
End of the road for noisy boy racers? Car makers are axing their beloved hot hatches to go electric
The days of noisy boy racers flying past in souped-up cars with offensively loud exhaust pipes look numbered.
That's because their beloved 'hot hatches' are accelerating towards demise as car makers cull them from their ranges as part of their transitions to electric vehicles.
Two of the nation's most popular have been confirmed for the chopping block by their respective manufacturers in recent weeks.
Ford says production of its much-loved model is due to cease in November - and it is no longer taking new order.
And Honda has said its big-spoilered offering will disappear for good next year, bowing out with a final edition version that's just been unveiled to culminate its near 30-year lifecycle.
Riotous petrol-engined hot hatches are now being replaced by a new breed of silent electric performance cars that are likely to cause far less offence, though might not provide the excitement craved by boy racers congregating in McDonalds car parks.
Hot hatchbacks are high performance variants of run-of-the-mill family cars.
While they're fast and relatively easy to customise with bigger exhaust systems and whooshing dump valves that when passing your house in the evening will make you leap out of your armchair - they are also practical enough to cope with the rigours of day-to-day life, with lots of space in the back and traditionally big boots.
But as manufacturers brace for an electric future, they are increasingly being motivated to kill off their combustion engine vehicles at alarming pace to avoid Government-imposed fines for failing to achieve adequate EV sales between now and 2030.
And its hot hatches that have become prime candidates to kill off earliest.
Stricter emissions regulations due to come into force have also rendered many of these unleaded-gulping motors unviable for sale.
Ford has reacted to these mounting pressures, confirming last month that its Focus ST is no longer available to order in the UK - ahead of production climaxing at the end of this year.
The blue-oval brand had still been taking deposits on the ST until April, but on 26 May culled it from its updated dealer price lists.
It ends a 23-year run for the hot hatch that's spanned four generations of Focus family cars, much to the upset of petrolheads across the country.
Ford UK said that while it is no longer taking new orders, there are 'around 170 built and unsold' STs currently available within the dealer network.
Just a week after Ford ditched Focus ST availability, Japanese rival Honda confirmed its Civic Type R - an icon among boy racer ranks for almost three decades - will bow out in the next few months.
The Civic Type R has epitomised the boy racer scene for decades, thanks to its scintilating performance, big exhausts and even larger spoilers
Unveiling an 'Ultimate Edition' version at the start of June, it said the Civic Type R's 28-year lifespan is being ended in 2026 by more stringent emissions regulations.
Honda said it's removing the Type R from its line-up next year because 'the industry is changing and our model range is having to evolve with it in accordance with European legislation' being introduced in the next 12 months.
Only 40 Ultimate Edition Type Rs will be made - and just 10 are guaranteed for UK customers, with prices likely to exceed £50,000.
The Focus ST and Civic Type R's expiries come in the tyre tracks of a series of hot hatches being axed in the UK.
Last year, Hyundai called time on its i20N and i30N, while Ford terminated its Focus RS in 2018.
The Fiesta, which Ford lowered the curtain on in the summer of 2023, took with it the ST variant, while Peugeot's 308 GTi was terminated in 2020, having only been available for around a year.
It means that very few front-wheel-drive hot hatches now remain, with the VW Golf and Polo GTI, Mini Cooper S, and Ford Puma ST among the increasingly limited options.
Those wanting a four-wheel-drive performance model can still get their hands on a Golf R, Mercedes A45 AMG S, or Toyota GR Yaris - though these hot hatches are seriously under threat from the tightening EU emissions regulations due shortly.
In the last few days, Toyota confirmed that production of its GR Corolla hot hatch will move from Japan to its Derbyshire factory in the UK to appease huge demand from US customers. Though despite being in Britain, the GR Corolla isn't a car that's sold here.
Instead, brands are focussing on a new wave of electric performance models.
Car makers forced to kill off their hot hatches over emissions regulations and the EV transition running towards the end of the decade, we're seeing the arrival of electric performance models, like Abarth's 500
Alpine's new A290 is a hot hatch version of the recently-launched Renault 5 E-Tech. It promises to be one of the best electrified performance cars we've seen so far
The Hyundai Ioniq 5 N is another electric hot hatch on sale currently. It's not cheap, though, starting from an eye-watering £65,000
The Abarth 500, Alpine A290 and Hyundai Ioniq 5 N are all zero-emission - and zero noise - cars already on sale to fill the void left by the traditional hot hatchback.
Though they're not cheap.
The Fiat 500-sized Abarth rings in at £30k, Alpine's tuned-up take on the Renault 5 E-Tech starts from £33,500, and Hyundai's souped-up electric SUV is an eye-watering £65,000.
On Friday, Peugeot unveiled its e-208 GTi on the eve of the Le Man 24 Hour race.
It is the battery-powered spiritual successor to its legendary 205 GTi from the 1980s and '90s.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
BBC threatens legal action against AI start-up Perplexity over content scraping, FT reports
June 20 (Reuters) - UK broadcaster BBC is threatening legal action against AI search engine Perplexity, as it seeks to crack down on tech companies scraping its vast content archives to train artificial intelligence models, the Financial Times reported on Friday. Reuters could not immediately verify the report.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
US weighs in with concerns over China's proposed ‘super-embassy' in London
A US intervention over China's proposed new embassy in London has thrown a potential resolution 'up in the air', campaigners have said, amid concerns over the site's proximity to a sensitive hub of critical communication cables. The furore over a new 'super-embassy' on the edge of London's financial district was reignited last week when the White House said it was 'deeply concerned' over potential Chinese access to 'the sensitive communications of one of our closest allies'. The Dutch parliament has also raised concerns about Beijing's ideal location of Royal Mint Court, on the edge of the City of London, which has so far failed to gain planning permission. The ultimate decision lies with the government, which has taken control over the stalled decision after permission was initially rejected on security grounds two years ago. Labour is expected to make a decision over the proposed 2-hectare (5-acre) site opposite the Tower of London after an inquiry was held earlier this year. Those who have long campaigned against the move over security concerns have criticised the row's revival, saying it has sidelined their views. 'They seem to be struggling to make the right decision,' said Dave Lake, the chair of the local residents' association and lead of the local campaign. 'It's got too political now. It was a straightforward inquiry but because of this, that and the other, particularly the Americans getting involved, it's made it all up in the air.' The intervention comes after the signing of a US-UK trade deal with Donald Trump at the G7 summit in Canada this week. Before the deal was signed, a US official told the Sunday Times: 'The United States is deeply concerned about providing China with potential access to the sensitive communications of one of our closest allies.' In the Netherlands, MPs have raised similar security concerns. A state department official said they had full faith in the UK to ensure the safety and security of their diplomatic mission in London. Nevertheless, for those who have long opposed the embassy site, what was once a campaign focused on security concerns from local residents and communities in exile has been overtaken by geopolitics. Lake has lived near the proposed site, bought by the Chinese government in 2018 for £255m, for 35 years. On Saturday he attended the latest demonstration there, fearing that building an embassy could attract further demonstrations and political attacks. Recent concerns have shifted to cables underneath the sites, which serve as an arterial link between the City of London and Canary Wharf, London's two financial centres. Lake said: 'We know there are cables running underground, and we know the capabilities of the Chinese. In the early conversations it was never part of it, it was just completely our security.' Charles Parton, who spent 22 years working in and on China as a UK diplomat and has advised the UK parliament's foreign affairs committee, said it was 'a big problem' if there were very sensitive cables running directly under the site. He said: 'There are two ways to be seen with it: one way is to say, well, you can't use the site; the other is to say reroute the cables. How difficult is it to reroute the cables? I don't know the answer to that question.' Parton said the British embassy had been wanting to rebuild its Beijing site for as long as he could remember. The building had not been fit for purpose for several decades, he said, and the wishes of both countries for newer embassies was 'normal diplomatic business' as relations had greatly expanded. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion 'There are many things we should worry about with the Chinese,' said Parton, mentioning Beijing's geopolitical agenda and strangle on rare earth exports. 'But we need to choose the important ones and not the unimportant ones. And all goes back to the nature of these cables. What is crucial is the security issue. If that is resolved satisfactory, then why shouldn't we both go ahead and build new embassies?' The government, which has said it is committed to 'robust' and 'evidence-based' decision-making, is expected to issue its verdict by 9 September. Among those worried that the embassy plans will go ahead is Rahima Mahmut, a leading Uyghur activist. 'It is really unbelievable when not only the US government but also the Dutch government express their concerns,' said Mahmut, who lives in exile in the UK. Also concerned over increased surveillance and espionage is Simon Cheng, the founder of Hongkongers in Britain and a former Hong Kong consulate worker. Cheng, who in 2023 had a bounty issued for his arrest, said: 'The UK government need to think twice because it's not only just the closest ally that has given a warning and grave concern, but also that to many other people, especially us as part of the exile community … we have concerns about our security here.' A spokesperson for the Chinese embassy said the planning application had taken UK policy into consideration as well as the views of all relevant parties. Building a new embassy would help them 'better perform' the responsibilities of 'mutual beneficial cooperation' between the two countries, they added. The spokesperson said: 'Anti-China forces are using security risks as an excuse to interfere with the British government's consideration over this planning application. This is a despicable move that is unpopular and will not succeed.'


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Rachel Reeves and the Bank of England cannot change the long course of history
Questor is The Telegraph's stock-picking column, helping you decode the markets and offering insights on where to invest. The economy's near-term outlook remains highly uncertain. Although GDP growth surged to 0.7pc in the first quarter, which was up from an expansion of 0.1pc in the prior period, recent interest rate cuts are likely to take many months to have their full impact on the economy due to the existence of time lags. When combined with the potential for sticky inflation over the coming months, as well as the possible ill effects of higher costs for businesses caused by changes to employer National Insurance contributions, investors may naturally seek to avoid UK-focused stocks. However, in Questor's view, the long-term return prospects for UK-listed companies are highly appealing. Crucially, an uncertain near-term economic outlook means they trade on low valuations which in many cases are significantly below their intrinsic value. This provides scope for significant capital gains, both from upward re-ratings as investor sentiment gradually improves, and as a result of a faster pace of earnings growth as the full impact of monetary policy easing becomes apparent. Indeed, history shows that GDP growth and the stock market's performance are cyclical. Even though various chancellors and investors have previously claimed otherwise, often during periods of economic expansion and bull markets, the economy and equity markets are inherently boom-and-bust entities that simply refuse to go in one particular direction ad infinitum. Just as interest rate rises between 2021 and 2023 led to a stifling of economic activity, and acted as a drag on company profits, thereby prompting relatively downbeat stock market performance, the current period of sustained monetary policy easing is highly likely to do the opposite. Investors who are able to look beyond short-term economic uncertainty to a period of relatively fast-paced growth and buy shares that are grossly undervalued, are therefore likely to generate high returns over the long run. Of course, stocks purchased amid the current challenging economic climate must be able to ride out short-term difficulties in order to produce high capital returns in the long run. Companies with solid financial positions are well placed to do so, with modest levels of debt as a proportion of net assets and generous headroom when making interest payments from operating profits likely to be key considerations for investors. Sound finances also provide scope for a business to reinvest in its operations in order to strengthen its market position for the long run. A solid balance sheet may further allow it to make acquisitions that bolster its financial prospects as the economy's performance gradually improves. Companies that benefit from having a competitive advantage may also be in a relatively strong position to overcome prospective near-term economic difficulties. A solid competitive position may, for instance, be derived from having a significant amount of brand loyalty that means customers are more likely to reduce spending elsewhere before cutting back on their consumption of a specific company's products. Lower costs vis-à-vis rival firms also equates to a competitive advantage. It allows for price cuts that enhance the appeal of a company's products amid a challenging financial period for consumers. A strong competitive position further bodes well for a firm's long-term financial and share price performance. For example, it may enable a company to build its market share during an economic downturn, thereby allowing it to occupy a stronger position through which to capitalise on rising demand as the rate of GDP growth improves. Clearly, it is impossible to state exactly when the economy and stock market will deliver consistently strong performance. Indeed, it may only become clear after the event, when multiple quarters of strong GDP growth and attractive share price gains have already been posted. Therefore, it may be logical for long-term investors to seek to move ahead of the curve in terms of buying shares in high-quality companies at attractive prices while their peers continue to do the opposite. While this may entail paper losses in the short run, a willingness to go against the investment herd has proved to be a highly worthwhile approach in the past. In Questor's view, it is likely to remain so over the coming years.