Mount Lebanon municipal elections: Preparations finalized with extensive security and technical measures
Report by Petra Abou Haidar, English adaptation by Yasmine Jaroudi
One week before the municipal and local elections in Mount Lebanon, authorities are bracing for potential technical or security issues at polling stations.
To ensure smooth operations, multiple support centers have been set up to assist voters, polling staff, and election officials.
At the Interior Ministry, two dedicated units are ready: a call center and an operations room, both accessible through the hotline 1766.
The call center will be staffed by Internal Security Forces (ISF) personnel and UNDP-trained employees, who are equipped to address issues like delays in delivering ballot boxes, problems with voters' identification documents, or disruptions in electricity and communications at voting centers.
If a technical issue cannot be resolved at the call center, it will be escalated to the ministry's operations room, which includes representatives from security agencies, judges delegated by the Justice Ministry, senior officials, and ministry employees.
In case of security incidents, such as disputes or disturbances, matters will be transferred to the ISF's operations room for appropriate response.
The Interior Ministry's operations room, located in the hall named after the late General Wissam al-Hassan, was inaugurated Monday by the Interior Minister alongside Prime Minister Nawaf Salam. It is connected to a centralized dashboard that links with the ISF's operations center, which monitors the security situation and coordinates units across the country.
On election day, the General Director of Internal Security will oversee operations alongside senior officers to ensure the proper distribution of ballot boxes, the orderly start of the voting process, and immediate response to any security breaches.
More than 8,000 security personnel will be deployed under a detailed plan to safeguard the electoral process.
The Interior Ministry will continuously update voter turnout rates electronically on the shared dashboard. Although preparations are advanced, vote counting will proceed manually as in previous elections.
Results will be transmitted from the heads of polling centers to the Mount Lebanon governorate through district centers before being sent to the Interior Ministry and published on the dashboard.
Meanwhile, the Mount Lebanon governorate and district centers are finalizing their own plans to manage complaints and issues on election day, with details to be announced once preparations are complete.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LBCI
2 days ago
- LBCI
Potential nuclear risk: Could Israel's Dimona radiation reach Lebanon if targeted?
Report by Petra Abou Haidar, English adaptation by Yasmine Jaroudi As tensions escalate in the region, one question looms large: what happens if Israel's Dimona nuclear facility is targeted, which lies approximately 400 to 600 kilometers from Lebanon? Situated in the Negev desert, Dimona is widely believed to house a nuclear reactor, though Israel has never officially confirmed its exact nature or capabilities. According to international reports, it is classified as a power-generating nuclear reactor. A strike on such a facility could lead to radioactive leakage, potentially spreading beyond Israel's borders depending on wind direction and atmospheric conditions. Can radiation reach Lebanon in this case? While there is no way to definitively predict the extent of contamination in the event of a strike, the scale of radiation leakage and prevailing weather patterns would be determining factors. Crucially, Israel remains tight-lipped about the materials and exact functions of the site. In Lebanon, the body responsible for responding to such emergencies is the Lebanese Atomic Energy Commission. Established in 1995 with support from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and Lebanon's National Council for Scientific Research, the commission is responsible for monitoring radiation levels and implementing emergency measures as necessary. Should radiation be detected, protocols would involve analyzing air quality and assessing levels of radioactive spread before activating appropriate response plans. Although public anxiety is understandable, Lebanese experts urge against panic. They caution that fear-mongering—especially through social media ads promoting the so-called "comprehensive nuclear protection fund"—only fuels misinformation.
LBCI
2 days ago
- LBCI
Israel may need American backup again: Could a 1973-style US airlift return amid Iranian attacks?
Report by Joe Farchakh, English adaptation by Yasmine Jaroudi With every siren that sounds in Tel Aviv, Israel's air defense systems face a fresh challenge. In less than a week, Iran has launched more than 370 projectiles, including ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, and hundreds of drones, deep into Israeli territory in a coordinated and sustained assault. Israel's layered air defense network, working around the clock, includes several key systems. The Iron Dome is for short-range threats such as mortars but is not effective in fighting long-range ballistic missiles or precision drones, heavily used in Iran's attacks. David's Sling is designed for medium-range missiles and drones, whereas the Arrow 2 and 3 systems are developed explicitly for intercepting long-range ballistic missiles that travel beyond the atmosphere. These are supported by advanced radar and early warning systems that guide interceptors with precision. However, these systems are beginning to show signs of strain. According to The Wall Street Journal, Israel's stockpile of Arrow interceptor missiles is rapidly depleting. For the first time in decades, Israeli defenses are being forced to make tactical decisions on which incoming missiles to intercept—and which to let through. An intelligence source familiar with Israeli defense planning told The Washington Post: "In a matter of days, Israel may have to request direct U.S. assistance to replenish its interceptors—or even ask for deeper operational involvement." Meanwhile, Iran has adapted its own tactics. While it launched over 100 missiles on the first day of the conflict, it reduced that number to 30 by the fifth day, signaling a more controlled use of its ballistic missile arsenal, which analysts say remains limited. Tehran appears to be pursuing a strategy of attrition, engaging Israel in a prolonged confrontation that wears down its air defenses. This evolving standoff has sparked speculation over whether the United States will reopen a historic airlift to support Israel's military—a move reminiscent of Operation "Nickel Grass" in October 1973. After Egypt and Syria suddenly launched the October War on Yom Kippur, that mission saw the U.S. transport 22,395 tons of military supplies to Israel over 32 days until October 14, after Prime Minister Golda Meir appealed to President Richard Nixon. Nixon reportedly responded with: "Send everything that can fly." Today's conflict is markedly different. While the 1973 war involved ground, air, and naval combat, the current confrontation centers on high-volume missile and drone warfare. Yet the urgency remains. Unlike five decades ago, Iran now can strike Israeli supply routes—targeting Ben Gurion Airport or the Port of Haifa—even as the U.S. maintains overwhelming military superiority in the region. Whether another Operation "Nickel Grass" is imminent remains uncertain. As missile salvos continue and stockpiles shrink, one thing is clear: this is a war of endurance, and the skies may once again become a bridge between Washington and Tel Aviv.
LBCI
2 days ago
- LBCI
Fifth day of war: How Iran and Israel are testing each other's limits
Report by Wissam Nasrallah, English adaptation by Yasmine Jaroudi On the fifth day of open warfare between Tehran and Tel Aviv, Israel claims to have destroyed nearly 40% of Iran's missile launch platforms. Yet, Iranian rockets continue to rain down on Tel Aviv and other cities, raising questions over who holds the upper hand in this increasingly complex military confrontation. An imbalance in equipment, strategy, and geography shapes the military landscape. Israel operates a fleet of over 600 aircraft, with 45% classified as advanced fighter jets—among them the F-15 Eagle, F-16 Fighting Falcon, and the stealth-capable F-35 Lightning II. In contrast, Iran fields 551 aircraft, many of which are outdated models inherited from the Shah's era. Despite Russian and Chinese upgrades, Iranian aircraft remain largely incapable of matching Israel's airpower, especially given their limited range and vulnerability to Israeli air defenses. Israel's layered missile defense system—developed over decades—offers multi-tiered protection, yet it has struggled to withstand Iran's saturation tactics. Tehran has launched waves of ballistic missiles, interspersed with drones and cruise missiles, in a deliberate effort to overwhelm and confuse Israeli radar systems. The sheer volume has made intercepting every threat nearly impossible. On the Iranian side, air defenses remain largely obsolete. Systems such as the Russian-made S-200 and S-300PMU-2, as well as the domestically produced Khordad-15, have shown limited effectiveness. This was evident in recent days as Israeli warplanes penetrated deep into Iranian airspace, following significant damage inflicted on Iran's air defense grid during Israeli strikes in October 2024. Despite these vulnerabilities, Iran wields considerable asymmetric capabilities. It relies heavily on mobile missile launchers hidden underground or nestled in mountainous regions, posing a significant challenge for precision targeting. Many of these sites are shielded within fortified tunnel networks designed to evade both radar detection and thermal imaging. Additionally, Iran's extensive use of drones has played a critical role in this conflict. Models such as the Shahed-136 and Mohajer-6 have been deployed in large numbers, exploiting low-altitude flight paths and pre-programmed routes to avoid detection.
