Sri Lankan refugees of 1990: A dark chapter in T.N.'s otherwise proud history of offering sanctuary to those in need
Tamil Nadu has an enviable track record of providing shelter to those in distress, regardless of their place of origin. But an episode in March 1990, concerning Sri Lankan refugees, marks an aberration to the State's tradition. This episode, involving 1,612 refugees — 353 women and 400 children —remains less discussed in public discourse, and its recall assumes relevance in light of World Refugee Day falling on June 20.
Ranasinghe Premadasa's assumption of office of the President of Sri Lanka in January 1989 made a perceptible difference to the presence of Indian Peacekeeping Force (IPKF) in the neighbouring country. Five months later, Premadasa openly demanded the ouster of the IPFK, which went there in July 1987 on the request of his predecessor, J.R. Jayawardene, following the Indo-Sri Lanka accord. The new incumbent made the demand, keeping in mind the separate anti-IPKF campaigns by two diverse militant groups, Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP, which had subsequently abandoned its militant path and joined the political mainstream) and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE). After the IPKF's de-induction commenced by the end of July 1989, the LTTE began taking control of areas in the northern and eastern regions. As the end of the political set-up in the then North East Provincial Council (NEPC), headed by A. Varatharaja Perumal of the Eelam People's Revolutionary Liberation Front (EPRLF), became evident, the influx of refugees to Tamil Nadu resumed in a big way.
It was against this backdrop that two ships, Harsh Vardhana and Tippu Sultan, carrying about 1,250 refugees, were not permitted for disembarkation of passengers at what was then known as the Madras harbour, on March 8 and 9. Both were diverted to Visakhapatnam, after which the passengers were taken to Odisha (then Orissa) for transit camps in Malkangiri, about 125 km from Koraput town.
A report of The Hindu, published on March 10, quoting 'official and other sources,' stated that 'the decision to ferry the refugees from Trincomalee to Madras was taken at a meeting' of the External Affairs Minister I.K. Gujral and the NEPC Chief Minister in New Delhi in January/February 1990. Only on the basis of that decision, both Harsh Vardhana and Tippu Sultan were hired to transport about 1,300 refugees. The report went on to state that 'most probably, the Tamil Nadu Chief Minister [M. Karunanidhi] does not know about it.'
K. Premachandran, Sri Lanka's Member of Parliament belonging to the EPRLF, was bitter about the treatment. The passengers, at the time of embarkation at Trincomalee, were assured they could disembark at Madras. 'Imagine their mental agony. They were in the middle of the sea, not knowing what was happening,' the report added, quoting him as having said. P. Upendra, Union Minister of Information and Broadcasting in the National Front government led by V.P. Singh, told reporters in the city on March 9 that there were doubts whether the passengers aboard the ship were 'real refugees or EPRLF cadres.'
On the apprehension that the refugees could be the cadres of the EPRLF and Eelam National Democratic Liberation Front (ENDLF), who could have spirited off weapons on board the vessels, Mr. Premachandran said, 'each and everyone was thoroughly checked at China Bay in Trincomalee and the IPKF also made sure that there was not a single weapon on board the ships.'
According to Anil Dhir, Bhubaneshwar-based researcher-writer, the then Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister M. Channa Reddy, who allowed the ships to drop anchor at the outer harbour of Visakhapatnam port and gave food and water, however, refused disembarkation of the passengers. A similar stand was taken by other Chief Ministers too, who did not want any trouble in their respective States. Eventually, it was Biju Patnaik who had agreed to take the refugees.
'The fact that he had been sworn in as the Chief Minister just four days earlier (March 5) did not deter him from taking such a vital decision.' Patnaik, who became Chief Minister again after a gap of over 26 years, had again responded to Singh's request for accommodating the EPRLF general secretary, K. Padmanabha along with others, a fact acknowledged by Mr. Perumal in a recent conversation with this writer.
That Odisha, despite its modest economic condition, had come forward to accept the refugees did not go unnoticed among parliamentarians. On March 29, 1990, A.N. Singh Deo, Member of Parliament from the Aska constituency in the eastern State, called his State 'a very poor State' and asked Gujral whether the Centre would bear the whole cost of providing shelter to the refugees. The Minister assured the Member that the Centre would bear the entire burden.
It was a fact that there were EPRLF cadres among the refugees. But they claimed that they were not 'more dreadful than the LTTE militants,' Sukumar, an activist of the (EPRLF) and an inmate of the Malkangiri camps, told The Hindu, as published in a report on March 13, 1990. But Karunanidhi had reasons to justify his government's refusal to provide asylum to the seekers. On April 26, 1990, intervening in a discussion in the Assembly, the Chief Minister cited law and order as the main reason for the move.
'He felt that militants should be kept off even from neighbouring States,' The Hindu reported on April 27, 1990. Karunanidhi had even suggested to the Central government to shift the refugees, sheltered in Odisha, to Andamans, as a majority of them were militants. A fortnight later, he told reporters that he had discussed his suggestion with Singh and Gujral.
Parliament had also discussed the refugee matter. On March 28, 1990, the External Affairs Minister told the Rajya Sabha that 'hospitality does not mean open the door.' At the same time, in keeping with India's 'humanitarian traditions, we have never refused entry to refugees who, as in the present case, felt that their lives were at risk,' Gujral said. He added the refugees were brought by sea and air to the country.
Notwithstanding the Patnaik administration's sympathetic treatment of the refugees, most of them did not find Odisha a conducive place to stay. In fact, Karunanidhi had then informed the House that the 'militants' continued to arrive in the city from Orissa camps by train and they were apprehended by the police. In the middle of May, he described the refugees' action of deserting the camps as 'wrong' and contended that 'of those who had come to Tamil Nadu, 190 persons who were militants were taken into custody. Other refugees, including women and children, had not been arrested,' stated this newspaper in its report on May 17, 1990.
A few days later, after a protest-fast by 111 refugees at the Central Prison who came from the eastern State, the Chief Minister ordered their release. Within a year, the number of refugees in Odisha dwindled to 218, according to the Annual Report of the Union Ministry of Home Affairs for 1990-91. [As on March 31, 1991, there were about 2.1 lakh Sri Lankan refugees living in the country.] The former CM of the NEPC recalls that a majority of those who left the camps had finally settled in the Western countries. He and his family were initially taken to Mauritius before being taken to central and northern parts of India. He now shuttles between India and Sri Lanka.
The episode ended on a further sad note, as the EPRLF's general secretary and 14 others were gunned down allegedly by a killer squad of the LTTE on the evening of June 19, 1990, while he was holding a meeting in a flat at Kodambakkam, a busy locality of Chennai.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
Sean Strickland issues strong reactions on reports of Donald Trump leading US military in bombing nuclear sites of Iran
Sean Strickland, Ted Cruz and Donald Trump 2025 (Photo via Getty Images) Former UFC middleweight champion Sean Strickland spoke up through his posts on X about the bombings of nuclear sites in Iran by the US military. The initial reaction from the fighter was on the relationship shared between Israel and America, where he wrote - Israel "jump" Trump "how high. " Strickland's follow-up opinions were mostly mixed with claims of not being anti-Israeli, that he would still vote for Donald Trump , but also believes that both Israeli and American politics should be kept separate from each other. The fighter even took a dig at US Senator Ted Cruz's comment supporting Israel. Sean Strickland condemns the act of violence carried out by the US military, drags in US Senator Ted Cruz for his reasons for supporting Israel The fighter's latest post targeted US Senator Ted Cruz for the latter's viral comment, which stated the Senator's support towards Israel. Cruz, without much filter, stated that it was God who had asked him to support Israel. Strickland, while revealing the real reason behind the unwavering support, wrote, 'I'm not anti israel and id vote for Trump again... But we need to get Israel out of America politics... @tedcruz "God told me to support israel" really or was it the millions you got from them? I bet you've never even raid the Bible you slimimg f*ck' Known for his sociopolitical comments, Sean Strickland once again strikes beyond his role in the Octagon as an informed citizen of the state. In his recent series of posts on X, the fighter wrote about the recent step taken by US President Donald Trump while siding with Israel against Iran. On Saturday evening, i.e., June 21, 2025, the President announced the successful obliteration of 3 major nuclear sites in Iran—Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. Reflecting on the act, a mixed reaction was received from countries across the world, with some supporting the extreme step and a section condemning it. Strickland makes himself heard with some mixed, unapologetic comments posted on X. Sean Strickland issues his reasons for keeping the politics of Israel and America separate Following his dig at the political relationship shared between Israel and the USA, the fighter's next statement highlights the time when the US was provided with information involving Iraq's supposed possession of Weapons of Mass Destruction. Strickland builds on his reasons why Israel should be kept out of American politics. He wrote, 'Do you remember the first time our greatest ally said Iraq had WMDs? Knowingly lying to us to get us involved in a war. No Israel blood was spilt, no trillions of dollars of debt for their children. The debt that enslaves generations of Americans off a known lie.' Sean claims that most of the American politicians have been bought by the Israeli government, which has indirectly affected the citizens of the state. Even though he would vote for Trump yet again, however, the intermixing of Israeli and American politics is not something that the former middleweight champion approves of. While Israel feels strongly supported after the recent act by the US military, countries like New Zealand, Australia, Mexico, Cuba, and Iran themselves have continued to forward the talks of de-escalation and believe that diplomacy would bring more good to the area than violence. Also Read: Jon Jones retires from UFC with heartfelt message as fresh legal trouble shadows final exit Follow all the live updates, scores, and highlights from the India vs England Test match here . Game On Season 1 kicks off with Sakshi Malik's inspiring story. Watch Episode 1 here
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
HM Amit Shah in Chhattisgarh: Forensic education, Maoist crackdown on agenda
Raipur: Union Home Minister Amit Shah begins his two-day visit to Chhattisgarh on Sunday, with a packed itinerary focusing on forensic science education and internal security operations. HM Shah is scheduled to arrive at Raipur Airport around 1.40 p.m. He will head directly to Naya Raipur, where he will attend a 'Bhoomi Pujan' ceremony at 2 p.m., followed by the foundation stone laying of the National Forensic Sciences University (NFSU) campus at 3.15 p.m. The upcoming NFSU Raipur campus will be constructed on a 40-acre site at an estimated cost of Rs 350 crore. Although the permanent infrastructure will take time to complete, academic sessions are expected to begin in 2025-26 from a temporary facility, for which HM Shah will lay the foundation today. Originally established as the Gujarat Forensic Sciences University in 2008, NFSU was upgraded to a national institution through an Act of Parliament in 2020. It offers specialised courses in forensic science, investigative techniques, and criminology. Notably, in 2023, it expanded its global footprint by opening its first overseas campus in Uganda. Union Home Minister Shah is also scheduled to chair a meeting in Raipur with Directors General and Additional Directors General of Police from neighbouring states to review inter-state security coordination. Later in the evening, he will also hold a review meeting on the anti-Maoist campaign in Chhattisgarh. On June 23, he will travel to Narayanpur, where he is expected to meet personnel at the BSF (Border Security Force) camp at 1.45 p.m. to review anti-Naxal operations. His return to Raipur is scheduled for 3.20 p.m., with departure set for 4.30 p.m. HM Shah's visit underscores the Centre's focus on strengthening forensic capabilities and reviewing on-ground security efforts in Naxal-affected regions. The Union Home Minister's two-day tour of Chhattisgarh signals renewed political and operational focus on the state's long-standing battle against Naxalism. Following key engagements on Sunday, HM Shah is slated to visit the Abujhmad region on June 23, where he will interact directly with local villagers -- an area symbolically and strategically significant in the government's anti-Naxal campaign. This visit comes barely three months after his previous appearance in the state, when he attended the Pandum closing ceremony in Bastar and chaired a crucial meeting in Raipur with top officials of the CRPF, BSF, and police to assess counterinsurgency progress. HM Shah has maintained that Naxalism will be eradicated from the country by March 31, 2026 -- a deadline now less than a year away. With the BJP government under Chief Minister Vishnu Deo Sai intensifying its operations, the past few months have seen a notable surge in encounters, with over 400 Naxals reportedly neutralised since the government took charge.
New Indian Express
4 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Operation Sindhu: 310 Indians brought back from Iran
NEW DELHI: As tensions between Israel and Iran entered their ninth day, India intensified its evacuation efforts under Operation Sindhu, bringing home over 800 Indian nationals stranded in the conflict zone. A special evacuation flight from Mashhad, Iran, landed in New Delhi at 4.30 pm Saturday, carrying 310 Indian citizens. Earlier in the day, another flight from Ashgabat, Turkmenistan, repatriated evacuees who had transited from Iran. 'This brings the total number of Indians evacuated to 827,' confirmed Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal, adding that the mission is on. 'Operation Sindhu continues,' he said. In a gesture of regional solidarity, India also facilitated evacuation of Sri Lankan and other South Asian nationals. Sri Lanka's Deputy Foreign Minister Arun Hemachandra expressed gratitude for India's assistance in evacuating its citizens. Among the evacuees were 256 Indian students, mostly from J&K, who arrived in Delhi early Saturday. Many of them described days of anxiety and disruption in Iran before being flown to safety. This is the second evacuation flight from Iran in 24 hours after the first on Friday with 290 Indian students.
