Commentary: From Trump's parade to ‘No Kings' protests, the clash over what makes America great has only just begun

SINGAPORE: Two versions of American patriotism were on full display this weekend: a military-based message of might, and a grassroots-based outpouring of will. But the jury is still out over which version will triumph as the people and the Trump administration seek to define what makes America great.
On Saturday (Jun 14), more than 6,600 soldiers, 150 military vehicles and 50 aircraft paraded down Constitution Avenue in the heart of the American capital to commemorate the 250th anniversary of the United States Army. It was also President Donald Trump's 79th birthday.
Across the rest of the country, millions of 'No Kings' protesters demonstrated against the Trump administration's policies and alleged abuses of power.
While the parade and protests did not physically meet, they are part of a larger struggle to define American patriotism.
DONALD TRUMP FINALLY GOT HIS BIG PARADE
Since the end of World War II, military parades have been rare, but not unheard of in American history. The US did not hold national or major city parades after the Korean and Vietnam wars, though an 8,000-troop-strong victory parade rolled down Constitution Avenue after the Gulf War of 1991.
One would have to go back even further to the 1950s and 1960s to find a military parade for a US president. Dwight Eisenhower and John F Kennedy featured military segments in their inauguration parades, but no modern president has repeated this display.
Many observers borrow Mr Eisenhower's thoughts to explain this: Having the US military imitate Soviet parades makes it look weak. Mr Trump, however, would beg to differ.
His desire for a military parade began during his first administration, especially after he witnessed the Bastille Day parade in July 2017, calling it a 'tremendous thing for France and for the spirit of France' and suggested that he would 'try and top it'. In May, he expressed irritation that France and Russia were commemorating the end of World War II with elaborate celebrations while America was not.
As he told the crowd after the parade in Washington DC: 'Every other country celebrates their victories. It's about time that America did, too.'
A DIFFERENT VERSION OF AMERICAN PATRIOTISM
Meanwhile, the 'No Kings' protests presented a different version of American patriotism – not about the conflicts its military has won but the systems and way of life it has protected, not about enforcing the law at all costs but upholding America's system of checks and balances.
Hence, the name 'No Kings': Protesters criticise Mr Trump's actions as overstepping the limits of a democratically elected president and more akin to a king.
It is difficult to ignore that the parade coincided with Mr Trump's birthday, conflating his leadership with military strength. At least one veterans group turned down invitation to the official reviewing stand because they were uncomfortable with the political implications of the parade.
There is also a question of cost at a time of US government-funded programmes and federal jobs cuts. According to an AP-NORC poll, 60 per cent of Americans believed the parade was not a good use of government funds.
Mr Trump's initial plans for a military parade in 2018 were frustrated by hesitant aides and a massive US$92 million price tag. This year, it was estimated to cost up to US$45 million.
More broadly, the parade took place amid growing protests against immigration crackdowns in Democrat-run cities.
Mr Trump ostensibly wanted to pit an image of power, order and stability against 'lawless riots'. This is especially since the epicentre of recent protests is California, whose governor Gavin Newsom, has locked horns with Mr Trump and is reportedly positioning himself for a 2028 presidential run.
BUILDING UP TO A BIGGER POLITICAL CLASH
If Mr Trump wanted a spectacle, he certainly received one. In Washington, the parade rolled out despite threatening weather conditions, with generations of American military hardware from P-51 Mustangs to Abrams tanks proudly featured.
Yet, attendance for the parade appeared to be far below the 200,000 expected guests. Recordings that emerged from the parade were also less-than-flattering, from the squeak of threads from old Sherman tanks to soldiers awkwardly holding up drones as they marched.
In comparison, millions of protesters were estimated to have attended No Kings protests in all 50 states. If true, that would make it the largest single-day protest in American history, far bigger than the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests which peaked at 500,000 people.
Granted, attendance at political events does not equate to electoral support. Mr Trump won the popular vote just eight months ago, after all, despite months of sold-out rallies for then-Vice President Kamala Harris. Outrage over the immigration crackdown and other measures might fade by the midterm elections in 2026, let alone 2028.
However, it is clear that popular resistance to Mr Trump has returned at an unprecedented scale and level of coordination. It is likely that the political clash between the protesters and the administration has only just begun.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Straits Times

an hour ago

• Straits Times

Trump assurance of US support for Aukus to Starmer some consolation for Albanese after meet cancelled

US President Donald Trump (left) and British PM Keir Starmer shake hands as they speak to reporters during the G-7 Summit in Kananaskis, Canada. PHOTO: AFP – A much-vaunted meeting between Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and US President Donald Trump to discuss the future of a three-way security pact that also involves Britain did not take place as planned at the Group of Seven (G-7) Summit in Calgary, after the American leader abruptly left to deal with the Israel-Iran war. Nevertheless, Canberra's concerns about the US commitment to the Aukus pact – which involves the supply of nuclear-powered submarines to Australia at a cost of A$368 billion (S$306.73 billion) – were partially assuaged when British Prime Minister Keir Starmer appeared to secure the backing of the mercurial Mr Trump for the deal. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Straits Times

2 hours ago

• Straits Times

Forced to wait for Trump, Israel faces strategic dilemma in Iran

Protesters rallying in New York on June 18. US President Donald Trump says he will wait up to two weeks before deciding on a US attack on Iran. PHOTO: REUTERS JERUSALEM – President Donald Trump's decision to defer a US attack on Iran has left Israel in a strategic bind. Israel's main remaining war goal is to wipe out a nuclear enrichment site at Fordo in northern Iran, which is buried so deep underground that Israeli bombs will struggle to damage it. For days, Israeli officials hoped Mr Trump would send US warplanes armed with the only munitions in the world that are deemed powerful enough to destroy Fordo. Now, Mr Trump says he will wait up to two weeks before deciding whether to make such an intervention, a delay that imposes a dilemma on Israel. The longer Israel waits for Trump, the greater the strain on its air defence system. To keep out Iran's ballistic missile barrages, Israel is burning through its stocks of missile interceptors, forcing it to prioritise the protection of some areas over others. As time goes on, that raises the risk of more missiles hitting both civilian neighbourhoods and strategic security sites. With Israel's airspace closed and much of its economic life suspended, the war's protraction will also come at an economic cost. The sooner the war ends, the faster commercial flights will return and businesses can resume full operations. Rather than wait for US help, Israel could decide to attack Fordo alone, taking a chance with the planes and munitions it has at its disposal. Some analysts say Israel could even send commandos to enter and sabotage the site. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hinted at going it alone June 19, saying in a television interview that Israel would 'achieve all of our objectives, all of their nuclear facilities. We have the power to do so'. But experts say this route is fraught with risk and that its effect may be limited. 'It probably won't be on the scale of what the US can achieve,' said Mr Itamar Rabinovich, a former Israeli ambassador to Washington. 'If we could do what the US can, we would have already done it.' Another option is for Israel to wind down the war unilaterally, without attacking Fordo. But that approach would leave at least a significant part of Iran's nuclear enrichment programme intact, leaving open the possibility that Iran might create a nuclear bomb that could be used against Israel. For now, Israel does not seem set to take that route. Israel's political leadership has begun to speak explicitly about prompting the collapse of the Iranian regime and assassinating its leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Even if Israel has no real way of toppling his government, the tone of the comments suggest that Israel, at the very least, intends to continue with its strikes for several days. The tone of the Israeli news media on June 20 also indicated continued domestic support for the Israeli campaign, as did new opinion polling. After Israel's attack on Iran, Mr Netanyahu's party is in its strongest polling position since October 2023, when Hamas carried out the deadliest attack in Israel's history. NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Straits Times

3 hours ago

• Straits Times

Strait of Hormuz tracker: Fewer ships seen entering oil chokepoint

An oil tanker passing through the Strait of Hormuz. Such ships make up the bulk of traffic through the Strait. PHOTO: REUTERS Fewer commercial vessels appear to be entering the Strait of Hormuz, a vital chokepoint for energy exports from the Persian Gulf to the world, as Israel's attack on Iran – and signs the US may join it – bring unease to the shipping industry. Importantly, oil tanker arrivals appear more normal. A five-day rolling average of vessels above 10,000 deadweight tons reveals a decline in ships sailing through the Strait into the Gulf since Israel and Iran started exchanging missile strikes a week ago, according to vessel-tracking data compiled by Bloomberg. The drop was led by container ships and bulk carriers. Departures from the sea are just above usual norms. It is too early to draw definitive conclusions from the data, which are volatile at the best of times, but they offer a tentative idea that vessel owners might be steering clear of the conflict-ridden region. Of the ships entering, oil tankers are showing little impact so far, with about 40 to 44 of the vessels still sailing through the space in both directions. The ships account for bulk of the traffic through the Strait, with more than a quarter of the world's oil shipped through the waterway between Iran and Oman. Movements by liquefied petroleum gas and liquefied natural gas tankers also remain close to the usual combined total of seven to nine ships a day. While Iran has threatened repeatedly to close the Strait in times of heightened geopolitical tensions, the government in Tehran relies heavily on the route for its own oil and gas exports and revenues. Still, traders will be watching closely for any impact on traffic should US President Donald Trump decide to get his country's forces into the conflict. Overall, daily transits through the waterway remain within typical ranges, with most loading and discharge activities proceeding as planned. To be clear, it takes time to parse trends from data on shipping traffic. Cargo-loading schedules, the weather and other things can influence vessel movements and the snapshot covers a relatively short timespan. In addition, electronic interference affecting navigational signals in the region may be impacting the results. While physical traffic isn't blocked, high freight rates for vessels transiting the region reflects the wariness of shipowners amid the sharply increased perceived risk. BLOOMBERG Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.