
US lawmakers divided on Iran strikes largely along party lines
US lawmakers have had a mixed reaction to the country's strikes on Iran, with responses largely split down party lines.
President Donald Trump said the US had targeted three nuclear sites in Iran late on Saturday, as Washington directly joined Israel's days-long assault on the Islamic Republic.
The threat of war between the US and Iran has been on the cards for decades and the attack was the fulfillment of a long-standing wish for some, while others dreaded the spectre of the US entering another Middle East war.
Left-wing Senator Bernie Sanders was giving a speech at a rally in Tulsa, Oklahoma, when he learned of the attack on Iran, which he denounced as "unconstitutional".
As he read out the statement from Trump on the attack, the crowd started booing and chanting "no more war" to which Sanders responded "I agree".
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
"All of you know that the only entity that can take this country to war is the US Congress. The president does not have the right," he said.
Other Democrats, particularly on the progressive wing, also condemned the attacks.
Democratic California Congressman Ro Khanna condemned the attack taking place "without any authorisation of Congress" and said on X that Congress needed to urgently support his "War Powers Resolution to prevent America from being dragged into another endless Middle East war".
Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez called for Trump to be impeached over the assault.
"The President's disastrous decision to bomb Iran without authorisation is a grave violation of the Constitution and Congressional War Powers," she said on X.
"He has impulsively risked launching a war that may ensnare us for generations. It is absolutely and clearly grounds for impeachment."
US strikes on Iran: How the world reacted Read More »
Other more centrist Democrats also criticised the attacks, albeit often while also condemning Iran.
Hakeem Jeffries, leader of the House Democratic Caucus, said the authority to launch a war should rest with Congress, but also said Iran was an "enemy" of the US who could "never be permitted to become a nuclear-capable power".
US Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer, a longtime opponent of Iran, said a vote needed to be called in Congress on the war.
A number of Democrats, primarily staunch Israel supporters, threw their weight behind the attacks.
"As I've long maintained, this was the correct move by [Trump]," wrote Pennsylvania Senator John Fetterman.
"Iran is the world's leading sponsor of terrorism and cannot have nuclear capabilities. I'm grateful for and salute the finest military in the world."
Republicans rejoice
Republicans largely threw their support behind the attacks.
"This was the right call. The regime deserves it. Well done, President @realDonaldTrump," wrote South Carolina Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, a longtime supporter of attacking Iran. "To my fellow citizens: We have the best Air Force in the world. It makes me so proud. Fly, Fight, Win."
Rick Crawford, an Arkansas Republican and chair of the House Intelligence Committee, also supported the attack, saying he regretted "that Iran has brought the world to this point".
There were, however, a handful of Republicans who criticised the attack.
Marjorie Taylor Greene, a far-right congresswoman associated with Trump's Make America Great Again (MAGA) faction, has been staunchly opposed to US involvement in a war on Iran.
In a post on X she wrote: "Let us all join together and pray for peace."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
US lawmakers push to curb Trump's authority on Iran strikes
A group of US lawmakers from both major parties has urged Congress to assert its constitutional authority over war powers, following President Donald Trump's decision to order strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. While Republican leaders in both the Senate and House have backed the military action, there appears to be little chance that any resolution curbing Trump's powers would pass both chambers. Democratic Senator Tim Kaine said he plans to force a Senate vote this week on a measure requiring Trump to end military operations against Iran unless Congress formally declares war. "This is the U.S. jumping into a war of choice at Donald Trump's urging, without any compelling national security interest for the United States to act in this way, particularly without a debate and vote in Congress," Kaine told CBS' Face the Nation. In the House, Republican Representative Thomas Massie and Democrat Ro Khanna have introduced similar legislation and called for an immediate vote. The White House has not commented on the pushback from lawmakers.


Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Trump hints at 'regime change' in Iran after military strikes
US President Donald Trump has raised the prospect of regime change in Iran following recent American strikes on key Iranian military sites. In a post shared on his social media platform on Sunday, Trump wrote: 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!' His comments come amid soaring regional tensions after the US launched attacks on Iranian nuclear and military infrastructure over the weekend.


The National
4 hours ago
- The National
US attack on Iran could spark 'rat hole of retaliation', UN Secretary General warns
UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres said on Sunday that the Middle East conflict is at risk of "descending into a rat hole of retaliation after retaliation", after the US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites. Mr Guterres was speaking at an emergency session of the Security Council focused on the expanding Israel-Iran conflict. The war began when Israel launched a "pre-emptive" strike against nuclear and military targets in Iran about 10 days ago. 'We must act immediately and decisively to halt the fighting and return to serious sustained negotiations on the Iran nuclear programme,' he added. He then urged all states to act with reason, restraint and urgency, pleading for all those present at the meeting to not give up on peace. Rafael Grossi, head the the UN's nuclear watchdog, said initial evidence suggested that Iran's Fordow and Natanz nuclear sites had been hit by powerful ground-penetrating missiles, while Isfahan's nuclear facility was hit by cruise missiles. He added that Iran has indicated there has been no increase in radiation levels near the three sites. 'I am ready to travel immediately and to engage with all relevant parties to help ensure the protection of nuclear facilities and the continued peaceful uses of nuclear technology in accordance with the agency's mandate,' Mr Grossi said. He said that the International Atomic Energy Agency was ready to send nuclear safety and security experts to Iran immediately. He warned of the consequences that might be felt as a result of the US strikes should Iran respond militarily. 'Let us not allow the window to close on diplomacy,' Mr Grossi said. The UK and France said that while they continue to agree that Iran must not be allowed to possess a nuclear weapon, they did not take any part in planning or carrying out the US attack on Iran's nuclear sites on Saturday. They also pushed for diplomacy to prevail, and urged Iran not to worsen the situation. China strongly condemned the US strikes. 'The actions of the US violate the UN Charter as well as Iran's sovereignty and territorial integrity,' China's ambassador to the UN Fu Cong said, calling for an immediate ceasefire to prevent an escalation. Russia's ambassador said the already delicate situation in Iran had been significantly aggravated by the US strikes. 'Washington once again shows its complete contempt for the international community and law,' Vasily Nebenzya said. China, Russia and Pakistan have issued a draft resolution calling for an unconditional ceasefire and a push for the protection of civilians affected in and around Iran. Days before the Saturday attack by the US, Iran called on Mr Guterres to invoke Article 99 of the UN Charter as the conflict with Israel continued. The article empowers the secretary general to bring to the Security Council's attention any matter that may threaten international peace and security. 'Failure to act at this pivotal and perilous moment would constitute a profound abdication of the Security Council's responsibilities,' said a letter sent to the UN, seen by The National. The US hit back against those accusations, calling Iran the world's foremost state sponsor of terror. "For 40 years, the Iranian government has called for death to America and death to Israel, and posed a constant menace to the US, and the entire world," US acting deputy ambassador Dorothy Shea said, claiming that a recent IAEA report conclusively showed that Tehran had continued to accelerate its nuclear capabilities. "Iran has long obfuscated its nuclear weapons programme and stonewalled good faith efforts in recent negotiations." Iran condemned the US and Israel's "brutal aggression". "Once again, the world has witnessed the blatant corruption of the US political system … and over the past 10 days, Israel has continued a barbaric assault on the international bodies," said Amir Iravani, Iran's ambassador to the UN. Mr Iravani insisted that Iran was interested only in peaceful nuclear energy. Israel blamed the UN Security Council for failing to check Iran's nuclear programme earlier. Israel has said Iran was within days of gaining a nuclear weapon. "You were silent, you were complicit, you were afraid, you were bystanders," Israeli ambassador to the UN Danny Danon told the council. "The United States acted not just for itself, but for every nation that values freedom over radicalism." He said that Iran's nuclear programme "was not a diplomatic puzzle – it was a loaded gun pointed at the heart of the international system and the stability of the world". The Gulf Co-operation Council, represented by Kuwait, repeated its call for de-escalation. "We call for an immediate cessation of military actions and exercise of maximum restraint, avoiding anything that could lead to a spillover of this conflict," said Faisal Al Enezi, charge d'affaires at Kuwait's mission to the UN. "GCC countries are firmly committed to support all regional and international efforts aiming at defusing this crisis and consolidating security and stability and to preserve the interests of peoples in the region and the world."