What has happened to Bournemouth Air Festival?
As hopes of a 2026 edition of Bournemouth Air Festival fade, what factors have led to its demise, and will it ever return?The private air show operator that was expected to run the event on a 10-year contract has pulled out of talks.The major sticking point was its plan to close the promenade and seafront between the piers, which the council said it legally could not do.The US-based firm has also blamed the "instability of the financial and political climate" for its decision to withdraw.
The free air festival was first held in 2008 and has taken place every August, with the exception of 2020 when Covid restrictions were in place.At its peak, it attracted about 1.3 million visitors to the seaside conurbation, and estimates of how much it annually contributed to the local economy vary from £14m to £59m.But the cost to the council has sky-rocketed in recent years, with hikes across insurance, security, infrastructure and counter-terrorism measures.
Bournemouth Christchurch and Poole Council (BCP) said its net budget for the four-day festival had risen from £300,000 in 2019 to £400,000 by 2022.New legislation brought in after the 2017 Manchester Arena bombing is also set to significantly increase costs for all organisers of public events.The authority, which has been run by a coalition since 2023, has already slashed millions from its budget as it grapples with a huge deficit for its special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) services.Half a million people attended the final council-funded air show in 2024, which was scaled back from four days to three, with the final net cost to the council reaching £248,000.In the months that followed, officers explored two options - one was for a sponsor to foot the £400,000 bill of a council-run event, the other was for an external operator to run the air show at no cost to the authority.With no firm offers of sponsorship, but five potential operators raising their hand, things began to look up.But those early discussions led to just two firm expressions of interest and, with one of those requiring financial backing from the council, the initial flurry of enquiries quickly dwindled to a shortlist of one.BCP's destination and leisure councillor Richard Herrett said the prospective organisers had flown from the US to attend the 2024 event, but had drawn up a "wide range of requests that would have created significant financial pressures on the council".A report to BCP councillors said the plan to close off the beach and promenade between Boscombe and Bournemouth piers was to enable "a variety of hospitality offers ranging in price".But the authority said the firm's "non-negotiable" request presented legal difficulties, as fencing off the area would contravene the Open Spaces Act 1906.
After the report was published, but before councillors met to discuss it, the company announced it was pulling out.In a letter read to councillors, the operator, whose name was redacted, said: "Several factors led us to this decision, with the most significant being that, without the ability to fence off and restrict access to a significant part of the beach and the surrounding areas, it would be challenging to create a financially sustainable event model."The instability of the financial and political climate were also factors that would challenge us to deliver the event in a similar manner to our other events."Council leader Millie Earl said: "We are still open to any interest from potential operators or sponsors. "In the meantime, we remain invested in the cultural future of our beautiful area and are continuing to work with our partners and support others where we can."The council says its Bay Run, Arts By the Sea Festival and Christmas in Bournemouth events will still go ahead.But, with 12-months needed to organise the air show, any potential air show sponsor or operator would now be working towards 2027 at the earliest.
You can follow BBC Dorset on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
CMA to review wrong turns on road and rail building projects
The UK's competition regulator has opened an investigation into Whitehall's delivery of rail and road infrastructure. The inquiry by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) comes just a day after a damning report into the failed delivery of the HS2 high-speed rail line between London and Birmingham which is hugely over-budget, hopelessly late and which ministers have admitted has made Britain the laughing stock of infrastructure investment. It also follows the government's renationalisation of the railways, which it is planning to complete incrementally over the next couple of years. • What happened to HS2? The project that made Britain a laughing stock The CMA said its inquiry would focus 'on persistent issues around costs and delivery of road and railway infrastructure across the country', especially in the light of Sir Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves's new ten-year infrastructure strategy to help grow the economy. 'There's no question that reliable, high-quality infrastructure is critical in accelerating economic growth,' said Sarah Cardell, chief executive of the CMA. 'To achieve this, public authorities and the civil engineering sector must be able to work together to deliver projects on time, within budget and to high standards. 'This review is a crucial step in identifying barriers holding back the sector — supporting the drive to get Britain building and ensuring every penny spent is delivering value for taxpayers.' Identifying the long-standing friction and dysfunctional procurement engagement between Whitehall and its agencies, and private sector contractors, the CMA inquiry states: 'The market study will examine whether there are opportunities to improve how the public sector and industry work together, for example through improvements to public procurement, so more cost-effective infrastructure can be built in support of the government's growth mission.' • Pumping money into infrastructure may not keep Labour in power The CMA said it would make recommendations to government but does not have the power to intervene in the market directly. Civil engineering is reckoned to be worth £23 billion annually to the UK economy. The National Infrastructure Commission has estimated that public and private sector investment will need to increase by up to 50 per cent over the next decade to deliver more complex infrastructure. Road and railway projects account for up to 75 per cent of government spending on economic infrastructure such as transportation and energy. The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors indicated the sector has previously suffered from a lack of what its chief executive Justin Young called a 'clear, joined-up infrastructure strategy that incorporates long-term thinking and vision'. Young said he believes 'the country is on a considerably clearer path and represents a significant shift in how the government approaches infrastructure and industrial capacity', but warned of 'skills and labour shortages [that] stifle construction projects and investment in skills for new professionals'.
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Labour's tax strategy under fire as Reeves defends fiscal rules
The chancellor has defended Labour's record as the party of business and its fiscal rules after controversial tax rises, saying the government had stabilised the economy and enabled interest rate cuts. Rachel Reeves told The Times CEO Summit that the government had achieved its 'number one job' to return economic stability after the 'turbulence' of the 'previous decade'. The contentious decision to raise employers' national insurance contributions in October's budget provoked a sharp backlash from business leaders, who had been courted by senior Labour figures in the run-up to July's general election. Bosses have since warned of hiring and investment cuts, while the decision is still being felt in the jobs market and in sentiment.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Passport prices could rise AGAIN in another blow for British holidaymakers
The cost of a new passport could rise by a whopping £32 in the latest blow for millions of British holidaymakers. Ministers have been urged to increase the current £95 renewal fee to address a growing black hole in the Passport Office's budget. The department recorded a budget shortfall of £223million last year and a £916million deficit over the past five years. The National Audit Office, which scrutinises public spending, has recommended that the Passport Office increase the cost of its services to address the issue. It did not, however, give a figure for how much the passport renewal fees should increase by. According to The Telegraph, the Passport Office, would need to charge each applicant £32 more to overcome last year's shortfall. The cost of renewing passports has already risen significantly in recent years. The department drastically hiked prices for adult passports in February 2023 - from £75.50 to £82.50. Fees then rose again by 7 per cent last year - before an inflation busting increase of 6.7 per cent in April. The Home Office previously said the new fees were necessary to ensure the cost of passport operations is met without relying on taxpayer funding. It added that fees help cover passport processing, consular services for lost or stolen passports, and border operations. Adults must currently pay £94.50 for a new passport, while a one-day renewal costs £222. Nearly seven million new passports were issued last year. Adult passports are valid for ten years, while passports for children are valid for just five. A Home Office spokesperson said there were no 'immediate plans' to increase fees. Meanwhile, the National Audit Office declined to comment on the estimated price hike. The call for higher passport renewal fees came in a wider report by the National Audit Office into government services. A total £340million shortfall was found across all the services looked at - including UK Visas and Immigration, the Court and Tribunals Service and the Driver & Vehicle Licensing Agency. The National Audit Office's report concluded: 'Many government departments rely on charging fees to recover the costs of providing services to people and businesses. 'But none of the services we looked at recovered costs consistently, and the charges for the services may not accurately reflect the costs.' 'The government is missing opportunities to deliver efficiencies and share good practice,' it added. 'This poses risks to the financial resilience of public services, the costs of which are likely to be borne by future fee payers.' Gareth Davies, head of the National Audit Office said: 'Government bodies provide important services for the public and businesses, including issuing passports and driving licences, and filing company information. 'But many are not consistently recovering their costs - posing risks to the financial resilience of these services and fairness between users. 'HM Treasury should strengthen how it oversees cost recovery processes and provide more comprehensive guidance to charging bodies.'
