logo
Assura evaluates PHP's revised acquisition offer

Assura evaluates PHP's revised acquisition offer

IOL News6 days ago

The Assura board, together with its financial and legal advisers, is currently reviewing the revised PHP offer in detail, it said.
The board of Assura plc, which is secondary listed on the JSE, said on Tuesday it notes the announcement made by Primary Health Properties (PHP) on June 13 outlining revised terms of its share and cash offer for the entire issued and to be issued ordinary share capital of Assura.
Assura is a UK-based Real Estate Investment Trust specialising in the development, investment, and management of primary healthcare properties. Assura owns and operates a portfolio of over 600 healthcare facilities across the UK, including GP surgeries, diagnostic and treatment centers, and private hospitals.
Key amendments to the PHP offer include the potential acceleration of Assura's quarter three dividend, without a corresponding reduction in the overall value of the PHP offer to shareholders; and a reduction in the acceptance condition for the PHP offer to more than 50% of the voting rights normally exercisable at a general meeting of Assura shareholders - aligning it with the acceptance threshold of the competing cash offer from Sana Bidco, announced on June 11.
The board of Assura further notes that PHP published its formal offer document on June 13, setting out the full terms and conditions of the revised PHP offer.
The Assura board, together with its financial and legal advisers, is currently reviewing the revised PHP offer in detail, it said. As part of this process, the board is conducting comprehensive consultations with shareholders to ensure their views are appropriately considered.
Assura said, "The board remains committed to acting objectively and in accordance with its fiduciary duties, with a firm focus on maximising value for all Assura shareholders."
In line with regulatory requirements, the board said it will publish a circular setting out its formal response to the PHP offer no later than June 27.
In the interim, Assura told shareholders that they are strongly advised to take no action in relation to the PHP offer.
BUSINESS REPORT
Visit: https://businessreport.co.za/

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Black Economic Empowerment: Has BEE failed South Africa's poor
Black Economic Empowerment: Has BEE failed South Africa's poor

The Star

time15 hours ago

  • The Star

Black Economic Empowerment: Has BEE failed South Africa's poor

Thabo Makwakwa | Published 1 week ago The debate surrounding the effectiveness of Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) in South Africa has intensified in recent months, with critics pointing to its shortcomings in achieving its core objectives. BEE is a government policy enacted in 2003 to increase economic participation by black South Africans. It seeks to transform the economy by promoting black ownership of companies, increasing black representation in management and boardrooms, and fostering entrepreneurship among historically disadvantaged communities. Although its objectives are widely supported, the policy's success has been scrutinised. In a detailed analysis published in the St Andrews Law Review on May 24, 2023, James Vandrau argued that BEE has failed to reconcile social inequalities in South Africa. He pointed out that resistance from the white business community has hampered the policy's effectiveness. 'This demographic has largely opposed the changes instigated by BEE, leading to a considerable backlash against the program,' Vandrau noted. According to a 2006 survey, approximately one-fifth of South African companies had no plans to implement black empowerment initiatives. The slow pace of progress prompted the Presidential Black Business Working Group to call for more stringent measures, with the ANC acknowledging that more aggressive interventions were necessary to meet BEE targets. This frustration has led many black entrepreneurs to advocate for faster economic de-racialisation. One of the most persistent criticisms of BEE is that it has been undermined by corruption and nepotism. Critics argue that a privileged few have benefited disproportionately at the expense of the wider black community. Gelb & Black (2004) highlighted how unissued equity was transferred from white-owned companies to a select group of 'tenderpreneurs'—black businesspeople often with high political profiles but limited business experience—resulting in a form of enrichment rather than broad-based empowerment. Furthermore, the representation of black individuals in senior management and boardrooms remains disappointingly low. The Black Business Executive Circle report of October 2005 revealed that only five of the top 200 companies on the Johannesburg Securities Exchange (JSE) had black ownership exceeding 51%. Only 32 companies had black ownership above 25%, collectively accounting for less than 2% of the JSE's market capitalisation. In an opinion piece published in The Star three months ago, Professor Bheki Mngomezulu, Director of the Centre for the Advancement of Non-Racialism and Democracy at Nelson Mandela University, acknowledged that BEE was a noble idea but emphasised that corruption has derailed its progress. 'The process should start with politicians who have corrupted the system and then move to businesses that have exploited loopholes to serve self-interests,' Mngomezulu wrote. 'Unless these corrupt practices are addressed, BEE will hinder economic growth and exclude those it was meant to benefit.' Weighing in, Dr. Khwezi Mabasa, a sociology lecturer at the University of Pretoria and an economic policy analyst, emphasised the need for a broader approach. Speaking to IOL, Mabasa highlighted that current legislation and initiatives, such as the broad-based black economic empowerment codes (B-BBEE), must be complemented by efforts outside the stock exchange, including supporting small and medium enterprises, entrepreneurship, and local economic development. 'We need to look beyond listed companies,' Mabasa explained. 'Most businesses are unlisted, and we must focus on fostering local ventures, job skills development, and access to affordable financing for black entrepreneurs. 'Transformation should also prioritise building sustainable local economies, especially in townships, rather than relying solely on high-profile corporate ownership.' Without these reforms, Mabasa argued that South Africa risks perpetuating the inequalities that the BEE was designed to eradicate. [email protected] IOL Politics

KwaZulu-Natal DOT assembles legal team for Tokio Marine lawsuit over flood damages
KwaZulu-Natal DOT assembles legal team for Tokio Marine lawsuit over flood damages

IOL News

timea day ago

  • IOL News

KwaZulu-Natal DOT assembles legal team for Tokio Marine lawsuit over flood damages

The MEC for Transport and Human Settlements, Siboniso Duma, met with Andrew Kirby, the president and CEO of Toyota South Africa Motors. Image: Supplied The KwaZulu-Natal Department of Transport (DOT) is assembling a strong team of legal minds to guide them on a lawsuit instituted by insurance company Tokio Marine & Nichido Fire Insurance Co. The Japan-based insurance company has sued the eThekwini Municipality, Transnet SOC Limited, and the DOT in respect of the April 2022 floods, which affected Toyota South Africa Motors (Pty) Ltd (TSAM), based in Prospecton. In court papers, it is stated that the three organisations had failed in their duty to maintain infrastructure and should have known that neglecting such responsibilities could lead to flooding. During the April floods, the structural integrity of the Umlaas Canal and the diversion berm was compromised, leading to stormwater flowing into the Prospecton Industrial Area, where the Toyota plant is situated, causing extensive flooding and damage, as read in the court papers. It stated that Transnet owned the Umlaas Canal and was responsible for its management and maintenance, as well as the flood risk associated with it. The concrete-lined canal is intended to channel and divert the uMlazi River around the Prospecton Industrial Area. Together with the diversion berm, it forms an integral part of the flood control and prevention mechanism for the Prospecton Industrial Area, it further stated. It said the DOT was responsible for the management and maintenance of the diversion berm, while the municipality owned, managed, and was responsible for the maintenance and control of the stormwater management system for the Prospecton Industrial Area. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Tasneem Lorgat, the general manager, Marketing Communications for Toyota, stated that TSAM submitted its insurance claim to Tokio Marine in respect of the floods. Lorgat stated that the flood affected TSAM's manufacturing operations. She said the litigation proceedings are not being facilitated and/or funded by TSAM. Accordingly, TSAM will not benefit in any way from the subrogated recovery action against these entities. She said upon learning of the impending recovery litigation, TSAM undertook, with the consent of Tokio Marine, to engage with each of the defendants to advise them of the impending subrogated recovery action. The MEC for Transport and Human Settlements, Siboniso Duma, said that he had spoken with Andrew Kirby, the president and CEO of TSAM, on Friday. Duma stated that the department is consulting with lawyers and could not get into the legal technicalities and details of the processes that will unfold. 'Kirby has emphasised his commitment to work with us to build this province. We have agreed to sustain our relationship that has evolved over the years. We have agreed that nothing should come between us and this enduring relationship,' Duma said. eThekwini Municipality spokesperson, Gugu Sisilana, said the municipality was aware of the court action and had filed a notice to defend. An eThekwini Municipality finance committee report, in April 2025, stated that the municipality is actively working on improving critical infrastructure and water supply systems, particularly in the Toyota and South African Breweries (SAB) precincts, south of Durban, to mitigate future disruptions and demonstrate accountability In a municipal report, a suggestion was made to explore the possibility of relocating TSAM from its current location, which is situated in a flood-prone area in Prospecton, and that the current weather conditions pose significant risks to the company's operations. According to the report, relocating to another area within the eThekwini municipal region should be considered to mitigate potential long-term impacts, including huge job losses. Refilwe Ramatlhodi Ndhlovu, manager of corporate communications at TSAM, indicated that TSAM has no plans to relocate its manufacturing operations and remains invested in the community and investments made at the plant. Andre Beetge, DA Ward 97 councillor and Executive Committee member (Exco), stated that TSAM plays an important role within the southern economy. He said TSAM also creates job opportunities, and one must take into account the ancillaries that find themselves directly reliant on the existence and location of this 'anchor' manufacturer.

World Bank and IMF climate snub 'worrying', says COP29 presidency
World Bank and IMF climate snub 'worrying', says COP29 presidency

eNCA

time2 days ago

  • eNCA

World Bank and IMF climate snub 'worrying', says COP29 presidency

BONN - The hosts of the most recent UN climate talks are worried international lenders are retreating from their commitments to help boost funding for developing countries' response to global warming. Major development banks have agreed to boost climate spending and are seen as crucial in the effort to dramatically increase finance to help poorer countries build resilience to impacts and invest in renewable energy. But anxiety has grown as the Trump administration has slashed foreign aid and discouraged US-based development lenders such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund from focussing on climate finance. Developing nations, excluding China, will need an estimated $1.3 trillion a year by 2035 in financial assistance to transition to renewable energy and climate-proof their economies from increasing weather extremes. Nowhere near this amount has been committed. At last year's UN COP29 summit in Azerbaijan, rich nations agreed to increase climate finance to $300 billion a year by 2035, an amount decried as woefully inadequate. Azerbaijan and Brazil, which is hosting this year's COP30 conference, have launched an initiative to reduce the shortfall, with the expectation of "significant" contributions from international lenders. But so far only two -- the African Development Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank -- have responded to a call to engage the initiative with ideas, said COP29 president Mukhtar Babayev. "We call on their shareholders to urgently help us to address these concerns," he told climate negotiators at a high-level summit in the German city of Bonn this week. "We fear that a complex and volatile global environment is distracting" many of those expected to play a big role in bridging the climate finance gap, he added. - A 'worrisome trend' - His team travelled to Washington in April for the IMF and World Bank's spring meetings hoping to find the same enthusiasm for climate lending they had encountered a year earlier. But instead they found institutions "very much reluctant now to talk about climate at all", said Azerbaijan's top climate negotiator Yalchin Rafiyev. This was a "worrisome trend", he said, given expectations these lenders would extend the finance needed in the absence of other sources. "They're very much needed," he said. The World Bank is directing 45 percent of its total lending to climate, as part of an action plan in place until June 2026, with the public portion of that spilt 50/50 between emissions reductions and building resilience. The United States, the World Bank's biggest shareholder, has pushed in a different direction. On the sidelines of the April spring meetings, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent urged the bank to focus on "dependable technologies" rather than "distortionary climate finance targets." This could mean investing in gas and other fossil fuel-based energy production, he said. Under the Paris Agreement, wealthy developed countries -- those most responsible for global warming to date -- are obliged to pay climate finance to poorer nations. Other countries, most notably China, make voluntary contributions. - Money matters - Finance is a source of long-running tensions at UN climate negotiations. Donors have consistently failed to deliver on past finance pledges, and have committed well below what experts agree developing nations need to cope with the climate crisis. The issue flared up again this week in Bonn, with nations at odds over whether to debate financial commitments from rich countries during the formal meetings. European nations have also pared back their foreign aid spending in recent months, raising fears that budgets for climate finance could also face a haircut. At COP29, multilateral development banks (MDBs) led by the World Bank Group estimated they could provide $120 billion annually in climate financing to low and middle income countries, and mobilise another $65 billion from the private sector by 2030. Their estimate for high income countries was $50 billion, with another $65 billion mobilised from the private sector. Rob Moore, of policy think tank E3G, said these lenders are the largest providers of international public finance to developing countries. "Whilst they are facing difficult political headwinds in some quarters, they would be doing both themselves and their clients a disservice by disengaging on climate change," he said. The World Bank in particular has done "a huge amount of work" to align its lending with global climate goals. "If they choose to step back this would be at their own detriment, and other banks like the regionally based MDBs would likely play a bigger role in shaping the economy of the future," he said. The World Bank declined to comment on the record.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store