‘This is not Edinburgh': South Ayrshire council set to abandon plans for visitor levy after pushback

A local Scottish council is set to abandon its plans to introduce a tourist tax despite other towns and cities jumping at the chance to put a levy on visitors.
South Ayrshire Council, covering an area of western Scotland under Glasgow, is likely to drop plans to introduce a visitor levy after negative feedback at a public consultation.
The local authority proposed the plans to implement a visitor levy in the area on overnight stays to try and boost the economy.
Accommodation providers, groups representing tourism businesses and residents were asked to give their feedback during the 12-week consultation.
The plans received criticism from the public, with only 15 per cent of respondents supporting the proposal compared to 79 per cent against it.
The negativity towards the levy largely focused on doubts that Ayrshire was a popular enough location for the levy to work.
The area attracts people to its miles of stunning coastline, backed by a series of world-renowned golf courses, including the Trump-owned Turnberry course, and is home to attractions such as the Robert Burns Birthplace Museum, which celebrates the life of Scotland's national poet.
One respondent said: 'I don't believe that Ayrshire is attractive enough as a destination to warrant a tourist tax /levy.
'I can see how this works in very popular places like Barcelona or Athens. If this was inevitable, I would look to delay it until [the] surrounding areas have introduced the tax.'
Another person said that the levy could even deter tourists from visiting the area.
'I think we need to encourage visitors rather than penalise them… This is not Edinburgh, where they have huge numbers of visitors... we need to make things more attractive to visitors and this sends completely the wrong message,' they said.
Meanwhile, the minority who support the tourist tax said that they hope it will 'generate income for the area and hopefully keep council tax lower for residents'.
It has been recommended that the plan be abandoned for two years, with the council agreeing with this during a meeting on Tuesday. Other councillors have 48 hours to object to this decision before it is finalised.
The local council says that the visitor economy is highly important to South Ayrshire and supports thousands of jobs in the area.
It said it wanted to investigate the visitor levy as an option to support services and infrastructure for both residents and tourists to enjoy.
It said it could raise £400,000 to £500,000 per year based on a five per cent visitor levy charge after administration costs are accounted for.
The visitor levy is not completely off the table for Ayrshire, but it will not be prioritised by the council until August 2027, when it will be reconsidered.
The Visitor Levy Act became law in September 2024, which allows councils in Scotland to tax overnight accommodation if they wish to do so.
The Highland Council and Glasgow City Council have established consultations on visitor levies in their area, while Edinburgh spearheaded the tax in January, when it voted to introduce a five per cent surcharge on overnight stays in the city.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Times

40 minutes ago

• Times

SNP is using devolution for its lazy politics of divide and rule

F or neither the first nor, I fear, the last time, today's text comes courtesy of Wilkins Micawber. The relationship between Scotland and the rest of the United Kingdom in the devolved era is one in which, as far as the Scots are concerned, our friends in the south provide the standard by which satisfaction or contentment in north Britain may be measured. As dear old Micawber sagely observed in David Copperfield, 'Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen and six, result happiness. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds nought and six, result misery.' Translate this into our politics and we may come up with a useful rule of thumb decreeing that if a policy or outcome is sixpence or half an ounce more agreeable in Scotland than in England then joy may be unconfined across the land. Should it be so very marginally worse than the way in which affairs are organised south of the border then misery and woe sweeps the land.

Telegraph

2 hours ago

• Telegraph

Blair's old school ‘to axe teachers' after Labour VAT raid

Teachers at Sir Tony Blair's former college are facing redundancy after Labour's VAT raid on private school fees. Fettes College in Edinburgh, which charges up to £54,000 a year, is examining its options for reducing staff after changes to VAT and National Insurance forced it into 'difficult' decisions. It comes as private schools experienced their biggest year-on-year drop in pupil numbers for more than a decade. A number of schools across the country have also had to close, with others revealing the cost of Labour changes had run into seven figures. Fettes College sits on 100 acres and offers mountain views, woodland and green space on campus. Pupils pay up to £15,150 a term, rising to £18,000 if they board. However, it has been hit by Chancellor Rachel Reeves's decision to remove the VAT exemption on private school fees from January 1 and hike employer National Insurance contributions from 13.8 per cent to 15 per cent. It is now running a consultation with staff that could lead to redundancies. A Fettes College spokesman said: 'Various factors have conspired to increase costs on all organisations and schools are not immune, particularly with the recent imposition of VAT on school fees and rise in National Insurance contributions. 'Despite being financially very well managed with a strong student roll, these factors are having an impact on our costs and numbers, and we are obliged to run our operations as efficiently as possible. 'A consultation process began in May to right-size our staffing model. This difficult decision may result in some redundancies.' Experts have previously warned that the raid could hurt thousands of Scottish children with special educational needs and disabilities. Pupils with an educational, health and care plan are exempt from the increase in fees, but the system does not exist in Scotland. Private school pupil numbers have already fallen by more than 11,000 across England, with some schools already forced to close after becoming unaffordable. Park Hill School in Surrey, London-based Falcons School and Wakefield Independent School are among those which have said they will shut their doors. The headmaster of Malvern College, based in Worcestershire, said the raid had cost his school £2m. Earlier this month, affected families brought a series of High Court legal challenges in a bid to reverse the Government's decision. However, judges dismissed all three claims in a single judgment. Julie Robinson, chief executive of the Independent Schools Council, said: 'This is an unprecedented tax on education, and it was right that its compatibility with human rights law was tested. 'We will continue to work to ensure the government is held to account over the negative impact this tax on education is having across independent and state schools.'

The Guardian

2 hours ago

• The Guardian

Who's the boss? The ousted car sales tycoon versus his private equity investor

In many ways, Peter Waddell is lucky to be alive, let alone a multimillionaire. His backstory involves him wandering the streets of Glasgow after parental abuse left him in a children's home during the 1970s. And yet Waddell went on to build a used car empire called Big Motoring World, accumulating an estimated £500m fortune, a historic home on the outskirts of London and a string of performance cars. But now the 59-year-old faces another challenging chapter, which is threatening chunks of his fortune. The used car salesman has brought an employment tribunal claim as well as a high court case against private equity investors in his company after he was ousted from Big last year. His exit, in April 2024, was triggered after an investigation found he had made sexist, racist and abusive comments towards colleagues – allegations that he contests. However, Waddell goes further than simply denying the claims, raising questions about how private equity firms interact with founders once the financiers have invested in their companies. His court filings allege he was prevented from responding to the accusations, and that they were used by his 'capricious' investors who 'prejudged and in fact determined the outcome of [an] independent investigation as a means of securing Peter Waddell's exclusion from Big'. Now it looks likely that a court will have to assess whether Waddell's alleged behaviour demanded he be sidelined from the business he created. A surprising second question will also be in play: does Waddell's ousting make him a victim? When entrepreneurs give interviews about their big career break, they often tell tales about dropping out of university to launch a startup or hustling for jobs they were barely qualified for. Waddell's tale is very different. The businessman, who is autistic, has dyslexia and is partially deaf, for which he now wears two hearing aids, has a story that involves being physically abused by his mother. 'She scarred my whole body, attempted to cut my hands off and smashed my head,' he said in a recent interview. From toddler age onwards he spent most of his childhood in a children's home. From there he graduated to living on the streets, describing himself as a 'tramp'. Homeless and desperate for warmth during one particularly biting winter day, Waddell wound up at Glasgow's Buchanan bus station where he shielded himself from the cold behind a pile of suitcases in the boot of a parked coach. The door was slammed behind him and the teenager finally emerged in London. In the capital he recalls landing a job at a minicab office and eventually ploughing his earnings into buying cars at auction, which he lined up in parking spaces along the road near a flat he had managed to rent. This was the genesis of Big Motoring World, which grew to a company with 525 employees, revenues of £371m and profits of £6.6m, according to the company's 2021 annual accounts. Those figures attracted investors and in April 2022 Freshstream, a private equity group, acquired about a third of the business, with the option of eventually buying out Waddell's remaining shares. The businessman planned to retire to Spain and enjoy his string of homes, luxury cars and helicopter. But it didn't work out like that. Within two years the used car market had stalled and the two parties were at war. With the business beginning to struggle, Freshstream started to doubt whether it wanted Waddell running Big and so began to explore potential avenues. Freshstream's contract gave it 'step in rights', where it could take action against Waddell if the business underperformed. It also possessed a nuclear option: removing Waddell from his company if he had committed a grave offence that might affect Big's value – a 'material default event', in the jargon. At the start of last year, Freshstream and the company's management opened an investigation into accusations concerning how the founder spoke to staff, customers and business partners. The allegations that emerged were shocking. The claims, some of which were historical and were not formally dealt with by the company at the time, included 'extremely serious racist abuse and sexual harassment of female employees', according to defence filings submitted to the high court by a Freshstream holding company. 'Serious instances of racism including allegedly referring to Hindu people as [the car marque] 'Hyundais',' the Freshstream papers add. 'Serious allegations of sexual harassment including allegedly … telling a female cleaner: 'I bet you'd like to suck my dick?'' The papers also allege that Waddell called 'senior members of the management team the 'C word'' and suggested 'he would 'give it to them up the arse''. In total, Freshstream investigated 27 allegations, some of which Waddell denies and some of which he claims were taken out of context. 'The allegations are fake,' Waddell told the Guardian. 'We will prove it in the court case.' Waddell's high court filings deal mostly with process, with the tycoon stating that he was not allowed to defend himself during the group's internal investigation, which he alleges was set up to oust him. Waddell's claim says it is difficult for him to 'easily read and digest information'. He had been signed off work by a doctor for four weeks with a heart condition on 28 March 2024, the court papers say, and was invited five days later – on 2 April – to an 'investigation interview' that would take place on 9 April. At the interview, 764 pages of evidence were to be considered. Waddell's lawyers requested more time but the company pressed on without him, on the basis that there would be an 'intolerable risk' to the business in delaying. The investigation's final report, which was written by the employment lawyer Nicholas Siddall KC, runs to 138 pages. In it, Siddall suggests he was instructed to come to a conclusion in the absence of any response by the accused; he also seems to raise questions about why the company had concluded there would be an 'intolerable risk' in granting Waddell extra time in which to respond. 'Plainly I had hoped to interview PW [Peter Waddell] in order to receive his version of events,' the KC's report states. 'However, my instructions … were clear. I was not informed of the intolerable risk which [Big Motoring World] would face, and in any event I do not consider it is a matter for me to interrogate the reasons of those who instruct me.' Siddall found, having interviewed 22 sources, that a 'material default event' had occurred in 15 out of the 27 allegations. Waddell was out. All of which means this row – along with a separate claim about how Waddell came to invest some of his fortune in a Freshstream fund – looks likely to be fought out in the high court, probably next year. But whichever way the judge leans, other entrepreneurs have made comparable allegations. The Guardian has spoken to four other British founders of startup businesses who wished to remain anonymous but make similar claims that various investors had attempted to oust them from their companies. None of these allegations were ever tested in court. In Waddell's case, that seems about to change.