Leaving Cert history: A tricky paper where students were pushed to think on their feet
Students may have been thrown by questions with narrower focuses on the higher-level history exam, while the reappearance of topics from last year will have upset some, teachers have said.
Stephen Tonge, a history teacher at the Institute of Education, said that students faced a very tricky paper that pushed them to edit together elements of topics under pressure.
'Students who opened section one's documents-based question will be pleased with the topic of the Jarrow March,' said Mr Tonge.
'While document B was perhaps a little longer than you'd like for such a pressurised environment, the first three questions were very approachable.
READ MORE
'At question four, the challenge increases. Being asked to 'argue your case' on the failure of the march is an unusually narrow focus and while students could easily approach it, and it would tax them to write a fully robust answer in order to get the marks.'
Leaving Cert history, higher level: later modern:
Studyclix
subject expert Jamie Dockery, a teacher at Tyndall College in Carlow said that, at first glance, the exam may have looked like a daunting prospect for students.
'Many will have been surprised not to see questions on Charles Stewart Parnell or the Montgomery Bus Boycott,' Mr Dockery said.
'Those who placed all their bets on these topics – undoubtedly a sizeable number – will be bitterly disappointed.'
Mr Tonge said that the most surprising element of the paper was topic five: politics and society in Northern Ireland, 1949-93.
'The questions themselves were not particularly difficult but three of the four questions returned to topics from last year's exam.
Leaving Cert history, higher level, early modern:
'In a curriculum as vast as history, students and teachers often must prioritise some elements over others, and the reappearance of questions on Lord Brookeborough and the Coleraine University Controversy will be an unpleasant surprise.
'If students had thoroughly prepared this case study, they would be fine, but many would not have anticipated a second outing for such comparatively minor elements of the topic,' said Mr Tonge.
There was, however, there was much to be pleased with in the paper, said Mr Dockery.
'The 'movements for reform' section featured an interesting question comparing the successes of Michael Davitt and James Larkin, two reformers with shared ideals but from different eras.
'Éamon de Valera was widely expected to appear on the paper, given that this year marks the 50th anniversary of his death – and 'the long fellow' didn't disappoint. The question was broad, covering his role in the Treaty negotiations, the Civil War, and World War II.
'As with last year's paper, women featured prominently, with questions on Isabella Tod, Hanna Sheehy-Skeffington, Bernadette Devlin, Mary Robinson, Sylvia Meehan, Simone de Beauvoir, and Nadine Gordimer,' said Mr Dockery.
Mr Tonge said that 'Europe and the wider world' topics were also varied and offered the well-prepared candidate the opportunity to do well.
Ordinary
On the ordinary-level paper, Mr Dockery said it had many similarities to the higher-level exam.
'It can often be more predictable and accessible in that its higher-level counterpart – should have been generally well received by students and teachers. Again, the Jarrow March was the focus of the documents-based question,' he said.
'I very much welcome the higher and ordinary-level exam having similar questions, particularly considering that the average senior history groups will have higher and ordinary-level students learning together in the one class.'
Many of the main personalities from Irish History found their way into the exam including O'Connell, Yeats, Davitt, Douglas Hyde, Collins, Cosgrave and de Valera, he said.
'Women were also well represented in the guise of Hanna Sheehy-Skeffington and Countess Markievicz and Maureen O'Hara, among others.
'The 'Europe and the Wider World' topics were also varied and offered the well-prepared candidate the opportunity to do well,' said Mr Dockery.
Leaving Cert history, ordinary level:
Try this one at home:
-Leaving Cert history, section two, topic one:
Ireland: Topic 1 Ireland and the Union, 1815-1870
1. What was the impact of the Great Famine on life in Ireland both during and after the Famine, 1845-1870?
2. What did Young Ireland and Fenianism contribute to Irish nationalism?
3. In what ways did Cardinal Paul Cullen influence political attitudes and religious practices? 4. What developments took place in science and technology, 1815-1870?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
30 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Upgrade of A5 road to Derry quashed by High Court in Belfast
A decision by Northern Ireland's Executive to proceed with the upgrade of the A5 road to Derry has been quashed at the High Court in Belfast. Mr Justice McAlinden told the court that he was aware his ruling would bring 'fresh anguish' to the families of those who lost loved ones on the road, but said the proposed scheme breached elements of the Climate Change Act 2022. The North's Infrastructure Minister Liz Kimmins was at the Royal Courts of Justice to hear the ruling on Monday. The Executive gave the green light for the long-awaited upgrade to the A5 in October. READ MORE However, judicial review proceedings were brought against the Department for Infrastructure by nine applicants, including residents, farmers and landowners opposed to the £1.2 billion (€1.4 billion) scheme. There have been more than 50 deaths on the A5, one of the North's main road arteries that links Derry with Aughnacloy in Co Tyrone, since 2006. The road connects the northwest – Donegal and Derry – to Dublin through regional towns including Strabane and Omagh. A scheme to turn the road into a dual carriageway was first approved by the Executive in 2007 but it has been held up by legal challenges and uncertainty over funding. This is the third time in 18 years that approval for the road's upgrade has been overturned in court. Many relatives and friends of people killed and injured on the road have long campaigned for a modernised road to improve public safety on the route. Justice McAlinden acknowledged in his judgment that it was 'likely that delays in the progression of this scheme will coincide with the occurrence of further loss of life and serious injury on the existing road'. But he added that 'the decision to proceed with the scheme must be taken in accordance with the law'. 'The principle of the rule of law cannot be subverted, even if the motivation for doing so is to achieve what is deemed to constitute a clear societal benefit.' – Press Associatio n
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Slow ‘pace of disclosure' leads to Omagh bombing inquiry delay
The public inquiry into the 1998 Omagh bombing will not begin examining the atrocity itself until next year due to the 'pace of disclosure', a senior lawyer has said. In opening remarks on Monday, Paul Greaney KC, senior counsel to the inquiry, said he had 'hoped and expected to be further advanced than we are'. He said chapter three of the inquiry, which 'will consider the bombing itself', would commence in March of next year. 'That gap of nine months between Chapter Two and Chapter Three is unfortunate, in our view, and is a further consequence of the pace of disclosure to the inquiry,' Mr Greaney said. READ MORE 'The speed of disclosure to the inquiry by material providers must increase, and that is why we repeat the need for the state core participants and indeed all material providers to work at pace to fulfil the requirements of the inquiry and to ensure that the necessary resources, both human and financial, are dedicated to that work.' A total of 31 people, including unborn twins, died and hundreds were injured when a car bomb planted by the dissident republican group the Real IRA exploded in the centre of Omagh on August 15th, 1998. The inquiry, which opened last year, was ordered by the UK government to examine whether the atrocity could reasonably have been prevented by British state authorities. During a four-week sitting in the Strule Arts Centre in Omagh earlier this year, the inquiry heard emotional testimony from bereaved relatives who delivered pen portraits of their loved ones, as well as from the injured and first responders. It resumed on Monday for two days to hear opening statements from core participants to the inquiry. The core participants include the bereaved and injured and state authorities including the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) and the Northern Secretary. Mr Greaney said he was 'grateful' for the efforts of the PSNI to allocate resources to the inquiry, and he was 'not today advancing criticisms of any material' but was 'simply setting out our expectations as the inquiry moves forward'.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Irish applicants for US education visas must make social media profiles public, embassy says
Irish students seeking US educational and exchange visas will be required to make their social media profiles public to allow officials to review their online activity, the US Embassy in Dublin has said. In a statement on Monday, the embassy said the US State Department is 'committed to protecting our nation and our citizens by upholding the highest standards of national security and public safety through our visa process'. 'A US visa is a privilege, not a right,' it said. The embassy said visa applicants will be required to list all social media usernames or handles for every platform they have used from the last five years on their visa application form so these accounts can be vetted. READ MORE 'Applicants certify that the information in their visa application is true and correct before they sign and submit. Omitting social media information could lead to visa denial and ineligibility for future visas,' the embassy said. The approach will apply to all foreign students applying for visas to enter the US. The embassy's statement added that under new guidance 'we will conduct a comprehensive and thorough vetting, including online presence, of all student and exchange visitor applicants in the F, M, and J nonimmigrant classifications'. 'We use all available information in our visa screening and vetting to identify visa applicants who are inadmissible to the United States, including those who pose a threat to US national security,' the embassy said. 'To facilitate this vetting, all applicants for F, M, and J nonimmigrant visas will be instructed to adjust the privacy settings on all of their social media profiles to 'public'.' The embassy said every visa adjudication was 'a national security decision' and that the US 'must be vigilant' that those applying for admission 'do not intend to harm Americans and our national interests'. US president Donald Trump's administration paused issuing new education visas late last month as it considered new social media vetting rules. The Dublin embassy said it would soon resume scheduling appointments for F, M, and J nonimmigrant visa applications.
