Staffers face arrest after caravan plot inquiry no-show
Five senior government staffers face possible arrest in a dramatic escalation of a probe examining officials' knowledge about an explosive-laden caravan found on Sydney's outskirts.
The high-ranking staff in the offices of NSW Premier Chris Minns and Police Minister Yasmin Catley failed to appear as summonsed on Friday at an upper house inquiry.
Committee chair independent MP Rod Roberts conducted a roll call for the premier's chief of staff James Cullen and four other staffers on Friday before the committee set in motion a process to seek arrest warrants.
In a letter to the committee announcing their intention not to appear, the staffers say appearing before the inquiry "would be at odds with the principles of ministerial accountability".
Mr Roberts pressed against that motion on Friday as he addressed empty chairs.
"The committee is not seeking to sanction ministerial staff for their actions, only to shed light on the events in the lead up to the passage of the hate speech and protest laws through parliament," Mr Roberts said.
Controversial protest legislation was rushed through the NSW parliament in February after explosives, anti-Semitic messaging and a list of addresses of Jewish people and institutions were found inside the caravan at Dural in Sydney's northwest on January 19.
The discovery prompted fears of a terrorist attack or mass-casualty event, as the premier and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese immediately dubbed it.
It later emerged to be a hoax, with senior NSW police telling Mr Roberts' inquiry they believed virtually from the outset it was a ruse.
The premier on Thursday attacked the upper house for "on a routine basis" trying to get government staff to appear at inquiries "almost like they're criminals and under investigation, or they should front some kind of Star Chamber inquiry".
"And if not, they're under threat of arrest," he said.
As members of the lower house, Mr Minns and Ms Catley cannot be compelled to appear at the upper house inquiry to give evidence.
Staffers, however, can be forced to appear. The committee believes they were present during police briefings to the ministers.
Another staffer named in the motion, Mr Minns' deputy chief of staff Edward Ovadia, said in the letter he should be excused from attending the committee as he was on leave at the time and did not attend any meetings.
The committee will ask the upper house president, independent Ben Franklin, to go to the NSW Supreme Court and seek warrants for their arrest.
The premier and police minister say they have commented extensively on the matter, including parliamentary hearings, press conferences and question time.
Five senior government staffers face possible arrest in a dramatic escalation of a probe examining officials' knowledge about an explosive-laden caravan found on Sydney's outskirts.
The high-ranking staff in the offices of NSW Premier Chris Minns and Police Minister Yasmin Catley failed to appear as summonsed on Friday at an upper house inquiry.
Committee chair independent MP Rod Roberts conducted a roll call for the premier's chief of staff James Cullen and four other staffers on Friday before the committee set in motion a process to seek arrest warrants.
In a letter to the committee announcing their intention not to appear, the staffers say appearing before the inquiry "would be at odds with the principles of ministerial accountability".
Mr Roberts pressed against that motion on Friday as he addressed empty chairs.
"The committee is not seeking to sanction ministerial staff for their actions, only to shed light on the events in the lead up to the passage of the hate speech and protest laws through parliament," Mr Roberts said.
Controversial protest legislation was rushed through the NSW parliament in February after explosives, anti-Semitic messaging and a list of addresses of Jewish people and institutions were found inside the caravan at Dural in Sydney's northwest on January 19.
The discovery prompted fears of a terrorist attack or mass-casualty event, as the premier and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese immediately dubbed it.
It later emerged to be a hoax, with senior NSW police telling Mr Roberts' inquiry they believed virtually from the outset it was a ruse.
The premier on Thursday attacked the upper house for "on a routine basis" trying to get government staff to appear at inquiries "almost like they're criminals and under investigation, or they should front some kind of Star Chamber inquiry".
"And if not, they're under threat of arrest," he said.
As members of the lower house, Mr Minns and Ms Catley cannot be compelled to appear at the upper house inquiry to give evidence.
Staffers, however, can be forced to appear. The committee believes they were present during police briefings to the ministers.
Another staffer named in the motion, Mr Minns' deputy chief of staff Edward Ovadia, said in the letter he should be excused from attending the committee as he was on leave at the time and did not attend any meetings.
The committee will ask the upper house president, independent Ben Franklin, to go to the NSW Supreme Court and seek warrants for their arrest.
The premier and police minister say they have commented extensively on the matter, including parliamentary hearings, press conferences and question time.
Five senior government staffers face possible arrest in a dramatic escalation of a probe examining officials' knowledge about an explosive-laden caravan found on Sydney's outskirts.
The high-ranking staff in the offices of NSW Premier Chris Minns and Police Minister Yasmin Catley failed to appear as summonsed on Friday at an upper house inquiry.
Committee chair independent MP Rod Roberts conducted a roll call for the premier's chief of staff James Cullen and four other staffers on Friday before the committee set in motion a process to seek arrest warrants.
In a letter to the committee announcing their intention not to appear, the staffers say appearing before the inquiry "would be at odds with the principles of ministerial accountability".
Mr Roberts pressed against that motion on Friday as he addressed empty chairs.
"The committee is not seeking to sanction ministerial staff for their actions, only to shed light on the events in the lead up to the passage of the hate speech and protest laws through parliament," Mr Roberts said.
Controversial protest legislation was rushed through the NSW parliament in February after explosives, anti-Semitic messaging and a list of addresses of Jewish people and institutions were found inside the caravan at Dural in Sydney's northwest on January 19.
The discovery prompted fears of a terrorist attack or mass-casualty event, as the premier and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese immediately dubbed it.
It later emerged to be a hoax, with senior NSW police telling Mr Roberts' inquiry they believed virtually from the outset it was a ruse.
The premier on Thursday attacked the upper house for "on a routine basis" trying to get government staff to appear at inquiries "almost like they're criminals and under investigation, or they should front some kind of Star Chamber inquiry".
"And if not, they're under threat of arrest," he said.
As members of the lower house, Mr Minns and Ms Catley cannot be compelled to appear at the upper house inquiry to give evidence.
Staffers, however, can be forced to appear. The committee believes they were present during police briefings to the ministers.
Another staffer named in the motion, Mr Minns' deputy chief of staff Edward Ovadia, said in the letter he should be excused from attending the committee as he was on leave at the time and did not attend any meetings.
The committee will ask the upper house president, independent Ben Franklin, to go to the NSW Supreme Court and seek warrants for their arrest.
The premier and police minister say they have commented extensively on the matter, including parliamentary hearings, press conferences and question time.
Five senior government staffers face possible arrest in a dramatic escalation of a probe examining officials' knowledge about an explosive-laden caravan found on Sydney's outskirts.
The high-ranking staff in the offices of NSW Premier Chris Minns and Police Minister Yasmin Catley failed to appear as summonsed on Friday at an upper house inquiry.
Committee chair independent MP Rod Roberts conducted a roll call for the premier's chief of staff James Cullen and four other staffers on Friday before the committee set in motion a process to seek arrest warrants.
In a letter to the committee announcing their intention not to appear, the staffers say appearing before the inquiry "would be at odds with the principles of ministerial accountability".
Mr Roberts pressed against that motion on Friday as he addressed empty chairs.
"The committee is not seeking to sanction ministerial staff for their actions, only to shed light on the events in the lead up to the passage of the hate speech and protest laws through parliament," Mr Roberts said.
Controversial protest legislation was rushed through the NSW parliament in February after explosives, anti-Semitic messaging and a list of addresses of Jewish people and institutions were found inside the caravan at Dural in Sydney's northwest on January 19.
The discovery prompted fears of a terrorist attack or mass-casualty event, as the premier and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese immediately dubbed it.
It later emerged to be a hoax, with senior NSW police telling Mr Roberts' inquiry they believed virtually from the outset it was a ruse.
The premier on Thursday attacked the upper house for "on a routine basis" trying to get government staff to appear at inquiries "almost like they're criminals and under investigation, or they should front some kind of Star Chamber inquiry".
"And if not, they're under threat of arrest," he said.
As members of the lower house, Mr Minns and Ms Catley cannot be compelled to appear at the upper house inquiry to give evidence.
Staffers, however, can be forced to appear. The committee believes they were present during police briefings to the ministers.
Another staffer named in the motion, Mr Minns' deputy chief of staff Edward Ovadia, said in the letter he should be excused from attending the committee as he was on leave at the time and did not attend any meetings.
The committee will ask the upper house president, independent Ben Franklin, to go to the NSW Supreme Court and seek warrants for their arrest.
The premier and police minister say they have commented extensively on the matter, including parliamentary hearings, press conferences and question time.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
2 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Trump effort to keep Harvard from hosting foreign students blocked by judge
Boston: A federal judge has blocked the Trump administration's efforts to keep Harvard University from hosting international students. An order from US District Judge Allison Burroughs preserves the ability of Harvard to host foreign students while the case is decided. It marks another victory for the Ivy League school as it challenges multiple government sanctions amid a battle with the White House. Harvard sued the Department of Homeland Security in May after the agency withdrew the school's certification to host foreign students and issue paperwork for their visas. The action would have forced Harvard's roughly 7000 foreign students to transfer or risk being in the US illegally. New foreign students would have been barred from coming to Harvard. The university called it illegal retaliation for rejecting the White House's demands to overhaul Harvard policies around campus protests, admissions, hiring and other issues. Burroughs temporarily halted the action hours after Harvard sued. Less than two weeks later, in early June, Trump moved to block foreign students from entering the US to attend Harvard, citing a different legal justification. Harvard challenged the move and Burroughs temporarily blocked that effort as well. Trump has been warring with Harvard for months after it rejected a series of government demands meant to address conservative complaints that the school has become too liberal and has tolerated anti-Jewish harassment. Trump officials have cut more than $US2.6 billion ($4 billion) in research grants, ended federal contracts and threatened to revoke its tax-exempt status. Loading In April, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem demanded that Harvard turn over a trove of records related to any dangerous or illegal activity by foreign students. Harvard says it complied, but Noem said the response fell short and, on May 22, revoked Harvard's certification in the Student and Exchange Visitor Program. The sanction immediately put Harvard at a disadvantage as it competed for the world's top students, the school said in its lawsuit, and it harmed Harvard's reputation as a global research hub. 'Without its international students, Harvard is not Harvard,' the suit said.
The Age
2 hours ago
- The Age
Trump effort to keep Harvard from hosting foreign students blocked by judge
Boston: A federal judge has blocked the Trump administration's efforts to keep Harvard University from hosting international students. An order from US District Judge Allison Burroughs preserves the ability of Harvard to host foreign students while the case is decided. It marks another victory for the Ivy League school as it challenges multiple government sanctions amid a battle with the White House. Harvard sued the Department of Homeland Security in May after the agency withdrew the school's certification to host foreign students and issue paperwork for their visas. The action would have forced Harvard's roughly 7000 foreign students to transfer or risk being in the US illegally. New foreign students would have been barred from coming to Harvard. The university called it illegal retaliation for rejecting the White House's demands to overhaul Harvard policies around campus protests, admissions, hiring and other issues. Burroughs temporarily halted the action hours after Harvard sued. Less than two weeks later, in early June, Trump moved to block foreign students from entering the US to attend Harvard, citing a different legal justification. Harvard challenged the move and Burroughs temporarily blocked that effort as well. Trump has been warring with Harvard for months after it rejected a series of government demands meant to address conservative complaints that the school has become too liberal and has tolerated anti-Jewish harassment. Trump officials have cut more than $US2.6 billion ($4 billion) in research grants, ended federal contracts and threatened to revoke its tax-exempt status. Loading In April, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem demanded that Harvard turn over a trove of records related to any dangerous or illegal activity by foreign students. Harvard says it complied, but Noem said the response fell short and, on May 22, revoked Harvard's certification in the Student and Exchange Visitor Program. The sanction immediately put Harvard at a disadvantage as it competed for the world's top students, the school said in its lawsuit, and it harmed Harvard's reputation as a global research hub. 'Without its international students, Harvard is not Harvard,' the suit said.
Sydney Morning Herald
4 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
I was turned back at the US border after a 12-hour interrogation
Last Thursday, I departed Melbourne on QF93 for a two-week holiday in New York. I never made it. After landing at LAX, I disembarked with everyone else and made my way towards the famously long passport queue. I was eager to get through, collect my bags, and board the second leg of my journey. But as soon as I stepped into the snaking line, a voice came over the loudspeaker, calling me out by name. They had been waiting for me. 'Alistair Kitchen, please report to the officer at the back of the arrival hall.' I turned back and was met by a Customers and Border Protection Officer I found disquietingly polite. He asked me to follow him, and we walked together past that long line, down a special queue where my passport was quickly scanned, and then into a room some passengers will know as 'secondary processing'. The officer, who I later learned was Officer Adam Martinez, asked for my phone. He asked if I wanted to use the water fountain, as Americans call it, and if I wanted to use the bathroom. Over the course of the two interrogations that were to come, and in my 12 hours of detention, I was asked many times if I wanted to use the bathroom, as if the customs officers had been taught that availability of a toilet would make up what they were about to do. Then he asked for my phone, and told me I would be immediately deported if I did not give him my passcode. I made the mistake of complying. I may have been visiting only for a short holiday on this occasion, but I know the US well – I lived there for six years, studying and working. Last year I moved back home, to Castlemaine, in regional Victoria, but for the years 2022 to 2024 I was studying a master of fine arts in nonfiction writing at Columbia University. In April 2024, months into the Israeli war on Gaza, students at Columbia began to protest the university's investment in Israel. Columbia is famously the 'activist Ivy', and proudly advertises its history of student protest, such as the 1968 occupation of university buildings to protest the war in Vietnam, and the fight against apartheid in South Africa. One day, I stepped onto campus to discover that students had erected tents on the lawn. At that moment, they began a protest movement that rapidly swept around the world, including to the lawns of universities here in Australia. I began to write down what I saw. Over the days and weeks that followed I posted reports to my Substack, Kitchen Counter. I wrote plainly about what I observed: from Jewish and Muslim students holding hands, singing together for peace, to faculty mounting their own protests opposing university administration. In the end, it was how militarised police used siege vehicles to storm the campus. All of this I watched with my own eyes, and reported as a witness, and a journalist. I wrote, too, about my best guesses for why the university, and the NYPD, were making choices disproportionate in their fierce violence to the peaceful behaviour of the students. I wrote against the swirl of misinformation that rose rapidly, driven from powers a long way from campus. Because the university went into lockdown, professional media were not on the ground. I realised then that my first-person accounts were as important for describing what I saw as they were for describing what I did not see. And what I did not see, in my time observing the protests, were instances of antisemitism from Columbia student protesters. That was why I was detained at LAX. I didn't need to guess the reason – Officer Martinez had told me. As he sat down for the first interrogation, he said, 'We both know why you're here.' I was there because of what I 'wrote online about the protests at Columbia'.
