Iran, Israel launch new attacks after Tehran rules out nuclear talks

JERUSALEM/WASHINGTON, June 21 (Reuters) - Iran and Israel exchanged fresh attacks early on Saturday, a day after Tehran said it would not negotiate over its nuclear programme while under threat and Europe tried to keep peace talks alive.
Shortly after 2:30 a.m. in Israel (2330 GMT on Friday), the Israeli military warned of an incoming missile barrage from Iran, triggering air raid sirens across parts of central Israel, including Tel Aviv, as well as in the Israeli-occupied West Bank.
Interceptions were visible in the sky over Tel Aviv, with explosions echoing across the metropolitan area as Israel's air defence systems responded.
At the same time, Israel launched a new wave of attacks against missile storage and launch infrastructure sites in Iran, the Israeli military said.
Sirens also sounded in southern Israel, said Magen David Adom, Israel's national emergency service. An Israeli military official said Iran had fired five ballistic missiles and that there were no immediate indications of any missile impacts.
There were no initial reports of casualties.
The emergency service released images showing a fire on the roof of a multi-storey residential building in central Israel. Local media reported that the fire was caused by debris from an intercepted missile.
Israel began attacking Iran last Friday, saying its longtime enemy was on the verge of developing nuclear weapons. Iran, which says its nuclear programme is only for peaceful purposes, retaliated with missile and drone strikes on Israel.
Israel is widely assumed to possess nuclear weapons. It neither confirms nor denies this.
Its air attacks have killed 639 people in Iran, according to the Human Rights Activists News Agency, a U.S.-based human rights organisation that tracks Iran. The dead include the military's top echelon and nuclear scientists.
In Israel, 24 civilians have been killed in Iranian missile attacks, according to authorities.
Reuters could not independently verify casualty figures for either side.
Iran has repeatedly targeted Tel Aviv, a metropolitan area of around 4 million people and the country's business and economic hub, where some critical military assets are also located.
Israel said it had struck dozens of military targets on Friday, including missile production sites, a research body it said was involved in nuclear weapons development in Tehran and military facilities in western and central Iran.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said there was no room for negotiations with the U.S. "until Israeli aggression stops". But he arrived in Geneva on Friday for talks with European foreign ministers at which Europe hopes to establish a path back to diplomacy.
U.S. President Donald Trump on Friday reiterated that he would take as long as two weeks to decide whether the United States should enter the conflict on Israel's side, enough time "to see whether or not people come to their senses", he said.
Trump said he was unlikely to press Israel to scale back its airstrikes to allow negotiations to continue.
"I think it's very hard to make that request right now. If somebody is winning, it's a little bit harder to do than if somebody is losing, but we're ready, willing and able, and we've been speaking to Iran, and we'll see what happens," he said.
The Geneva talks produced little signs of progress, and Trump said he doubted negotiators would be able to secure a ceasefire.
"Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe. They want to speak to us. Europe is not going to be able to help in this one," Trump said.
Hundreds of U.S. citizens have fled Iran since the air war began, according to a U.S. State Department cable seen by Reuters.
Israel's envoy to the United Nations, Danny Danon, told the Security Council on Friday his country would not stop its attacks "until Iran's nuclear threat is dismantled". Iran's U.N. envoy Amir Saeid Iravani called for Security Council action and said Tehran was alarmed by reports that the U.S. might join the war.
Russia and China demanded immediate de-escalation.
A senior Iranian official told Reuters that Iran was ready to discuss limitations on uranium enrichment but that it would reject any proposal that barred it from enriching uranium completely, "especially now under Israel's strikes".

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Telegraph

16 minutes ago

• Telegraph

Trump deploys B-2 stealth bombers as he considers striking Iran

US B-2 stealth bombers have been moved to the American military base in Guam, as Donald Trump prepared to meet with his national security team and discuss whether to join Israel's attacks on Iranian nuclear sites. As many as four B-2 stealth bombers took off from the Whiteman Air Force base in Missouri on Saturday, heading towards the US naval station in the Pacific. The B-2 is designed for long-range missions and is the only aircraft capable of delivering the 30,000-lb 'Massive Ordnance Penetrator' precision-guided bunker busters that could be used to destroy Iran's underground nuclear plant at Fordow. The US president was expected to call a national security meeting on Saturday night as he decides whether or not to join the conflict. The relocation of the B-2 stealth bombers, which puts them in striking distance of Iran with the support of refuelling tankers, appears to be a clear demonstration of US military might as it ramps up pressure on Iran to strike a nuclear deal. From Guam, they could fly to the US base on Diego Garcia, in the Chagos Islands, which is within striking distance of Iran. The movements come amid reports that the US president tried to arrange a meeting with Iranian officials but couldn't get through to Ayatollah Khamenei, the country's supreme leader. Mr Trump and Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the Turkish president, quietly sought to organise face-to-face talks with Iranian officials in Istanbul this week, but efforts collapsed when Khamenei, who is in hiding, could not be reached, three US officials told Axios. The backchannel effort reveals the extent the US president was willing to go to seek a diplomatic solution with Iran and avoid US military intervention. On Saturday, Emmanuel Macron, the French president, vowed that Europe would step up its diplomatic efforts, a day after Mr Trump dismissed European efforts to end the war between Iran and Israel. After speaking with Masoud Pezeshkian, the Iranian president, Mr Macron wrote on X: 'I am convinced that a path exists to end war and avoid even greater dangers. 'To achieve this, we will accelerate the negotiations led by France and its European partners with Iran.' 'Iran must never acquire nuclear weapons,' he added. 'It is up to Iran to provide full guarantees that its intentions are peaceful.' His comments followed criticism from Mr Trump, who dismissed the role of European partners in brokering a ceasefire after Friday's talks with top Iranian officials ended with no breakthrough. Mr Trump told reporters: 'Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe. They want to speak to us.' Iran and Israel continued to trade missile barrages on Saturday, with a senior Israeli military official saying that IDF strikes would continue for 'as long as possible' and anyone saying otherwise was making 'empty promises'. Israeli government officials had originally publicised a 'two-week' time frame for the campaign, saying its objectives could be met in that period. Overnight on Friday, 50 Israeli jets hit targets across Iran with 150 munitions, killing three senior Iranian military commanders, including the new commander of its drone force. The three senior Iranian commanders killed were named by the IDF as Saeed Izadi, head of the Palestinian Division in the IRGC Quds Force, Behnam Shahriyari, head of the Quds Force's Unit 190, and Aminpour Joudaki, head of the IRGC Aerospace Force's drone unit. Izadi had been killed 'hiding' in a location that was not his home, indicating the power of Israel's intelligence, said the IDF. Israel also hit the Isfahan nuclear site in Iran for the second time, further degrading its capacity to manufacture the centrifuges required to produce weapons-grade uranium. A senior military official said Israel had dealt a 'severe blow to centrifuge production' in Iran and had taken out '50 per cent or more' of its ballistic missile launchers. They added that missile launchers were a 'bottleneck' for Iran, with the country having many more missiles than launchers. Israeli officials trumpeted the success of their air strikes, claiming they had set back Tehran's development of nuclear weapons by 'years'. 'According to the assessment we hear, we already delayed for at least two or three years the possibility for them to have a nuclear bomb,' Gideon Saar, Israel's foreign minister, said in an interview with Bild on Saturday. Streaks of smoke were also visible in the sky over Tel Aviv on Saturday as Israel's air defence responded to a fresh onslaught of projectiles from Tehran. During the barrage, an Iranian drone hit a home in Israel's Beit She'an valley region, marking the first time a drone has hit a residential area in Israel since the conflict began on June 13. In a message to American officials, Iran's top diplomat warned that it would be 'very dangerous for everybody' if the US were to join Israel's strikes. Speaking on his way back from talks in Geneva, Abbas Araghchi, Iran's foreign minister, said: 'Unfortunately, we have heard that the US may join this aggression. 'That would be very unfortunate and very, very dangerous for everybody.' The Islamic Republic has so far ruled out further nuclear talks with the US until Israel halts its attacks. In a sign of how precarious the current conflict has left the Iranian regime, the supreme leader is said to have named three senior clerics as candidates to succeed him should he be killed, according to The New York Times. Buried 300ft inside a mountain, the Fordow enrichment plant is one of three key pieces of nuclear infrastructure in Iran, alongside the Natanz enrichment plant and research facilities in Isfahan. If the US were to launch a strike on the nuclear plant from Diego Garcia, it would need permission from the UK, which maintains sovereignty over the islands. On Thursday, Mr Trump said that the decision on whether to strike Iran would be made 'in the next two weeks'.

The Independent

44 minutes ago

• The Independent

Israeli-backed group seeks at least $30 million from US for aid distribution in Gaza

A U.S.-led group has asked the Trump administration to step in with an initial $30 million so it can continue its much scrutinized and Israeli-backed aid distribution in Gaza, according to three U.S. officials and the organization's application for the money. That application, obtained by The Associated Press, also offers some of the first financial details about the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation and its work in the territory. The foundation says it has provided millions of meals in southern Gaza since late May to Palestinians as Israel's blockade and military campaign have driven the Gaza to the brink of famine. But the effort has seen near-daily fatal shootings of Palestinians trying to reach the distribution sites. Major humanitarian groups also accuse the foundation of cooperating with Israel's objectives in the 20-month-old war against Hamas in a way that violates humanitarian principles. The group's funding application was submitted to the U.S. Agency for International Development, according to the U.S. officials, who were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity. The application was being processed this week as potentially one of the agency's last acts before the Republican administration absorbs USAID into the State Department as part of deep cuts in foreign assistance. Two of the officials said they were told the administration has decided to award the money. They said the processing was moving forward with little of the review and auditing normally required before Washington makes foreign assistance grants to an organization. In a letter submitted Thursday as part of the application, Gaza Humanitarian Foundation secretary Loik Henderson said his organization 'was grateful for the opportunity to partner with you to sustain and scale life-saving operations in Gaza.' Neither the State Department nor Henderson immediately responded to requests for comment Saturday. Israel says the foundation is the linchpin of a new aid system to wrest control from the United Nations, which Israel alleges has been infiltrated by Hamas, and other humanitarian groups. The foundation's use of fixed sites in southern Gaza is in line with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's plan to use aid to concentrate the territory's more than 2 million people in the south, freeing Israel to fight Hamas elsewhere. Aid workers fear it's a step toward another of Netanyahu's public goals, removing Palestinians from Gaza in 'voluntary' migrations that aid groups and human rights organizations say would amount to coerced departures. The U.N. and many leading nonprofit groups accuse the foundation of stepping into aid distribution with little transparency or humanitarian experience, and, crucially, without a commitment to the principles of neutrality and operational independence in war zones. Since the organization started operations, several hundred Palestinians have been killed and hundreds more wounded in near-daily shootings as they tried to reach aid sites, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. Witnesses say Israeli troops regularly fire heavy barrages toward the crowds in an attempt to control them. The Israeli military has denied firing on civilians. It says it fired warning shots in several instance, and fired directly at a few 'suspects' who ignored warnings and approached its forces. It's unclear who is funding the new operation in Gaza. No donor has come forward. The State Department said this past week that the United States is not funding it. In documents supporting its application, the group said it received nearly $119 million for May operations from 'other government donors,' but gives no details. It expects $38 million from those unspecific government donors for June, in addition to the hoped-for $30 million from the United States. The application shows no funding from private philanthropy or any other source.

Telegraph

an hour ago

• Telegraph

BBC must reveal if money for axed Gaza film ‘ended up in the hands of Hamas'

BBC bosses are under pressure to establish whether licence payers' cash used to make a cancelled Gaza documentary ended up in the hands of Hamas. MPs and peers said the broadcaster must launch an investigation into the money spent on commissioning the film Gaza: Doctors Under Attack. The show was pulled from the schedules on Friday after its director branded Israel 'a rogue state that's committing war crimes and ethnic cleansing'. It is the second documentary about Gaza that the BBC has been forced to cancel, amid accusations that it is 'biased' against Israel in its reporting. The corporation was forced to apologise in February after it aired a 'propaganda' film that was narrated by the son of a leading Hamas minister. In light of that controversy it had already delayed the planned release of Gaza: Doctors Under Attack, and has now said it will not be shown at all. In a statement, the BBC said it had cancelled the show because it ' risked creating a perception of partiality ' about its coverage of Israel. Stuart Andrew, the shadow culture secretary, said the decision ' raises yet more serious questions over its coverage of events in Gaza'. 'The BBC must provide a full accounting of how it ended up commissioning the abandoned documentary and whether any money ended up in the bloody hands of Hamas terrorists during the production process,' he said. Lord Austin, a former Labour MP, said that staff responsible for commissioning the cancelled documentary should face disciplinary action if any wrongdoing took place. 'What we need to know is whether the makers of this programme paid Hamas terrorists or anyone linked to them,' he said. Call for 'urgent investigation' 'There must now be another urgent investigation to find out what has happened. When is the BBC going to start sacking those responsible for these appalling failures?' Baroness Deech, a crossbench peer, added: 'An urgent investigation is needed to assure the British public that its licence fee hasn't ended up in the hands of Hamas terrorists. 'Questions must be urgently answered. What went wrong at the BBC, whether Hamas received money for granting access to Hamas-run hospitals, and whether the national broadcaster has breached counter-terrorism legislation by funding a proscribed terror group.' The decision to pull the documentary came after Ramita Navai, its director, appeared on BBC Radio 4's Today programme to discuss it. She said: 'Israel has become a rogue state that's committing war crimes and ethnic cleansing and mass-murdering Palestinians'. Last month, a letter signed by 600 people, including Harriet Walter, Miriam Margolyes, Maxine Peake and Juliet Stevenson, called for the release of the film. In a statement on Friday, the BBC said: 'For some weeks, the BBC has been working... to find a way to tell the stories of these doctors on our platforms. 'Yesterday, it became apparent that we have reached the end of the road with these discussions. 'We have come to the conclusion that broadcasting this material risked creating a perception of partiality that would not meet the high standards that the public rightly expect of the BBC. 'Impartiality is a core principle of BBC News. It is one of the reasons that we are the world's most trusted broadcaster.' Gaza: Doctors Under Attack is the second film to have been pulled by the BBC, coming after controversy over Gaza: How to Survive a Warzone. That programme, created by production company Hoyo, was aired, before being removed from the BBC's iPlayer amid huge controversy. BBC bosses apologised after it emerged a major contributor was the son of Ayman Alyazouri, a Hamas minister, which was not disclosed to viewers. The corporation insisted it was not aware of the Hamas link, but Hoyo later claimed it was. A BBC spokesman said: 'We can confirm that no money spent on this documentary has been paid to Hamas. As we said yesterday, production of the documentary was paused in April, and any film made will not be a BBC film.'