Shame on you, Labour. How can you still sell arms to Israel?

Sandy Slater, Stirling.
• What appalling, deeply distressing scenes were screened on Channel 4 News on Tuesday night with people in Gaza desperate for food being mown down by Israeli Defence Force bullets.
Former UK Supreme Court senior judge Lord Sumption was interviewed on the programme and said he believed Israel was committing gross breaches of international humanitarian law in Gaza by killing on an indiscriminate scale. He also opined that genocide was the most plausible explanation for what was taking place.
Gaza is now in ruins with most of its infrastructure, hospitals, schools and other public buildings shattered beyond repair. People are starving, hundreds are being slaughtered every week and children are suffering unimaginable horrors. Why oh why are our Labour MPs not up in arms; how can they watch this deteriorating catastrophe every night on TV news and do nothing? Why is Scottish Secretary Ian Murray not leading a delegation to Westminster to demand we stop supplying Israel with arms as of now?
I truly despair.
Alan Woodcock, Dundee.
Read more letters
Scotland could be Ground Zero
With great fanfare, Keir Starmer and John Healey this week revealed that the mysterious magic money tree, never available for things that people need but always in full blossom for incendiary hardware, is once again being shaken down for "defence".
Meanwhile, a former director of Russia analysis at the CIA tells the journal Foreign Policy that "the Russians recently revised their nuclear-use doctrine, and one of the things that they specifically said in there was that if there are attacks by an adversary on important state or military infrastructure that would disrupt responses, potentially by Russia's nuclear forces, that is potentially a trigger for Russian nuclear use".
The fact that Ukraine is a non-nuclear nation becomes irrelevant, because it is perceived to be enabled by the US and Nato, which ARE nuclear powers, ergo justifying a potential nuclear response.
Long ago, a Westminster political correspondent said that if there were to be a nuclear war, he was certain that in the aftermath I would be saying "I told you so" [as a former chair of CND]. It gives me no pleasure at all to say we are very possibly nearing that stage, and none of the things Messrs Healey and Starmer have announced would make any difference, even if we already had them.
I don't need to remind anybody where Ground Zero in Europe is. Oh yes, aside from the US submarines currently in the Atlantic, Scotland would be the most significant target. In fact, in US nuclear war planning, it's always been "independent". It's called Unit 11.
Marjorie Ellis Thompson, Edinburgh.
PM is right over Russia
Hugh Kerr's 'the Russians are not our enemies' claim (Letters, June 3 on the basis that 'they lost 20 million people helping us defeat Nazi Germany', is I suggest delusional. Firstly, Stalin, who murdered millions of his own citizens, not least in Ukraine, before the war, was an ally of Hitler, until Hitler betrayed him and invaded the Soviet Union. Then the Soviets became our allies on the basis that our enemy's enemy was our ally, but certainly not in reality our friend. Nor is Putin's dictatorship, murderers of civilians, abductors of children and suppressors of political opposition, the kind of friend I would wish to have. It is only too clear that his invasion of Ukraine is just the start of his dream of expanding westwards.
Whatever Keir Starmer's failings, he is right to warn of the threat that Putin's Russia poses to European liberal democracy, of which the citizens of these islands are a fundamental part. By relying on American heft, Europe, UK included, has for too long under-invested in defence. With Donald Trump in the White House, those days are over. We must shoulder that burden ourselves because a government's first responsibility is the defence and safety of its people, and we know the price of appeasement. As the Romans had it: "Si vis pacem, para bellum' – if you want peace, prepare for war.
Roy Pedersen, Inverness.
Despairing of the SNP
Where does one even begin with the SNP? No, to £2.5 million to one of Scotland's and the UK's cutting-edge employers ("SNP in munitions ban hypocrisy row over Ferguson Marine", heraldscotland, June 3); yes to £2.5m to promote a language that virtually no one in Scotland speaks or even comprehends.
Then, the leader and his prospective candidate in the Hamilton by-election disagree on how to manage child poverty, an issue that's been an awful by-product of capitalism since that economic system became dominant ("SNP candidate Loudon takes different stance on the Scottish Child Payment from Swinney", The Herald, June 4). You'd think that a party who'd been in power for 18 years would have the perfect opportunity to come up with fresh ideas on how to eradicate child poverty, and many other of society's problems.
But wait, if that government is the parochial SNP, whose total stock of ideas, strategies and tactics amounts to how to make Westminster and the UK look bad, then none of our problems is addressed, and you end up with our leading Scottish politician eating rusks with two-year-olds, rather than talking to fellow politicians about the defence of the UK which, last time I looked, included Scotland.
Stuart Brennan, Glasgow.
Capital woes will get worse
Edinburgh's woes continue with the £1.7bn sea of debt that is only going to get bigger ("Edinburgh faced with £1.7 billion 'sea of debt' amid fears for services", The Herald, June 4) This is symptomatic of the general situation in Scotland as a whole under the less than careful guidance of the SNP. Large debts accrue because of reckless spending and suddenly taxes must rise to cover this but it is never quite enough and so the cycle goes on ever upward. There is a limit and it has already been breached.
Edinburgh wants to introduce a visitor levy, and is also mooting a congestion zone tax on cars. Elsewhere, taxes on cruise ship passengers are in the pipeline. This will actually lead to the exact opposite effect, a drop in revenue as people go elsewhere. If Scots return an SNP administration in 2026 all this will continue until the penny finally drops with Holyrood, that is once it has sorted out its toilet rules properly. Scotland is going down the pan.
Dr Gerald Edwards, Glasgow.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer and with Defence Secretary John Healey (Image: PA)
Flip side of the equation
Once again Guy Stenhouse seems determined to present his jigsaw but with several key pieces missing ("Public sector workers who refuse to come into the office should be sacked", The Herald, May 31). He makes rather sweeping assumptions about Tesco and Aldi and suggests that their performance in one field somehow equips them, or other private sector organisations, to deliver important public services.
To take the examples he cites, Tesco and Aldi can certainly be considered successful if profit levels are the only factor taken into account – £3.1 billion and £553 million respectively. At face value, he might be entitled to think he has a case.
However he might want to consider other significant figures in this equation such as the fact that 30% of children in the UK are now living in poverty. He might also want to look at the exponential rise in food banks in recent years and the fact that over three million people last year were having to make use of them. While there are many factors giving rise to this situation, I believe it does call into question the "success" of the supermarkets if their pricing policies are putting their products beyond the reach of a significant number of people, particularly the most vulnerable.
Mr Stenhouse might consider taking a more measured view the next time he wants to offer up another "private sector good/public sector bad" rant.
Andy Crichton, Cupar.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Daily Mirror

an hour ago

• Daily Mirror

Russia 'preparing new military operations in Europe', Zelensky warns

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has said Russia is preparing military operations beyond the borders of Ukraine, according to a report from its military intelligence chief President Volodymyr Zelensky has claimed Ukraine has intelligence that Vladimir Putin's Russia is preparing military operations in Europe. Mr Zelensky made the comments following a report from Kyrylo Budanov, the chief of Ukraine 's military intelligence, and said the 'Russian leadership' is 'preparing new military operations on European territory'. The Ukrainian president said Ukraine is 'preparing joint decisions for defence, in particular with the United Kingdom and the European Union ' and that allies would be informed. He did not reveal further details contained in the report or expand on what 'evidence' was included. ‌ ‌ Details of planned operations by Russia, when they are expected or countries that could be targeted were not shared by Zelensky. In is comments made on the social media app X, he also said Ukraine is "observing a continued intellectual decline within the Russian leadership". Mr Zelensky also praised economic sanctions on Russia, saying they were causing "tangible damage". This week, Putin received a stark warning from Russian economy minister Maxim Reshetnikov, who said Russia's economy is "on the verge" of transitioning to a recession. Putin, in a speech at the St Petersburg International Economic Forum, mentioned the recession warnings but emphasised that 'it mustn't be allowed'. Ukraine has previously warned of the potential for Russian aggression beyond Ukraine, with the chief of Ukraine's foreign intelligence, the SZRU, suggesting in May that Russia would be able to rearm between two to four years after the war in Ukraine ends. Similar comments came from NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte at the beginning of June. Speaking at Chatham House, Mr Rutte said that 'danger will not disappear even when the war in Ukraine ends,' The Guardian reported. The Mirror has approached the UK's Ministry of Defence (MoD) for comment. Following the publication of the strategic defence review (SDR) this month, defence secretary John Healey said plans to boost the UK's military muscle is a 'message to Moscow'. ‌ The Government has pledged £1.5 billion to set up at least six factories, and will support the procurement of up to 7,000 UK-built long-range weapons in response to the strategic defence review (SDR) to be published on Monday. The new funding will see UK munitions spend hit £6 billion during this parliament and support around 1,800 jobs throughout the country. Sir Keir Starmer has called the review a 'radical blueprint' and pledged a 'wave of investments' in shipbuilding, drone technology and cyber defences. A cyber command to counter cyber attacks from state-linked sources is being set up as part of the review. The PM has committed to spend 2.5 percent of gross domestic product on defence from April 2027, with a goal of increasing that to three percent over the next parliament – a timetable which could stretch to 2034. At the same time, Mr Rutte is pushing NATO members to reach five percent of GDP although he has given no deadline for the target. Shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick welcomed the Government's pledge to increase defence spending but said he was 'sceptical' as to whether the Chancellor would make good on the plans. Mr Jenrick said the UK should reach three percent of GDP spending on defence 'within this parliament'.

The National

3 hours ago

• The National

Holyrood must yet again mitigate against harm caused by Westminster

This announcement, just like the Scottish Child Payment, is progressive, and tackling child poverty at source. Time and time again the Scottish Government are having to mitigate against the harmful policies from Westminster, just like they did with Westminster's abolition of the universal Winter Fuel Payment. READ MORE: Scottish Government names date for ditching two-child cap Those mitigating measures along with the public outcry resulted in a U-turn by the Labour government at Westminster and rightly so. On the pressing and urgent issue of child poverty, can we expect a U-turn from Westminster with the immediate withdrawal of the damaging two-child cap on benefits? Catriona C Clark Falkirk

The National

4 hours ago

• The National

With independence, Scotland could become a beacon for peace

Firstly Scotland is acting as a staging post for the US bombing missions in Iran and their assistance to Israel's war. Prestwick Airport, which is owned by the Scottish Government, has seen large numbers of US war plans landing and being refuelled on their way to wage war on Iran and to assist the Israeli war effort. It's time the Scottish Government closed this route for war by banning US war planes at Prestwick. READ MORE: Scotland may be 'complicit in war crimes' allowing US to use Prestwick Secondly, if this war in the Middle East extends to a global war, Scotland's nuclear base at Faslane will be the number one target for attack, and if it's hit then much of Glasgow will disappear. Surely it's time that this expensive and ineffective nuclear base was closed. Thirdly, Scottish arms industries are supplying the Israeli war machines with vital spare parts and it's time this was ended. Of course I realise that none of this can be achieved while Scotland is part of the UK and where Starmer's Labour government is guilty of failing to condemn Israel for genocide in Gaza or the US for its warlike interventions. Instead, they are grovelling to Trump in the hope of crumbs from his table. Support for Scottish independence has reached a new high of 56% recently. Let's turn that into a pro-independence majority in the Scottish Parliament elections next year. If that happens, the Scottish Parliament should declare our independence, end our complicity in war and instead make Scotland a beacon for peace in the world. Hugh Kerr (former MEP) Edinburgh ARE nuclear weapons defensive or offensive? It seems the answer depends on whether the UK Government is talking about a lauded 'friend' or a condemned 'foe', a supposedly 'democratically elected' President or a supposedly 'expertly elected' Ayatollah. The obscene devastation in Gaza and unabated slaughter of its people on the pretext of responding to the horrendous terrorist acts of October 7 is a totally disproportionate portend of what an expansionist, war-mongering, fanatical regime might impose on the rest of the Middle East if Iran is neutered militarily. This may suit Western governments (which appear to have learned little from the catastrophic consequences of war rhetoric ahead of the illegal invasion of Iraq), with 'energy companies' keen to further exploit Iran and the region's massive oil and gas reserves, but when will the British public stand up and say 'enough is enough'? READ MORE: UK providing 'political cover' for US and Israel after Iran attack Proscribing a protest group as a terrorist organisation for spray-paint vandalism would simply demonstrate how far the UK Government, aided and abetted by much of the UK mainstream media, is prepared to go in order to justify its lethal bias in the Middle East, where an out-of-control despot intent on obliterating cities and massacring civilians wreaks generational havoc. Scotland, as an independent country, could choose a different path by genuinely promoting global nuclear disarmament and by ending compelled complicity in the actions of a 'British state' still posturing as a global super-power in order to feed the greed of international capitalist moguls and the wealthy British establishment while more inconsolable mothers cradle lifeless children in their forlorn arms. Stan Grodynski Longniddry, East Lothian ARE we really expected to believe that British planes are working with the Israelis only to help find the hostages, and only information pertinent to this is given to the Israelis and shared with the US? Why are the hostages still not found? Why are British spy planes still flying over Gaza? Hundreds of Palestinians have been killed and wounded since May 27th, when the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation began distributing food in southern Gaza. On June 17, at least 51 people were killed and 200 wounded, including children, while waiting for food. Westminster talks big about finding a diplomatic solution while supporting Israel with British aircraft. Is this not complicity in war crimes? READ MORE: UK Defence Secretary walks into oncoming traffic to escape Israel questions Now that Iran is in the picture, Gaza is no longer in the news. This allows the IDF to run further amok in the Occupied Territories, destroying homes and businesses. What will be the end result of this destruction? The Riviera of the Middle East? Keir Starmer is so enamoured with his 'special relationship' with Donald Trump and his rhetoric about Israel's right to defend itself that he ignores the message of the many thousands of UK citizens who march in protest against the treatment of the Palestinians and especially the carnage in Gaza. Sophocles gives a message from the past that is so relevant for now: 'whoever makes his journey to a tyrant's court becomes his slave, although he went there a free man'. Marion McPherson Ayr PALESTINE Action stage a protest at an RAF base and the Home Secretary announces she plans to proscribe them. The IDF slaughters in excess of 55,000 Palestinians and we give them armaments and surveillance assistance! READ MORE: Mark Brown: Donald Trump's ultimatum is a threat to Iran and the Middle East In the US, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard testified before congress in March that Iran had a stock of materials but was not building nuclear weapons. President Trump did not challenge this, but now says she was 'wrong' and that intelligence showed Iran had a 'tremendous amount of material' and could have a nuclear weapon 'within months'. Ms Gabbard has now made a statement to the effect that Iran could produce nuclear weapons 'within weeks' and that her March testimony (which seemed crystal clear at the time ) had been taken out of context by 'dishonest media'! To paraphrase the Doors from 1967 – strange days indeed! Alan Woodcock Dundee