logo
‘Radical creator' takes a ‘kaleidoscopic look at love' in Shakespeare-adjacent opera

‘Radical creator' takes a ‘kaleidoscopic look at love' in Shakespeare-adjacent opera

The Age02-06-2025

'The scenarios that are presented in The Fairy Queen are a kind of kaleidoscopic look at love in every aspect,' she says. 'It's all about love and marriage, loss, sorrow, unrequited love – every possible angle. The universal experience of love.'
Indeed, one of the opera's most affecting numbers begins with the line, 'If love's a sweet passion/why does it torment?'
The libretto, thought to be by Thomas Betterton, is best described as Shakespeare-adjacent. No named characters from A Midsummer Night's Dream appear in it. Instead, we have personifications of the seasons, night and sleep, and fairies and green men. There's a comic scene for a rustic couple, Corydon and Mopsa, traditionally sung by bass and countertenor.
'What felt more interesting for me, for this production, was to allow The Fairy Queen to stand very much by itself,' Jones says.
'It's got a fantastic structure, it really works as a theatrical piece. Although it's a series of vignettes, they are structured together in a very clever way. Purcell was brilliant – he died when he was 36 – but he was such an interesting, curious, people-loving person. He was amazing.'
British director Jones is known as an innovative theatre-maker who often incorporates video in her shows. Her recent production of Peter Grimes for Gothenburg Opera in Sweden was praised in The Observer for its devastating impact, and noted Jones as a 'radical creator who uses video to original effect'. She works with a team of designers and technicians at her creative studio, Lightmap.
This is her first project with an Australian company, although in 2017 she brought her production of The Dark Mirror – a version of Schubert's Winterreise – with Ian Bostridge, to the Perth Festival. Pinchgut was lucky to secure Jones' services; last December she took up the newly created role of associate director of the Royal Opera.
Jones has set this production of The Fairy Queen in a modern city that could be Sydney, with the action taking place across a 24-hour period. A wide video screen will reach across the back of the stage.
'The production will be very visual – there are lots of changes, lots of colour,' she says.
'The first production of The Fairy Queen almost bankrupted the theatre because they put everything in it. We can't do that but we can use the technology at our disposal to do something that's very visual. We've included dance and other elements of baroque theatre but we've just made it very contemporary.'
Loading
At the Royal Opera, Jones is charged with bringing in new commissions, new artists and new ways of addressing opera as an art form, working out of the Linbury Theatre.
'[Opera] has been with us 300 years, it's not going away,' she says. 'It's an art form, not a medium. Media do tend to come and go – we may have something different to television in our domestic lives in the future. Whereas opera and painting and poetry and play-making, they are not the same.
'Companies have felt the squeeze but the work will live on and shift into something that is much more central to our cultural life. Sometimes when something is under threat you become more active in protecting it.'
Purcell's music for The Fairy Queen was all but lost until its rediscovery in 1901. Growing interest in early music led to its revival. In 2003 the barely year-old Pinchgut Opera chose The Fairy Queen for its second production, after making its debut the previous year with Handel's Semele.
Helyard says he has chosen to return to The Fairy Queen to show how far this small but musically rigorous company has come.
'Back then we weren't quite as stylistically confident with playing and singing this kind of music,' he says. 'This seemed like the perfect piece to go to the Ros Packer Theatre, our premiere there, and to revisit Purcell.'
Back in the rehearsal room at the Drill Hall, the wedding party is in full swing. Mezzosoprano Anna Fraser rises from her seat, mock-drunkenly staggers to centre stage and begins to sing: 'Hark! How all things in one sound rejoice …'
Almost on cue, rain starts to fall, like a thousand fairies drumming on the iron roof.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Concert tickets prices are skyrocketing. Fans have come up with a worrying solution
Concert tickets prices are skyrocketing. Fans have come up with a worrying solution

Sydney Morning Herald

time3 hours ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Concert tickets prices are skyrocketing. Fans have come up with a worrying solution

When Bianca Wilmott wanted to surprise her boyfriend with two expensive tickets to Lady Gaga's coming Australian tour, she knew exactly how she was going to do it. The 32-year-old social media manager from Sydney's inner west turned to the buy now, pay later (BNPL) service Afterpay to cover the cost of her two $600 tickets. 'It's part of my budgeting, to be able to split the payment up … I wouldn't have [purchased tickets without Afterpay] because I wouldn't have wanted to make that big payment in one go,' says Wilmott, who was one of 11,500 people to purchase Lady Gaga tickets through the BNPL platform. Data provided by Afterpay showed that 1.5 million transactions were made in live entertainment in Australia over the 12 months to April 2025 amid a flurry of big international acts such as Katy Perry, Billie Eilish, Dua Lipa and Olivia Rodrigo, as well as our own Kylie Minogue. Later this year there's Gaga, Metallica, Kendrick Lamar, Bad Bunny, Oasis and Usher. And tickets are getting more expensive – last year, a Live Performance Australia report revealed that the average price for a concert ticket rose from $87.01 in 2022 to $128.21 in 2023. And a report by Music Australia this year found that 'despite feeling less financially secure, young Australians are spending larger sums on entertainment and leisure in 2024 than they were in 2019' and are increasingly purchasing last-minute tickets that might 'break the bank'. Loading The report, titled Listening In: Insights on live music attendance, found that young people were driven by FOMO – fear of missing out – when it came to shelling out for international touring artists, often to the detriment of ticket sales for local talent. A fall in ticket sales for pub and club concerts, often featuring emerging artists, corresponded 'with a spate of big international acts touring Australia after the pandemic', the report says. While the report did not address how audiences bought tickets, it did find that 79 per cent of under 24s had saved money to purchase concert tickets, compared with 31 per cent of those over 40.

Comedian Margaret Cho says Ellen DeGeneres was ‘not nice' to her
Comedian Margaret Cho says Ellen DeGeneres was ‘not nice' to her

Courier-Mail

time4 hours ago

  • Courier-Mail

Comedian Margaret Cho says Ellen DeGeneres was ‘not nice' to her

Don't miss out on the headlines from Celebrity Life. Followed categories will be added to My News. Comedian Margaret Cho has spoken out about her 'creepy and weird' encounters with Ellen DeGeneres. Joining the chorus of people to air their unpleasant stories about the former talk show host, who now lives on a farm in the UK, Cho revealed she opened for DeGeneres at comedy clubs in the 1980s before they both hit the big time. Years later, Cho said she was invited as a guest on DeGeneres' talk show, where she claimed the host pretended they had never met before. 'Ellen was really weird and not nice to me for most of my career,' Cho said on The Kelly Mantle Show podcast. 'I opened for her in the 1980s, when she was a headliner in comedy clubs. Later, when I would do her talk show in the 2000s, she would act like we just met. And I'm like, 'Bitch, what?' That's weird. We go way back. It's so creepy and weird.' Margaret Cho made the revelation on The Kelly Mantle Show. Ellen DeGeneres has been the subject of claims she's 'not nice'. Picture: AP Things got weirder as Cho, 56, recalled a bizarre broadcast edit she felt was a personal swipe from DeGeneres, 67. Remembering how she attended a David Bowie concert in a 'Chinese emperor outfit', Cho said the late singer went on DeGeneres' show the very next day where he talked at length about the comedian's fabulous attire at his show. 'The producer, who's a really good friend of mine, had to call me and tell me, 'I can't believe she did this, but she cut it out of the show,'' Cho said. '[The producer continued] 'But you need to know that he was going on and on about your outfit. God [Bowie] said your name. He loves you.'' While unsure if the comments were cut for another reason, Cho conceded, 'I'm going to take it personally.' Cho claimed David Bowie's comments were cut from the broadcast. Picture:/AFP DeGeneres, who is married to Australian actress Portia de Rossi, quit her long-running talk show in 2022 following widespread reports of a toxic environment on-set. It all started when a March 2020 tweet claimed DeGeneres was 'notoriously one of the meanest people alive', which was met by more than 1000 replies of people detailing their not-so-nice experiences with her. The aftermath was even more brutal, with countless Ellen staff coming forward on the record with their own stories of bullying. Addressing claims for the first time after her return to TV for the show's 18th season months later, DeGeneres admitted she was a 'work in progress' but pleaded to viewers that she is still 'the person you see on TV'. Ellen ended her talk show after nearly 20 years. Picture: Warner Bros 'As you may have heard this summer there were allegations of a toxic work environment at our show and then there was an investigation. I learned that things happened here that never should've happened,' she said at the time. 'I take that very seriously, and I want to say I'm so sorry to the people who were affected.' She admitted being known as the 'be kind' lady is 'a tricky position to be in'. 'Sometimes I get sad. I get mad. I get anxious. I get frustrated. I get impatient. And I am working on all of that. I am a work in progress,' she said. 'And I am especially working on the impatience thing because … and it's not going well because it's not happening fast enough.' DeGeneres moved to the UK with de Rossi late last year, shortly after US President Donald Trump was elected. X SUBSCRIBER ONLY She's shared brief glimpses on social media of her quieter life living on a sprawling property. It is unclear where in the UK DeGeneres and de Rossi have relocated to, but they are rumoured to have set up in the English countryside. Shortly after news of the couple's big move broke, the two were spotted out with a group of friends at The Farmer's Dog in the Cotswolds, a countryside region in England. They had earlier in the year sold two of their homes in Montecito, California, in March and August. Originally published as Comedian Margaret Cho says Ellen DeGeneres was 'not nice' to her

Infectious zombie sequel breathes new life into horror genre
Infectious zombie sequel breathes new life into horror genre

The Advertiser

time4 hours ago

  • The Advertiser

Infectious zombie sequel breathes new life into horror genre

Danny Boyle is back at the helm, not quite 28 years later, for the second sequel to his brilliant 2002 zombie movie 28 Days Later, a film that breathed new life into that particular horror genre. Here he delivers a film experience that feels just as fresh as the first. In fact, this film feels closer in tone to Boyle's breakout hit film Trainspotting, in terms of pace, of editing, of music use, of grimy visual spectacle. Boyle's original film's stars are nowhere to be seen, but there are visual touches that throw us back, and I felt nostalgic at a character stepping over a derelict billboard for the British soft drink Tango. Both Boyle and his screenwriter collaborator Alex Garland are at the top of their game, all these years later, with Boyle's mantlepiece home to a best director Oscar for Slumdog Millionaire. Garland was quite prescient with last year's Civil War, a film he wrote and directed, with a message that felt just a few weeks ago, as citizens of Los Angeles had the National Guard called on them by their President, like it was a crystal ball into a likely future. In their first zombie film, England has been ground zero for an infection called Rage, passed on by bodily fluids - a sneeze, the saliva of a bite, a drop of blood - that turns its victims almost immediately into fast-moving killing machines that aren't zombies so much as carriers of an aggressive human form of distemper. We learn as the film opens that the rest of the world has written England off to keep the infection under control, the entire island a quarantine zone that no remaining human is allowed to leave, which is fairly Brexit-coded. Twelve-year-old Spike (Alfie Williams) lives with dad Jamie (Aaron Taylor-Johnson), grandfather Sam (Christopher Fulford) and ma Isla (Jodie Comer) in a community of survivalists thriving on an island just off the Scottish coast. Jamie is taking his son for one of the community's rites of passage, a hunting trip to mainland Scotland to make his first kill of the infected, which in 28 years have evolved into two species, one a slow slug-like eater of worms, and one athletic and sentient. Isla is bedridden by a mystery ailment that has her rambling and feels like it might scarily turn into the Rage virus at any moment, and full of his own success at having survived his mainland killing trip, Spike takes his mother with him back to the mainland on the trail of a rumoured doctor who might heal her. They find this doctor, Kelson (Ralph Fiennes), but he has tragic observations to share about Isla, but also about the evolving nature of the infected. Like Garland did with his Civil War screenplay, there's been some dramatic upheavals in real-life that allow him to make some keen observations about us as a society with this script, knowing his audience have already survived their own infectious pandemic. He must have had a bunch of insights to share, because 28 Years Later is actually the first in a planned trilogy, the final instalment filmed back-to-back with this film and due out in cinemas just after Christmas. The performances are very strong and sometimes against type, like Jodie Comer's non-action film tragic figure, or Aaron Taylor-Johnson's very action-film approach. Danny Boyle and his crew do some fairly amazing technical work, including filming with an array of iPhones that give gorgeous crisp visuals and are carried in a lightweight frame specially designed to allow cinematographer Anthony Dod Mantle to follow his cast into tight spaces or up ladders and hills at a matching speed. It really amps up the film's pull-your-legs-up-onto-the-seat-with-you terror. Danny Boyle is back at the helm, not quite 28 years later, for the second sequel to his brilliant 2002 zombie movie 28 Days Later, a film that breathed new life into that particular horror genre. Here he delivers a film experience that feels just as fresh as the first. In fact, this film feels closer in tone to Boyle's breakout hit film Trainspotting, in terms of pace, of editing, of music use, of grimy visual spectacle. Boyle's original film's stars are nowhere to be seen, but there are visual touches that throw us back, and I felt nostalgic at a character stepping over a derelict billboard for the British soft drink Tango. Both Boyle and his screenwriter collaborator Alex Garland are at the top of their game, all these years later, with Boyle's mantlepiece home to a best director Oscar for Slumdog Millionaire. Garland was quite prescient with last year's Civil War, a film he wrote and directed, with a message that felt just a few weeks ago, as citizens of Los Angeles had the National Guard called on them by their President, like it was a crystal ball into a likely future. In their first zombie film, England has been ground zero for an infection called Rage, passed on by bodily fluids - a sneeze, the saliva of a bite, a drop of blood - that turns its victims almost immediately into fast-moving killing machines that aren't zombies so much as carriers of an aggressive human form of distemper. We learn as the film opens that the rest of the world has written England off to keep the infection under control, the entire island a quarantine zone that no remaining human is allowed to leave, which is fairly Brexit-coded. Twelve-year-old Spike (Alfie Williams) lives with dad Jamie (Aaron Taylor-Johnson), grandfather Sam (Christopher Fulford) and ma Isla (Jodie Comer) in a community of survivalists thriving on an island just off the Scottish coast. Jamie is taking his son for one of the community's rites of passage, a hunting trip to mainland Scotland to make his first kill of the infected, which in 28 years have evolved into two species, one a slow slug-like eater of worms, and one athletic and sentient. Isla is bedridden by a mystery ailment that has her rambling and feels like it might scarily turn into the Rage virus at any moment, and full of his own success at having survived his mainland killing trip, Spike takes his mother with him back to the mainland on the trail of a rumoured doctor who might heal her. They find this doctor, Kelson (Ralph Fiennes), but he has tragic observations to share about Isla, but also about the evolving nature of the infected. Like Garland did with his Civil War screenplay, there's been some dramatic upheavals in real-life that allow him to make some keen observations about us as a society with this script, knowing his audience have already survived their own infectious pandemic. He must have had a bunch of insights to share, because 28 Years Later is actually the first in a planned trilogy, the final instalment filmed back-to-back with this film and due out in cinemas just after Christmas. The performances are very strong and sometimes against type, like Jodie Comer's non-action film tragic figure, or Aaron Taylor-Johnson's very action-film approach. Danny Boyle and his crew do some fairly amazing technical work, including filming with an array of iPhones that give gorgeous crisp visuals and are carried in a lightweight frame specially designed to allow cinematographer Anthony Dod Mantle to follow his cast into tight spaces or up ladders and hills at a matching speed. It really amps up the film's pull-your-legs-up-onto-the-seat-with-you terror. Danny Boyle is back at the helm, not quite 28 years later, for the second sequel to his brilliant 2002 zombie movie 28 Days Later, a film that breathed new life into that particular horror genre. Here he delivers a film experience that feels just as fresh as the first. In fact, this film feels closer in tone to Boyle's breakout hit film Trainspotting, in terms of pace, of editing, of music use, of grimy visual spectacle. Boyle's original film's stars are nowhere to be seen, but there are visual touches that throw us back, and I felt nostalgic at a character stepping over a derelict billboard for the British soft drink Tango. Both Boyle and his screenwriter collaborator Alex Garland are at the top of their game, all these years later, with Boyle's mantlepiece home to a best director Oscar for Slumdog Millionaire. Garland was quite prescient with last year's Civil War, a film he wrote and directed, with a message that felt just a few weeks ago, as citizens of Los Angeles had the National Guard called on them by their President, like it was a crystal ball into a likely future. In their first zombie film, England has been ground zero for an infection called Rage, passed on by bodily fluids - a sneeze, the saliva of a bite, a drop of blood - that turns its victims almost immediately into fast-moving killing machines that aren't zombies so much as carriers of an aggressive human form of distemper. We learn as the film opens that the rest of the world has written England off to keep the infection under control, the entire island a quarantine zone that no remaining human is allowed to leave, which is fairly Brexit-coded. Twelve-year-old Spike (Alfie Williams) lives with dad Jamie (Aaron Taylor-Johnson), grandfather Sam (Christopher Fulford) and ma Isla (Jodie Comer) in a community of survivalists thriving on an island just off the Scottish coast. Jamie is taking his son for one of the community's rites of passage, a hunting trip to mainland Scotland to make his first kill of the infected, which in 28 years have evolved into two species, one a slow slug-like eater of worms, and one athletic and sentient. Isla is bedridden by a mystery ailment that has her rambling and feels like it might scarily turn into the Rage virus at any moment, and full of his own success at having survived his mainland killing trip, Spike takes his mother with him back to the mainland on the trail of a rumoured doctor who might heal her. They find this doctor, Kelson (Ralph Fiennes), but he has tragic observations to share about Isla, but also about the evolving nature of the infected. Like Garland did with his Civil War screenplay, there's been some dramatic upheavals in real-life that allow him to make some keen observations about us as a society with this script, knowing his audience have already survived their own infectious pandemic. He must have had a bunch of insights to share, because 28 Years Later is actually the first in a planned trilogy, the final instalment filmed back-to-back with this film and due out in cinemas just after Christmas. The performances are very strong and sometimes against type, like Jodie Comer's non-action film tragic figure, or Aaron Taylor-Johnson's very action-film approach. Danny Boyle and his crew do some fairly amazing technical work, including filming with an array of iPhones that give gorgeous crisp visuals and are carried in a lightweight frame specially designed to allow cinematographer Anthony Dod Mantle to follow his cast into tight spaces or up ladders and hills at a matching speed. It really amps up the film's pull-your-legs-up-onto-the-seat-with-you terror. Danny Boyle is back at the helm, not quite 28 years later, for the second sequel to his brilliant 2002 zombie movie 28 Days Later, a film that breathed new life into that particular horror genre. Here he delivers a film experience that feels just as fresh as the first. In fact, this film feels closer in tone to Boyle's breakout hit film Trainspotting, in terms of pace, of editing, of music use, of grimy visual spectacle. Boyle's original film's stars are nowhere to be seen, but there are visual touches that throw us back, and I felt nostalgic at a character stepping over a derelict billboard for the British soft drink Tango. Both Boyle and his screenwriter collaborator Alex Garland are at the top of their game, all these years later, with Boyle's mantlepiece home to a best director Oscar for Slumdog Millionaire. Garland was quite prescient with last year's Civil War, a film he wrote and directed, with a message that felt just a few weeks ago, as citizens of Los Angeles had the National Guard called on them by their President, like it was a crystal ball into a likely future. In their first zombie film, England has been ground zero for an infection called Rage, passed on by bodily fluids - a sneeze, the saliva of a bite, a drop of blood - that turns its victims almost immediately into fast-moving killing machines that aren't zombies so much as carriers of an aggressive human form of distemper. We learn as the film opens that the rest of the world has written England off to keep the infection under control, the entire island a quarantine zone that no remaining human is allowed to leave, which is fairly Brexit-coded. Twelve-year-old Spike (Alfie Williams) lives with dad Jamie (Aaron Taylor-Johnson), grandfather Sam (Christopher Fulford) and ma Isla (Jodie Comer) in a community of survivalists thriving on an island just off the Scottish coast. Jamie is taking his son for one of the community's rites of passage, a hunting trip to mainland Scotland to make his first kill of the infected, which in 28 years have evolved into two species, one a slow slug-like eater of worms, and one athletic and sentient. Isla is bedridden by a mystery ailment that has her rambling and feels like it might scarily turn into the Rage virus at any moment, and full of his own success at having survived his mainland killing trip, Spike takes his mother with him back to the mainland on the trail of a rumoured doctor who might heal her. They find this doctor, Kelson (Ralph Fiennes), but he has tragic observations to share about Isla, but also about the evolving nature of the infected. Like Garland did with his Civil War screenplay, there's been some dramatic upheavals in real-life that allow him to make some keen observations about us as a society with this script, knowing his audience have already survived their own infectious pandemic. He must have had a bunch of insights to share, because 28 Years Later is actually the first in a planned trilogy, the final instalment filmed back-to-back with this film and due out in cinemas just after Christmas. The performances are very strong and sometimes against type, like Jodie Comer's non-action film tragic figure, or Aaron Taylor-Johnson's very action-film approach. Danny Boyle and his crew do some fairly amazing technical work, including filming with an array of iPhones that give gorgeous crisp visuals and are carried in a lightweight frame specially designed to allow cinematographer Anthony Dod Mantle to follow his cast into tight spaces or up ladders and hills at a matching speed. It really amps up the film's pull-your-legs-up-onto-the-seat-with-you terror.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store