AI art can't match human creativity, yet — researchers – DW – 06/11/2025
Generative AI models are bad at representing things that require human senses, like smell and touch. Their creativity is 'hollow and shallow,' say experts.
Anyone can sit down with an artificial intelligence (AI) program, such as ChatGPT, to write a poem, a children's story, or a screenplay. It's uncanny: the results can seem quite "human" at first glance. But don't expect anything with much depth or sensory "richness", as researchers explain in a new study.
They found that the Large Language Modes (LLMs) that currently power Generative AI tools are unable to represent the concept of a flower in the same way that humans do.
In fact, the researchers suggest that LLMs aren't very good at representing any 'thing' that has a sensory or motor component — because they lack a body and any organic human experience.
"A large language model can't smell a rose, touch the petals of a daisy or walk through a field of wildflowers. Without those sensory and motor experiences, it can't truly represent what a flower is in all its richness. The same is true of some other human concepts," said Qihui Xu, lead author of the study at Ohio State University, US.
The study suggests that AI's poor ability to represent sensory concepts like flowers might also explain why they lack human-style creativity.
"AI doesn't have rich sensory experiences, which is why AI frequently produces things that satisfy a kind of minimal definition of creativity, but it's hollow and shallow," said Mark Runco, a cognitive scientist at Southern Oregon University, US, who was not involved in the study.
The study was published in the journal Nature Human Behaviour , June 4, 2025.
What are the challenges to book preservation?
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
AI poor at representing sensory concepts
The more scientists probe the inner workings of AI models, the more they are finding just how different their 'thinking' is compared to that of humans. Some say AIs are so different that they are more like alien forms of intelligence.
Yet objectively testing the conceptual understanding of AI is tricky. If computer scientists open up a LLM and look inside, they won't necessarily understand what the millions of numbers changing every second really mean.
Xu and colleagues aimed to test how well LLMs can 'understand' things based on sensory characteristics. They did this by testing how well LLMs represent words with complex sensory meanings, measuring factors, such as how emotionally arousing a thing is or whether you can mentally visualize a thing, and movement or action-based representations.
For example, they analyzed the extent to which humans experience flowers by smelling, or experience them using actions from the torso, such as reaching out to touch a petal. These ideas are easy for us to grasp, since we have intimate knowledge of our noses and bodies, but it's harder for LLMs, which lack a body.
Overall, LLMs represent words well — but those words lack any connection to the senses or motor actions that we experience or feel as humans.
But when it comes to words that have connections to things we see, taste or interact with using our body, that's where AI fails to convincingly capture human concepts.
What's meant by 'AI art is hollow'
AI creates representations of concepts and words by analyzing patterns from a dataset that is used to train it. This idea underlies every algorithm or task, from writing a poem, to predicting whether an image of a face is you or your neighbor.
Most LLMs are trained on text data scraped from the internet, but some LLMs are also trained on visual learning, from still-images and videos.
Xu and colleagues found that LLMs with visual learning exhibited some similarity with human representations in visual-related dimensions. Those LLMs beat other LLMs trained just on text. But this test was limited to visual learning — it excluded other human sensations, like touch or hearing.
This suggests that the more sensory information an AI model receives as training data, the better it can represent sensory aspects.
AI's impact on the working world
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
AI keeps learning and improving
The authors noted that LLMs are continually improving and said it was likely that AI will get better at capturing human concepts in the future.
Xu said that when future LLMs are augmented with sensor data and robotics, they may be able to actively make inferences about and act upon the physical world.
But independent experts DW spoke to suggested the future of sensory AI remained unclear.
"It's possible an AI trained on multisensory information could deal with multimodal sensory aspects without any problem," said Mirco Musolesi, a computer scientist at University College London, UK, who was not involved in the study.
However, Runco said even with more advanced sensory capabilities, AI will still understand things like flowers completely differently to humans.
Our human experience and memory are tightly linked with our senses — it's a brain-body interaction that stretches beyond the moment. The smell of a rose or the silky feel of its petals, for example, can trigger joyous memories of your childhood or lustful excitement in adulthood.
AI programs do not have a body, memories or a 'self'. They lack the ability to experience the world or interact with it as animals and human-animals do — which, said Runco, means "the creative output of AI will still be hollow and shallow."
Edited by: Zulfikar Abbany
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
a day ago
- DW
Pope Leo warns leaders about pitfalls of AI – DW – 06/21/2025
Pope Leo XIV told politicians in Rome not to forget that artificial intelligence is a tool. He warned, "our personal life has greater value than any algorithm." Pope Leo XIV has renewed calls for a deeper consideration of the potential impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on humanity, voicing concern for the development and well being of children and youths. The recently installed pontiff made his remarks on Saturday, when he welcomed Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and parliamentary delegations from 68 further nations to the Vatican for the Second Annual Rome Conference on Artificial Intelligence. "In particular, it must not be forgotten that artificial intelligence functions as a tool for the good of human beings, not to diminish them or even to replace them," said Leo, who added that AI's "static memory" could not match the "creative, dynamic" power of human memory. "Our personal life has greater value than any algorithm, and social relationships require spaces for development that far transcend the limited patterns that any soulless machine can pre-package," he told attendees. Although the pontiff acknowledged the unquestionable advantages such computing offers, he nevertheless warned of the threat it poses to how we understand life and the world around us. "AI, especially generative AI, has opened new horizons on many different levels, including enhancing research in healthcare and scientific discovery; but also raises troubling questions on its possible repercussions on humanity's openness to truth and beauty, on our distinctive ability to grasp and process reality." Leo, who has repeatedly addressed the issue of AI and its impact on society since becoming pope in May, urged "serious reflection" on the "inherently ethical dimension of AI," noting that respect for the uniqueness of human existence was an essential element of any discussion about its use and regulation. "All of us, I am sure, are concerned for children and young people, and the possible consequences of the use of AI on their intellectual and neurological development," he said. "Our youth must be helped, and not hindered, in their journey towards maturity and true responsibility," he added, calling young people "our hope for the future." For all of the praises that AI proponents sing, claiming, among other things, that it allows more access to information and that if computers are allowed to perform the tasks of workers, former laborers will then be able to pursue other more fulfilling creative tasks, Leo warned of the dangers of mistaking "access to data" for actual intelligence. "Authentic wisdom," he said, "has more to do with recognizing the true meaning of life, than with the availability of data." The pontiff also underscored AI's potential for "misuse for selfish gain at the expense of others, or worse, to foment conflict and aggression." "Society's well-being," said Leo, "depends upon their [young people] being given the ability to develop their God-given gifts and capabilities, and to respond to the demands of the times and the needs of others with a free and generous spirit. "This entails taking into account the well-being of the human person not only materially, but also intellectually and spiritually. It means safeguarding the inviolable dignity of each human person and respecting the cultural and spiritual riches and diversity of the world's peoples," according to Leo. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Leo has said the Catholic Church is keen on contributing to a peaceful and thoughtful public discussion about the advent of AI "and the future of our human family." A final concern brought up by the pontiff addressed the strains AI puts on relations between young people and the elderly, pointing to what he called the "necessary intergenerational apprenticeship that will enable young people to integrate truth into their moral and spiritual life, thus informing their mature decisions and opening the path towards a world of greater solidarity and unity." Leo ended by reminding lawmakers of the need to protect "healthy, fair and sound lifestyles, especially for the good of younger generations," admonishing, "the task set before you is not easy but it is one of vital importance." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Int'l Business Times
2 days ago
- Int'l Business Times
Tech-fueled Misinformation Distorts Iran-Israel Fighting
AI deepfakes, video game footage passed off as real combat, and chatbot-generated falsehoods -- such tech-enabled misinformation is distorting the Israel-Iran conflict, fueling a war of narratives across social media. The information warfare unfolding alongside ground combat -- sparked by Israel's strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities and military leadership -- underscores a digital crisis in the age of rapidly advancing AI tools that have blurred the lines between truth and fabrication. The surge in wartime misinformation has exposed an urgent need for stronger detection tools, experts say, as major tech platforms have largely weakened safeguards by scaling back content moderation and reducing reliance on human fact-checkers. After Iran struck Israel with barrages of missiles last week, AI-generated videos falsely claimed to show damage inflicted on Tel Aviv and Ben Gurion Airport. The videos were widely shared across Facebook, Instagram and X. Using a reverse image search, AFP's fact-checkers found that the clips were originally posted by a TikTok account that produces AI-generated content. There has been a "surge in generative AI misinformation, specifically related to the Iran-Israel conflict," Ken Jon Miyachi, founder of the Austin-based firm BitMindAI, told AFP. "These tools are being leveraged to manipulate public perception, often amplifying divisive or misleading narratives with unprecedented scale and sophistication." GetReal Security, a US company focused on detecting manipulated media including AI deepfakes, also identified a wave of fabricated videos related to the Israel-Iran conflict. The company linked the visually compelling videos -- depicting apocalyptic scenes of war-damaged Israeli aircraft and buildings as well as Iranian missiles mounted on a trailer -- to Google's Veo 3 AI generator, known for hyper-realistic visuals. The Veo watermark is visible at the bottom of an online video posted by the news outlet Tehran Times, which claims to show "the moment an Iranian missile" struck Tel Aviv. "It is no surprise that as generative-AI tools continue to improve in photo-realism, they are being misused to spread misinformation and sow confusion," said Hany Farid, the co-founder of GetReal Security and a professor at the University of California, Berkeley. Farid offered one tip to spot such deepfakes: the Veo 3 videos were normally eight seconds in length or a combination of clips of a similar duration. "This eight-second limit obviously doesn't prove a video is fake, but should be a good reason to give you pause and fact-check before you re-share," he said. The falsehoods are not confined to social media. Disinformation watchdog NewsGuard has identified 51 websites that have advanced more than a dozen false claims -- ranging from AI-generated photos purporting to show mass destruction in Tel Aviv to fabricated reports of Iran capturing Israeli pilots. Sources spreading these false narratives include Iranian military-linked Telegram channels and state media sources affiliated with the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB), sanctioned by the US Treasury Department, NewsGuard said. "We're seeing a flood of false claims and ordinary Iranians appear to be the core targeted audience," McKenzie Sadeghi, a researcher with NewsGuard, told AFP. Sadeghi described Iranian citizens as "trapped in a sealed information environment," where state media outlets dominate in a chaotic attempt to "control the narrative." Iran itself claimed to be a victim of tech manipulation, with local media reporting that Israel briefly hacked a state television broadcast, airing footage of women's protests and urging people to take to the streets. Adding to the information chaos were online clips lifted from war-themed video games. AFP's fact-checkers identified one such clip posted on X, which falsely claimed to show an Israeli jet being shot down by Iran. The footage bore striking similarities to the military simulation game Arma 3. Israel's military has rejected Iranian media reports claiming its fighter jets were downed over Iran as "fake news." Chatbots such as xAI's Grok, which online users are increasingly turning to for instant fact-checking, falsely identified some of the manipulated visuals as real, researchers said. "This highlights a broader crisis in today's online information landscape: the erosion of trust in digital content," BitMindAI's Miyachi said. "There is an urgent need for better detection tools, media literacy, and platform accountability to safeguard the integrity of public discourse."
Int'l Business Times
2 days ago
- Int'l Business Times
Amazon's AI Revolution Brings Job Cut Warnings, Relocation Mandate Adds to Employee Uncertainty
Amazon, a global e-commerce and tech giant, which is on the cusp of an artificial intelligence revolution, is sparking significant concerns among its workforce. With whispers of impending job cuts and a recent mandate requiring some employees to relocate, a palpable sense of uncertainty is now hanging over Amazon's vast employee base. Amazon's AI Revolution: A Time of Unease for Employees Amazon CEO Andy Jassy has hinted at workforce reductions, attributing them to the rapid advancements in AI. He has confirmed that the company will require fewer employees as Amazon pursues greater efficiency with Generative AI. The severity of the situation, including how many roles will be cut, remains unconfirmed, but the message clearly tells employees to prepare themselves for upcoming layoffs. Jassy's note, also shared on his public blog, highlights AI's rapid progress and profound impact on business efficiency and operations. Furthermore, Bloomberg reports that Amazon is poised to announce these cuts next month. 'As we roll out more Generative AI and agents, it should change the way our work is done. We will need fewer people doing some of the jobs that are being done today, and more people doing other types of jobs,' Jassy wrote in his note to the employees. He added, 'It's hard to know exactly where this nets out over time, but in the next few years, we expect that this will reduce our total corporate workforce as we get efficiency gains from using AI extensively across the company.' Efficiency Driven by AI: A Changing Workforce Amazon claims to have developed over 1,000 Generative AI services, with additional applications under development. This year, the company pledged to invest $100 million in AI technologies. Jassy hailed AI as a 'one-in-a-lifetime technology,' stating it will reshape Amazon's operational approach. Beyond the impact of AI, Amazon's workforce is grappling with another pressing issue: a strict relocation policy that leaves many employees with a difficult choice. Forced Moves: The Relocation Ultimatum Citing sources familiar with the situation, Bloomberg reports that Amazon has issued an ultimatum to its corporate employees: move closer to their managers and teams or resign without any severance. Amazon requires employee relocation: No severance offered via My Northwest local news feed. This is really interesting, and a sign of things to come at other companies. AI means fewer employees, which means Corporate will start demanding 'do this or goodbye' workforce… — stevemur (@stevemur) June 20, 2025 According to the report, employees must relocate to key centres, including Seattle, Arlington (Virginia), and Washington, D.C., a mandate that may necessitate cross-country moves for many. Employee Concerns Mount Amidst Changes This policy has sparked fresh concern among Amazon employees, who are already uneasy due to ongoing job reductions and warnings that AI might diminish their roles in the years ahead. A source cited by Bloomberg suggests this new directive could impact thousands of employees across different teams, particularly mid-career staff reluctant to move because of family commitments and spousal careers. The 30-Day Relocation Mandate The company operates numerous satellite offices throughout the US, including in key cities such as New York, Boston, Los Angeles, and Austin. These locations have typically offered employees some choice in where they reside. One employee revealed to Bloomberg that this message was given during a team meeting. Their manager reportedly informed them they had 30 days to decide on relocating. Should they opt against it, they would receive 60 days to resign or start the relocation process. The manager said, ' There would be no severance for employees who resigned in lieu of relocating.' Originally published on IBTimes UK This article is copyrighted by the business news leader
