Black Democrats Fume over 2024 While ‘Searching for a Leader' in 2028

Sam Wolfe/For The Washington Post
Former DNC chair Jaime Harrison speaks during the South Carolina Democratic Party State Convention on Saturday in Columbia, South Carolina.
COLUMBIA, South Carolina – A mostly Black crowd of hundreds of Democrats erupted in cheers when former national party chairman Jaime Harrison urged them to 'go on offense' and energize their communities to propel a 'blue Democratic wave' in next year's midterms.
But offstage Saturday, Harrison was still wrestling with the problems of the last election.
'I feel like, as chair, my voice was not always heard, that I was taken for granted. I was seen as somebody to just rubber stamp and not to actually have a seat at the table to influence certain things,' Harrison said in an interview with The Washington Post on the sidelines of the South Carolina Democratic Party's annual convention. 'And that has to change.'
Black Democratic leaders and activists are filled with apprehension as they try to regroup more than six months after a dispiriting defeat that ignited lingering frustrations, recriminations and disagreements about what went wrong and what the party should do differently as it eyes elections in 2026 and 2028. They are eager for the party to rally around a hopeful message and a clearer plan for combating President Donald Trump and Republicans. But they don't yet see a clear standard-bearer to help them turn the tide.
'Trump took all our steam out of us and we're still searching for a leader right now,' said Daryl Scott, a retired Army veteran from Myrtle Beach who attended the state Democratic convention. 'There's none. Name one. Where are they? They feel embarrassed because they didn't deliver.'
Tensions came into sharp focus this past weekend in South Carolina, a longtime early nominating state and major power center for some of the party's most influential Black leaders.
In interviews with more than two dozen Black elected officials, strategists, candidates and activists, many said they felt national Democratic leaders took Black voters for granted in 2024. Some said they felt betrayed by parts of the Democratic base, such as Latino voters, who didn't show up as forcefully for Kamala Harris as they had hoped. Others expressed disappointment in former president Joe Biden's decision to run for a second term and strategic decisions Harris's campaign made after she replaced him on the ticket.
Harrison expressed anger about the result of the election, troubled by indicators that some Black voters stayed home or supported Trump. He supported Biden vocally, including when others called on him to step aside sooner amid concerns about his age and acuity, and rallied behind Harris when she became the party's nominee. But he suggested some of their advisers ignored his ideas about how to sell voters on Democratic policy wins.
'We can't just be nice ornaments,' said Harrison, who opted to not seek reelection as head of the Democratic National Committee when his term ended earlier this year. 'We actually have to have a substantive and real role in terms of directing this party and moving this party forward.'
While other corners of the party are engaged in similar bouts of blame and self-doubt, the discussions among Black Democrats are especially pertinent. They have played a major role in determining the Democratic presidential nominee for decades; and Black voters have been the most loyal members of the party's coalition – supporting the nominee in general elections more than any other racial or ethnic group.
Although few blamed Biden directly for the party's malaise, some Black Democrats said he shouldn't have run for a second term and should have made good on his pledge to build a 'bridge' to the next generation of leaders. Others, like Harrison, the first Black chair of the South Carolina Democratic Party, and Rep. James E. Clyburn, a beloved elder among Black Democrats, defended Biden throughout the weekend of events.
The release of recent books has reignited a debate about whether Biden's inner circle hid information about his health from the public. Speaking with reporters at his annual 'world-famous fish fry,' Clyburn sought to shut down a question about Biden's health and the election.
'Who's talking about that? Well, this is the first time I've heard that in the last three weeks. I've been all over the state at town halls,' he said.
Catherine Fleming Bruce, a Democratic activist running for the U.S. Senate seat held by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R), said she wished there had been an open primary because Democrats should be 'making sure that we have Democratic processes at all times' – and Biden dropping out so late meant there wasn't enough time for Harris to win over skeptics.
Harris, the first Black woman to accept a major party's nomination for president, after Biden ended his campaign in July, overwhelmingly won over Black voters. But by some measures, including the reputable AP VoteCast voter surveys, she won a smaller share of them than Biden did in 2020. A recent analysis from Democratic data firm Catalist found that Black men shifted toward Republicans, with Harris performing seven percentage points worse among them than Biden did in 2020.
Sitting Saturday at the back of the building in the South Carolina State Fairgrounds listening to statewide candidates at the convention, Scott said the priority for Democrats is to win elections in Virginia and New Jersey this November and then in the 2026 midterms. But the party badly needs a national leader who 'can deliver for all of us,' he added.
Black Democrats survey a wide-open 2028 field
With the 2028 field wide open, a pair of potential presidential candidates visited the state, swinging by the state party's Blue Palmetto Dinner fundraiser and the fish fry hosted by Clyburn on Friday night. The visits from Maryland Gov. Wes Moore and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz were early opportunities to connect with South Carolina's Black voters, who make up roughly half the state's Democratic electorate and helped power Biden's rise in 2020.
Moore, the nation's only current Black governor, urged Democrats to become 'the party of 'yes' and 'now' ' during a hopeful speech at the dinner fundraiser. He encouraged them to move quickly to deliver policy wins as he accused the Trump administration of 'actively divesting from our Black communities, dismantling our minority business programs, and banning books about our history.'
'In 10 years, our success will be measured not by how much we resisted, or how loud we yelled. Our success will be measured in the results we deliver to make life better for people,' Moore said in his speech. Afterward, some attendees spoke positively about his pitch.
In an interview with The Post, Moore said he didn't think Trump made gains with Black voters 'because he figured something out that Democrats didn't. I think he gained a vote share because he just exposed the fact that Democrats weren't figuring it out.'
'It's not like he offered anything new or interesting or innovative. He just simply said, 'What are they doing? How are they benefiting your life?' Moore said. 'Trump was a fantastic vessel for the frustration.'
Beyond concerns from some about Biden's age and acuity, Black voters, like other demographic groups, were vocal about their economic frustrations – even as Biden made significant gains in reducing unemployment, boosting funding for Black-owned businesses and creating jobs for Black Americans during his presidency.
Biden spokesperson Kelly Scully said that Biden and Harris made 'important progress' for Black Americans, touting some of his economic achievements and others, including capping the cost of insulin for seniors and canceling billions of dollars in student loan debt. 'President Biden believes that while progress was made, the work to make the promise of America real for Black communities must continue,' Scully said.
A spokesperson for Harris did not respond to a request for comment.
Trump used targeted advertising, occasional outreach events and support from some high-profile Black celebrities as he vowed to deliver a strong economy with more opportunities for Black Americans. He promoted his mug shot and said Black voters liked him more because of it and his criminal indictments. Trump has spoken for years with inflammatory and sometimes racist remarks about Black Americans that have drawn widespread condemnation.
Biden and his campaign argued that the prospect of Trump returning to the White House meant risking 'all progress, all freedom, all opportunities.' But polls showed Black Americans' support for Biden was down, particularly among young voters, even before he ended his campaign last summer after a disastrous debate where he repeatedly appeared to lose his train of thought.
When Harris replaced Biden on the ticket, she initially generated excitement, but later struggled to address concerns that Democrats failed to deliver on promises, such as overhauling the criminal justice system. Black Democrats beyond South Carolina, including younger, more liberal members of the party, have in recent years been frustrated by its stalled agenda.
Concerns about slippage in support prompted former president Barack Obama weeks before the election to issue an impassioned plea to Black men to support Harris. He admonished them for thinking about sitting out the presidential contest and suggested sexism might factor in.
Moore suggested Democrats' missteps with Black voters predated Trump and 2024, arguing that candidates often waited until election years to aggressively reach out to the Black community.
'It's tiring,' Moore said.
Walz, who was Harris's running mate, delivered a keynote speech at the convention, where he encouraged Democrats to match Trump's tough tactics and worry less about offending people. He also challenged conservative criticism that Democrats have focused too much on diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives, saying, 'We focus on it because it's foundational to everything we do.'
Walz drew loud cheers and a line of supporters who flocked to the side exit to take selfies and chat with him. Several praised him for speaking candidly in a speech peppered with expletives
'We're just not coming together like we should'
Christale Spain, the chair of the South Carolina Democratic Party, reflected on the last election as she looked to the next one, saying she doesn't like the word postmortem 'because we're not dead.'
Spain said the Harris campaign did not make Black voters a big enough priority as it courted centrists and moderate Republicans.
'We can't lose our most dependable base because we're chasing rainbows,' she said. 'You've gotta know where your bread is buttered. Invest there.'
Many Black Democrats who aired frustrations were also quick to praise Biden and Harris for their service. Some spoke fondly about the former president's decades-long commitment to their community and expressed well wishes for Biden as he undergoes cancer treatment. Several shied from blaming Biden or Harris for the election outcome.
While Harrison criticized some in Biden's inner circle for not listening to him, he emphasized that he felt Biden himself understood the importance of having Black leaders empowered and making decisions about the party's direction and policy.
In 2020, Biden said he saw himself as a 'bridge' to the next generation of Democratic leaders, which some in the party interpreted as a pledge that he would step down after one term.
'At that point, way back then, that would have given the people a full amount [of time to run], and that didn't happen,' said Bruce, the Senate candidate.
Some convention attendees over the weekend said they longed for the early days of the Obama presidency when they felt more unity within the party, and before Trump, his inflammatory rhetoric and chaotic agenda had become a fixture of American politics. But they acknowledged those days were gone, and focusing on the strategies of the past probably wouldn't serve them now.
Renee Boles, 62, a volunteer with the Council of Black Democrats at the convention, said she was pleased to see so many Black Democrats gathering to talk about the party's future. But she doesn't see Democrats doing that on a national scale, she said, and she struggled to name someone she would like to see run for president.
'I actually think the Democratic Party could be better at trying to get people together. We're just not coming together like we should,' she said. 'That's the sad part.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Japan Today

36 minutes ago

• Japan Today

U.S. lawmakers call for Congress to review Trump's Iran actions

FILE PHOTO: U.S. House of Representatives Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) looks on, after President Donald Trump delivered remarks on tariffs, in the Rose Garden at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., April 2, 2025. REUTERS/Leah Millis/File Photo By David Morgan Some Democratic and Republican lawmakers on Sunday called on Congress to rein in President Donald Trump's use of military force in Iran and prevent U.S. involvement in a deepening Middle East conflict. With Republican leaders in the Senate and House of Representatives strongly backing the U.S. attacks on key Iranian nuclear sites, it seemed unlikely any resolution that asserts the power of Congress to declare war and restricts Trump's actions could pass both chambers. U.S. Democratic Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia said he expects to force the Senate to vote this week on his measure requiring Trump to terminate hostilities against Iran unless explicitly authorized by a declaration of war from Congress. Republican Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Democratic Representative Ro Khanna of California said they want a vote on similar legislation they introduced in the House. "This is the U.S. jumping into a war of choice at Donald Trump's urging, without any compelling national security interest for the United States to act in this way, particularly without a debate and vote in Congress," Kaine told CBS' "Face the Nation" program. The White House did not respond to a request for comment on the criticism from lawmakers. House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune were both notified of the U.S. military action ahead of time, according to sources familiar with the matter. Members of Congress are expected to be briefed on Tuesday. Thune's office declined to comment on Kaine's measure. The attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities on Saturday divided Trump's populist MAGA movement, with some leaders rallying behind the president and others calling for an end to hostilities after so-called U.S. "forever wars" in Iraq and Afghanistan following the September 11, 2001, attacks on U.S. soil. "I represent part of the coalition that elected President Trump. We were tired of endless wars," Massie told CBS. "We were promised that we would put our veterans, our immigration policies and our infrastructure first." Massie and Kaine each said there was no urgency requiring Trump to act unilaterally. "There was no imminent threat to the United States," Massie said. "We haven't been briefed." Intelligence reports and analysts have reached different conclusions on how close Iran was to building a nuclear bomb. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said on Friday that the U.S. had intelligence that should Iran decide to do so, it could build a nuclear weapon in weeks or months. U.S. officials say they do not believe Iran had decided to make a bomb. Iran claims its nuclear ambitions are peaceful and focused on energy production and medical research. But its program, which began in the late 1950s with U.S. support, has fallen under suspicion in recent years, with Tehran ramping up enrichment to 60%, just below the weapons-grade of 90%, and restricting the access of international inspectors to its sites. Trump vowed on Sunday to support Massie's primary challenger in the 2026 midterm elections, saying the Kentucky congressman's criticism of the Iran attack and opposition to Trump's legislative efforts proved he was not aligned with the party's new base. "MAGA is not about lazy, grandstanding, nonproductive politicians, of which Thomas Massie is definitely one," Trump posted to Truth Social. REPUBLICANS VOICE DIFFERING VIEWS Another Trump loyalist, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, also criticized Trump's decision on Sunday, but insisted she was not being disloyal. "I can also support President Trump and his great administration on many of the great things they are doing while disagreeing on bombing Iran and getting involved in a hot war that Israel started," the Georgia Republican wrote on X. Other Trump allies pushed back on claims that his actions against Iran violated the U.S. Constitution and a federal law that restricts unilateral action by a president to conditions involving an attack on the United States. "He had all the authority he needs under the Constitution. They are wrong," said Senator Lindsey Graham, a staunch Trump ally who has long been a leading voice on U.S. foreign policy matters in Congress. "If you don't like what the president does in terms of war, you can cut off the funding," the South Carolina Republican told NBC's "Meet the Press" program. The attacks on Iran generally drew accolades from Republican lawmakers who declared that the operation set back Iran's ability to obtain a nuclear weapon. "The President made the right call, and did what he needed to do," Johnson said in a post on X late Saturday. "The Commander-in-Chief evaluated that the imminent danger outweighed the time it would take for Congress to act." The U.S. Constitution divides war powers in the federal government by making the president the commander-in-chief of the armed forces but leaving sole authority to declare war to Congress. The balance has shifted, with Congress relinquishing the use of military power to presidents of both parties in recent years. But Democrats said it was too early to tell whether the mission had succeeded, warning that Iran could have moved its nuclear material to other sites far from U.S. targets. "The tragedy in this country is that we keep entering these overseas wars. We triumphantly declare the mission is accomplished the day after, and then we're left with Americans bearing the consequences for decades," Khanna told CBS. © Thomson Reuters 2025.

Japan Today

41 minutes ago

• Japan Today

Bombing Iran, Trump gambles on force over diplomacy

By Shaun TANDON US President Donald Trump addresses the nation on strikes on Iran with Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth behind him For nearly a half-century the United States has squabbled with Iran's Islamic Republic but the conflict has largely been left in the shadows, with U.S. policymakers believing, often reluctantly, that diplomacy was preferable. With President Donald Trump's order of strikes on Iran's nuclear sites, the United States -- like Israel, which encouraged him -- has brought the conflict into the open, and the consequences may not be clear for some time to come. "We will only know if it succeeded if we can get through the next three to five years without the Iranian regime acquiring nuclear weapons, which they now have compelling reasons to want," said Kenneth Pollack, a former CIA analyst and supporter of the 2003 Iraq war who is now vice president for policy at the Middle East Institute. U.S. intelligence had not concluded that Iran was building a nuclear bomb, with Tehran's sensitive atomic work largely seen as a means of leverage, and Iran can be presumed to have taken precautions in anticipation of strikes. Trita Parsi, an outspoken critic of military action, said Trump "has now made it more likely that Iran will be a nuclear weapons state in the next five to 10 years." "We should be careful not to confuse tactical success with strategic success," said Parsi, executive vice president of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft. "The Iraq war was also successful in the first few weeks but President Bush's declaration of 'Mission Accomplished' did not age well," he said. Weak point for Iran Yet Trump's attack -- a week after Israel began a major military campaign -- came as the cleric-run state is at one of its weakest points since the 1979 Islamic revolution toppled the pro-Western shah. Since the October 7, 2023 attack on Israel by Hamas, which enjoys Iran's support, Israel -- besides obliterating much of Gaza -- has decimated Lebanon's Hezbollah, a militant group that would once reliably strike Israel as Tehran's proxy. Iran's main ally among Arab leaders, Syria's Bashar al-Assad, was also toppled in December. Supporters of Trump's strike argued that diplomacy was not working, with Iran standing firm on its right to enrich uranium. "Contrary to what some will say in the days to come, the U.S. administration did not rush to war. In fact, it gave diplomacy a real chance," said Ted Deutch, a former Democratic congressman who now heads the American Jewish Committee. "The murderous Iranian regime refused to make a deal," he said. Top Senate Republican John Thune pointed to Tehran's threats to Israel and language against the United States and said that the state had "rejected all diplomatic pathways to peace." Abrupt halt to diplomacy Trump's attack comes almost exactly a decade after former President Barack Obama sealed a deal in which Iran drastically scaled back its nuclear work -- which Trump pulled out of in 2018 after coming into office for his first term. Most of Trump's Republican Party and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has long seen Iran as an existential threat, attacked Obama's deal because it allowed Tehran to enrich uranium at levels well beneath weapons grade and the key clauses had an end date. But Trump, billing himself a peacemaker, just a month ago said on a visit to Gulf Arab monarchies that he was hopeful for a new deal with Iran, and his administration was preparing new talks when Netanyahu attacked Iran. This prompted an abrupt U-turn from Trump. "Trump's decision to cut short his own efforts for diplomacy will also make it much harder to get a deal in the medium and long runs," said Jennifer Kavanagh, director of military analysis at Defense Priorities, which advocates restraint. "Iran now has no incentive to trust Trump's word or to believe that striking a compromise will advance Iran's interests." Iran's religious rulers also face opposition internally. Major protests erupted in 2022 after the death in custody of Mahsa Amini, who was detained for defying the regime's rules on covering hair. Karim Sadjadpour, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, wrote on social media that Trump's strikes could either entrench the Islamic Republic or hasten its downfall. "The U.S. bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities is an unprecedented event that may prove to be transformational for Iran, the Middle East, U.S. foreign policy, global non-proliferation and potentially even the global order," he said. "Its impact will be measured for decades to come." © 2025 AFP

Yomiuri Shimbun

18 hours ago

• Yomiuri Shimbun

A $250 Bill and ‘WMAGA': GOP Lawmakers Push Legislation Honoring Trump

Late last month, Florida Republican Rep. Greg Steube introduced a bill that would halt any funding for the Washington Metropolitan Area Transportation Authority unless its name was changed. Steube, whose southwest Florida district is about 950 miles from Washington, proposed WMATA be rechristened the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access or … WMAGA. The legislation also called for Metrorail, the system's flagship rail line, to be renamed the 'Trump Train.' The bill, Steube said in a statement, would signal a 'cultural shift away from bureaucratic stagnation toward public-facing excellence and patriotism.' Steube's proposal is just the latest in legislative offerings this year paying tribute to President Donald Trump. House Republicans have proposed at least eight bills since January to honor the president or burnish his image. They would, among other things, put Trump's portrait on U.S. currency, carve his face onto Mount Rushmore, rename Washington Dulles International Airport for him and make his birthday a national holiday. Two bills, both introduced by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Georgia), called for the House to expunge Trump's impeachments in 2019 and 2021. Longtime political observers say the GOP's legislative love fest for the president is well outside of congressional norms. While members have often proposed legislation that honors presidents, it is almost never while they are still in office. 'It is unprecedented and to be honest with you, it's completely wild,' John White, professor emeritus of politics at Catholic University, said in an interview. 'History shows that most things are named after presidents after they have either long left office or been deceased.' Ronald Reagan was still alive in 1998 when Congress passed legislation renaming Washington National Airport for him. But by then, Reagan had been out of office for almost a decade and had been diagnosed with Alzheimer's. White also pointed to the renaming of Idlewild Airport in New York for John F. Kennedy in December 1963, just a month after his assassination. But that was a decision proposed by New York City's mayor at the time, not Congress. In 2012, Congress passed bipartisan legislation that renamed federal buildings for former Democratic president Bill Clinton and former Republican presidents George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush. Steube's proposal to rename the Metro was cheered by many from Trump's's base and met with derision by Democrats and other critics who saw it as a craven appeal to the commander in chief. 'WMATA is not a vanity project for Donald Trump to steamroll. It's the backbone of our nation's capital,' Sen Mark R. Warner (D-Virginia) posted on X. 'When will House Republicans stop trying to suck up to Donald Trump and start focusing on lowering the cost of living?' WMATA did not respond to a request for comment on the proposed change. None of the current laundry list of Trump-praising bills are likely to become law, as they face a challenging legislative process and constitutional obstacles. But they do serve a purpose for the members who introduce them, said Casey Burgat, director of the Legislative Affairs masters program at George Washington University's Graduate School of Political Management. 'They're trying to stand out amongst their peers of who can be the most supportive of a president who has a complete hold on their party,' Burgat said. 'Attaching their name to something in their institutional capacity not only signals to their constituents that they're doing this, but more importantly, probably, the president who's looking for fealty.' Three days after Trump's inauguration in January, Rep. Addison McDowell (R-North Carolina) proposed renaming Washington Dulles International Airport in Virginia to the 'Donald J. Trump International Airport.' 'President Donald J. Trump, the greatest president of my lifetime, was just sworn into office for a second term after a historic landslide victory,' Rep. Guy Reschenthaler (R-Pennsylvania), a co-sponsor of the bill, said in a statement. 'This legislation will cement his status in our nation's capital as our fearless commander in chief, extraordinary leader and relentless champion for the American people.' Rep. Claudia Tenney (R-New York) chose Valentine's Day to submit a bill that would make Trump's birthday, June 14, a national holiday along with Flag Day. 'Just as George Washington's Birthday is codified as a federal holiday, this bill will add Trump's Birthday to this list, recognizing him as the founder of America's Golden Age,' Tenney said in a statement at the time. (A few days earlier, Tenney had introduced H.R.1216 – a bill that would end federal support for PBS and NPR. It is titled the Defund Government-Sponsored Propaganda Act). 'President Trump is arguably the most consequential president ever, and his place in history will be remembered for generations to come,' said White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt in a statement. 'These proposals from Republican lawmakers serve as further proof there's never been a political leader in American history with such immense support from their Party as President Trump. The President appreciates the overwhelming support and these kind gestures from Republican lawmakers.' Several lawmakers in the current session have served up bills that aim to make Trump's face more ubiquitous. Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Florida) introduced legislation directing the secretary of the interior 'to arrange for the carving of the figure of President Donald J. Trump on Mount Rushmore National Memorial.' The National Park Service has previously said there is no suitable stable space on the monument for another face to be added. Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas) proposed H.R. 1790, the Golden Age Act of 2025, which directs the Treasury Department to print $100 bills with Trump's portrait on them. That was just after Rep. Joe Wilson (R-South Carolina) introduced the Donald J. Trump $250 Bill Act, which would require the Treasury to print 'Federal reserve notes in the denomination of $250 and such notes shall feature a portrait of Donald J. Trump.' The $250 bill is meant to help the nation celebrate its 250 birthday next year, Wilson said in a statement, which concluded, 'The most valuable bill for the most valuable President!' Numerous House members co-sponsored the bill including Steube, Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-New York), Rep. Diana Harshbarger (R-Tennessee), Rep. Ralph Norman (R-South Carolina) and Rep. Darrell Issa (R-California). U.S. Treasurer Brandon Beach, who was appointed by Trump, wrote to Wilson in late May expressing his support for the bill but acknowledging that the law does not allow living people to appear on U.S. currency. In a letter Wilson's office shared with The Washington Post, Beach wrote, 'I am willing to help in any way that I can to make this a reality.' A spokesperson for House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) did not respond to an email seeking comment. Spokespeople for other Republican representatives contacted for this story pointed to statements made when the bills were introduced. Former Republican congressman Charlie Dent of Pennsylvania, who served in Congress from 2005 to 2018 and was a chair of the House Ethics Committee, said he thinks the bills honoring Trump would probably make some current GOP House members uncomfortable and he doesn't see much appetite for action on any of them. 'It's better to name buildings and institutions and airports for politicians long after they're out of office, after there's been some time to reflect on their records and their place in history,' he said. The various proposals honoring Trump this session are 'being done to please the president,' Dent said in an interview on Friday. 'I mean, he loves that kind of attention.' Dent added that he thinks it is 'ill-advised' to pass legislation bestowing honor on people in such a politically charged atmosphere. 'Usually when you do these types of honorifics, they are moments of celebration and joy to remember that individual,' Dent said. 'I don't think that's what would happen today with the current president, certainly not while he's in office. Maybe over time, after he's long gone, maybe people's views will shift on him. Who knows?' GW's Burgat says there's a risk involved that the legislation introduced extolling Trump diminishes the institution's reputation and its work. A 2023 Congressional Research Service report on commemorations noted that beginning in the 1960s, Congress attempted to reduce legislative proposals for naming federal buildings, designating federal holidays and establishing monuments. 'These initiatives were in response to concern that the legislative time spent on commemorative measures was excessive,' the report stated. 'It undermines the job itself,' Burgat said. 'Your job is to write laws, to study them. Not just memorialize the current president.'