Say goodbye to Google Fi VPN and hello to VPN by Google
Google Fi offers a variety of perks for being a member, including access to the company's VPN. If you commonly use this VPN, get ready for a few changes to come your way.
As you may be aware, the VPN offered by the Google-owned MVNO is called 'Google Fi VPN.' At the same time, the Pixel 7 and up feature a built-in VPN experience known as ' VPN by Google .' According to 9to5Google , Google Fi is renaming its VPN to 'VPN by Google' to make branding more consistent. While the name is changing, it appears the service itself is staying the same, with no technical or functional changes for most Android or iOS users.
For Fi subscribers who own a Pixel 7 or newer, you'll now simply use the built-in VPN. This built-in VPN is better integrated with the system, making it a more seamless experience. Meanwhile, subscribers with other handsets will continue with the service they're already using.
One change that is coming is how you access VPN controls. Currently, you can go to Privacy & security in the Fi app to toggle the feature on or off. However, these controls will soon move to the Settings app. A message on the Privacy & security page reads:
VPN controls are moving: Beginning May 22, VPN controls are moving to Settings. To make sure your online activity is protected, turn on VPN by Google now.
If you tap on the 'Update VPN now' button in the message, the controls will be relocated to Settings. In place of the toggle, you'll now see a shortcut that will take you to where you can manage the feature.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk Makes Big Announcement About New Technology
The neurotechnology company co-founded by Elon Musk, Neuralink, is set for what could be world-changing human trials soon. Musk recently revealed that Neuralink will begin human trials for the company's first implants for vision within the next year. "In the next six to 12 months, we'll be doing our first implants for vision, where even if somebody is completely blind, we can write directly to the visual cortex," Musk said to Y Combinator on Thursday. Neuralink has already tested the implant on a monkey, and Musk says that the animal has had it for three years. He adds that the vision offered from the implant would be in low resolution at first, but will improve over time. "Long term, it'll be very high resolution and you'll be able to see multi-spectral wavelengths," Musk revealed. Musk said back in April that the vision of the people who use the implant "will exceed the best human eyes." The "Blindsight" implant will enable its users to see ultraviolet rays, infrared and radar "like a superpower situation," the Tesla CEO added. Neuralink's brain-computer interface (BCI) has already seen some success. The BCI was inserted into the brain of Noland Arbaugh, a paralyzed man who is now able to control computers with his thoughts thanks to the Musk Makes Big Announcement About New Technology first appeared on Men's Journal on Jun 21, 2025
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nvidia (NVDA) Rises After Cathie Wood Rebuilds $18.5M Stake Near All-Time High
Cathie Wood's Ark Innovation ETF (ARKK, Financials) resumed its position in Nvidia (NVDA, Financials), purchasing 128,163 shares valued at approximately $18.5 million on June 16, as the stock trades just 2.7% below its all-time high of $149.41. The move marks a reversal from 2022, when Wood exited her Nvidia position amid tightening U.S. export controls and macroeconomic concerns. She began rebuilding the stake in April following eased trade tensions and the Trump administration's decision to roll back AI-related export restrictions. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with NVDA. The buy came shortly after Nvidia reported fiscal first-quarter results on May 28, with adjusted earnings of 96 cents per share on $44.06 billion in revenue, beating expectations of 93 cents and $43.31 billion, respectively. For the July quarter, the company forecast $45 billion in revenue, nearly $1 billion below consensus estimates, citing the impact of chip restrictions to China. Nvidia said revenue would have been about $8 billion higher without those curbs. China accounted for 13% of the company's revenue in the past fiscal year. Despite geopolitical risks, Nvidia stock is up 8.3% year to date. Wood's purchase comes as Ark Innovation ETF gains momentum, rising 15.9% in 2025 through June 18, outpacing the S&P 500's 1.9% increase. Wood's strategy remains focused on innovation platforms such as artificial intelligence, robotics, and blockchain, with Nvidia seen as a core holding aligned with those themes. Her flagship fund, however, has faced volatility, including a 60% decline in 2022 and a five-year annualized return of negative 0.3%, compared with the S&P 500's 15.7%. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Better EV Stock: Ford vs. Tesla
Robotaxis aren't an optional extra for the car industry; they are the future of mobility. One company stands best placed to deliver affordable electric vehicles. The two companies could potentially become partners. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › -The comparison between Ford (NYSE: F) and Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) is valuable and valid because it speaks to where the auto industry is headed and highlights the relative position of each company as it moves toward electric vehicles and robotaxis. Whether it's a legacy automaker (Ford) or a dedicated battery electric vehicle company(Tesla), the key opportunities and challenges are the same. So, which company is better placed to thrive in the future? Tesla's launch of its full-self-driving (FSD) robotaxi is sometimes seen as a tactical move as its electric vehicle (EV) sales and market share come under pressure in 2025, but nothing could be further from the truth. The reality is that major automakers, including Ford, and leading technology companies have invested billions in robotaxis and autonomous driving, and it's an integral part of the future of the auto industry. The reason behind the investment is a recognition that robotaxis have huge profit potential, not least because they offer a long stream of recurring income from ride-per-mile revenue. Another reality is that EVs are not cheap, and if they are the future of the auto industry, automakers need to make them more affordable. They also need to offer robotaxis to make mobility more affordable. However, don't take my word for it. Here's Ford's CEO Jim Farley in 2019 on autonomous driving and robotaxis: "The self-driving system is incredibly important to develop, but it's just one part of building a safe and scalable self-driving service that consumers can trust." Farley went on to outline a timeline for a "commercial self-driving service" in 2021, which Ford would fail to achieve. As for affordable EVs, last year, Farley reiterated the need to offer smaller and more affordable EVs to achieve profitability as an EV maker. The two things are strongly connected. You can't have robotaxi EVs if the vehicles aren't affordable. That's a point that resonated during a recent CNBC interview with Waymo, which has a robotaxi service already in place, yet co-CEO Tekedra Mawakana declined to outline a timeline for the company's profitability. Waymo's lack of profitability means its owner, Alphabet, is going to have to invest significant sums, at a loss, if it wants Waymo to build scale. That creates a huge opportunity for a company like Tesla that is just entering the market and potentially offers a much more commercial and scalable service. Tesla's advantage in scaling robotaxis lies in its ability to transform existing Tesla vehicles into robotaxis, as well as its capability to produce a dedicated robotaxi, the Cybercab. Unlike Waymo, Tesla doesn't need to partner with automakers to build scale. Moreover, Musk has disclosed that Tesla has been in discussions about licensing its FSD to other automakers -- another route to long-term profitability. I'll cut to the chase. If Tesla can make automated driving and robotaxis work, then there's only one winner here, and it's Tesla. First, Ford is a long way from having a profitable EV business. For example, its Model E segment lost $5.1 billion in 2024, and then $849 million in the first quarter of 2025. Ford sold 22,550 EVs in the first quarter, implying it lost almost $38,000 on every EV sold. Moreover, its EV models, the Mustang Mach-E, the F-150 Lightning, and the E-Transit, are far from being affordable EVs. In contrast, Tesla generated $7.1 billion in operating profit in 2024. Despite losing market share amid declining sales, it still dominated the U.S. market, holding 43.5% of the market in the first quarter of 2025. Ford was a distant second with 7.7%. Both Ford and Tesla are planning to release low-cost models in the future, but given Ford's ongoing losses, Tesla's profitability, and its ability to lower its average cost per car, down from above $38,000 in early 2023 to below $35,000 in late 2024, the latter looks far better positioned to do so sustainably. Ford backed off its robotaxi/FSD plans in 2022, following the shutdown of Argo AI by Ford and Volkswagen after years of heavy investment. The company had been created to develop the technology and received billions of dollars in investment from Ford and Volkswagen. For reference, General Motors has also ended robotaxi development. In contrast, Tesla is preparing for the official launch of its unsupervised FSD/robotaxi service in Austin, Texas, this month, and it may be live by the time you read this article. While the launch will be small and highly contained, it still marks the birth of Tesla's robotaxi offering. Musk believes Tesla will have a dedicated, low-cost robotaxi, the Cybercab, in volume production by 2026. Indeed, Ford may end up licensing FSD from Tesla, and to his great credit, Farley has indicated an openness to partnering on FSD. There is no guarantee that Tesla's robotaxi or FSD will be successful, and investors need to closely monitor events. Moreover, Musk has a history of being overly optimistic on such matters. That said, the major automakers have been and are still pursuing the idea of lower-cost EVs and robotaxis and automated driving, and currently, Tesla remains the best-positioned company to meet those aims. It's where the industry wants to be, and Tesla is in pole position. Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this. On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $373,066!* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $38,158!* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $664,089!* Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join , and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.*Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Lee Samaha has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet and Tesla. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Better EV Stock: Ford vs. Tesla was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
