to 700 condo units.
Ms Sun said public housing is more likely for the site, as its proximity to a medical campus and Sembawang Air Base will make it less attractive to private developers.
Ng Keng Gene is a correspondent at The Straits Times, reporting on issues relating to land use, urban planning and heritage.
Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Singapore Law Watch

8 hours ago

• Singapore Law Watch

When a dual-income, no-kids couple fight over $2.3m cash

When a dual-income, no-kids couple fight over $2.3m cash Source: Straits Times Article Date: 22 Jun 2025 Author: Tan Ooi Boon Man tries but fails to deny ex-wife share of commission earned for brokering a company takeover. There's usually plenty of money to fight over when Dinks – dual income, no kids – couples split up, but a Singapore pair took that to a new level when they fought over even the $15,000 spent on their pampered dogs. The dog fight was just a sideshow; the real battle was over savings in excess of $2 million. The conflict – sadly all too common among divorcing spouses, no matter what money is at stake – became a sort of legal benchmark here because it is rare for the High Court to hear cases involving such couples, especially when large sums of cash are involved. Their occupations were not disclosed in the court ruling but all attention was on the $2.8 million in sales commission the husband earned for brokering the takeover of a company. That sum alone, which attracted income tax of over $500,000, dwarfed all other assets they owned during their relatively short union of about eight years. The couple, who lived with the husband's parents, had other combined assets of about $900,000, which included a $132,000 net gain from the sale of their HDB flat. They had married in 2011 but barely a year after that, there were signs that not all was well, with allegations of infidelity and a general drifting apart. In 2020, the wife moved out and, in 2022, they filed for divorce. During the hearing for the division of assets, the Family Justice Court looked only at the couple's financial contributions, as they did not have any children. The husband had close to $3 million in his name while his ex-wife's assets amounted to $213,000, so the division ratio was about 93 to 7 in the husband's favour. When the case came before High Court Judge Mohamed Faizal, he saw no reason to adjust this ruling. But he noted that even in the case of a childless marriage, a spouse's indirect contribution must still be considered, otherwise the efforts in caring for each other would be rendered 'worthless'. 'Even in the context of a childless marriage, the parties would have ordinarily invested deeply in each other's personal and professional growth,' he said, adding that the law would 'honour the shared journey and investment made as a partnership'. In the end, the division ratio for the couple was adjusted to 85 to 15, which doubled the wife's initial share. Here are three points relating to matrimonial assets that all couples should know. Proof of income and expenses With a windfall as high as $2.8 million, it was only human that the husband would claim the money was not entirely his in order to prevent his ex-wife from having a share. He said the commission was earned by 'a group of people' who brokered the deal. To prove his point, he retained only $50,000 and transferred the rest of it to a friend. If this was true, it would not make sense to declare the bulk of the commission to the taxman as his own income, which attracted a levy of over $500,000. If the sum was earned by a group of people, they would collectively pay a lot less tax if they each declared their share of the commission to the taxman. Not surprisingly, Judge Faizal did not believe the husband's story, especially when the documents he submitted to support his claim were seen 'as poor, at best'. 'He was only able to produce an undated letter entitled 'Invoice', where he stated that all the commission was to be paid to him, without reference to anyone else.' As a result, about $2.3 million of the commission was added to the pool for sharing, after paying tax. The wife could also not prove her claim that $15,000 was paid to a pet clinic to treat their dogs. She had withdrawn about $42,000 from their joint bank account after the sale of their HDB flat and claimed that part was spent on the dogs. As she could not produce receipts, it was presumed she spent the whole amount on herself. Living in parents' home When a couple live in a home owned entirely by one of them, both are likely to have shares in the property, which will be viewed as their matrimonial home. But living in a residence belonging to a set of parents will not transform this property into a couple's matrimonial home as the assets are not theirs in the first place. Even if they have contributed to renovating their bedroom, for example, it is still hard for an ex-spouse to make a claim on the in-laws' property. At most, the sum spent would be considered in the matrimonial division. In this case, the wife had no claim on her former in-laws' property as she was living there as a tenant who was also served by their domestic helpers. But she could stake a claim to a private apartment that her ex-husband bought as an investment because this was done during their marriage. Contributions in childless marriages As the law views a marriage as a partnership, the successes and achievements attained in a Dinks marriage should not be seen as the result of one spouse's hard work and effort, but a collective effort of both parties. As Judge Faizal put it: 'This can manifest in a multitude of ways, from one partner taking on more domestic responsibilities to allow the other to excel in their career, to providing important emotional support to each other when facing the many hurdles of life.' So in this instance, he found that a 50-50 ratio for indirect contributions would be appropriate, as both sides also did their part before the marriage broke down. That said, such contributions would not be viewed as having the same weightage as financial contributions, especially for short marriages. Judge Faizal cited two previous cases and noted that the court gave a 50 per cent weightage for a childless marriage that lasted over 11 years, and a 25 per cent weightage for one of five years with one child. As the couple were effectively together for about eight years, he said a 20 per cent weightage for indirect contributions would not be at odds with the precedents and was also appropriate on the facts. So after considering the overall contributions, he adjusted the wife's earlier share of about 7 per cent to 15 cent. Since the total value of the matrimonial assets, which included the sales commission, was about $3.2 million, the wife would be entitled to about $480,000 and the husband $2.72 million. While a divorce may be a painful experience for estranged spouses, the law strives to be fair to all parties by compensating the efforts that both sides have invested in their marriage. Tan Ooi Boon is the Invest Editor of The Straits Times Source: The Straits Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction. Print

Business Times

10 hours ago

• Business Times

Transactions of million dollar or more HDB resale flats brings many positives

[SINGAPORE] Looking for a five-room Housing & Development Board (HDB) resale flat on a high floor that is under ten years old in the Queenstown area? You may need to budget about S$1.5 million. A search on HDB's data showed a premium loft unit on the 22nd to 24th story of Block 92 Dawson Road, with remaining land lease of over 89 years and size of 122 square metres (sq m), was transacted in June at about S$1.66 million. Meanwhile, several five-room flats along Dawson Road, with remaining land lease of over 94 years and size of 107 sq m, were transacted at S$1.4 million or more each this year. One unit on the 28th to 30th story of Block 79 Dawson Road fetched around S$1.47 million. In perspective, paying S$1.5 million for a home works out to around 6.3 times the annualised average monthly household income including employer CPF contributions of the eighth decile of resident employed households of S$19,948 in 2024. Certainly, very few HDB resale flats fetch close to S$1.5 million each. And one may need to budget S$1.5 million for a resale condo unit of around 70 sq m near Dawson Road. Still, HDB resale flats have generally gotten far pricier these days. The HDB Resale Price Index – which tracks the overall price movement of resale flats – rose by 52.9 per cent from 131.5 in Q4 2019, pre Covid-pandemic, to 201 in Q1 2025. And the proportion of resale flats transacting at over S$1 million dollars each is generally rising, with some analysts expecting up to 1,500 such deals this year. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Tuesday, 12 pm Property Insights Get an exclusive analysis of real estate and property news in Singapore and beyond. Sign Up Sign Up Is a strong HDB resale market, with more transactions of at least a million dollars, a cause for consternation or celebration? I see various positives to having a buoyant HDB resale market. Wealth effect One, many Singaporeans are HDB homeowners who intend to live in their homes for years with no intention to sell, even if they are constantly pestered to do so by overzealous property agents. An owner occupier of an HDB flat, which appreciates in value, will enjoy a positive wealth effect and be able to consume with greater confidence. In turn, private consumption is a key driver of the economy. Think of the many food and beverage sector jobs, for example, that are supported by local residents dining out. Or how the spending of local residents on everything from home improvement and wellness to enrichment classes supports jobs. Also, robust HDB resale flat prices help provide a strong base for the housing pyramid here. Ultimately, having firm housing prices in general helps ensure a healthy financial system as home loans are a vital part of the loan books of major lenders here. Importantly, Singapore is a global city that attracts numerous wealthy people from Asia and elsewhere, many of whom go on to become its permanent residents (PRs) and citizens. Letting many Singaporeans enjoy asset appreciation from their HDB homes can help locals deal with possible issues of envy and resentment that may arise from living in a city where some experiences are well beyond the financial reach of the general public. Condo upgrading Two, a strong HDB resale flat market supports many locals in pursuing their condo ownership dreams. That many young locals aspire to own condos is positive. After all, economic growth is driven by people working hard to chase material aspirations instead of lying flat and being content. Many Singaporeans use gains from selling an HDB Build-To-Order (BTO) home after the minimum occupation period to help buy condo homes. Indeed, for some young locals, recycling gains from selling a BTO home to buy a condo home can help them catch up with peers who received parental help to get into condo ownership. Moreover, the economy gains when there is healthy demand for new condos as this supports the livelihoods of developers, contractors and property agents, among many others. The state, too, benefits from selling land for building private homes, with proceeds from state land sales accruing to past reserves. Funding for retirement Three, the owned-HDB flat is the single most important financial asset for many Singaporean households. The fact that HDB flats rise in value and have a ready market of buyers gives owners financial options. For example, a flat can be sold to raise funds to deal with a family emergency, fund a business venture or finance a child's higher education overseas. Crucially, with rising life expectancy, seniors can raise funds by selling their HDB home to better ensure financial adequacy in their retirement years. For one, an elderly person will likely raise a substantial amount of cash by selling a four- or five-room HDB home and buying a short-lease two-room flexi flat or community care apartment from HDB. Meanwhile, elderly HDB flat owners who aim to leave a financial legacy to their family members, can draw much satisfaction from knowing that they are gifting a valuable flat upon their demise. Doubtless, rules governing the eligibility of buyers of HDB resale flats can be tightened if the goal is to bring down HDB resale flat prices and improve their affordability. Should PR households be restricted from buying HDB resale homes? What about imposing an income cap on buyers of all HDB resale flats? Or instead of possibly relaxing the wait-out period, applying a much longer wait-out period before former private homeowners can buy an HDB resale home? Nonetheless, while many people may hope for cheaper HDB resale flats, I think having a strong HDB resale flat market offers various positives and is well worth cherishing. May the HDB continue to provide many locals a good start in their homeownership journeys with affordably priced BTO homes in a wide range of locations including centrally located ones. Concurrently, may HDB flat owners enjoy the wealth effect and the greater financial options afforded that come with owning a home which rises in value despite its remaining land lease gradually running down.

Straits Times

a day ago

• Straits Times

Home-based food gigs are great, but unchecked growth risks tipping the balance

A bar in a HDB flat in the north of Singapore. Ensuring all home-based business operators obtain food hygiene certification is a start, says the writer. PHOTO: LEON SINGAPORE – In a stylishly renovated Housing Board flat in the north of Singapore, patrons are served $24 cocktails containing premium liquors such as Chinese moutai. The 'mixologist' has a full-time job in the healthcare sector – the bar is his after-hours gig. There are no signs, no menu boards, and he technically also has no licence. Such home-based businesse s have had restaurateurs up in arms recently, especially over private dining outfits operating on the scale of restaurants. Food and beverage bosses say they are not begrudging home-based businesses' success. What they are questioning is the fairness of allowing large set-ups to operate without licences or regulatory oversight, while actual restaurants and eateries contend with high overheads, manpower shortages and strict hygiene audits. But it's clear that some loopholes in the current landscape need to be closed so that there are better all-round protections and basic fairness for everyone with skin in the game. Home-based businesses took off during the Covid-19 pandemic as a way for workers to make extra cash, and today account for a fairly sizeable segment of Singapore's food industry. An online search by The Straits Times found more than 150 listings of F&B businesses operating out of residential properties, from HDB flats to landed homes. The actual numbers are likely higher. For homemakers, students and aspiring chefs, operating out of their homes offers a low-barrier way to test ideas, build confidence and earn income, particularly for those juggling caregiving duties. For consumers, home-based F&B concepts offer more than novelty. These businesses bring a level of diversity and intimacy that restaurants may not match – from heritage recipes and niche menus to one-on-one interactions with the chefs. With lower overhead costs, their prices can also be more accessible than restaurants'. Yet, with some home-based operations generating substantial revenue approaching $1 million annually, their unchecked growth challenges the system's fairness and food safety assumptions. The Home-Based Business scheme overseen by the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) and HDB allows owners, registered occupants or tenants of the property to operate small-scale home-based business activities without requiring approval from the agencies. The scheme stipulates guidelines that home-based business activities must adhere to. No non-resident employee is allowed to work in the flat or residential premises, for instance, and heavy equipment and commercial-grade appliances are not allow ed. Home-based F&B business activities must also comply with the Singapore Food Agency's (SFA) guidelines on good food hygiene practices to ensure food safety. But SFA does not require such businesses to be licensed, as it deems the food safety risk of these small-scale outfits to be limited, it told ST. Both URA and HDB do not keep track of the number of such businesses. Observers say this means the authorities likely also do not have visibility of the scale, volume or potential risks from such businesses, if they flout the rules. At the moment, any sort of enforcement on these businesses is mostly driven by complaints from the public. The lack of regulatory oversight on these businesses can also leave consumers without protection. Also, the 'small-scale' premise of the home-based-business scheme no longer reflects the reality on the ground. Some home-based businesses are no longer just dishing out weekend bakes or passion projects in the kitchen – a number are operating on pretty much the same scale as small restaurants. Little Social, for instance, operates from a residential shophouse in Tanjong Pagar, charging $140 per head for a Peranakan meal of seven dishes. It can serve up to 60 guests at a time. While URA and HDB say there is no cap on the number of guests allowed in a private dining setting, they have reminded home-based business operators to be 'responsible and considerate' to avoid disturbing neighbours. By contrast, licensed restaurants are subject to spot checks by regulators and must meet specific design and hygiene requirements to obtain a food shop licence. Is it time for larger home-based operations to be held to similar standards? After all, food safety lapses can happen in any setting. Case in point:In 2021, a home-based baker's products caused food poisoning that left 15 people ill – sending nine, including a four-year-old boy, to hospital. A good starting point could be to make basic food hygiene training mandatory for home-based food operators. If a coffee shop assistant handling food is required to complete such training, what more someone who sells 50 cakes a day or serves food to dozens of guests at a private dinner? Such a requirement should result in raising hygiene awareness and improving overall standards, and have the added benefit of giving the authorities a clearer picture of the landscape. Requiring attendees to declare if they run a home-based food business – even on a casual or part-time basis – would also be a good starting point for the authorities to gauge the size of this sector. The regulatory framework must evolve to reflect the reality on the ground. But any policy shift should be carefully calibrated and should not stifle entrepreneurship. Requiring basic hygiene certification for all food handlers is a logical and necessary first step. Larger home-based businesses operating at restaurant-like scales should be required to meet the same licensing, food hygiene and safety standards as bricks-and-mortar restaurants. It is time for the rules to catch up. Again, this is not to stifle entrepreneurship, but to ensure public trust and a level playing field. Check out ST's Food Guide for the latest foodie recommendations in Singapore.