Power shift: How Tesla's turmoil is steering global capital towards India
In the high-stakes arena of global business and politics, few collisions make markets tremble like the fallout between a tech titan and a political juggernaut. This is exactly what unfolded in early June 2025 when Elon
Musk
, the CEO of
Tesla
and SpaceX, clashed publicly with former U.S. President Donald
Trump
. The result? This was a devastating blow to Tesla's stock, which plunged by over 14% in a single day, wiping out an estimated $150 billion in market capitalisation. This was not just a stock market blip; it was the most severe single-day loss for Tesla since its listing and one of the most dramatic wealth erasures in corporate history.
The catalyst? Trump's verbal attacks on Musk during a campaign rally, accusing him of being "disloyal" and threatening to cut off federal contracts and regulatory support for Tesla and SpaceX if he regains the presidency, were also included. Investors responded with a swift selloff, and Tesla's valuation fell below the trillion-dollar mark. Global markets watched in shock as this political-personal feud spilled over into financial chaos.
However, amid this volatility lies a powerful truth: in global disruption, emerging markets like India often find their greatest opportunities. As the U.S. grapples with political instability and tech industry turbulence, India stands poised to benefit from capital reallocation, tech realignment, and supply chain diversification. While damaging to U.S. markets, the Tesla shockwave could become a springboard for India's clean-tech and high-growth sectors.
India's EV Ecosystem: Charging Ahead as Tesla Slows Down
India has been on an accelerated path toward electrification, and Tesla's current struggles have only sharpened the global spotlight on India's domestic electric vehicle (EV) ecosystem. As Tesla faces regulatory headwinds and reduced investor confidence, India's homegrown EV sector is booming, powered by market demand and policy incentives.
In the fiscal year 2024–25, India's EV market crossed a new milestone with over 1.7 million
electric vehicles
sold, reflecting a 96% year-on-year increase. Leading the charge are Indian companies such as Tata Motors, Mahindra Electric, and Ola Electric, which have committed billions of rupees to expand their EV product lines, charging infrastructure, and battery assembly capabilities.
The Indian government's Faster Adoption and Manufacturing of Hybrid and Electric Vehicles(FAME-II) scheme and the Production-Linked Incentive (PLI) Scheme for Advanced Chemistry Cell Battery Storage worth ₹18,100 crore have further catalysed industry momentum. States such as Tamil Nadu, Gujarat, and Maharashtra have introduced EV-specific policies offering land, tax exemptions, and power subsidies to manufacturers. As global investors rethink high-risk bets in politically volatile environments such as the U.S., they are increasingly drawn to India's policy stability, market scale, and rising consumer demand.
Analysts at Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs recently highlighted India's EV sector as a 'structural investment theme' for the next decade. Tesla's hiccups may prompt global auto majors to partner with or invest in Indian EV startups as a hedge against Western uncertainty, creating an entirely new lane for India's industrial growth.
Supply Chain and Clean-Tech Investment: India as the Next Global Pivot
Tesla's valuation collapse was not just a corporate crisis; it exposed the deeper fragility of global supply chains tethered to geopolitical risks. Tesla's core supply lines depend heavily on rare earth elements (REEs), lithium, and semiconductors, many of which are sourced from China, South America, or politically sensitive regions.
With U.S.–China tensions rising and Trump threatening tighter trade policies, the world's clean energy future needs new anchors—and India is stepping into that vacuum. In response to the rising global demand and strategic concerns, India unveiled its Critical Minerals Strategy (2023), identifying 30 minerals, including lithium, cobalt, and nickel, as essential for national security and industrial development.
The Geological Survey of India discovered a significant 5.9-million-ton lithium reserve in Jammu and Kashmir—India's first—and auction processes are already underway for its commercial extraction. Meanwhile, India's semiconductor manufacturing mission—backed by a ₹76,000 crore incentive package—has begun bearing fruit. Micron Technology, in collaboration with Tata Group, is establishing chip assembly and testing units in Gujarat. These developments are being closely monitored by global players looking to diversify away from China and the U.S. India's proven IT prowess, skilled workforce, and competitive cost structures provide it with a unique advantage in scaling both battery and semiconductor supply chains.
According to BloombergNEF, global clean energy investments are expected to cross $2 trillion in 2025, and India is projected to attract nearly $60 billion, up from $45 billion in 2024. The Tesla–Trump debacle added urgency to this diversification. Indian companies working in battery storage, solar inverters, EV components, and green hydrogen can now tap into redirected global capital that would have otherwise flown into American companies.
Moreover, India's space technology sector, often overlooked, is quietly booming. As Trump's remarks also targeted SpaceX and its satellite network Starlink, Indian startups like Skyroot Aerospace, Agnikul Cosmos, and Pixxel are seizing the moment to attract international investments. With 30 private satellite launches scheduled for 2025 and a supportive government ecosystem, India's space economy could grow to $13 billion by 2026, up from $7 billion in 2022, according to the EY-ISpA.
Disruption for Some, Direction for Others
The Musk–Trump standoff may have caused a ripple of fear in U.S. markets, but for India, it is a signal to act. As Western investors reassess the risks of politicised corporate battles, India offers a pragmatic alternative rooted in stable policy, scalable infrastructure, and strategic clarity. The Tesla fallout, while costly for America's most iconic EV brand, might accelerate India's emergence as a global industrial and investment powerhouse. In the wreckage of a $150 billion loss lies the blueprint for India's trillion-dollar leap.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
43 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Car and an American family
What happens when your dream car becomes the most polarising vehicle in the country? I fell in love with the Cybertruck when Tesla founder Elon Musk unveiled the design. The engineering impressed me, and it fit my needs perfectly. As a triathlon enthusiast, I needed a pickup truck to haul my gear after training. The supervised full self-driving mode was ideal for my tired body and mind after long workdays or tough sessions. Then the political climate shifted. Musk went from hero to villain for half the country. News reports of damaged Tesla cars were disconcerting, but the bigger issue was my family's reaction. My son thought it looked like a trash can on wheels. My wife swore she would never be seen in it. Friends called, imploring me to buy anything but 'that monstrosity'. Who am I politically? I'm a first-generation immigrant who is socially liberal and fiscally conservative — both parties can appeal to me. My family spans the political spectrum, and I am proud of our differences. I admire Musk's technological prowess, even if I don't entirely agree with his political approach. My automotive journey has spanned the spectrum. Growing up on an isolated tobacco farm in India, our first automobile was a motorbike. Dad had me sitting on the fuel tank, while mother carried my brother. As we grew, we used crowded buses to reach the nearest village, then walked home for two kilometres. We hitchhiked on trucks, tractors, and bullock carts. My cousin reminded me that once I went to boarding school, I refused to ride the bullock cart as it wasn't cool, preferring to walk. Our first car was a worn-down Ambassador — life-transforming for us. I was never fascinated with luxury brands; cars served one purpose: transportation. In America, an uncle gave me an old Mazda during residency training. Then I bought my first car: a Nissan Altima that lasted eight years through Buffalo and Chicago winters. When my junior physicians ribbed me about my old car, I impulsively bought an Infiniti FX SUV. After test-driving it in the hospital parking garage with a colleague, tires squealing, he delivered one of his one-liners: 'Money does buy happiness.' When Musk announced his electric revolution, the world and I laughed. When a colleague first took me for a Tesla drive, I grasped the massive technological leap. Still, I waited for an electric SUV. I tried liking other electric trucks to appease my circle, but Every sighting of the Cybertruck made my heart skip a beat. Taking my sceptical daughter for a test drive, we both fell head over heels for it. The car drove us to dinner — I never touched the wheel. The full self-driving (FSD) data is fascinating. Average Americans drive 700,000 lifetime miles. Tesla FSD has logged 3.6 billion miles. Imagine an experienced driver who never drinks, never tires, never gets nagged by the spouse. My FSD experience has been exceptional, even in weather when I couldn't see lanes. It follows rules, navigates roundabouts brilliantly, and parks better than I do. Human reaction time averages 250 milliseconds; FSD is 2.5 times faster. Musk's plan for unsupervised self-driving in Austin could eliminate drunk driving and help elderly and disabled people get around. After a family trip to Orlando — the car driving both ways —, my wife grudgingly acknowledged the technological marvel. We are now the quintessential American family: Democrats, Republicans, Independents, an apolitical dog, and a Cybertruck. dinarab@
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Neighbourhood policy at work: India to fly home Nepal, Sri Lanka citizens from Iran
In a major diplomatic outreach to its neighbours, India said Saturday it will evacuate nationals of Nepal and Sri Lanka who are stranded in Iran and want to leave the country. Officials in Delhi framed it as an example of India's 'neighbourhood first policy' — of helping its neighbours in times of crisis, be it conflict, natural calamity or pandemic. This announcement came on the day two more flights, operated by the Iranian Mahan Air, landed in Delhi. The Indian embassy in Tehran, in a post on X, said, 'On request of the Governments of Nepal and Sri Lanka, the Indian Embassy's evacuation efforts in Iran will also cover citizens of Nepal and Sri Lanka.' 'The citizens of Nepal and Sri Lanka may urgently reach out to the Embassy, either on the Telegram channel or over the emergency contact numbers: +989010144557;+989128109115; +989128109109,' it stated. Nepal's Foreign Minister Arzu Rana Deuba expressed Kathmandu's gratitude. In a post on X, she thanked External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar 'for India's swift assistance in helping to evacuate Nepali nationals from Iran'. 'India's support in Nepal's evacuation efforts is a reflection of the strength of Nepal-India ties,' she said. Sources said about 16 Nepal nationals are in touch with the Nepalese embassy in Delhi. Sri Lanka's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, in a post, said, 'Sri Lanka extends its sincere gratitude to the Government of India for the timely assistance to evacuate Sri Lankan nationals from Iran alongside Indian citizens. This act of solidarity exemplifies the strong and enduring partnership between Sri Lanka and India, and is deeply appreciated by the people of Sri Lanka.' So far, a total of 827 Indians have been evacuated from Iran. 'Another evacuation flight from Mashhad landed in New Delhi at 1630 hrs on 21 June with 310 Indian nationals from Iran. With this, a total of 827 Indians have been evacuated,' Randhir Jaiswal, spokesperson for the Ministry of External Affairs, said. A group of about 290 Indian nationals, including students, reached Delhi late Friday night and early Saturday after being evacuated from Iran as its war with Israel intensified. On Wednesday, India announced the launch of Operation Sindhu to evacuate its nationals from Iran. 'Operation Sindhu flight brings citizens home. India evacuated 290 Indian nationals from Iran, including students and religious pilgrims by a charter flight. The flight arrived in New Delhi at 2330 hrs on 20 June and was received by Secretary (CPV& OIA) Arun Chatterjee,' Jaiswal wrote on X. 'Government of India is grateful to the Government of Iran for the facilitation of the evacuation process,' he said. The first batch of 110 Indian nationals, evacuated under Operation Sindhu, arrived in India Thursday, with many evacuees sharing firsthand accounts of the frightening situation they witnessed before being moved to safer locations. This is not the first time that Delhi has stepped in to evacuate citizens of its neighbours. In the early days of the Ukraine war, India evacuated nationals of neighbouring countries along with its own. Delhi managed to persuade Tehran to open Iranian airspace for the evacuation of around 1,000 Indians via the north-eastern town of Mashhad. Sources said Delhi, after days of negotiations, moved its nationals to Mashhad and secured overflight permissions from Iran and Turkmenistan to fly Indians out of harm's way. Mashhad is close to Iran's border with Turkmenistan, and India found an air corridor for a safe flight out. Indians were moved from Tehran to Qom and then to Mashhad, with the help of the Indian embassy and Iranian authorities. India's ties with Iran and Israel puts it in a delicate spot, where it has to do some diplomatic balancing act. Delhi has strategic stakes with Iran – from Chabahar port to shared concerns on Pakistan and Afghanistan. So, it has been very careful in its statements. It has a very strategic security and defence partnership with Israel as well. Shubhajit Roy, Diplomatic Editor at The Indian Express, has been a journalist for more than 25 years now. Roy joined The Indian Express in October 2003 and has been reporting on foreign affairs for more than 17 years now. Based in Delhi, he has also led the National government and political bureau at The Indian Express in Delhi — a team of reporters who cover the national government and politics for the newspaper. He has got the Ramnath Goenka Journalism award for Excellence in Journalism '2016. He got this award for his coverage of the Holey Bakery attack in Dhaka and its aftermath. He also got the IIMCAA Award for the Journalist of the Year, 2022, (Jury's special mention) for his coverage of the fall of Kabul in August 2021 — he was one of the few Indian journalists in Kabul and the only mainstream newspaper to have covered the Taliban's capture of power in mid-August, 2021. ... Read More
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Trump's ‘Two Weeks' Pause on Iran Strikes Comes With High Stakes
President Donald Trump often suggests that something will happen in 'two weeks' when he's looking to buy himself some time. But his latest two-weeks declaration — on possible US military strikes in Iran — comes with unusually high stakes. The pause, after days of bellicose rhetoric and social posts about evacuating Tehran, rattled markets in the region, triggered new threats from the Iran-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen, led Iranian officials to call the US Israel's 'partner in crime' and left Israel in a holding pattern. Because by now the world knows that Trump's 'two weeks' could mean two days, two months or never, his delay this time only fed the uncertainty. Regional equities slid on Friday, despite a sustained surge in oil prices that would typically support sentiment in Gulf economies. Israel — a US ally with particularly close ties to Trump — has been placed in a holding pattern. It launched its attacks arguing that Iran's nuclear capabilities must be neutralized. But experts say it will be hard for Israel to destroy Iran's most fortified uranium enrichment facility, the Fordow plant, without the bunker-busting bombs only the US has. The US military launched several long-range stealth B-2 bombers — the kind that could carry the 30,000-pound bombs — from Missouri over the Pacific, according to media reports, possibly positioning them in case of a strike. The Wall Street Journal cited officials saying that no order has been given to ready an operation. 'For the Israelis it does put them in a bind,' said Illan Goldenberg, a former White House and Pentagon official who worked on Iran issues. 'They'd prefer this not go on for weeks and months.' 'My guess is they have some kind of option for Fordow, but it's not as good as our option for Fordow,' said Goldenberg, a senior vice president at J Street, a liberal Israel lobbying group focused on creating a two-state solution. The Israelis 'put themselves in this limbo by launching a war and putting their faith in Donald Trump to come and finish the job.' Israeli officials told the White House in what was described as a tense phone call on Thursday that two weeks is too long to wait for Iran to reach a deal to dismantle its nuclear program, Reuters reported Saturday. Iran, meanwhile, could seek to disrupt oil shipments through the Strait of Hormuz, a chokepoint for roughly 20% of global crude flows. Even without a direct move by Tehran, nearly 1,000 vessels daily have reported GPS jamming near the narrow passage separating Iran from its Arab neighbors, according to the French naval liaison body MICA Center. The Houthis, an Iran-backed militia in Yemen, threatened on Saturday to target US vessels and battleships if the US joins Israeli attacks. The conflict started June 13 when Israel, saying it had evidence that Iran was close to achieving nuclear weapons capability, launched a series of missile attacks on Iran, which has returned missile attacks. Keeping the world guessing Trump for years has had a penchant for setting two-week deadlines, sometimes following through and at other times missing them or never acting at all, making 'within two weeks' a stock phrase for pending decisions in both his White House terms. On Friday, Trump kept the world guessing on his next steps. Speaking to reporters in New Jersey, he called himself a 'peacemaker' and dismissed the idea of sending in ground troops. He both suggested he wanted a diplomatic path and said he might support a ceasefire, but also kept a military threat alive, describing the two-week time frame as a maximum. 'I'm giving them a period of time,' he declared. Israel has pressed Trump to offer support, but in return Trump has only offered a run of tough commentary. European diplomats have stepped in to try to de-escalate tensions by talking to Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi with little to show for it but a dismissive remark from Trump. Trump won the presidency twice promising not to get the US involved in the kinds of intractable Middle East wars he savaged his predecessors over. His most fervent MAGA supporters have been urging him publicly and privately to avoid military action in keeping with his 'America First' position. Since Israel's assault on Iran started, Israelis have faced hundreds of ballistic missiles and 1,000 drone attacks launched by Tehran. Iran has lost a slew of military officials, with more than 400 people dead and several nuclear facilities and related infrastructure destroyed or damaged. Israel, which has been waging a military campaign in Gaza since Hamas militants attacked the country on Oct. 7, 2023, may struggle to sustain a war against Tehran. The US is already working to replenish Israel's defenses as they deplete their stock of interceptors. And Israeli officials say Trump's pause means the war will last even longer. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu insisted the Jewish state will 'achieve all of our objectives,' including rendering Fordow inoperable. Trump cited hopes for negotiations as part of his aim for the 'two-week' pause. But Iranians refuse to negotiate with the US while an Israeli assault continues, and the talks with European leaders appeared to make little progress. Trump expressed skepticism about those efforts Friday, saying: 'Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe. They want to speak to us. Europe is not going to be able to help them.' Yet Iran refuses to talk to the US while the Israeli assault continues. Peter Krause, a Boston College professor who specializes in Middle Eastern politics, argued that if Trump is doing 'coercive diplomacy' with Iran, then his 'hand is strengthened' the more damage Israelis do to Iran. Krause said the next two weeks will likely see a 'ramping up with more of the same militarily, but simultaneously, attempted diplomacy led by the Europeans and maybe the United States and the Turks to see if we can get an off-ramp before things get worse.' Trump has also long hurled ultimatums at opponents that he often quickly reverses as he pushes them to make concessions — as the world saw with his tariffs regime in the spring — demanding exorbitant tariffs only to back off once the trading partner arrived at the negotiating table. But taking that approach here may not work. The latest signals from the White House suggest a demand for zero uranium enrichment in Iran, a condition Tehran sees as fundamentally unacceptable. Iranian officials maintain they have no intention of pursuing nuclear weapons, but argue that some level of enrichment, under clear restrictions and oversight, is a sovereign right. Stripping that away, they contend, would amount to capitulation rather than compromise. With assistance from Ethan Bronner. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
