Sentencing hearing for disgraced Cree medicine man shows 'breathtaking impact' of sexual assaults
Warning: this story discusses sexual assault.
A Saskatoon prosecutor says that Cecil Wolfe's sexual assaults over nine years had a "breathtaking impact" on his victims and community.
"He breached a significant position of trust," prosecutor Lana Morelli said Tuesday at Court of King's Bench.
"The victims' own trauma was compounded by the sexual assaults by a trusted healer."
The 63-year-old pleaded guilty before Justice John Morrall in February to a dozen sexual assaults. Wolfe returned to court this week to hear from his victims and the submissions from Morelli, co-chair Maria Shupenia and defence lawyer Harvey Neufeld.
Both the defence and Crown say Wolfe will face time in a federal penitentiary. The defence is asking for a sentence in the four to five year range. The Crown is arguing for 10 years and nine months.
Morelli said the case presents unique challenges in terms of finding comparable cases as a reference for sentencing. Medical cases typically lack a spiritual component, while religious abuses lack the medical element.
"A medicine man is a symbol of culture, tradition, spirituality — and the healing as a doctor," she said.
The defence filed seven letters of support for Wolfe, but Morelli said one of the notes had a troubling aspect. It appears that Wolfe continued to treat at least one woman since his charges, "and this appears in violation of his release conditions."
She said the Crown is agreeing that so-called Gladue factors do play into the sentencing submissions — "he had a life shaped by colonialism" — but that his culture had not been stripped away.
Further, even though he only went to Grade 3 in his education, "he has 63 years of life experience," Morelli said.
"Lack of education does not mean he should not appreciate that his actions are wrong."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
a day ago
- CTV News
Jury finds Quebec man guilty on all charges in 2023 truck attack in Amqui, Que.
Steeve Gagnon is escorted by police into court in Amqui, Que., Tuesday, March 14, 2023. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jacques Boissinot RIMOUSKI — A Quebec man has been found guilty of all charges in a 2023 truck attack in a rural community that killed three men and injured nine other people. Forty-year-old Steeve Gagnon learned his fate following two days of deliberations by the jury, who returned with unanimous verdicts this evening. Gagnon was found guilty of three counts of first-degree murder and two counts of attempted murder of nine other people in March 2023 in Amqui, about 350 kilometres northeast of Quebec City. Quebec Superior Court Justice Louis Dionne immediately sentenced Gagnon to life in prison without possibility of parole for 25 years on the murder charges and 10 years for each of the attempted murder charges, to be served concurrently. The Crown had argued the acts that led to the deaths were intentional and premeditated, saying Gagnon had formed and adapted a plan that resulted in pedestrians being run down on the road as he accelerated his truck onto the sidewalk. The accused, meanwhile, had argued the deaths were an accident in a moment of inattention when he picked up an e-cigarette from the cab of his truck. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 21, 2025.
Toronto Sun
a day ago
- Toronto Sun
Jury finds Quebec man guilty in 2023 truck attack in Amqui, Que.
Published Jun 21, 2025 • 1 minute read A section of the 500-metre stretch of road where a pickup truck plowed into pedestrians in Amqui, Que., killing two and injuring nine, is shown on Tuesday, March 14, 2023. Photo by Jacques Boissinot / THE CANADIAN PRESS RIMOUSKI — A Quebec man has been found guilty of three counts of 1st degree murder in the deaths of three men he struck with his truck. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Steeve Gagnon learned his fate following two days of deliberation by the jury, who found him guilty on all counts. Gagnon was on trial for three counts of first-degree murder and two counts of attempted murder of nine other people in March 2023 in Amqui, about 350 kilometres northeast of Quebec City. The Crown had argued the acts that led to the deaths were intentional and premeditated, saying he had formed and adapted a plan that resulted in pedestrians being run down on the road as he accelerated his truck onto the sidewalk. The accused, meanwhile, had argued the deaths were an accident in a moment of inattention when he picked up an e-cigarette from the cab of his truck. More coming. Columnists World Toronto & GTA Columnists Columnists
Global News
2 days ago
- Global News
Man acquitted after B.C. judge rules he ‘likely' slashed woman but Crown couldn't prove it
A man accused of slashing a woman in the face in an apparent stranger attack in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside has been acquitted, even though the judge ruled it was 'more likely than not' that he was the accused. In a ruling delivered Thursday, Provincial Court Judge G.M. Rideout concluded that while it was possible Shone Robert Selbie was the attacker caught on CCTV, the evidence wasn't good enough to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. 'It wasn't me,' Selbie told Global News outside the court. 'That's why the judge found me innocent.' 'I look like the person in the video,' he added. Selibe, who turns 52 this year, had been charged with a single count of aggravated assault in Aug. 11, 2024 attack in the 400 block of Cordova Street that left a woman with a serious laceration on her cheek. Story continues below advertisement 1:53 Vancouver machete attacker sentenced CCTV footage captured from two social housing buildings on the block depicts a man hunched over and swaying and holding a box cutter in his hand. In the video, he can be seen putting a woman into a headlock, appearing to slash her face, and then casually walking away. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy The case hinged on the identity of the accused, and the Crown's ability to prove it. At trial, the Crown pointed to the CCTV images themselves, along with testimony from a Vancouver police officer who had interacted with Selbie twice that summer and identified him in court from the images. At trial, prosecutors argued Selbie had a distinctive face with prominent features, including crooked and pointy nose, high cheekbones, and sunken cheeks with deep-set eyes. On the stand, the officer further testified he was '100 per cent certain' Selbie was the person depicted in the CCTV images that had been compiled into a police information bulletin. Story continues below advertisement Selbie's defence argued the CCTV footage was of average quality, and never caught a clear full facial image of the attacker. It also noted that the officer had pointed to the attacker's Nike shoes as a distinctive identifying characteristic, but had incorrectly described the logo on them as black when it was actually white. 0:54 Vancouver police safety trailer vandalized in Downtown Eastside In acquitting Selbie, Rideout agreed the CCTV footage shows someone with a pointed nose, but acknowledged it never caught a full facial view of the suspect. 'Clearly there are some physical characteristics of the suspect in the CCTV footage consistent with the accused's appearance in court,' he ruled. 'I am unable to say with any confidence that the suspect in the CCTV footage is the accused before this court.' Story continues below advertisement The identifying officer, he added, does not have any special training in identification, and 'agreed in cross-examination that some of the characteristics he identifies as distinctive to the accused can also apply to other individuals.' Rideout noticed that in the CCTV footage, the suspect had a distinctive walk, a 'physical hunch-like walk consistent with drug addicts' known in the Downtown Eastside as the 'benzo gait.' The identifying officer, he said, never noticed anything distinctive about Selbie's gait in the two interactions he had with the accused that summer. 0:30 Vancouver police officer slashed with knife in Downtown Eastside Those interactions, together, lasted for about 45 minutes — not enough for his level of familiarity with Selbie to rise to the level of being 'so well acquainted' with him to make his identification 'certain and safe,' Rideout said. 'His recognition evidence is insufficiently reliable to assist the court in identifying the accused as the suspect in the identification bulletin,' Rideout ruled. Story continues below advertisement That led the judge to conclude that while Selbie was more likely than not the attacker, the Crown hadn't met the threshold of proof beyond a reasonable doubt. 'The inherent frailties of identification evidence are well known to the law and have been the subject of frequent judicial consideration and comment,' he said, quoting a legal precedent. 'We must, however, never regard these principles as trite. They are fundamental.'
