logo
Nigerian Sovereign Fund Boosts Exposure to Asia, European Assets

Nigerian Sovereign Fund Boosts Exposure to Asia, European Assets

Bloomberg20-05-2025

By , Jennifer Zabasajja, and Joumanna Bercetche
Save
Nigeria's sovereign wealth fund reduced its exposure to the US at the beginning of this year and bought other investments to diversify its portfolio.
The fund, which had 4.42 trillion naira ($2.76 billion) under management as of December, reduced the exposure of its Future Generation Fund to US markets and bought more Japanese, Australian and European assets, Umar-Sadiq said in an interview with Bloomberg TV on the sidelines of Qatar Economic Forum in Doha on Tuesday.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hormuz On A Knife‑Edge: Qatar's LNG Warning Sends Insurance And Freight Costs Exploding
Hormuz On A Knife‑Edge: Qatar's LNG Warning Sends Insurance And Freight Costs Exploding

Forbes

time3 hours ago

  • Forbes

Hormuz On A Knife‑Edge: Qatar's LNG Warning Sends Insurance And Freight Costs Exploding

Qatar's Energy Minister and CEO of QatarEnergy Saad Sherida al-Kaabi speaks during a press ... More conference in Doha on September 1, 2024. (Photo by KARIM JAAFAR / AFP) (Photo by KARIM JAAFAR/AFP via Getty Images) Fresh alarm. In a 20 June Reuters exclusive, Doha confirmed that it hauled ExxonMobil, Shell and TotalEnergies into a closed-door meeting two days earlier, warning that one stray missile in the Strait of Hormuz could instantly wipe out one-fifth of global LNG supply. Asian spot prices obeyed the signal—jumping 11 percent to $14/mmBtu before London markets had fully digested the headline. One narrow waterway still moves the world. Hormuz pinches to 21 nautical miles at its choke and carries roughly 20 million barrels of oil—about one-fifth of global seaborne supply—plus a similar share of LNG every day. Close the channel and power stations from Houston to Hong Kong scramble for fuel while tanker queues lengthen by thousands of nautical miles. Chokepoint concentration. The International Energy Agency calculates that only about 6.5 million barrels a day can shift quickly to Fujairah, SUMED or inventories; the balance simply waits. Price-shock amplitude. Additional-war-risk premiums (AWRP) on very-large crude carriers have rocketed from 0.05 percent to 0.25 percent of hull value—roughly a US $225 000 surcharge on each $90 million ship—and forward Brent markets now build in triple-digit scenarios for any prolonged disruption. Policy bandwidth. True spare capacity inside OPEC clocks in near three million barrels a day and sits inside the same blast zone, leaving diplomacy—so far untested in open conflict—to carry most of the burden. Backup pipes replace only a sliver. Saudi Arabia's East-West line and the UAE's Habshan–Fujairah bypass together provide about 2.6 million barrels a day of spare capacity, barely one-eighth of normal Hormuz throughput. Even a coordinated drawdown of strategic storage could not keep two-thirds of Gulf exports moving if the strait closed for a week. Insurance costs shout before oil charts whisper. Since 13 June, tanker underwriters have priced the region as an active war zone. A five-fold jump in AWRP lands before a single barrel is lifted, signalling risk faster than futures curves can. For a refiner, those premiums flow straight into delivered crude costs within days. Freight rates leap in lock-step. Gulf-to-Asia VLCC rates hit $2.14 per barrel on 17 June—60 percent higher in just five days—and charterers now fix ships day-to-day rather than locking in multi-month contracts. The volatility premium migrates down the supply chain, raising break-even prices for refiners, airlines and petrochemicals alike. Qatar's tankers loiter outside the Gulf. QatarEnergy has instructed LNG carriers to remain east of Hormuz until the day before loading. AIS data confirm a multi-year low in Persian-Gulf-bound empty tankers—evidence of growing caution even as contractual volumes continue to flow. Spare capacity sits where missiles can reach it. RBC Capital Markets pegs genuine OPEC spare capacity at roughly three million barrels per day, nearly all within Hormuz's threat ring. Every new headline—whether a cease-fire whisper or another drone strike—moves Brent and insurance quotes long before drilling rigs or pipelines can respond. Economic ripples extend well beyond crude. Higher tanker premiums bleed into LNG freight, lifting electricity costs that keep AI data centres humming. European refiners, already paying roughly €70 per tonne of CO₂, see margins flip negative once reroute costs stack up; Asian importers instead burn through stockpiles that last weeks, not months. Insurance leverage unseen since the late 1980s now shows up in airline ticket prices and industrial power bills. Numbers translate geopolitics into P&L. U.S. energy-agency models suggest each $10 oil shock trims about one-tenth of a percentage point from U.S. GDP. BloombergNEF freight curves add another $1.60 per barrel for a Cape of Good Hope detour plus $0.80 in bunker fuel. War-risk elasticity studies show that 70 percent of an insurance premium embeds into headline freight within a fortnight—effectively turning geopolitical anxiety into everyday costs at the pump. Strategic takeaway remains uncomplicated. Boards cannot micromanage every contingency, but they can widen risk limits, diversify shipping lanes and co-fund a GCC–EU 'Hormuz Alternative Route Task-Force.' The planning bill is trivial next to today's $225 000 voyage surcharge. In the absence of bold collective action, every forward-freight contract will continue to price a toll for geopolitical complacency. Better to pre-empt that charge than pay it in arrears.

Shell to face High Court trial over legacy oil pollution in 2027
Shell to face High Court trial over legacy oil pollution in 2027

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Shell to face High Court trial over legacy oil pollution in 2027

Oil giant Shell will now face a full trial in London's High Court in 2027 over allegations it was legally responsible for legacy oil pollution in Nigeria. Shell Plc and a Nigerian-based subsidiary of the company, now known as the Renaissance Africa Energy Company, are being sued by members of the Bille and Ogale communities in the Niger Delta. The legal action is led by the claimant law firm Leigh Day, which began legal action in 2015. The claim contains allegations that years of chronic oil spills have left the communities, which have a combined population of 50,000, without access to clean water, unable to farm and fish, and with a serious ongoing risk to public health. The case has been through several courts, including the High Court in 2017 and the Court of Appeal in 2018. Both courts ruled that there was no arguable case that Shell owed the claimants a duty of care. However, the Supreme Court overturned those in 2021, viewing that there was a 'real issue to be tried'. The High Court went on to green-light the legal battle in November 2023. The parties went to a preliminary issues trial between February and March this year at the court, where Mrs Justice May had to rule on several issues, including Shell's rejected argument on liability and concluded that the oil giant can still be liable for these spills. Shell argued that there was a strict five-year limitation period. However, the judge, in her 102-page judgment, rejected the argument and left it open for the communities to claim compensation for oil spills that occurred more than five years ago. She stated that 'some 85 spills have, so far, been identified,' and despite it being launched 10 years ago, she added that this case was 'still at a very early stage'. The judge also found that Shell could be liable for damage resulting from bunkering or illegal refining if it failed to protect its infrastructure, particularly if there is evidence that its staff have been complicit in the illegal activities. Leigh Day partner Matthew Renshaw said: 'Shell's attempts to knock out or restrict these claims through a preliminary trial of Nigerian law issues have been comprehensively rebuffed.' 'This outcome opens the door to Shell being held responsible for their legacy pollution as well as their negligence in failing to take reasonable steps to prevent pollution from oil theft or local refining,' he added. A spokesperson for Shell said the company welcomed this judgement. 'For many years, the vast majority of spills in the Niger Delta have been caused by third parties acting unlawfully, such as oil thieves who drill holes in pipelines, or saboteurs.' 'This criminality is the cause of the majority of spills in the Bille and Ogale claims, and we maintain that Shell is not liable for the criminal acts of third parties or illegal refining. These challenges are managed by a joint venture which Shell's former subsidiary operated, using its expertise in spill response and clean-up.' 'The spills referenced in this litigation were cleaned up by the joint venture regardless of the cause, as required by Nigerian law, working closely with government-owned partner NNPC Ltd, Nigerian government agencies and local communities.' 'Clean-up certificates were issued by the Nigerian regulator NOSDRA,' the spokesperson added. The trial, which will be closely watched, is set to take place over four months from March 2027.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store