Aussies' $3k loss could flip script on interest rate cut

Aussies are planning to hunker down this year and save rather than spend in a trend expected to drag on businesses and stymie economic growth and property prices.
New polling has revealed 'rebuilding savings' has emerged as the top financial goal for Aussies this year, with respondents indicating they planned to save more even if interest rates were cut.
It suggests widely anticipated cuts in interest rates later this year, which would have the aim of boosting a sluggish economy, may not produce as large an economic sugar hit as regulators would like.
If this scenario plays out it could mean the decision by more Aussies to save, rather than spend, will lead to a higher chance of further RBA cuts down the track.
A common reason Aussies wanted to save more money and reduce their spending was due to cost of living pressures and a financial hangover from years of higher interest rates, the Finder.com.au polling showed.
Nearly half of all Australians surveyed said they had dipped into their savings within the last year to manage living expenses
The average Aussie withdrew $3,600 from a designated savings account over the past 12 months to cover everything from medical treatment to mortgage repayments.
The research found 18 per cent of Australians had depleted their savings to pay for everyday essentials, while one in 10 raided their savings to pay for an emergency expense.
With their savings now depleted, a third of Aussies said their top financial goal this year was to save more and rebuild their bank balances.
Another common priority was boosting income, with about a quarter of Aussies saying this was their biggest financial goal for the rest of the year.
Finder personal finance expert Sarah Megginson said Aussies have set their sights on recovery.
'People want to regain a sense of control over their money, whether that's by increasing their income, reducing debt, or boosting their super,' she said.
Ms Megginson said the trends pointed to a climate of lower economic sentiment.
'When people prioritise saving over spending, it can directly reduce consumer demand for goods and services,' she said.
'This can lead to decreased sales for businesses, which can have the impact of prompting them to cut back on staff hours, headcount and production.
'Since consumer spending is a major driver of economic growth, a sizeable drop can slow down the economy.'
Ms Megginson noted that increased savings was a good thing at an individual household level.
'For individuals, higher savings can provide a necessary financial buffer against unexpected expenses or economic downturns.'
Rebecca Pike, money expert at Finder, said the cost of living has negatively impacted the wealth status of Australians.
'It's disappointing that households had to empty their savings to stay on top of expenses.
'From health crises to job losses, millions have had to turn to their savings to get themselves or someone they know out of trouble.'
Ms Pike said the cost of living is to blame. 'Many are struggling to pay their bills and are left to dip into their savings jeopardising their financial goals.'
Westpac last week announced it expected the Reserve Bank to cut the cash rate by 0.25 per cent at its May meeting.
Interest rate cuts have historically driven up home prices but the boost from another cut may be less pronounced this time due to looming global uncertainty.
Westpac's chief economist Luci Ellis told 'turmoil abroad' suggested a weaker economic environment ahead.
'Global growth – and especially US growth – will be slower; the response of China will be disinflationary for the world outside the US; and uncertainty is likely to delay decisions on some investment projects.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Perth Now

an hour ago

• Perth Now

Workers' retirement nest eggs set for super boost

Australian workers can look forward to a bigger nest egg, with an increase to the superannuation guarantee to add tens of thousands of dollars to the average super account. From July 1, employers' minimum required contribution to employees' superannuation accounts will rise from 11.5 per cent to 12 per cent. It's the latest and last in a series of incremental increases from nine per cent over more than a decade since they were legislated by the Rudd-Gillard Labor government in 2012. With the latest bump, a 30-year-old earning $60,000 would have an extra $20,000 in super by retirement, according to the Association of Superannuation Funds Australia. It will add about $300 each year to the superannuation of a worker on a $60,000 salary, or $500 for someone on a $100,000 salary. "The system foundations are cemented for young, working people to have a comfortable retirement," ASFA chief executive Mary Delahunty said. "It's a moment all Australians should be proud of." The association says the cost of a comfortable retirement increased 1.6 per cent in the past year, while the cost of a modest retirement rose 1.7 per cent. A "comfortable" retirement includes top-level health insurance, a reasonable car and leisure activities. The cost of either outcome was increasing slower than Australia's current 2.4 per cent headline inflation but retiree budgets remained under pressure from rising food, energy and health costs. Couples on average need $73,900 annually for a comfortable retirement, while most singles needed $52,300 per year, ASFA says. For a modest retirement covering the basics, couples needed $48,200 each year, singles $33,400, or for renting couples, $64,250, and $46,660 each year for singles who rent. The figures underlined the importance of increasing Australia's housing stock, Ms Delahunty said. "They also illustrate how super can be the difference between hardship and stability later in life, especially for renters." For some workers, the extra contribution will come from their existing pay package, according to CPA Australia's superannuation lead Richard Webb. "It's a good idea to check with your employer to see how they view the changes and what it means for you," he said. Workers on contracts with a total remuneration package could see a slight drop in their take-home pay, while those on award or enterprise agreements would likely receive the contribution on-top of their current pay. When compulsory superannuation was introduced in 1992 - in part to reduce government spending on the Age Pension - only one in 10 Australian retirees listed super as a source of income. Nine in 10 people between 30 and 50 now have super. Government spending on the Age Pension is projected to fall from 2.3 per cent of gross domestic product in 2020 to two per cent by 2062/63, despite a doubling of the over-65 population and a trebling of over-85s over the same period. However the super guarantee increase wouldn't help those who missed out on paid work for extended periods, Super Consumer Australia chief executive Xavier O'Halloran said. "(For) people who have caring responsibilities or who have been locked out of the unaffordable housing market ... increasing SG further won't address those inequalities," he told AAP. Mr O'Halloran said there was more that could be done to support people struggling in retirement, when a significant portion of their autumnal years' savings were made. "Right now, there are no minimum standards for retirement products like there are for MySuper," he said. "There is also no performance testing of retirement products, so super funds can still sell poor products."

Canberra Times

4 hours ago

• Canberra Times

Do you have $3 million in super? Me neither. These changes will actually help you

Do you have $3 million in super? Me neither. It is estimated that the changes will only impact a tiny fraction of the Australian population, around 80,000 people. That's fewer people than can fit in the MCG. In fact, 99.5 per cent of Australians currently do not have more than $3 million in super. According to ATO data, the average super balance is a mere $182,000 for men and $146,000 for women. Greg Jericho, chief economist at the Australia Institute, crunched the numbers and found that around 97 per cent of people currently in the labour force will never have $3 million in superannuation, no matter how hard they work for their entire lives. Even if a young person works their entire life on the full-time average wage, with no time out of the workforce for kids or illness, they will never accumulate $3 million in super. Not surprising when you consider the median super balance for women aged 60-64 is less than $160,000, meaning half of Australian women have less super than that (half of Australian men the same age have just $211,996 or less).

Sky News AU

4 hours ago

• Sky News AU

‘Net negative': Positive Economics Advisory's David Williams-Chen delivers warning as Labor mulls family trust tax changes

Labor imposing a flat tax rate on family trusts could be a 'net negative' for the economy, an expert has warned after a report arose the government is considering trusts in its raft of tax reforms. Sources told the Australian Financial Review Labor is likely to propose higher taxes on family trusts as Treasury ramps up scrutiny of the tax-friendly investment vehicles in its economic reforms. Many Australian families and businesses use the trusts to protect their assets and split income between beneficiaries to reap the benefits from the lower tax rates. The report follows Labor proposing a minimum 30 per cent tax rate on trusts as part of its failed swath of tax reforms it took to the 2019 election. Positive Economics Advisory's managing director David Williams-Chen said if Labor were to apply a flat tax rate, Aussies would find a way to avoid it. 'People will respond to incentives and we see this time and again,' Mr Williams-Chen told 'Whether it's smokers buying black market tobacco to avoid paying high price cigarettes as excise levies have increased. 'Or whether it's the wealthy who have taken advantage of lower tax settings in superannuation before balance transfer caps and contribution limits came into place. 'We know there'd be a response.' He pointed to research from US academics Shahar Rotberg and Joseph Steinberg where it was found increasing wealth taxes incentivised people to hide their assets and resulted in lower tax revenue. Mr Williams-Chen urged the government to keep in mind taxpayers' capacity to avoid other taxes and even warned this could lead to a situation shown in the work of Rotberg and Steinberg. 'The evidence from the US shows that once the behavioural responses to wealth taxes on capital are factored in, there's a likelihood that they're actually negative for the economy,' he said. 'Rotberg and Steinberg in 2024 found wealth taxes would cause an overall decline in economic welfare between 0.3 and 0.4 percent.' The individuals who are the beneficiaries of a trust pay their personal income tax rate on the distributions. This means the tax paid on a trust can vary from zero per cent to 47 per cent. Labor considering changes to family trusts, alongside plans to tax high earning super accounts and wind back electric vehicle rebates, come as Labor faces a decade of deficits and ballooning costs of the NDIS and defence. The Albanese government also faces reduced tax revenue from lower tobacco excise and falling fossil fuel exports as Australia continues on its renewables shift.