Oil price spike likely following US strikes on Iran nuclear sites, investors say

A US attack on Iranian nuclear sites could push oil prices even higher and trigger a knee-jerk rush to safety, investors said, as they assessed how the latest escalation of tensions would ripple through the global economy.
Advertisement
The reaction in Middle East stock markets, which trade on Sunday, suggested investors were assuming a benign scenario, even as Iran intensified its missile attacks on Israel in response to the sudden, deep US involvement in the conflict.
Trump called the attack 'a spectacular military success' in a televised address to the nation and said Iran's 'key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.' He said the US military could go after other targets in Iran if the country did not agree to peace.
Iran said it reserves all options to defend itself, and warned of 'everlasting consequences.'
Investors said they expected the US involvement would cause a sell-off in stock markets and a possible bid for the dollar and other safe-haven assets when major markets reopen, but they also said much uncertainty about the course of the conflict remained.
Advertisement
'I think the markets are going to be initially alarmed, and I think oil will open higher,' said Mark Spindel, chief investment officer at Potomac River Capital.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

RTHK

an hour ago

• RTHK

Trump hints at regime change in Iran with MIGA slogan

Trump hints at regime change in Iran with MIGA slogan US President Donald Trump made the comment on social media. File photo: AFP US President Donald Trump hinted on Sunday at interest in regime change in Iran, despite several of his administration officials earlier stressing that US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites did not have that goal. "It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!" Trump posted on his Truth Social platform. (AFP)

South China Morning Post

2 hours ago

• South China Morning Post

Can the US and China forge a rivalry of convenience?

Deteriorating China-US relations are often blamed on the two countries' different political and economic systems. However, building on the commonalities of the strategic objectives of Chinese President Xi Jinping and US President Donald Trump may offer a path to improved relations. The path forward is relatively wide and multifaceted in terms of geopolitical concerns but narrower in terms of trade and economic issues. Both leaders seek a new world order that offers different roles for their countries. For Trump, this means shedding America's obligations to provide global public goods and ostensibly focusing more on US domestic interests. Xi, meanwhile, wants to preserve a rules-based global economic system in which China has prospered but seeks a greater say in its management. Trump's obsession with exercising leverage to strike deals involves threatening allies, who are more susceptible to pressure than America's perceived enemies due to their reliance on the US for security and economic support. Washington's disruptive behaviour provides an opening for Beijing regarding global leadership, but Beijing is still developing its soft power skills and lacks the financial and military resources to make this a near-term reality.

South China Morning Post

3 hours ago

• South China Morning Post

Democrats lash out at ‘erratic' Trump over Iran strikes, demand vote to rein in war powers

Democrats bristled on Sunday over US President Donald Trump's decision to launch air strikes on Iran without seeking authorisation from Congress, accusing the Republican of violating the constitution and demanding a vote to rein in his war powers. Advertisement Members of the Senate and House of Representatives argued that US intelligence had not shown an imminent threat from the Middle Eastern country that justified Trump's unilateral action. 'President Trump's actions in bombing Iran puts the US on the brink of a wider war in the Middle East, all without constitutionally required Congressional approval,' Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin said in a statement. Democrats were divided between those demanding a vote on a war powers resolution to constrain Trump's authority to launch further action and a smaller group, who maintained that the strikes were grounds for the Republican leader's impeachment. They included Illinois moderate Sean Casten and New York leftist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who accused the president of having 'impulsively risked launching a war that may ensnare us for generations'. Advertisement Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries, the Democratic leaders in the Senate and House respectively, said Trump had 'dramatically increased' America's risk of becoming embroiled in a new Middle Eastern conflagration. 'No president should be allowed to unilaterally march this nation into something as consequential as war with erratic threats and no strategy,' Schumer said.