Asian shares decline after mixed Wall Street finish and tensions simmer in the Middle East
A dealer walks past near the screens showing the Korea Composite Stock Price Index (KOSPI), left, and the foreign exchange rate between U.S. dollar and South Korean won at a dealing room of Hana Bank in Seoul, South Korea, Thursday, June 19, 2025. (AP Photo/Lee Jin-man)
TOKYO — Asian shares retreated Thursday as worries persisted about conflict in the Middle East.
Ratcheting up tensions, President Donald Trump warned of the possibility of getting directly involved in the conflict with Israel, while Iran's supreme leader rejected U.S. calls for surrender.
Oil prices rose while U.S. futures declined.
In Asian trading, Japan's benchmark Nikkei 225 shed 1.0% to finish at 38,488.34. Shares in Japan's Nippon Steel Corp. jumped 2.3% after it announced that its acquisition of U.S. Steel, which met U.S. government opposition for more than a year, was finally completed.
Hong Kong's Hang Seng dropped 2.1% to 23,217.07 on heavy selling of tech-related shares, while the Shanghai Composite lost 0.8% to 3,362.11.
Australia's S&P/ASX 200 was little changed at 8,523.70 and in South Korea, the Kospi rose 0.2% to 2,977.74.
U.S. financial markets will be closed Thursday for the Juneteenth holiday.
On Wednesday, U.S. stocks drifted to a mixed finish after the Federal Reserve indicated it may cut interest rates twice this year, though it's far from certain about that.
The S&P 500 finished nearly unchanged at 5,980.87. The Dow Jones Industrial Average dipped 0.1% to 42,171.66, and the Nasdaq composite rose 0.1% to 19,546.27.
Treasury yields also wavered but ultimately held relatively steady after the Fed released projections showing the median official expects to cut the federal funds rate twice by the end of 2025. That's the same number they were projecting three months ago, and it helped calm worries a bit that inflation caused by T rump's higher tariffs could tie the Fed's hands.
Cuts in rates would make mortgages, credit-card payments and other loans cheaper for U.S. households and businesses, which in turn could strengthen the overall economy. But they could likewise fan inflation higher.
So far, inflation has remained relatively tame, and it's near the Fed's target of 2%. But economists have been warning it may take months to feel the effects of tariffs. And inflation has been feeling upward pressure recently from a spurt in oil prices because of Israel's fighting with Iran.
Fed Chair Jerome Powell stressed on Wednesday that all the uncertainty surrounding tariffs means the median forecast for two cuts to interest rates this year could end up being far from reality. 'Right now it's just a forecast in a very foggy time,' he said
Fed officials are waiting to see how big Trump's tariffs will ultimately be, what they will affect and whether they will drive a one-time increase to inflation or something more dangerous. There is also still deep uncertainty about how much tariffs will grind down on the economy's growth.
'Because the economy is still solid, we can take the time to actually see what's going to happen,' Powell said.
'We'll make smarter and better decisions if we just wait a couple months or however long it takes to get a sense of really what is going to be the passthrough of inflation and what are going to be the effects on spending and hiring and all those things.'
A report released Wednesday said fewer workers applied for unemployment benefits last week, possibly indicating fewer layoffs. But another said homebuilders broke ground on fewer homes last month than economists expected. That suggests higher mortgage rates may be casting a chill on the industry.
In other dealings early Thursday, benchmark U.S. crude rose 71 cents to $74.21. Brent crude, the international standard, advanced 76 cents to $77.46 a barrel.
Oil prices have been yo-yoing as fears rise and ebb that the conflict between Israel and Iran could disrupt the global flow of crude. Iran is a major producer of oil and also sits on the narrow Strait of Hormuz, through which much of the world's crude passes.
In currency trading, the U.S. dollar rose to 145.33 Japanese yen from 145.13 yen. The euro cost $1.1465, down from $1.1484.
Yuri Kageyama, The Associated Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
2 No-Brainer Artificial Intelligence Stocks to Buy Right Now
No matter where you are on the artificial intelligence (AI) debate -- for or against -- there's no denying that it's transforming the way people work. Companies of all shapes and sizes are integrating into their daily workflows, and new industries are popping up because of it. The mass adoption of AI could result in a market size of more than $15 trillion by 2030, according to PwC research. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More » Fortunately, there are tons of AI companies out there that actually have a foothold in the market and aren't just flash-in-the-pan opportunities. Here are two well-established companies that are already benefiting from this trend and could be great AI stocks for years to come. 1. Taiwan Semiconductor Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (NYSE: TSM) does exactly what its name describes -- it manufactures processors for companies. The world's leading chip designers, including Nvidia, rely on Taiwan Semiconductor (often referred to as TSMC) to make their processors because the company is so good at it. TSMC manufactures an estimated 90% of the world's artificial intelligence semiconductors, making it the clear leader in this market. This dominance led to TSMC's revenue rising 41% in the first quarter of 2025 to $25.5 billion and diluted earnings per share jumping 60% to $2.12 per American depository receipt (ADR). TSMC relies on its technological lead in semiconductor manufacturing to stay ahead of its competitors, and so far, it's still leading the pack. The company is focused on its 5-nanometer (nm) and 3nm chip production and management said recently that there continues to be "strong demand" for both. The company's CEO, C.C. Wei, said early this year he expects TSMC's artificial intelligence revenue to double this year compared to last year and recently reiterated that forecast. Taiwan Semiconductor stock has already gained 142% over the past three years, so what makes the stock a buy right now? Demand for semiconductors hasn't slowed down yet, and no one knows when or if it will. Companies are locked in an AI race right now, and a big part of that involves getting their hands on the most advanced AI chips. With TSMC's dominance in semiconducting manufacturing and it already holding a lead in advanced AI processors, the company is poised to benefit from chip demand as long as tech giants need the best processors available. And despite its share price gains, TSMC stock has a price to earnings ratio of just 25, which is below the P/E multiple of the broader S&P 500. 2. Microsoft Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) has made itself an important player in artificial intelligence by making strategic investments in ChatGPT creator OpenAI over the past several years. The early move gave Microsoft access to one of the most advanced AI chatbots on the market, and it quickly implemented ChatGPT into everything from its Microsoft 365 suite of productivity tools to its GitHub Copilot coding assistant. That's helped Microsoft stay relevant in a rapidly shifting tech market and benefit from AI's growth. Part of Microsoft's AI strategy has been to offer more advanced services with its Azure cloud computing platform, which has helped result in a 35% jump in cloud services sales in the fiscal third quarter (which ended March 31). Microsoft is the second-largest public cloud computing provider with 21% market share, trailing only Amazon, which holds 30%. Microsoft has narrowed this gap over the past few years, and its investments in artificial intelligence infrastructure could make it an even stronger contender. The company will spend $80 billion on cloud infrastructure this fiscal year alone to stay ahead of the competition. Microsoft's stock is a bit more expensive than Taiwan Semiconductor's, with a P/E multiple of 36. But with Microsoft already off to a strong start in implementing advanced AI into its software and benefiting from AI cloud services, the company is setting itself up to remain a leading tech player for years to come. Should you invest $1,000 in Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing right now? Before you buy stock in Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $659,171!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $891,722!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is995% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to172%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Chris Neiger has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Precious metals: platinum edition
Platinum has recently captured market attention with a notable price breakout, definitively pushing above US$1,100 per ounce, after spending much of this decade rangebound between US$850-$1,100 per ounce. A primary catalyst for this shift in platinum's fortunes lies in the evolving landscape of the automotive industry. For years, the anticipated dominance of electric vehicles (EVs) cast a long shadow over platinum demand, given that approximately one-third to nearly half of its use is in catalytic converters for internal combustion engines. However, a significant pivot is underway. Auto original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) are now re-evaluating and scaling back ambitious EV targets, instead placing a renewed emphasis on hybrid engines. Growing demand This may be a considerable boon for platinum, not only because hybrids still incorporate catalytic converters, but critically, these vehicles demand more platinum per unit. The start-stop technology and extended battery-only operation in hybrids mean their catalytic converters often run at lower temperatures, requiring a higher concentration of platinum to maintain optimal efficiency. Beyond the automotive sector, robust jewelry demand is providing substantial support to platinum's price. Historically, a price increase might dampen jewelry sales, but in the current environment, particularly in key markets like China, demand remains strong. A significant factor here is the compelling price disparity between platinum and gold. With platinum currently trading at approximately one-third the price of gold, a substantial gap exists, making platinum jewelry an attractive alternative. This stark difference suggests that jewelry demand is not only supportive of the current breakout but has the potential to further bolster the demand side of the equation. Platinum/gold ratio shifting Adding another layer to this positive narrative is the recent upward trend in the platinum-to-gold ratio. This ratio, which had seen a prolonged decline partly fueled by the 'platinum is dead' narrative linked to EV expectations, is now signaling a change in investor sentiment. The recent movement of platinum outpacing gold suggests that investors are increasingly looking for value beyond traditional safe havens and may be diversifying into platinum as a store of value. In summary, platinum's recent price surge is underpinned by several powerful forces. These include a turn to positive net long positions among traders, a fundamental shift in the auto industry towards hybrid vehicles, sustained strong jewelry demand driven by an attractive price differential with gold, and a notable re-evaluation of platinum's investment appeal relative to gold. Collectively, these factors suggest a robust and potentially lasting upward trajectory for the metal. John Kratochwil, MBA, is Senior Analyst at AGF Management Ltd. specializing in the Materials (ex-Chemicals) and Real Estate sectors. Notes and Disclaimer Content copyright © 2025 by AGF Ltd. This article first appeared in AGF Perspectives. Reprinted with permission. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions of AGF, its subsidiaries or any of its affiliated companies, funds, or investment strategies. Commentary and data sourced from Bloomberg, Reuters and other news sources unless otherwise noted. The commentaries contained herein are provided as a general source of information based on information available as of June 10, 2025. It is not intended to address the needs, circumstances, and objectives of any specific investor. The content of this commentary is not to be used or construed as investment advice, as an offer to buy or sell any securities, and is not intended to suggest taking or refraining from any course of action. Every effort has been made to ensure accuracy in these commentaries at the time of publication, however, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Market conditions may change and AGF Investments accepts no responsibility for individual investment decisions arising from the use or reliance on the information contained herein. This document may contain forward-looking information that reflects our current expectations or forecasts of future events. Forward-looking information is inherently subject to, among other things, risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed herein. For Canadian investors: Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with investment fund investments. Please read the prospectus before investing. Investment funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated. AGF Investments is a group of wholly owned subsidiaries of AGF Management Limited, a Canadian reporting issuer. The subsidiaries included in AGF Investments are AGF Investments Inc. (AGFI), AGF Investments America Inc. (AGFA), AGF Investments LLC (AGFUS) and AGF International Advisors Company Limited (AGFIA). AGFI is registered as a portfolio manager across Canadian securities commissions. AGFA and AGFUS are registered investment advisors with the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission. AGFIA is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland and registered with the Australian Securities & Investments Commission. The term AGF Investments may refer to one or more of these subsidiaries or to all of them jointly. This term is used for convenience and does not precisely describe any of the separate companies, each of which manages its own affairs. AGF Investments entities only provide investment advisory services or offers investment funds in the jurisdiction where such firm, individuals and/or product is registered or authorized to provide such services. Investment advisory services for U.S. persons are provided by AGFA and AGFUS. In connection with providing services to certain U.S. clients, AGF Investments LLC uses the resources of AGF Investments Inc. acting in its capacity as AGF Investments LLC's 'participating affiliate', in accordance with applicable guidance of the staff of the SEC. AGFA engages one or more affiliates and their personnel in the provision of services under written agreements (including dual employee) among AGFA and its affiliates and under which AGFA supervises the activities of affiliate personnel on behalf of its clients ('Affiliate Resource Arrangements'). ® ™ The 'AGF' logo and all associated trademarks are registered trademarks or trademarks of AGF Management Limited and used under licence.
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
U.S. judge blocks National Science Foundation from slashing universities' federal funding
A federal judge on Friday prevented the National Science Foundation from sharply cutting research funding provided to universities in the latest legal setback to efforts by U.S. President Donald Trump's administration to slash government support of research at major academic institutions. U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani in Boston invalidated a policy NSF adopted in May that limited the ability of universities to be reimbursed for administrative and facility costs that indirectly support grant-funded research, ruling that it was 'arbitrary and capricious.' Spokespeople for NSF and the White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the ruling. NSF, a US$9 billion agency that funds scientific research, adopted the policy after having already canceled hundreds of grants out of step with the Republican president's priorities. His administration has also been freezing billions of dollars in government funding for numerous universities, including Harvard. NSF's policy, which was announced on May 2, set a cap on how much grant funding could go to cover indirect costs. NSF said funding for such costs could equal no more than 15% of the funding for direct research costs, regardless of what the costs actually were at universities. Historically, universities had negotiated with NSF and other agencies over the rate at which indirect costs could be reimbursed. The cap meant that for every $100 in funding going directly to a research grant award, universities would receive just $15 to cover overhead, such as the costs of maintaining lab space and paying for electricity and staff. The Trump administration said it sought through the policy to rein in spending on administrative overhead, which had grown to consume US$1.07 billion of NSF's annual US$4.22 billion grant-making budget for higher education institutions. That rate, though, is significantly lower than the indirect cost that many of the 69 research universities belonging to Association of American Universities had negotiated, which was often in the 50 per cent to 65 per cent range, the group's lawyers said. Talwani, an appointee of Democratic President Barack Obama, said in her Friday decision that the administration's 15 per cent rate was unlawful. The association along with two other academic trade groups and 13 schools sued in May to block the policy, after earlier convincing judges in Boston to block similar funding cuts at the National Institutes of Health and U.S. Department of Energy. The association did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the Friday decision. Among the schools that challenged NSF's funding cuts were the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Princeton University, Brown University, the University of California, Carnegie Mellon University, Cornell University, the University of Michigan and the University of Pennsylvania. They argued that NSF's action, if allowed to stand, 'will badly undermine scientific research at America's universities and erode our nation's enviable status as a global leader in scientific research and innovation.' The U.S. Department of Defense has since also adopted a 15 per cent cap, which a judge on Tuesday temporarily blocked pending a hearing on July 2. He did so a day after a different judge in Boston ordered NIH to reinstate hundreds of grants for research on diversity-related topics nixed as part of the administration's purge of initiatives viewed as supporting 'diversity, equity and inclusion.'
