Cargo That Set Off Blast at Iran Port Was Improperly Documented, Investigators Say
Iranian officials investigating a huge explosion at a strategic port in southern Iran have said they found 'false statements' in the documentation for the shipment believed to have triggered the blast, which the authorities say has now killed 70 people.
The explosion on Saturday at the Shahid Rajaee port, Iran's largest, triggered a fire that lasted for hours and emitted towering columns of black smoke, according to local authorities.
A statement released on Monday by the government committee investigating the blast said it had found evidence of 'failure to observe safety principles.' It added that investigators were seeking to identify those behind what it described as 'false statements' in the documentation of the cargo.
Iranian officials have told state news agencies that the cargo should have been identified as a shipment holding dangerous substances — the details of which they did not specify. Instead, the officials said, the shipment was classified and stored in the port as a container holding ordinary goods.
Video Surveillance footage from the port captured a growing fire before the explosion. Credit Credit... Reuters
The Iranian authorities have so far released little information as to where and when the shipment arrived, what substances were in the cargo, and which ship carried the goods into the port, which handles a substantial portion of the oil exports critical to supporting Iran's foundering economy.
A person with ties to Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps told The New York Times last week that the chemical set ablaze was sodium perchlorate, a major ingredient in solid fuel for missiles. The person spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss security matters.
The blast on Saturday was so powerful that forensics specialists were still working to identify 22 bodies from the 70 people declared dead, the provincial governor told official news agency IRNA on Monday. Among the nearly 1,200 people injured, state media said, some 120 were still being treated in hospitals.
The Shahid Rajaee port handled 85 percent of Iran's shipping container traffic last year, according to national statistics. It is situated in a southern region of Iran along the Strait of Hormuz, where the Persian Gulf meets the Gulf of Oman — one of the world's most critical shipping lanes for oil and gas.
In the past, the port been a target of foreign attack: Israel launched a cyberattack in 2020 that hampered operations at the port as part of its long-running shadow war with Iran. Neither Israeli or Iranian officials have made statements to indicate that last week's blast was the result of an attack.
In a television interview on Monday, Ebrahim Azizi, chairman of the Iranian parliament's security and foreign policy committee, eschewed any reference to an attack. He also did not respond to the interviewer's speculation as to whether the importer's false documentation might have been an attempt to save money.
In its statement, the committee vowed on Monday to make the results of its investigation public 'as soon as possible.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Iran accused of abducting journalist's family in retaliation for war coverage
Iran detained the family members of an Iran International journalist Saturday in retaliation for the channel's coverage of the country's war with Israel, threatening to hold them until the journalist resigned from her position. The London-based Farsi news channel said in a statement that it strongly condemns the abduction of its journalist's family, calling it 'an appalling act of hostage-taking aimed at coercing our colleague into resigning from their post.' 3 The London-based Farsi news channel said in a statement that it strongly condemns the abduction of its journalist's family. AFP via Getty Images 'This deeply reprehensible tactic marks a dangerous escalation in the regime's ruthless campaign to silence dissent and suppress independent journalism,' the news channel said. 3 The broadcaster said that Iran's paramilitary Revolutionary Guards took the presenter's mother, father and younger brother to an unidentified location. Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto/Shutterstock The detainment marks the latest example of Iran's longstanding effort to crack down not only on Iranian journalists inside the country but also those abroad who still have family and friends living in Iran. The Islamic Republic is one of the world's top jailer of journalists, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists, and in the best of times, reporters face strict restrictions. The broadcaster said that Iran's paramilitary Revolutionary Guards took the presenter's mother, father and younger brother to an unidentified location. The journalist, whose name the outlet did not disclose, then received a phone call from her father early Saturday, urging her to resign from her role, according to Iran International. The voices of security agents could be heard in the background telling her father what to say. 3 The journalist received a phone call from her father early Saturday, urging her to resign from her role, according to Iran International. Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto/Shutterstock 'I've told you a thousand times to resign. What other consequences do you expect?' Iran International said her father told her. 'You have to resign.' Farsi-language broadcasters like Iran International and BBC Persia have long been targets for the Islamic Republic, given the fact that they broadcast in the native language and many Iranians, both domestically and abroad, rely on them for news, especially of the most recent Iran-Israel war amid an official internet blackout. Iran International in particular has become a target of Tehran in recent years over its programming that is critical of the theocratic government in Tehran. The Iranian government has called the news outlet a terrorist organization. One of its journalists was stabbed in 2024 in an attack suspected to have been carried out by Iran, while men were arrested in a suspected plot to target others at the channel.
The Hill
4 hours ago
- The Hill
Threat of sleeper cells in US has ‘never been higher': CBP
The threat of sleeper cells in the U.S. has 'never been higher,' though there are no current specific threats, according to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). A memo sent Saturday from CBP Commissioner Rodney Scott, obtained by The Hill's sister network NewsNation, said 'thousands of Iranian nationals have been documented entering the United States illegally and countless more were likely in the known and unknown got-a-ways.' 'Though we have not received any specific credible threats to share with you all currently, the threat of sleeper cells or sympathizers acting on their own, or at the behest of Iran has never been higher,' Scott added. The memo urged CPB personnel to remain 'vigilant.' On Saturday, Trump announced that the U.S. had bombed three Iranian nuclear sites, stepping into an ongoing conflict between Iran and Israel. Iran's ambassador to the United Nations slammed the U.S.'s involvement in its conflict against Israel and said his nation's military would figure out its response following Trump's ordering of the bombing of the nuclear sites. NewsNation correspondent Rich McHugh said Friday on the network that 'experts that we've talked to said that should the U.S. join these strikes against Iran, they may try to activate these sleeper cells in the U.S. and the West.' On Sunday, retired Gen. Frank McKenzie, the former commander of U.S. Central Command (Centcom), said that he believed U.S. troops in Iraq and Syria were 'certainly vulnerable' to retaliatory attacks by Iran.
Time Magazine
7 hours ago
- Time Magazine
Vance Says U.S. 'Not at War With Iran' But Threats Mount
Vice President J.D. Vance has said that the United States is 'not at war with Iran,' despite U.S. strikes targeting three key Iranian nuclear sites overnight in what President Donald Trump called a "very successful attack." 'We're not at war with Iran, we're at war with Iran's nuclear program,' Vance said on Sunday during an appearance on NBC's Meet the Press. He doubled down on his point in other interviews throughout the day. Vance's response comes after Iran issued a furious warning to the U.S. The Iranian ambassador to the U.N., Amir Saeid Iravani, called for an emergency U.N. meeting to ensure "that the perpetrator of such heinous crimes is held fully accountable and does not go unpunished." Read More: Iran Delivers Furious Warning, Speaks of 'Unprecedented Level of Danger and Chaos' After 'Heinous' U.S. Strikes When addressing the nation in a televised address on Saturday night, Trump—flanked by Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth—warned Iran that if they were to retaliate, the U.S. would pursue other targets with "speed" and "precision." Now, with tensions seemingly at an all-time high, a National Terrorism Advisory published by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) on Sunday has added to the mounting concern. The notice, titled 'Summary of the Threat to the United States,' stated that the Iran conflict is "causing a heightened threat environment." 'Low-level cyber attacks against U.S. networks by pro-Iranian hacktivists are likely, and cyber actors affiliated with the Iranian government may conduct attacks against U.S. networks,' the advisory warned. 'Iran also has a long-standing commitment to target US Government officials it views as responsible for the death of an Iranian military commander killed in January 2020.' Iranian Major General Qasem Soleimani was assassinated on Jan. 3, 2020 by a drone missile strike ordered by Trump during his first term as President. Soleimani's death threatened to heighten tensions between the U.S. and Iran back in 2020, and some Iranian officials have since called for Trump to be put on trial or face revenge from Tehran. The advisory went on to say that 'hacktivists and Iranian government-affiliated actors' often target 'poorly secured U.S. networks and Internet-connected devices for disruptive cyber attacks.' It added that U.S. law enforcement has 'disrupted multiple potentially lethal Iranian-backed plots in the United States since 2020. During this timeframe, the Iranian government has also unsuccessfully targeted critics of its regime who are based in the Homeland for lethal attack.' A final warning stated that the ongoing conflict could also 'motivate violent extremists and hate crime perpetrators seeking to attack targets perceived to be Jewish, pro-Israel, or linked to the U.S. government or military in the Homeland.' Read More: How U.S. Strikes May Have Inadvertently Helped the Iranian Regime Amid concerns of a threat to the U.S., how have U.S. lawmakers responded to the strikes on Iran? Some in Trump's inner circle have praised his decision to strike Iran. "Good. This was the right call. The regime deserves it. Well done,' said Sen. Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican. Republican Sen. Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee echoed Trump's words, saying that 'peace can only be achieved through strength.' But many other U.S. lawmakers—both Republicans and Democrats—have outwardly disagreed with Trump, with some even calling for Trump's impeachment, since Congress was reportedly not consulted about the decision. During a rally on his 'Fighting Oligarchy' tour over the weekend, Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont called the strikes "grossly unconstitutional" as the crowd in Oklahoma chanted 'no more war.' 'All of you know that the only entity that can take this country to war is the U.S. Congress. The President does not have the right,' Sanders maintained. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, a Democrat who has been on the tour with Sanders, argued that the strikes are 'absolutely and clearly grounds for impeachment.' House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer both condemned Trump's actions and called for Congress to be briefed. In a statement, Jeffries said that Trump 'failed to deliver' on his promise of peace in the Middle East. 'The risk of war has now dramatically increased, and I pray for the safety of our troops in the region who have been put in harm's way,' he said. And the outrage has not just fallen on Democrats/ Republican Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky said the military action was 'not constitutional.' Trump responded with a lengthy post on Truth Social, stating that his Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement 'doesn't want [Massie], doesn't know him, and doesn't respect him.' He said that Massie is 'disrespectful to [America's] great military, and all that they stand for, not even acknowledging their brilliance and bravery in yesterday's attack, which was a total and complete WIN.' Meanwhile, Massie replied to a post from Speaker Mike Johnson via social media, asking: 'Why didn't you call us back from vacation to vote on military action if there was a serious threat to our country?' As many world leaders remain 'gravely alarmed' over the strikes and the increasing instability in the Middle East and beyond, the U.S. awaits a potential response from Iran, something Trump maintains would be a 'terrible mistake.'
