Syria asks women to dress modestly on beaches but says bikinis still allowed

Syria's government has asked women to wear 'burkinis' or more modest swimwear while visiting public beaches this summer, although they later clarified there will be no legal consequences for those who wear bikinis.
A government directive on Tuesday asked women to wear a 'burkini or swimwear that covers more of the body', and loose-fitting clothing when out of the water. The decree also asked men not to be shirtless when not swimming.
'Visitors to public beaches and pools, whether tourists or locals, are required to wear appropriate swimwear that takes into account public taste and the sensibilities of various segments of society,' the tourism minister, Mazen al-Salhani, said in a statement.
The guidelines would not apply for luxury resorts, where the decree said 'normal western swimwear' was permitted.
The order provoked outrage and accusations that the Islamist-led government was trying to impose its version of morality on Syrians, many of whom, but not all, prefer conservative clothing.
The government was quick to clarify that the directive was merely advice and there would be no legal penalties for those who did not follow them.
Instead, the government quickly published a list of beaches where western-style swimwear, such as bikinis, can be worn and other beaches where burkinis are preferred.
'This does not mean that beaches where modest clothing is preferred that western clothing is prohibited, but that we respect public preferences and cultural, religious and social diversity in Syria,' Ghaith al-Farah, the deputy tourism minister, said in an interview with the Syrian channel Al-Ikhbariyah on Wednesday.
He further said the directives had been published as part of general guidelines for public conduct and safety during the summer, which included advice on not getting sunburnt and avoiding certain fish.
The tourism ministry said authorities would only patrol the perimeter of beaches, and it published pictures of beaches with people in bikinis on X on Thursday.
Despite the seeming walking back of the decision, some Syrians worried this indicated a desire from the Syrian government to impose its own standards for women's dress.
It was the first time the new government had made any decrees on women's dress since the toppling of the former president Bashar al-Assad in December, and fanned fears among Syria's religious minorities. Though the Assad regime curtailed most freedoms in Syria, it was fiercely secular and did not control women's dress.
Maya Saloum, a 24-year-old English teacher from Jaramana, a suburb of Damascus, said: 'It's not their call to make decisions for others and decide what to wear and where to wear it.'
Sara, a 20-year-old student in Damascus using a pseudonym, said: 'Neither the government nor anyone else should interfere in such matters. In my view there are far more important issues the country needs to address than interfering with and limiting people's freedoms.'
She complained that since December she had received verbal harassment for wearing shorts or sleeveless tops in the streets from individuals and some security forces.
Syria's president, Ahmed al-Sharaa, has previously promised to protect freedoms and religious diversity in Syria and to guarantee women's rights under his rule.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Wales Online

2 hours ago

• Wales Online

Shocking decline in A Level results for one area of Wales

Shocking decline in A Level results for one area of Wales 'We're in a situation where only 65 per cent are getting A* to E grades. Let's be frank, an A-level grade below C is not much use to anyone in life' Stock image of pupil taking exam (Image: Getty Images/iStockphoto ) Councillors have voiced concerns over a "shocking" decline in school performance in Powys. The county's A Level results are well below the Wales average according to a council report on education standards. The report reads: "Over time the performance of Powys post-16 students has declined, with performance in all of the key indicators below the outcomes for 2019 and Powys performing at best 14th of the 22 Welsh local authorities." The proportion of post-16 Powys students who achieved three or more A* to E grades in their exams was 65% — compared to a Wales average of 69% — ranking 18th of the 22 Welsh local authorities. ‌ Neighbouring county Ceredigion, Gwynedd and the Vale of Glamorgan achieved the highest proportions with 77%, 76% and 73% respectively. ‌ And only 73.1% of Powys' A Level grades were between A* and C in 2024, compared to 75.1% in 2019. The report continues: "Based on the consistent performance measures for post-16 learning, summer 2024 outcomes showed that only 9% of Powys learners achieved three or more A* - A grades (or equivalent), and ranked Powys 15th when compared with all 22 local authorities." That is less than half the percentage of Vale of Glamorgan students (19%) who achieved the same feat. Article continues below Councillor James Gibson-Watt (Liberal Democrat) stood down as council leader last month but has stayed on in the cabinet to start a post-16 education review. The preferred option already backed by council officers could see all English-medium school sixth forms vanish – in favour of two specialist sixth form schools to be based in Brecon and Newtown. Mr Gibson-Watt said during a meeting on the report: 'If ever we needed evidence of some radical reform in post-16 this paper sums it up. If you look at the details of the decline in performance it is quite shocking." He added: 'We're in a situation where only 65 per cent are getting A* to E grades. Let's be frank, an A-level grade below C is not much use to anyone in life, particularly to get into higher education. I remember Powys was consistently in the top three counties for GCSE and A-level outcomes and here we are languishing in the bottom quartile.' ‌ Councillor Gareth E Jones (Powys Independents) asked an officer from the council's education department: 'Have you done any work around the significant number of learners that are going out of county for their post-16 education to Hereford, Shrewsbury and Merthyr. 'What impact do those learners going out of county have on the overall performance of post-16? My guess would be that better quality learners go out of county and if they had stayed our overall performance may be better.' Education officer Anwen Orrells replied: 'You would be correct in assuming that the more able are the ones that are leaving.' ‌ She said that the council knew 'how many' post-16 pupils were out of county but did not have details of their results from last summer. Between 2010 and 2019, sixth forms across the county saw a 32% decline in student numbers, falling from 1,445 to 978. At that time, it was estimated that up to 500 youngsters from Powys were leaving the county daily to continue their education elsewhere. Article continues below

Spectator

3 hours ago

• Spectator

Stephen Fry could do with a lesson in ‘radicalisation'

Stephen Fry has accused J.K. Rowling of being 'inflammatory and contemptuous', 'mocking' and adding to 'a terribly distressing time for trans people'. Fry, who narrated the Harry Potter audiobooks, has damned their author for saying 'cruel' and 'wrong' things and for failing to 'disavow some of the more revolting and truly horrible, destructive – violently destructive – things that people say'. He suspects that she's been 'radicalised by Terfs', charged her with kicking up 'a hornet's nest of transphobia which has been entirely destructive', and dismissed her as 'a lost cause'. Might I interrupt this lengthy damnatio memoriae to point out that Fry is supposed to be Rowling's friend and to venture that, if she deserves to be rebuked for anything, it's her godawful taste in friends. Fry, Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson. The woman is like flypaper for airheads, dilettantes, and abject ingrates. If J.K. Rowling has been radicalised, it is not by Terfs Fry's comments, which came in a recording of the podcast The Show People, are in stark contrast to his answer when asked about these matters in 2021 ('She's a friend and will remain a friend') and again the following year, when he refused to 'abandon' her and said: 'I know that J.K. Rowling doesn't want to see trans people bullied, alienated, shut out of society, made to feel ashamed, guilty, laughed at, all those things.' Fry suggests Rowling has been 'radicalised', a word familiar to followers of the gender controversy for its customary application to women who insist on their rights. Although the terminology echoes that used to describe recruitment of Islamist terrorists, you need not be a feminist semantician to suspect that 'radical' is being used as a synonym for 'hysterical', as though women who believe in chromosomal sex are like the mad heroine of a Charlotte Perkins Gilman story and would benefit from a lie down. Radicalisation is a deceptive and manipulative framing because recognising the existence of physiological differences between men and women isn't radicalism, it's biology. Fry has repeatedly professed his distaste for the gender wars and refused to engage on the substance. For all his donnish affectations, he's a 'be kind' merchant whose contribution to the debate is every bit as vacuous as those Insta mums who pose with a Pride Progress flag in front of their 'Live, Laugh, Love' wall canvas every 1 June. Yet were Fry to take heed of what the gender ideology vanguard say, he might grasp that their use of 'radicalisation' is projection. For if you've convinced yourself that men become women by declaring themselves to be so, that women corseting themselves in chest binders or having healthy breasts amputated is sound therapeutic care, that children should be offered medical and even surgical interventions to mutilate their bodies – and, yes, this is what the vanguard believes – then you should stop and ask who exactly has been radicalised here. When I first wrote critically about gender identity ideology on Coffee House in 2019, it set in motion a parting of ways with several friends who could not tolerate my disagreement with the fundamental convictions they had recently picked up from Twitter. The end of a friendship is often mired in sadness and regret but when a mate breaks away because you reckon Judith Butler is a bit of a nutter, there is – eventually – relief at a bullet dodged. There is also a deeper appreciation of those friendships which span political and philosophical divides. Some of my dearest friends are people who maintain that trans women are women, Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, Scotland should be an independent state, and Jeremy Corbyn would have made a good prime minister. Mateship across ideological lines is normal and healthy, I don't care what the bug-eyed scolds on BlueSky say. You stick by your mate, defend him even as you disagree with him, and you most certainly don't turn on him when a gang of under-medicated hall monitors corner you in the cafeteria. I'd like to think that Rowling doesn't pay much mind to turncoats who huff the fumes of her success then ditch her for status points. That she's too busy spending her days in a mountaintop hotel typing 'All work and no play makes Jo a dull girl' and her nights dive-bombing into a vault of gold coins like Scrooge McDuck. But no doubt it stings her just as it would the rest of us. That's unfortunate but it is better than the alternative. A friendship you can only hold on to by believing, or pretending to believe, that womanhood is nothing more than a feeling, that sex-based rights are bigoted, that transing the gay away is progressive, is a friendship from which you should flee without delay. If J.K. Rowling has been radicalised, it is not by Terfs but by the spinelessness and intellectual vacuity of characters like Stephen Fry. Men who profess left-liberal affinities in every other regard but are content to align themselves with harmful, reactionary doctrines because to do otherwise would be low-brow. Why, he'd be no better than the ghastly Americans who voted for Trump and those hideous English provincials who read the Daily Express. People like this have nothing to add to the conversation beyond repeating vapid platitudes half-remembered from their last dinner party. If this is the quality of contribution Fry has to offer the gender debate, it might be wise all round if he resumed his vow of silence.

Scottish Sun

6 hours ago

• Scottish Sun

Iranian mastermind of October 7 attack obliterated in revenge strike as Israel pummels nuke reactor in overnight blitz

Scroll down to read the latest updates... KINGPIN KILLED Iranian mastermind of October 7 attack obliterated in revenge strike as Israel pummels nuke reactor in overnight blitz Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) ISRAEL killed the Iranian military commander who funded the October 7 attacks which detonated the Middle East crisis in a revenge air strike yesterday. Evil terror kingpin Saeed Izadi - head of the Palestinian Division of Iran's Quds Force - was blown to bits in a pinpoint attack in the Iranian city of Qom. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 3 Evil terror kingpin Saeed Izadi has been killed Credit: @IDF 3 Missiles fired from Iran in retaliation for Israeli attacks are seen in the sky over the Hebron, West Bank Credit: Getty 3 Israeli air defense system fires to intercept missiles during an Iranian attack over Tel Aviv Israel Defence Force said Izadi was 'one of the architects' of the horror in which 1,200 died and 250 were kidnapped 'and among the few who knew of it prior to its execution.' It added: 'Izadi was eliminated in a safe house in the heart of Iran, following a prolonged intelligence effort.' Izadi was said to be a top money man in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps who sent state cash Palestinian terror organizations in Gaza and the West Bank. The Israeli military later said that it killed another commander of the Guards' overseas arm identified as Benham Shariyari, during a strike on his vehicle in western Tehran. Shariyary was said to be "was responsible for all weapons transfers from the Iranian regime to its proxies across the Middle East". The ongoing cull of top Iranian commanders - and their replacements - gathered pace along with another assassination of a top nuclear boffins. IDF officials refused to identify the scientist said to play a vital role in the rogue Islamist regime's plans to build an atom bomb. He was killed by a missile fired from a drone after being moved to a 'safe house' - which Israeli intelligence located overnight. His death is the 11th assassination of a nuclear scientist in the past nine days in a special Israeli manhunt dubbed Operation Narnia. Iran launched more missiles overnight which were intercepted amid reports of minimal damage - as Israel intensified its war on terror targets across Iran. Meanwhile, Israel hit "two centrifuge production sites" at Iran's Isfahan nuclear facility overnight. A military official revealed to reporters on the condition of anonymity: "Isfahan we targeted in the first 24 hours of our operation, but we carried out a second wave of strikes there overnight, deepening our achievements and advancing the damage to the facility." He added that the targeting of two centrifuge production sites in Isfahan was "in addition to a couple more centrifuge production sites that we have been able to strike successfully in recent days". The relentless raids by the Israeli air force have "dealt a severe blow to Iran's centrifuge production capabilities," the official said. Centrifuges are used to enrich uranium, both for civilian and military use. Stay up to date with the latest on Israel vs Iran with The Sun's live blog below...