Gold Miners Stage A Comeback, But Will The Rally Hold?

Open Cut Gold mine, with Haul truck driving up road, located in Cobar NSW AustraliaOpen Cut Gold ... More mine, located in Cobar NSW Australia
Mining stocks are stepping out of gold's shadow.
After years of lagging the metal they mine, gold miners are starting to outperform. The GDX Index — a benchmark index for the sector — is up roughly 28% this year, compared to a 19% gain for gold itself.
The shift comes as gold spot prices hit a record $3,142 per ounce, setting the stage for earnings upgrades and a shift in sentiment. 'Gold miners offer operational leverage to gold price upside, potential growth and dividend yields,' wrote UBS analyst Daniel Major in a recent note to clients.
Still, miners' leverage hasn't kept them from consistently underperforming gold over the past decade — a period in which gold nearly tripled.
In fact, over the past five years, the GDX has trailed gold by roughly 40%, dragged down by poor execution, rising costs, and disappointing returns on mergers and acquisitions. Even so, Major believes the setup is starting to shift in favor of the miners.
'We continue to see attractive risk vs reward in the gold miners.'
Despite the recent rally, gold stocks remain deeply discounted.
UBS estimates the sector is still trading around 30% below pre-Covid averages on a price-to-earnings basis. That disconnect, Major argues, is more about sentiment than fundamentals due to years of missed guidance.
'It is difficult to have conviction that the gold sector will hit its targets and restore investor confidence,' he said.
With gold holding above $3,140 and full-year results in, expectations for upward earnings revisions are rising. 'This should provide positive consensus earnings momentum vs consensus multiples that are already materially below historical levels,' Major noted.
He adds, however, that investor expectations may be more grounded this time. Forecasts for 2025 no longer assume broad unit cost declines, and guidance from big miners, including Newmont and Barrick, has become more conservative.
Seasonality may also work in miners' favor.
Historically, the period between full-year results and Q3 earnings coincides with positive revisions. According to Major, this window 'has typically been a better time to own gold stocks,' before the usual round of guidance resets kicks in later in the year.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Forbes

41 minutes ago

• Forbes

A Tale Of Two Prices: Retail Versus Investor Value

Thibault Adrien is the CEO and Founder of Lafayette Real Estate, an asset manager specializing in single family rentals and build to rent. When it comes to real estate prices, there are two distinct lenses through which they can be viewed: retail value and investor value. Understanding the difference is critical for investors in today's market where headlines often blur the lines between the two. For example, a recent article from The Wall Street Journal noted that for publicly traded single-family rental REITs, the investor valuation of housing is currently lower than the retail valuation of those properties, drawing the conclusion that investors believe prices will drop. However, I think the piece misses an important distinction in that investor valuation is not a speculative bet on future retail values. While the divergence between the two is fair, its explanation lies elsewhere: Investor valuations and retail prices differ because they are driven by distinct fundamentals and considerations. Since the rise of this asset class since 2008, the cap rates investors, like my own, have been willing to accept have usually implied a lower value than what a household would be willing to pay. A notable exception was a highly unusual period following Covid, during which surging inflation—fueled by fiscal stimulus—coexisted with historically low interest rates. That environment pushed some investors to be very aggressive, but this unsustainable window closed abruptly in the summer of 2022, triggering a swift retreat by some of our peers. Many remain on the sidelines, seemingly waiting for those conditions to return. (Spoiler: I don't think they will.) Investor Value: A Different Perspective Investor value reflects the amount an investor is willing to pay relative to the income the asset is expected to produce (the yield). As an investor in this space myself, my company, Lafayette Real Estate, views retail home prices as a form of downside protection—a foundational layer of intrinsic value—but not a primary driver of our investment thesis. The projected yield analysis relies on the underlying fundamentals such as supply and demand dynamics, population growth, affordability of rents compared to household income, wage growth, expense inflation and interest rate expectations, which shape long-term returns. Taking a view on these big trends, in a specific location, as well as a more subjective view on the risks/quality of the asset itself, allows investors to then take a shot at projecting each revenue and expense line item for the next 10 years and price an asset accordingly. Retail Value: Historical Performance And Current Trends The retail value of an investment property is the price a household pays when buying a dwelling. Prices, from a retail perspective, have historically outperformed inflation, offering investors a reliable store of value. Of course, neither investors nor economists can predict the future, and in the short term, an increase in homes for sale could put downward pressure on prices in a few markets. Yet overall, the U.S. continues to be plagued by a meaningful housing shortage, estimated to be in the millions of homes. The lock-in effect continues to be relevant with 56% of mortgages below 4% and inventory levels, while having risen since 2022, still remain well below pre-pandemic levels. Critics often cite current high prices as unsustainable, but I think the reality is that these values are just a reflection of the market's supply and demand dynamics. When Investors And Retail Buyers Co-Exist In The Same Market Everybody knows that when yields go up, asset prices go down, right? That might be true for treasuries, but for homes? Forget it. In summer 2022, interest rates rose, supply dropped and home prices went up. In real estate, supply and demand still rule. Investors aren't driving prices—they're reacting to them. Institutional investors (owning 1,000-plus homes) make up just 1% of transactions. But they do offer support: When prices dip, yields rise and investors step in. This helps cushion the market, making a 2008-style crash less likely. Builders know this and value their ties with SFR investors, especially when retail demand cools. Still, investors provide pricing support: If prices go down, yields go up—and investors step in. This dynamic makes a global financial crisis-style scenario, where home prices plummet, which is hard to envision today. Homebuilders also understand this dynamic and work to maintain strong relationships with real estate investors, whom they see as valuable partners when the retail market softens. Where We Stand Today As Investors The fundamentals of rental housing remain compelling, particularly in markets with strong demographic growth and persistent housing shortages. While we are seeing elevated deliveries in some areas, the structural shortage continues—and the recent, significant decline in new rental starts (with multifamily starts down 27% and build-to-rent starts down 60% year-over-year in 2024, according to a John Burns Real Estate Consulting report) will only deepen it. We are confident that projects launched now in dynamic markets will be delivered into favorable supply-demand conditions over the coming years. Disciplined institutional investors don't fixate on the short-term fluctuations of retail home prices or volatile tariff announcements. Instead, they focus on the long-term fundamentals that drive occupancy and portfolio performance. By focusing on well-located properties with strong demand and sound rental economics, you can build a portfolio designed to perform across market cycles, regardless of where retail prices happen to stand, so long as you stay in control of your development and operating costs and deliver an excellent resident experience. Investing in new build-to-rent communities of homes doesn't just capitalize on these trends—it also contributes to the solution. Addressing the housing shortage also means building quality rental options in markets where many households have been priced out or are unwilling to take on the burdens of homeownership. In any case, we have got millions of homes to build to fix the housing crisis, and our mission should be to become part of the solution. So let's get to work, one home at a time. Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?

Yahoo

2 hours ago

• Yahoo

The 5 Most Interesting Analyst Questions From Pfizer's Q1 Earnings Call

Pfizer's first quarter results drew a positive market response as management emphasized margin improvement and disciplined expense control, even as revenue declined. CEO Albert Bourla credited robust execution in key therapeutic areas, particularly oncology and internal medicine, for helping offset lower sales from COVID-related products. CFO Dave Denton highlighted the impact of productivity programs and a refined commercial approach, noting that adjusted operating expenses fell meaningfully due to ongoing cost realignment. Management acknowledged external pressures, including U.S. policy changes and lower COVID demand, but pointed to operational efficiency as a key factor supporting profitability. Is now the time to buy PFE? Find out in our full research report (it's free). Revenue: $13.72 billion vs analyst estimates of $13.94 billion (7.8% year-on-year decline, 1.6% miss) Adjusted EPS: $0.92 vs analyst estimates of $0.67 (36.5% beat) The company reconfirmed its revenue guidance for the full year of $62.5 billion at the midpoint Management reiterated its full-year Adjusted EPS guidance of $2.90 at the midpoint Market Capitalization: $136.3 billion While we enjoy listening to the management's commentary, our favorite part of earnings calls are the analyst questions. Those are unscripted and can often highlight topics that management teams would rather avoid or topics where the answer is complicated. Here is what has caught our attention. Vamil Divan (Guggenheim): Asked about Pfizer's ability to maintain and grow its dividend amid tariff uncertainty and cash flow pressure. CFO Dave Denton reiterated the dividend's priority in capital allocation and expressed confidence in cost management supporting this commitment. Evan Seigerman (BMO Capital Markets): Inquired about Pfizer's obesity pipeline strategy after discontinuing a candidate. Chief Scientific Officer Chris Boshoff explained the focus on differentiated, more tolerable oral therapies and the pursuit of both internal and external opportunities. Tim Anderson (Bank of America): Questioned the likelihood and scope of sector-specific tariffs and potential impacts on manufacturing. CEO Albert Bourla shared insights from government discussions, highlighting distinctions between friendly and adversary countries and Pfizer's contingency planning. Trung Huynh (UBS): Sought clarity on the timing and magnitude of cost savings. Denton said most additional identified savings would be realized post-2025, with R&D productivity improvements expected to be reinvested in the pipeline. Geoff Meacham (Citi): Asked about business development priorities and the impact of LOEs. Bourla and Chief Strategy Officer Andrew Baum emphasized the focus on building sustainable franchises through both internal R&D and disciplined acquisitions. In the months ahead, the StockStory team will be watching (1) progress on late-stage clinical trial readouts and regulatory decisions in oncology and vaccines, (2) the impact of cost-saving initiatives on operating margins as Pfizer approaches upcoming patent expirations, and (3) developments in global trade policy and tariffs that could affect supply chain resilience. Execution on business development and timely new product launches will also be important markers for future performance. Pfizer currently trades at $24, up from $23.03 just before the earnings. Is there an opportunity in the stock?The answer lies in our full research report (it's free). Donald Trump's victory in the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election sent major indices to all-time highs, but stocks have retraced as investors debate the health of the economy and the potential impact of tariffs. While this leaves much uncertainty around 2025, a few companies are poised for long-term gains regardless of the political or macroeconomic climate, like our Top 5 Strong Momentum Stocks for this week. This is a curated list of our High Quality stocks that have generated a market-beating return of 183% over the last five years (as of March 31st 2025). Stocks that made our list in 2020 include now familiar names such as Nvidia (+1,545% between March 2020 and March 2025) as well as under-the-radar businesses like the once-small-cap company Comfort Systems (+782% five-year return). Find your next big winner with StockStory today.

Business Insider

2 hours ago

• Business Insider

I had a comfortable life in Big Tech, but something unsettled me. I quit to start my own company — now I feel more fulfilled.

This as-told-to essay is based on a transcribed conversation with 41-year-old Srikanth Narayan, the CEO and founder of Cache, from the San Francisco Bay Area. The following has been edited for length and clarity. My career began in San Francisco. I've been in Silicon Valley ever since, working at both startups and Big Tech companies. In 2021, after roughly eight years working at Uber and then Waymo, an Alphabet subsidiary, I decided it was the right time to take a leap and become an entrepreneur. I had built a healthy financial cushion and was ready to take a risk and create a new company. I noticed a problem around Big Tech compensation — concentration risk. I saw an opportunity to help build a solution and educate employees on this risk. Entrepreneurship has been a lot harder than working in Big Tech, but I've found it far more fulfilling. While working in Big Tech, I spotted a massive business opportunity Prior to founding Cache, I spent most of my career focusing on data visualization. In 2014, Uber recruited me to lead a data visualization application suite. I stayed at Uber for six years and eventually became a staff engineer. If you work at a company like Uber for a long time, a lot of your compensation is in the form of stock, sometimes outsizing your cash compensation. As the company grows and does well, your net worth grows in line with the stock. This creates wealth for the people who hold that stock, but having way too much of your net worth in a few stocks means you're taking undue risk. Take Tesla. In recent months, some people who worked at Tesla may have seen their net worth fluctuate due to the changing value of the company's stock. People tend to hold on to these massive stock positions due to inertia and because the taxes for reallocating stock can be very expensive. I joined Uber at a good time. The company mostly did well and went public in 2019. All of the wealth I had accumulated in stock became real money on the open market that I could sell or trade. However, I had a lot of low-basis stocks that would trigger a high capital gains bill if I sold them. When I joined Waymo in 2020, my Alphabet colleagues talked about similar problems. I found this issue unsettling. A steep drop in stock price at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic affected my portfolio. I hired a wealth manager to help me find solutions for concentration risk. They showed me products that help people of high net worth manage concentration risk. One option is depositing concentrated stock into an exchange fund where others have done the same, and receiving fund units in return. This method can diversify your portfolio while deferring capital gains taxes. It sounded like a great product, but none of my peers had heard of it. It seemed to only be available at private banks, and only for people of a certain net worth. From what I saw, the exchange funds required a lot of human operational coordination. There seemed to be little innovation in this area to improve efficiency. I saw a massive business opportunity. I wanted to make products like this more efficient and available more broadly. My Big Tech experience proved helpful for building my business I resigned from Waymo in late 2021 to start my business, Cache, which I formally launched in March 2024. We're a specialized brokerage for people holding large stock positions. Our flagship product is an exchange fund that helps people diversify their portfolios. My experience at Uber gave me an understanding of how to turn an idea into a full-blown vision as a founder. I designed products at Uber that became widely adopted within the company. This took engineering work and entrepreneurial spirit. However, moving from corporate life to building a company myself involved a lot of learning on the job. There wasn't really a manual I could follow for building an exchange fund, so we had to do a lot of R&D. There were many steps involved, including working with the SEC and FINRA to get the right registrations, since the industry is highly regulated, and building the technical infrastructure for a brokerage system. I was one of the first users of my own product, and I invested a lot of my Uber stock in our exchange funds. I find entrepreneurship more fulfilling than Big Tech, but the journey is hard Running a startup is very different from working at a Big Tech company. I'm probably working triple the time I was before. Being employed in Big Tech was a very comfortable life. You worked on challenging problems and got paid well to do it. While I enjoyed this, I also wanted to figure out my own path. The entrepreneurial journey has been more fulfilling. I've had to go through personal trials, such as not paying myself for the first year after leaving Waymo. Because of my financial cushion from working in Silicon Valley, the stress of this didn't really bear on me. I'd made sure I had several years of living expenses in reserve before taking the leap. Becoming an entrepreneur requires drive and conviction. It's a very hard journey, and often, market forces will be against you until they start working with you. The glamour of being a startup founder or of an exit is the wrong reason for forming a company. It should be about self-fulfillment and a passion for building something from scratch and making a change in the world.