Varna not decided by birth, Shudra not derogatory—'The Hindu Manifesto', launched by RSS chief Bhagwat

'Varna refers to the classification of individuals or groups based on the different forms of dharma—that is, the duties, responsibilities and roles in life that they either embrace or are inducted into,' reads the book. 'The crucial point is that an individual's acceptance of varna demonstrates that it is not determined by birth, the term 'varna' itself implies that it is independent of birth.'
In Hinduism, Varna refers to the four traditional social classes—Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaishyas, and Shudras. The book—The Hindu Manifesto—argues people's varna is not birth-based and tries to explain why.
New Delhi: Varna is not birth-based and Shudra is not a derogatory term, according to a book authored by Swami Vigyananand, and launched by Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) chief Mohan Bhagwat last month.
The author also argues in the book that the word 'Shudra' is not a derogatory or demeaning term 'even though modern sociologists often associate it with the so-called lower stratum in Bharat'.
He cites the example of the Ashvinikumaras, considered the physicians of the gods and the presiding deities of Ayurvedic medicine, and how they were also referred as shudras, 'indicating that it is a respected term rather than a negative one. The Dignity of a Human Being Is Paramount'.
In a chapter titled 'Non-discriminatory Social System', the author argues that in Hindu Dharma and society, neither the scriptures nor ancestors discriminated against people based on 'varna, jati, jnati, skin colour, race, gender, language or region'.
Vigyananand, also the initiator of the World Hindu Congress, also cites the example of Lord Rama, Krishna and Kali to highlight the point that 'traditionally, Hindu deities were crafted from black granite, black hard stone or other materials such as sandstone'.
The author then goes on to state that the term jāti refers to the 'recognition of common features among different objects. Although each object is distinct, they share a common feature that links them, and this essential common feature is known as jati'.
In fact, during the book launch, Bhagwat also stressed the fact that the caste system went against the core tenets of Hinduism.
The RSS has been quite vocal on ending caste differences in society. Earlier this year, Bhagwat called upon the Hindu community to strive for social harmony by embracing the principle of 'one temple, one well, and one cremation ground' for all.
Explaining 'Varna', the book states that different jatis, specialised professional and occupational groups based on shared attributes, align with larger professional groupings known as varnas. 'This reflects the organisational structure of (the) Hindu society, where specialised communities (jati) integrate into broader profession categories or groupings (varnas).'
Also Read: Caste census is a bad idea whose time has come. Much worse lies ahead
A society without division
The author further argues that Hindu ancestors envisioned a society without division or discrimination based on varna, jati, jnati, skin colour, or race. 'In contemporary and future societies, evolution and progress are also measured by the absence of discrimination based on varna, jati, jnati, skin colour, race, gender, language, or region. While distinctions and divisions may have existed in the past among human societies based on various factors, Hindu ancestors envisioned a society without division or discrimination,' he states.
The book also writes, 'In all the varnas, there are no special signs or distinct markers. Everyone originates from Bhagwan Brahma; thus, everyone is considered a Brahmin.'
The author goes on to argue the 'absence of a special sign or distinct marker for each varna suggests that varna is not inherently based on biological birth. Instead, it underscores the equality of all individuals in their essential nature, believed to originate from the same source. This highlights the fundamental equality of all people'.
He further claims that at 'birth, individuals are not predestined to belong to a particular varna or professional grouping', refuting the idea varna is determined solely by birth.
Vigyananand states that many scholars argue that Brahmins are merely a jati or varna, rather than a professional or occupational grouping or community.
However, he cites an example from the Apad Dharma Parva within the Shanti Parva of the Mahabharata, which deals with the ethical and moral considerations when facing adversity or crisis. He then states 'the reference above demonstrates that when Brahmins lose their means of livelihood, they adhere to Kshatriya and Vaishya dharma (profession) as well'.
'This indicates that professions are interchangeable and also supports the idea that Brahmins can be considered an occupational jati. Several specialised Brahmin occupational jatis come together to form a larger professional community, constituting the Brahmin varna,' he said.
In the book, Vigyananand says jāti refers to shared characteristics including work and experience and is not a hereditary concept. 'Jati refers to a professional and occupational grouping characterized by common essential features, shared attributes, shared qualities, specific occupations and specialized professions.'
The author argues that many translate 'prasav' as birth, which he says is incorrect.
'The correct interpretation is provided by Maharishi Vatsayan in his commentary on this Sutra—ya saamna buddhi prasootay—this refers to the common features that appear in the mind from which they are recognised, and that constitutes their jati. Jati does not refer to biological birth here. Jati exists not only in animate beings but also in inanimate objects,' the book states.
Similarly, jātiya, the book argues, is rooted in a sense of brotherhood in the scriptures. The author states that in Bengali, the terms jati and jatiya have broader meanings 'often signifying both brotherhood and national identity. In Bengal, 'jatiya' was used to express a sense of brotherhood, meaning 'national' in this context'.
The author then goes on to explain the word jñāti which he says indicates 'lineage' or 'family line' (kul or vansh). '(It) Represents a family line that cannot be changed-neither in the past, present nor future.'
'A person's identity is known by their jnati, meaning lineage or 'family line', which refers to the family of their birth. This 'jnati' signifies that no one can deny their birth identity, regardless of whether their lineage is ordinary or prominent. 'Jnati' indicating lineage' or 'family line (kul or vansh) represents a family line that cannot be changed-neither in the past, present nor future,' the author wrties.
Jatiya, the book argues, refers to the concept where individuals from various 'jnati', signifying different families and lineages, come together to form a jati—a specialised professional and occupational grouping or community. 'The individuals within this jati develop a sense of brotherhood that unites them as part of that community. This essence of togetherness and shared identity among individuals constitutes jatiya identity,' the book states.
Also Read: At CWC, Rahul says caste count 1st step towards social justice, but timing of govt announcement suspect
'Lack of understanding'
Vigyananand further states that individuals from various jnati, or family lineages, come together to form or join a jati, which he says, represents a community centred on a particular profession, occupation, or grouping.
The author then goes on to highlight the problem of intermixing between Jati and Jnati. 'There is a significant issue arising from the lack of understanding of the difference between 'jnati' and 'jati'. This often leads to the misinterpretation and conflation of jnati as jati,' he highlights.
The book claims that over a long period in history, the word 'jatiya' gradually became 'jati' and was often used in its place. He cites the example of Pandit Madan Mohan Malviya, who in his final message to the nation while addressing Hindu society before his death, used 'Hindu jati' instead of 'jatiya'.
The book also gives a number of examples from the Mahabharata and the Ramayana to state there is no room for any form of untouchability even based on birth or social status in the Hindu society. The book cites the example of how Lord Rama shared a strong friendship with King Guha, the Nishad Raj.
'In current societal norms, individuals who engage in the practice of untouchability and those often discussed in public discourse and academia in the context of untouchability within (the) Hindu society need to understand that untouchability was never historically accepted in the Hindu society. The friendship between Shri Rama and Guha serves as an example, indicating that there is no room for any form of untouchability, even based on birth or social status, in Hindu society,' it says.
Within the Non-discriminatory Social System chapter, there is a strap stating, 'In Hindu Society, the Shudras are a respected community, and they also have their own states.'
The author then cites an example from the Bhumi Parva within the Bhishma Parva of the Mahabharata and states that in the Mandaga Janpada (state) of Shudraa, where there is no centralised authority such as a king or a ruler, punitive measures enforced by a governing body become unnecessary.
'This absence signifies a profound level of self-governance and mutual respect among individuals,' he said.
(Edited by Ajeet Tiwari)
Also Read: Mohan Bhagwat's speech isn't working on Hindu fundamentalist mobs on the ground

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Indian Express

40 minutes ago

• Indian Express

Janaki vs State of Kerala: Upcoming Suresh Gopi starrer faces CBFC hurdle over its name

The release of Malayalam film Janaki vs State of Kerala, starring actor and Union minister Suresh Gopi, has hit a roadblock after the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) sought a change in the title of the film. The film's director, Praveen Narayanan, said that the CBFC has denied a screening certificate for the film, which was slated to be released on June 27. He said the film will now not be released on that date. The CBFC has reportedly sought a change in the name of the titular character, Janaki, and for the name to be removed from the film's title, as Janaki is also a name for Goddess Sita. The film revolves around the legal fight of a woman against the government. The CBFC is yet to serve a written notice to the film's producers regarding the demand, and it is expected to be delivered on Monday. Director and general secretary of the influential Film Employees Federation of Kerala (FEFKA), B Unnikrishnan, reacted sharply to the CBFC's reported demand. 'A woman who faces an atrocity cannot be given the name of Goddess Sita? This will create a major crisis in the industry… At times, the names of Hindu characters will be that of a God or Goddess. If this is the situation, we will not even be able to use my name,' Unnikrishnan said. He also said that all films are made as per the guidelines of the CBFC, and that these guidelines do not mention anything related to what the board has demanded. Suresh Gopi has, so far, not reacted to the controversy related to the movie, which is his first one to hit screens after he became a Union minister last year.

Hindustan Times

an hour ago

• Hindustan Times

Shiv Sena UBT exodus continues, BJP gains two more corporators

Mumbai: The mass exodus of Shiv Sena (UBT) corporators continued on Sunday as Ishwar Tayade and Akanksha Shetye, along with more than 100 of their supporters and office bearers, joined the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). So far, over 50 Shiv Sena (UBT) leaders, who were corporators from 2017-2022 have migrated to the BJP, a party that is vying for control of the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) in the upcoming elections. 'This is just the first act of the larger political shift—the second, third, and final act will soon follow,' Shelar said (Praful Gangurde/HT Photo) (HT PHOTO) Mumbai BJP chief Ashish Shelar said that Tayade and Shetye were attracted to the leadership of prime minister Narendra Modi and chief minister Devendra Fadnavis, and wanted to align themselves with the ideology and principles of the BJP. 'This is just the first act of the larger political shift—the second, third, and final act will soon follow,' Shelar said, calling the move ' a rejection of the Shiv Sena (UBT)'s leadership'. Shelar said, 'The state of Shiv Sena (UBT) is dangerous and dilapidated,' adding that the party's crisis was fuelled by their opposition to 'Mumbai, Mumbaikars, Hindutva, and Hindu festivals'. He claimed that the exodus of party corporators further pointed to the Shiv Sena (UBT)'s 'dilapidated condition'. In the 2017 BMC elections, the undivided Shiv Sena had won a majority of 84 seats, with the BJP close behind at 82. At present, according to Shelar, 50 of the original Shiv Sena corporators stand with the BJP, making it the 'number one party' and 'pushing the UBT faction into complete disarray'. Tayade and Shetye's move to the BJP comes four days after Ajit Bhandari and Vijayendra Shinde, also former corporators of the Shiv Sena (UBT), joined the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena.

Hindustan Times

2 hours ago

• Hindustan Times

Murugan conference begins, BJP hits out at DMK for ‘hurdles'

The courts delivered justice for the massive conference held for Tamil deity Lord Murugan in Madurai, BJP state chief Nainar Nagendran said on Sunday while accusing the ruling DMK for trying to obstruct the event. Murugan conference begins, BJP hits out at DMK for 'hurdles' 'We organised this (the conference) to protect our culture. We may not have got justice from the DMK government but we got justice from the courts and the conference is a huge success,' said Nagendran. The Muruga Bakthargalin Aanmeega Maanadu (Spiritual Conference of Devotees of Murugan) was embroiled in controversy, with the Tamil Nadu police imposing several conditions, including restricting the 11-day programme to three days. On June 13, the Madurai bench of the Madras high court, granted permission for the event but asked the Hindu Munnani to comply with the conditions laid down by the police in Madurai. The conference organised by right wing outfit Hindu Munnani with the backing of the BJP was held under tight security as scores of people thronged to visit the replicas at the venue made of six abodes (known locally as Arupadai Veedu) of Lord Murugan that's present across Tamil Nadu. The conference to celebrate the Tamil deity was attended by Andhra Pradesh's deputy chief minister Pawan Kalyan, former BJP state president K Annamalai and the BJP's ally and Tamil Nadu's main opposition, the AIADMK. 'Certain groups who make fun of our culture and faith and call it secularism will disappear,' Kalyan said speaking in Tamil. Union home minister Amit Shah who on June 8 from Madurai urged people to participate in large numbers is likely to visit TN again in July - his third since April- ahead of the 2026 assembly elections. Shah, in his speech a week ago, drew in Lord Murugan over the Thiruparankunram issue. In February, there was tension at a temple (one of the six abodes of Lord Murugan) in Thiruparankundram near Madurai after members of Hindu Munnani held a protest against a demand by a few Muslim organisations to rename the hillock, which is also home to a dargah as Sikander malai (hillock). At the time, the residents belonging to the Hindu and Muslim communities said that they have coexisted peacefully for generations. But Shah said that the DMK had insulted Hindu worshippers here. 'Five lakh people have come today to Madurai for the conference for our ideology despite knowing that they will get wet in the rains today. This is a warning for the ruling government,' Annamalai said. He added that the Hindu religion was under threat referring to the attack in Pahalgham and India's response to Operation Sindoor. This is not the first time that the BJP has drawn in on Lord Murugan. The party made a similar outreach through the vetri vel yatra (victorious spear held by Lord Murugan) which was launched by then president of the BJP state unit L Murugan trying to appropriate the significance of the deity before the Tamil Nadu assembly elections in the yatra received a tepid response, it became the talking point as the then state government, led by BJP's ally the AIADMK, denied permission for the yatra. BJP leaders defied orders and courted arrest as they carried on with the yatra for three weeks across Tamil Nadu. Later, 'Vetrivel, Veeravel' became the BJP's war cry during the election campaign. BJP national leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Union home minister Shah began their rallies by raising the slogan. Sunday's conference comes a year after the DMK, known to have been established with rationalist tenets, also organised a conference for Lord Murugan last year. Last August, the DMK government organised a two-day conference on Lord Murugan as part of its efforts to oppose the BJP painting them as anti-Hindu and to manage the fallout of deputy chief minister Udhayanidhi Stalin's controversial remarks against Sanatana Dharma.