ST, Federal Excise Return: FBR extends date of submission upto June 5
ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has extended date of submission of Sales Tax and Federal Excise Return for the tax period of April, 2025 upto June 5, 2025.
This is subject to the condition that due sales tax liability has been deposited within due date.
FBR to levy 18% sales tax in erstwhile tribal areas
In this regard, the FBR has issued instructions to all Chief Commissioners Inland Revenue of Large Taxpayers Offices (LTOs), Medium Taxpayers Office (MTO), Corporate Tax Offices (CTOs) and Regional Tax Offices (RTOs) on extension in date of Submission of Sales Tax & Federal Excise Return for the Tax Period of April, 2025.
In exercise of the powers conferred under section 74 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 and section 43 of the Federal Excise Act, 2005, the FBR has directed that the date of submission of Sales Tax and Federal Excise Return for the tax period of April, 2025 which was due on May 18, 2025 is extended till June 5, 2025 subject to the condition that due sales tax liability has been deposited within due date, FBR added.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
3 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Aurangzeb unveils new tax measures, targets poultry, mutual funds & govt securities
Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb unveiled new taxation measures, including levies on income generated from mutual funds and government securities, at the National Assembly on Monday. Addressing the lower house, the finance minister presented three more budget proposals. 'The first of these is to increase the tax rate on income derived from the debt portion of mutual funds issued to companies from 25% to 29%. Secondly, it is proposed to impose a 20% tax on profits made by corporations and companies on investments in government securities,' he said. The government has also proposed to tax the poultry sector, said Aurangzeb. 'It is proposed that a Federal Excise Duty (FED) of Rs10 per day-old chick should be imposed on hatchery chicks, so that this sector can also contribute to the national exchequer,' he said. The finance minister maintained that the government has presented a balanced budget for the fiscal year 2025-26. 'On one hand, we have kept government expenditure under control, while on the other, much emphasis has been laid towards increasing tax base and its compliance,' said Aurangzeb. Imported cotton yarn: APTMA hails 18pc sales tax imposition Aurangzeb said that tariff rationalisation is vital, stating: 'By lowering import duties, our business unit cost would decrease, which will facilitate exports.' He said that the government will soon announce an industrial policy, whereas consultation on EV policy has already been initiated. Moreover, the government, in collaboration with British Asian Trust, would soon launch Pakistan's first Skill Impact Bond (SIB). The SIB links funding to the achievement of outcomes, he said. Affordable Housing The government, in its bid to promote affordable housing, would launch a 20-year loan scheme for the low-income segment, informed Auranzgeb. He clarified: 'Only those dams will be pursued that are already approved.' On Saturday, Aurangzeb, in his address to the Senate, announced key relief measures in the federal budget for FY2025-26, including a significant income tax cut for the salaried class and a reduction in General Sales Tax (GST) on imported solar panels. The finance minister, on Monday, reiterated that individuals earning between Rs600,000 and Rs1.2 million annually will now be taxed at just 1%, down from 2.5% proposed in the budget for FY2025-26. He said that tax has been imposed on individuals receiving an annual pension of over Rs10 million, while, on the special instructions of the Prime Minister of Pakistan, pensioners over the age of 75 are exempt from all types of taxes. Aurangzeb added that the proposed 18% GST on solar panel imports has been lowered to 10%. Powers of FBR Aurangzeb informed the lower house that on the special instructions of the Prime Minister, the existing powers of the FBR regarding tax fraud and the amendments made through the Finance Bill were reviewed once again, under which tax fraud has been categorised into cognizable and non-cognizable offences. 'In cases involving up to Rs50 million, the FBR will not be able to arrest without a court warrant,' he said. In addition, any one of the following conditions must be fulfilled for arrest: 1) the accused deliberately did not become a part of the inquiry despite three notices; 2) the accused tries to escape; and 3) tampers with the record. 'Despite this, the approval for arrest will be given by a high-level three-member committee of the FBR, instead of an officer, and it will be necessary to present the arrested persons before the court of a special judge within 24 hours,' he said. In addition, it will be ensured that no citizen is abused in this process, he added. Real estate sector In the real estate sector, Aurangzeb noted that in the past, people used to buy large properties beyond their declared financial means. Under Section 114C of the Income Tax Ordinance, the Finance Bill proposed to prohibit such people from engaging in large financial activities. 'On the instructions of the prime minister, this new law will not apply to the purchase of residential plots or houses worth up to Rs50 million, commercial plots or properties worth up to Rs100 million and vehicles worth up to Rs7 million,' said the finance minister. Aurangzeb said that the ongoing tensions between Iran Israel are expected to disturb the region's economic situation. However, the government is prepared to deal with any situation, he assured the lower house.
Business Recorder
11 hours ago
- Business Recorder
ICAP says AOB in finance bill may not be appropriate forum
KARACHI: The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Pakistan (ICAP) has reviewed the discussions held during the Senate Standing Committee on Finance and Revenue's session on June 17, 2025, regarding the Finance Bill 2025, relating to proposed insertion of Section 58C into the Sales Tax Act, 1990. ICAP understands the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) efforts to combat financial misstatements, which may be resulting in evasion of sales tax. However, ICAP explains that the Audit Oversight Board (AOB), proposed in the finance bill to conduct inspections of audit firms, may not be the appropriate forum, given its statutory mandate is limited to overseeing audit quality of Public Interest Companies (PICs) only under the SECP Act 1997. ICAP proposes that being national regulators of audit profession and equipped with a robust investigation mechanism under the Chartered Accountants Ordinance, 1961, be designated to fulfil this oversight role. The Institute further explains that its existing Investigation Committee, constituted under the ICAP Bye-Laws 1983, comprised a reasonable number of independent members and a senior legal professional. ICAP reiterates its openness to including a nominee from FBR, AOB, or SECP on the Investigation Committee to enhance transparency. It is also disclosed that over the past five years, many cases relating to complaints received from various regulatory bodies, including SECP, SBP, AOB, and FBR, have been processed under its investigation framework. ICAP emphasizes the effectiveness of this system and informed that it annually publishes a comprehensive investigation report, the most recent of which was shared with members and public on March 13, 2025. The Institute expresses its continued support for legislative and regulatory reform in the national interest and remains committed to strengthening professional accountability across the financial ecosystem but has a concern on the introduction of alternate inspection mechanisms which may not be productive and in line with international best practices. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
12 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Finance bill contains drafting errors: experts
ISLAMABAD: Finance Bill (2025-26) contains drafting errors and contradictions amongst taxing statues including Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, Sales Tax Act, 1990 and Federal Excise Act, 2005. Tax experts told Business Recorder that policymaker has been harmonizing the parallel provisions contained in the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, Sales Tax Act, 1990 and Federal Excise Act, 2005 as all these are administered by the same officer of the field formations. But contrary to the established policy and past practice through Finance Bill 2025 certain contradictory amendments are proposed. The tax experts have pointed out that earlier all the three taxing statutes contained a provision that after issuance of show cause notice the assessment order was to be passed within a specified period and this provision was interpreted as mandatory in various judgments of the Supreme Court. Budget FY25-26: Finance bill still being discussed, says FBR However, through Finance Bill the provisions contained in Section 122(9) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 is proposed to be omitted meaning thereby that there would be no time limit for passing the assessment order after issuance of show cause notice and practically the same can be passed within five years of the end of the Financial Year in which the relevant return of total income was filed. Contrary to this, the identical provision contained in Section 11G of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 and sections of the Federal Excise Act would be continued. This differential treatment in the taxing statute administered by the same assessing officer does not sound to reason and is contrary to the norms of justice and fair play. When contacted, Shahid Jami, a Lahore based tax lawyer, explained that though Anomalies Committees have been constituted by the Federal Government but such fine points are not likely to be addressed by them as this may not be considered anomaly by them. He pointed out a drafting error according to which sub-section (1) of Section 46 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 pertaining to appeal to the Appellate Tribunal is intended to be substituted and the proposed amendment provide appeal only against the appeal order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) and contrary to the earlier provision existing for decades no appeal has been provided against the order passed by the Zonal Commissioner and FBR under the Act or Rules. Jami stated that the wording appears to be erroneous in drafting and not intentional change in policy as the words 'under this Act and Rule made there under' exist in the proposed amendment but the authorities of Zonal Commissioner and FBR are missing. It is imperative that such drafting errors and contradictions are removed from the Finance Bill for uniformity of taxing statues and to protect the rights of the taxpayers. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
