Provide protection to caste hatred victim: HC to police

Justice T. Vinod Kumar of the High Court on Friday directed the Suryapet police to protect Kotla Bhargavi, whose husband Vadlakonda Krishna alias Mala Bunty, was murdered allegedly over caste hatred.
Bhargavi, belonging to the Gowda caste, and Krishna, a dalit, got married. Krishna was murdered on January 26 this year allegedly by the family members of Bhargavi owing to caste hatred, her counsel V. Raghunath said.
Even after the murder of her husband, Bhargavi had been receiving threats that she too would be eliminated the way her husband was killed once the accused come out, the lawyer said. He contended that it is the duty of the government to protect the kith and kin of victims under the Prevention of Atrocities against Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act.
He argued that even two months after Bhargavi approached the police authorities for protection in the backdrop of threats to her life, there was no response from the police officials.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Hindu

12 hours ago

• The Hindu

Police can't barge into houses of history-sheeters under guise of surveillance: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court has held that the police have no right to knock on the doors of suspected persons or history-sheeters or 'barge' into their houses at night under the guise of surveillance. The ruling by Justice V.G. Arun came on a plea by a man accused of threatening police officers from discharging their duties when they asked him to come out of his house late at night as part of night check on rowdy history sheeters. Allowing the plea, the court quashed the FIR against the man and all further proceedings in connection with it, saying that 'under the guise of surveillance, the police cannot knock on the doors or barge into the houses of history sheeters'. The court said that police officers should understand that the concept of home 'transcends its physical manifestation as a dwelling and encompasses a rich tapestry of existential, emotional and social dimensions'. 'In other words, every man's house is his castle or temple, the sanctity of which cannot be vilified by knocking on the door at odd hours. A person's right to life encompasses the right to live with dignity and dignity is non-negotiable,' it said. The court further said that under the Kerala Police Manual only 'informal watching' of history sheeters and 'close watch' over those leading criminal existence were permitted. 'Undoubtedly, neither of those expressions permit domicile visits at night,' it added. It also pointed out that under section 39 of the Kerala Police Act all persons are bound to comply with the 'lawful directions' of a police officer for discharge of his functions. 'Knocking on the doors of a history sheeter at midnight and demanding him to come out of the house cannot by any stretch of imagination be termed as a lawful direction,' the court said. Consequently, the petitioner cannot be prosecuted for the offence of threatening a police officer to obstruct him from discharging his duties under the Kerala Police Act for refusing to abide by the direction to come out of the house at night, the court added. 'If, as alleged, the petitioner had used derogatory language or threatened the police during the course of such refusal, his action may invite some other offence, but definitely not the offence he is presently charged with,' it said. The petitioner had claimed that he was implicated in the case to divert the enquiry ordered by the High Court into his complaint alleging police harassment. The police had claimed that as part of their night check duty on rowdy history sheeters, officers had gone to ascertain if the petitioner was at home. However, when he was asked to open the door of his home, he refused to do so and also abused and intimidated the officer, it had alleged.

Time of India

12 hours ago

• Time of India

4 cabbies held for killing youth over love affair in Lucknow

Lucknow: Madiaon police and crime branch jointly arrested four men for murder of Krishna Gupta, 26, resident of Radha Gram Duda Colony in Thakurganj for his relationship with the sister of the prime accused. All four, arrested near Madiaon flyover on Jun 20, were taxi drivers. On Jun 19, his elder brother, Suraj Gupta, filed police complaint at Madiaon police station, stating that Krishna was murdered by Sanjay Yadav alias Monu, following an altercation over Krishna being in relationship with Sanjay's sister. FIR was registered under sections 103(1), 115(2), and 351(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. Police arrested Monu Yadav (29) resident of Radha Gram Duda Colony, Thakurganj, originally from Ramnagar, Barabanki, along with Wasiq Khan alias Raja (21), resident of Muslimnagar, Jankipuram, originally from Muzaffarpur, Sitapur; Mohammad Aamir (23), resident of Ramleela Maidan, Madiaon, originally from Gopalpur, Sitapur and Sharif (20), resident of Sector-2 Jhopadpatti, Jankipuram, originally from Tarapur, Meerut. SHO, Madiaon, Shivanand Mishra, said the accused confessed to the crime. "The accused invited Krishna to drink with them and murdered him with a heavy iron rod, a wrench (pana) and blades. His body was dumped near Ghailla Bridge. Police recovered the blood-stained iron rod and wrench used in the murder," said Mishra. Police said items seized from crime scene include a wallet, passbook and Aadhaar and PAN cards of Krishna the deceased. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo Three mobile phones, Rs 270 cash and two vehicles were seized under Section 207 of Motor Vehicles Act. The body was found on June 20 with fatal injuries on the neck, head and face. Following investigation, police added Section 3(5)/238 of the BNS to the charges. Officials ensured compliance with Supreme Court and Human Rights Commission guidelines during arrest. Accused were presented before court and verification of their criminal backgrounds is underway across other districts and police stations.

NDTV

13 hours ago

• NDTV

Cops Can't Barge Into History Sheeters' Homes For 'Surveillance': Court

Kochi: The Kerala High Court has held that the police have no right to knock on the doors of suspected persons or history sheeters or "barge" into their homes at night under the guise of surveillance. The ruling by Justice V G Arun came on a plea by a man accused of threatening police officers from discharging their duties when they asked him to come out of his home late at night as part of night check on rowdy history sheeters. Allowing the plea, the court quashed the FIR against the man and all further proceedings in connection with it, saying that "under the guise of surveillance, the police cannot knock on the doors or barge into the houses of history sheeters". The court said that police officers should understand that the concept of home "transcends its physical manifestation as a dwelling and encompasses a rich tapestry of existential, emotional and social dimensions". "In other words, every man's house is his castle or temple, the sanctity of which cannot be vilified by knocking on the door at odd hours. A person's right to life encompasses the right to live with dignity and dignity is non-negotiable," it said. The court further said that under the Kerala Police Manual only 'informal watching' of history sheeters and 'close watch' over those leading criminal existence were permitted. "Undoubtedly, neither of those expressions permit domicile visits at night," it added. It also pointed out that under section 39 of the Kerala Police Act all persons are bound to comply with the 'lawful directions' of a police officer for discharge of his functions. "Knocking on the doors of a history sheeter at midnight and demanding him to come out of the house cannot by any stretch of imagination be termed as a lawful direction," the court said. Consequently, the petitioner cannot be prosecuted for the offence of threatening a police officer to obstruct him from discharging his duties under the Kerala Police Act for refusing to abide by the direction to come out of the house at night, the court added. "If, as alleged, the petitioner had used derogatory language or threatened the police during the course of such refusal, his action may invite some other offence, but definitely not the offence he is presently charged with," it said. The petitioner had claimed that he was implicated in the case to divert the enquiry ordered by the High Court into his complaint alleging police harassment. The police had claimed that as part of their night check duty on rowdy history sheeters, officers had gone to ascertain if the petitioner was at home. However, when he was asked to open the door of his home, he refused to do so and also abused and intimidated the officer, it had alleged.