
Worried Parents of Kashmiri Students in Iran Urge Indian Govt to Explore Evacuation Methods
Srinagar: Moments after a missile struck a sports ground near his apartment in downtown Tehran where he often played cricket, Sabir Bin Ayub, a final-year MBBS student at the Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), dialled his father.'Since the war broke out, he had been hearing faraway sounds of explosions, but now it had reached their neighbourhood,' said Mohammad Ayub, a contractor from Srinagar's Rainawari district while recalling that his son sounded terrified during the phone call on Saturday (June 14).Ayub, whose son was enrolled at IUMS in 2020, said that the area struck by Israel in downtown Tehran was home to dozens of Kashmiris pursuing professional degrees who live in apartment buildings there.'I am concerned about my son. The government should ensure his safety and security and bring him home,' he said.Dozens of anguished Kashmiri parents staged a demonstration in Srinagar's Lal Chowk on Sunday to demand evacuation of their children who study in Iran in the aftermath of the country's military conflict with Israel.Also read: As Israeli Missiles Hit Iran, Indian Students in Tehran Are Being Relocated to Safer AreasAccording to unofficial estimates, about 1,500 Kashmiri students are enrolled in different medical and other professional colleges and universities of Iran while a similar number of Kashmiris were visiting the country for trade and other purposes when the conflict broke out.Senior National Conference leader and Lok Sabha parliamentarian from Srinagar, Aga Syed Ruhullah said that Hujat Dost Ali hostel in Tehran which is home to many Kashmiri students pursuing MBBS and other degrees was hit by an Israeli strike on Sunday.'Some students have sustained minor injuries. We have urged the government of India to relocate these students to safer places and evacuate them,' he said.Smoke rises up from an oil facility after a Saturday explosion in southern Tehran on June 15, 2025. Photo: AP/PTI.Moderate Hurriyat chairman Mirwaiz Umar Farooq also said that the hostel was hit by an Israeli airstrike on Sunday in which some students are believed to have sustained minor injuries.'More than 1300+ Kashmiri students study there, who must be in great fear for their lives, while their parents are in great anguish here. We appeal to the Govt of India to take urgent steps to ensure their safety and well-being and possible return. May Allah ﷻprotect them all and grant relief to their anxious families. Let's all pray for their safety—and for the safety of all people living in Iran from Israeli aggression,' he said in a post on X.Srinagar-resident and housewife Afroza Jabeen, whose daughter is a second year MBBS student at Arak University of Medical Science, said that her family was in touch with the Indian embassy about the ongoing conflict.'There are some 150 Kashmiri students at the university and all of them want to return home. India has good relations with all the countries. Prime minister Narendra Modi spoke with Russian and Ukrainian authorities following which Indian citizens were evacuated from the war zone. Why can't he speak with Israel and Iran, and bring our children home,' Jabeen, a resident of Bemina in Srinagar, said.Jabeen urged the Indian government to explore options of evacuating Indian children through Iran's border countries of Syria, Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Libya.Norduz borderIn a letter shared with The Wire by Jabeen's family, the Indian embassy in Tehran on Sunday (June 15) sought permission from the Iranian authorities to evacuate the Indian and Indian-origin students from Urmia to Armenia due to the 'recent combat-like developments' in Iran.'The Embassy has the honour to refer to the esteemed Ministry for permitting the Embassy to escort those students /Indian origin students to the Norduz border of Armenia via buses. The details of the fleet will be provided subsequently,' the letter stated.However, in a statement early on Monday, the Ministry of External Affairs said that the embassy in Tehran was engaging Indian students for their safety and that 'in some cases' the students are 'being relocated with the embassy's facilitation to safer places within Iran'.'Other feasible options are also under examination,' the ministry said without elaborating, adding that it was separately in touch with 'community leaders regarding welfare and safety' of the students.J&K chief minister Omar Abdullah said that he had discussed the issue of safety of Kashmiri students with the external affairs minister S Jaishankar, 'The Hon Minister assured me that @MEAIndia is in close contact with their counterparts in Iran & will take all necessary steps to safeguard all Indian students in Iran,' he posted on X.Buses to QomAmid rising concerns, Srinagar-resident Ayub spoke with his son on Monday morning who informed him that a fleet of buses was taking foreign students to the historic city of Qom in Iran which is a prominent pilgrimage destination for Shia Muslims.'He was in one of the buses and authorities have assured them that Qom was a safer place than Tehran. I wanted him to become a doctor and we chose Iran because we thought that being a Muslim country he would be safe there. He only has a year to finish his degree. It would be better if the government brings him back till the situation gets better,' Ayub said.Jabeen said that her daughter, who lives in the college hostel, has been left terrified by the missiles which streak across the skies over the city of Arak in Iran every night since the conflict broke out. Arak city has been unaffected by the violence so far, she said.'Since Friday evening, all the students have been staying together on the first floor of their hostel and authorities ordered them not to come out. Today, the university resumed classwork and they were asked to attend. The government should not take any risk and instead bring them home,' she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
34 minutes ago
- Hans India
Omar Abdullah deliberately politicising water sharing with Punjab: AAP
Chandigarh: The Aam Aadmi Party in Punjab on Friday questioned Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah's remarks that 'we will not give water from the Indus River to Punjab' and accused him of deliberately politicising the issue. AAP spokesperson Neel Garg said the authority to decide on river waters lies with the Central government, and Omar Abdullah cannot take a unilateral decision on this matter. He emphasised that Punjab needs water and, therefore, Punjab should also get a share of the Indus River water, adding that during the war with Pakistan, the Indian government had decided to annul the Indus Water Treaty. 'Now, it is the Indian government's responsibility to appropriately distribute the remaining water and give Punjab its rightful share,' he said. Garg pointed out that like Jammu and Kashmir, Punjab is also a border state. 'Whenever war occurs, Punjab becomes the battleground. And when the country needs food grains, it becomes the granary of the nation. Now that there is water available, Punjab has a legitimate claim over it.' He highlighted that Punjab needs water today, as most of its regions have entered the dark zone. 'In the process of filling the nation's granaries, we have been deprived of our own water. Now that the Indus Water Treaty has been annulled, Punjab has the primary right over this water because it will not only bring relief to our barren lands but also boost our agriculture. When farmers prosper, the nation prospers,' he said. Garg added that Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann also stated, after the annulment of the Indus Treaty, that Punjab should receive a share of the water that is being prevented from flowing to Pakistan. 'Therefore, the government of India must consider this matter,' he said. The Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) also expressed surprise at Omar Abdullah's statement. In a statement, former Minister and senior SAD leader Daljit Singh Cheema said what Omar Abdullah was demanding was another attempt to do injustice to Punjab. He said that while filling the food bowl of the country, Punjab had lost its groundwater, which had fallen to alarming levels. He said the quantity of water in rivers had also gone down substantially, adding that the farmers of Punjab had taken huge debt on their shoulders to fulfil the food requirement of the country. Earlier, speaking on constructing a canal by the government of India to divert excess water from three rivers of the Indus system in Jammu and Kashmir to Haryana, Punjab and Rajasthan, Chief Minister Abdullah cited the 45-year-old Shahpur Kandi barrage dispute with Punjab and asked, 'Did they give us water?'
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
37 minutes ago
- Business Standard
What Happens if Trump Decides to Strike Iran or Assassinate Its Leader?
If President Trump decides to send American bombers to help Israel destroy an underground uranium enrichment facility in Iran, it will likely kick off a more dangerous phase in the war. And if the United States assassinates Iran's supreme leader, as Trump hinted was possible, there are no guarantees he will be replaced by a friendlier leader. Iran's autocratic clerical leadership, which has ruled for nearly half a century since the Islamic Revolution of 1979, has proved its staying power, even in the face of multiple domestic uprisings. Demolishing Fordo, the enrichment site buried deep in a mountain, may not obliterate Iran's nuclear program and could lead the country to broaden the war or accelerate that program. Here are some ways it could play out if the United States enters the war. Iran could negotiate Before Israel launched a surprise attack on Iran's nuclear program and other targets last week, Iran and the United States were discussing limits on Iran's uranium enrichment program. It was rapidly producing fuel close to the levels needed for nuclear weapons, and in exchange for new limits on the program, Iran would win relief from economic sanctions. The two sides were nowhere near a final agreement, but signs of a possible compromise had emerged by early June. When Israel attacked Iran, the negotiations collapsed. Yet Iran has signaled that it remains willing to talk, and even a strike on Fordo would not necessarily wipe out prospects of a return to the negotiating table. If the Trump administration follows an attack on Iran with an enticing offer, such as large-scale sanctions relief or peace guarantees, there is still a chance that Iran would consider making concessions, said Vali Nasr, an Iran expert and a professor at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies. 'Is there an offer on the table that the Iranian people in this moment can actually rally around?' he said. 'If it's only a stick, then they're going to fight.' So far, Trump has not extended many carrots. He called in a social media post on Tuesday for Iran's 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER.' Iran may lean into nuclear activity All eyes are on Fordo. But it is possible that Iran has secret nuclear sites aimed at producing weapons that the United States and Israel do not know about, though no public evidence has emerged of such places. If they do exist, Iran could use whatever it has left to try to accelerate its nuclear program in the wake an American attack. With the damage Israeli airstrikes have done to nuclear facilities and the killings of top nuclear scientists, Iran probably lacks the capacity to build a nuclear weapon quickly, analysts said. Still, it could move in that direction and would have fresh incentive to do so. 'You would begin to see that broader escalation that they've held back on,' said Sanam Vakil, the director of the Middle East and North Africa Program at Chatham House. After all, Iran would have few other options left for deterring future attacks, she added. Iran's Parliament has publicly discussed a withdrawal from the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. The treaty, of which Israel is not a signatory, currently requires Iran to submit to oversight by the International Atomic Energy Agency and other transparency obligations and to commit to not building a nuclear bomb. So far, the government has reiterated its longstanding insistence that Iran's nuclear program is solely for peaceful purposes. But Iran has firmly refused to capitulate to a central American demand that it give up uranium enrichment, saying it has the right to a civilian nuclear program. The war could get bigger and messier Over the past week, Iran has avoided striking American troops or other targets that could pull the United States into the war. Its leaders may still be hoping to make a deal with the Trump administration to end the conflict and wary of taking on the US military on top of Israel's. Though Iran has responded to Israeli attacks with missiles and threats of its own, it has refrained from hitting American troops or bases in the Middle East. It has also not struck Arab countries allied with the United States, such as Saudi Arabia or the United Arab Emirates. Nor has it sent global oil prices soaring by sealing off or harassing traffic in the Strait of Hormuz, a vital oil shipping channel to Iran's south. But at least one Iranian official has warned that Iran could do so if the United States enters the war. And Iran's allied militias in the region, including the Houthis in Yemen, Hezbollah in Lebanon and armed groups in Iraq, have not joined the fight. Many of them have been seriously weakened over the past two years. But those Iranian allies could still join the fray if the Trump administration decides to strike. If the United States tries to force Iran to capitulate, 'Iran will keep hitting until the end of the missile capabilities,' said Ellie Geranmayeh, an Iran expert at the European Council on Foreign Relations. Talk of regime change Trump said on social media this week that the United States is weighing whether to kill Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, but had decided 'not for now.' Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel said in a Fox News interview this week that changing Iran's regime 'could certainly be the result' of this war. Even if the United States assassinates Khamenei, however, the religious-military establishment that has tightly held power in Iran for nearly five decades may not fall. With a war raging, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, the most powerful branch of Iran's military, could seize control of the country, said Nasr, the professor. They might put in place a more Western-friendly government, or, more likely, replace Khamenei with a more extreme figure who would dig in for a long fight, Nasr added. If the military does not assert itself quickly, some analysts fear that Iran could plunge into chaos or civil war as different factions struggle for control. But they see little chance for Iran's liberal opposition, which has been weakened and brutally repressed by the regime, to prevail. Iran's people could rise up again Netanyahu encouraged the Iranian people last week to capitalize on Israel's attacks on their government and 'rise up' against their 'evil and oppressive regime.' Iranians have staged mass protests against clerical rule several times in recent history, most recently with the 'Women, Life, Freedom' demonstrations of late 2022. Each time, the opposition has faced a harsh crackdown by government security forces. Some Iranians so despise the clerical leaders that they have at times looked to Israel as an ally and openly hoped for the United States to install new leadership. Some Iranian opponents of the regime cheered Israel's initial attacks on Iran, which they saw as more evidence of their government's incompetence and mismanagement. But the growing death toll, the attacks on civilian infrastructure and the panic gripping Iranian cities are hardening many in the country against Israel. Iranian social media platforms have been full of patriotic posts in recent days, expressing unity against foreign intervention, if not exactly support for the regime.


India Today
37 minutes ago
- India Today
Fact Check: NOT Israeli woman crying over her destroyed house, this video is from Syria
Parts of Tel Aviv, the capital of Israel, suffered some serious damage from Iranian missiles, which struck several high-rise buildings. A video of a woman crying in the midst of rubble is now going clip featured the Israeli flag, and was shared with captions like: "She is crying because she lost her home. My satisfaction level is..." implying she is an Israeli woman who lost her home amid the military India Today Fact Check, however, found that the video is not from Israel but from Syria. It also predates the present Iran-Israel PROBEListening to the woman in the viral video speak immediately makes it clear that the video is from Syria. She can be heard saying in English, "I am back to my home, my home is in Darayya, the suburbs of Damascus." Damascus is the capital of reverse-searching keyframes from the viral video led us to the original clip, posted by professional Syrian swimmer Yusra Mardini on March 14, three months before the ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran began."I'm my home doesn't stand.. I want to share what I feel with you because this is not just about me, this is what many Syrians are going through right pain and trauma. This is the home I grew up in, drew my dreams of becoming the best woman I could be, and even washed dad's car with him in the neighbourhood. Yes, my home is just rubble, but those memories will always give me the strength to move forward," read Mardini's caption, making it obvious that the video is not from Israel but from an NDTV report, Mardini left war-torn Syria in 2015, when she was 17, and went on to compete in the 2016 and 2020 Olympic Games. Another report from Al Arabiya, published on March 28, featured her homecoming after almost a decade. Mardini's return marked a full-circle moment for the 27-year-old, whose dramatic escape from the war was documented in the Netflix film 'The Swimmers'.Thus, it is abundantly clear that a video from Syria was falsely shared as a video from InMust Watch Want to send us something for verification? Please share it on our at 73 7000 7000 You can also send us an email at factcheck@