I&B Ministry cautions media outlets against live coverage of defence operations in Pahalgam
NEW DELHI: The Indian Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (MI&B) on Saturday issued an advisory requesting media outlets, especially television news channels, to refrain from showing live coverage of defense operations related to the
The ministry urged news agencies, social media users and all media platforms to exercise "utmost responsibility and adhere strictly to existing laws and regulations" while reporting on matter concerning defence and other security related actions "in the interest of the national security."
The ministry further stated that specifically 'no real-time coverage', dissemination of visuals, or 'source-based reporting' should be undertaken.
"Premature disclosure of sensitive information may inadvertently assist hostile elements and endanger operational effectiveness and the safety of personnel… Past incidents have underscored the importance of responsible reporting. During events such as the Kargil war, the 26/11 Mumbai terror attack, and the Kandahar hijacking, unrestricted coverage had unintended adverse consequences on national interests," read the advisory.
On April 22, 2025, terrorists opened fire in Pahalgam's Baisaran meadow, killing 25 tourists, one local, and injuring several others.
Noting that media, digital platforms, and individuals play a vital role in safeguarding national security, the ministry said that besides legal obligations, it is a 'shared moral responsibility' to ensure that our collective actions don't compromise ongoing operations or the security of our forces.
Drawing attention towards the Cable Television Networks (Amendment) Rules, 2021, the advisory said that such a telecast is in violation of those regulations and the violators are liable for action.
'Media coverage may be restricted to periodic briefing by an office designated by the appropriate Government till such operation concludes. All stakeholders are requested to continue exercising vigilance, sensitivity and responsibly in courage, upholding the highest standards in the service of the nation,' the advisory stated.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
37 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Midnight Hammer' to Strait of Hormuz: 10 new developments after US bombs Iran's nuclear facilities
Tensions between the United States, Iran, and Israel escalated dramatically on Sunday after US airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, which President Donald Trump claimed had 'completely and fully obliterated' key sites. The attacks have triggered a deadly wave of retaliatory strikes, international condemnation, and fears of a wider regional war. On Saturday night, US President Donald Trump confirmed that the US military had struck three of Iran's nuclear sites—Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. Trump declared the facilities 'completely and fully obliterated." Senior Pentagon officials on Sunday detailed a highly secretive and coordinated military operation against Iran, calling it a demonstration of American air and naval power at its most effective. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, both spoke publicly, though neither could confirm whether Iran retained the ability to produce a nuclear weapon. Hegseth reiterated President Trump's claim from the previous night that the nuclear sites had been 'obliterated.' General Caine did not. Caine said a final battle damage assessment was still pending, but initial reports indicated that all three targeted Iranian nuclear sites had sustained 'severe damage and destruction.' A US official has confirmed that B-2 bombers flew non-stop for 37 hours from Missouri to carry out the strikes. The global nuclear watchdog, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), has said that there has been 'no radiation leak' from any nuclear facility in Pakistan after the escalated military engagement with India. The Vienna-based global nuclear watchdog's reply, to a query from The Indian Express, ties in with the earlier response by the Indian Air Force that India has not hit any target in Pakistan's Kirana Hills, which is reported to house some nuclear installations. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi announced on Sunday that he will travel to Moscow later in the day to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin on Monday morning. In a post on X, Araghchi condemned the United States, accusing it of a grave violation of the UN Charter, international law, and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) by attacking Iran's nuclear facilities. A representative of Iran's Supreme Leader said it is now Iran's turn to respond. He called for missile strikes on US naval forces in Bahrain and closure of the Strait of Hormuz to Western vessels. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi warned, 'They crossed a very big red line… We have to respond based on our legitimate right for self-defence." Several areas in central and northern Israel, including Nes Ziona, Rishon Lezion, Haifa, and a neighbourhood in Tel Aviv, were struck by Iranian missiles, according to Israeli state media and Fars News Agency. Videos show significant destruction in Tel Aviv. Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps warned the US to 'expect regrettable responses' in response to its strikes on Tehran's nuclear sites, state TV reported. Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu praised Trump, calling the strike 'a pivot of history.' UN Secretary-General António Guterres warned of 'a dangerous escalation,' and Pakistan condemned the US strike. Oman, previously mediating talks, called the attack a 'serious violation of international law. Iran's ambassador to the UN, Amir Saeid Iravani, has also called for an emergency Security Council meeting. In a letter to the UN, he described the US strikes as 'heinous attacks and illegal use of force.' Russia has "strongly condemned" bombings, calling the attacks "irresponsible" and a "gross violation of international law". Iran's Parliament has approved the closing of the Strait of Hormuz, though the final decision will be taken by the Supreme National Security Council, Iran's Press TV reported. The Strait is in the territorial waters of Iran and Oman, and accounts for a big bulk of the world's oil trade. Iran has in the past threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz on multiple occasions, but has never actually done it. The heightened risk of the closure is bound to raise concerns globally, including in India, particularly with regard to oil and gas supply security, and could lead to a jump in energy prices. India is the world's third-largest consumer of crude oil and depends on imports to meet over 85 per cent of its requirement. Israel closed its airspace as a precaution after the US strikes, though land crossings into Egypt and Jordan remain open, according to the Israel Airports Authority. Trump, speaking Sunday, said no military 'could have done what the US military has done.' He warned Iran of 'far greater' future attacks if it does not choose peace. 'There will either be peace or tragedy for Iran,' he said, adding that he acted 'as a team' with Netanyahu. The 'bunker buster' MOP is designed to attack 'deeply-buried facilities and hardened bunkers and tunnels' and is meant to destroy targets in well-protected facilities. Israel, or any country other than the US, does not have any non-nuclear weapon systems that can penetrate a site as deep as Fordow. A never-before-used American bomb — the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator, or MOP — which is extremely heavy and can only be dropped using the B-2 Spirit stealth bomber aircraft of the US Air Force was used for the bombing. The latest strike seems to have achieved that target, even though the extent of damage at Fordow is still under speculation, primarily because of the depth of the enrichment site.
Indian Express
42 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Bombay HC disposes plea against loudspeaker use at Thakur village in Kandivali, asks petitioners to seek remedy under law
The Bombay High Court disposed of a writ plea seeking prohibition on the use of loudspeakers and other noise-emitting devices at a public premises in Thakur village, Kandivali (East). The court asked the petitioners to approach the authority concerned for the remedy available as per law. A bench of Chief Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice Sandeep V Marne on June 18 made the observation while hearing a plea filed by activist Bhavesh Premchand Kalia and lawyer Rajeev Kumar Sharma, who are also local residents, through advocate Reena Rolland. The plea sought direction to the Mumbai police commissioner to immediately prohibit the use of loudspeakers and direct the state government to strictly implement the Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000. The plea also sought direction to the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) to take over the complete possession of the said public premises and regulate its use for the welfare of residents of Thakur village by developing it into a garden as per the original Development Plan and stop commercial misuse of the public property. It sought direction to the government to declare the premises a silent zone, considering its proximity to three schools, colleges, and hospitals. The petitioners claimed that while in 2015, the Thakur Public Schools 1 & 2 and Oxford International School were designated as part of the silence zone, they were excluded in 2017. Later, as per the plea, the BMC in the same year confirmed that it had taken over the public premises in question, which were initially given to Thakur College of Science and Commerce. Despite the same, the plea claimed that the premises continued to be in unauthorised possession and used by certain influential private individuals. The petitioners added that the police had granted permission for the use of loudspeakers on the said public premises in 2023, but they did not monitor decibel levels. They added that despite residents making several complaints against BMC and police authorities, no action was taken. Advocates Hare Krishna Mishra and Kunal Jha representing Thakur Educational Trust opposed the plea. They argued that the issues involved in the present plea had already been adjudicated in previous high court decisions involving larger consideration of noise pollution norms. 'In case if any one is acting in violation of the directions issued by the Division Bench of this Court in the aforesaid decision, it is open for the petitioners to take recourse to such remedies as may be available to them in law,' the HC bench said and disposed of the plea.
India.com
43 minutes ago
- India.com
Why Netanyahu Thanked Donald Trump in English After US Bombed Irans Nuclear Facilities?
New Delhi: On Sunday morning, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addressed the nation not in Hebrew but in English. The unusual choice was not accidental. His message was meant for more than just Israelis. Netanyahu was delivering an update on the latest developments in the conflict between Israel and Iran. And during that address, he praised U.S. President Donald Trump for authorising the bombing of Iranian nuclear sites. There was a noticeable sense of triumph in Netanyahu's voice. A faint smile lingered on his face. And perhaps it was fitting. He has spent much of his political life warning the world that Iran poses an existential threat to Israel. For over 15 years, he has lobbied U.S. presidents, diplomats and defense chiefs to consider military action as the only real answer to Iran's nuclear ambitions. Now, he stood before cameras as American B-2 bombers struck Iranian facilities. And he called Trump's decision 'historic' and 'bold'. He may as well have congratulated himself. After all, Netanyahu had managed to shift the stance of Trump, who had long campaigned against foreign military entanglements and whose conservative voter base had shown little enthusiasm for any war involving Israel. This moment did not arrive without internal resistance. U.S. intelligence agencies had long questioned Israel's claim that Iran was racing toward a nuclear bomb. They had not seen concrete evidence that Tehran had made that decision. And yet, despite these doubts, American warplanes were now targeting Iranian facilities. From the beginning of this conflict, now entering its second week, Israeli officials repeatedly insisted that they could handle Iran alone. But behind closed doors, it was clear that only American weaponry could breach the kind of hardened underground bunkers where Iran had placed its key nuclear assets. Especially in Fordow, the site buried deep within a mountain. If the sites bombed on June 22 morning are truly out of commission, Netanyahu will feel he has reached a turning point. For him, this may be the closest moment yet to declaring victory in a long battle. However, Iran claims it had already removed its nuclear material from the sites before the strikes. That claim will be hard to verify anytime soon. Without U.S. involvement, Israel would have continued chipping away at targets across Iran, its military leaders, nuclear scientists, infrastructure and enrichment sites. But there was never going to be a moment of closure. Unless, perhaps, regime change happened in Tehran. 'America Will Hit Back With Full Force' The B-2 jets may have changed the shape of this conflict. But whether this becomes an ending or a deeper escalation now depends on Iran and its allies. Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei had warned last week that any U.S. involvement would trigger retaliation. 'Americans must understand that any interference by their forces will lead to irreparable damage,' he said. His words may soon be tested. On June 21, Yemen's Houthi rebels, staunch allies of Tehran, threatened to attack U.S. vessels in the Red Sea if Washington escalated its role in the war. With that, U.S. troops, embassies and civilians across the Middle East could all become potential targets. Iran has a variety of options. It could strike U.S. bases in the Gulf. It could disrupt oil shipping routes – spiking global fuel prices. Or it could activate proxy groups across Syria, Lebanon, Iraq or beyond. The United States, for now, says its military operation is over. There is no appetite in Washington for toppling the Iranian government. That message could be a quiet invitation for Iran to keep its response limited. Tehran might choose symbolic retaliation – strikes that send a message without triggering a full-scale war. That is how Iran responded back in 2020, when Trump ordered the killing of General Qassem Soleimani. Iran launched a barrage of missiles at U.S. bases, but casualties were minimal. Still, on June 21 night, Trump issued a fresh warning, saying any retaliation from Iran would be met with overwhelming force. And now, on June 22 morning, the Middle East holds its breath – wondering whether this was the beginning of a resolution, or just the calm before a more devastating storm.
