Directors' personal liability for unpaid pension contributions: what employers need to know
In today's challenging economic climate, many companies face financial distress and even insolvency. However, recent legal developments make it clear that financial hardship is no excuse for failing to meet statutory obligations, particularly the obligation to pay over retirement fund contributions deducted from employees' salaries.
This was the view of the Western Cape Division High Court in Engineering Industries Pension Fund v Installair (Pty) Ltd and Others (1633/2023) [2025] ZAWCHC 8 (16 January 2025), which confirmed that financial distress cannot shield employers from the consequences of non-compliance. This case underscores the legal duty of employers to comply with retirement fund obligations, and it highlights the potential for directors to be held personally liable for non-compliance.
Legal framework
The Pension Funds Act 24 of 1956 (the PFA) aims to protect the retirement savings and financial security of members by ensuring that contributions are properly deducted, managed, and remitted to the relevant fund. It sets out clear employer obligations, including the timely and full payment of contributions, and holds directors personally liable in cases of non-compliance. This reinforces trust in the retirement system and ensures that employee benefits are protected, regardless of an employer's financial challenges.
Section 13A of the PFA plays a critical role in ensuring compliance. Section 13A(1) requires employers to pay both employee and employer contributions in full and on time. It also obliges the principal officer of the fund to report instances of non-payment to the board. Where an employer fails to comply, directors may be held personally liable.
Accordingly, section 13A of the PFA and its subsections provide clear guidance on the establishment, implementation, and maintenance of effective compliance in respect of pension fund contributions. Furthermore, the section creates a robust enforcement mechanism to ensure that financial distress cannot be used as a justification for withholding retirement fund contributions.
Case background
In brief, the facts of this case are that the Engineering Industries Pension Fund (the Fund) sought to recover outstanding pension and provident fund contributions from Installair (Pty) Ltd (the Company) for the period May 2020 to July 2020. In addition, the Fund sought to hold the Company's directors personally liable for the unpaid contributions. The Fund relied on the provisions of: section 13A(1), which mandates employers to pay both employee and employer contributions to the retirement fund in full and on time; section 13A(7) which provides for the personal liability of individuals responsible for ensuring the employer's compliance with its obligations; section 13A(8), which imposes personal liability on directors who are regularly involved in the management of the employer's financial affairs; and section 13A(9), which requires retirement funds to notify employers in writing of individuals who may be held personally liable, read with Regulation 33 (promulgated under the PFA but since repealed).
At the time of the application, the Company was in liquidation, and no relief was sought against it. Instead, the Fund pursued relief against the Company's directors. The directors acknowledged that during the relevant period, the Company had deducted pension and provident fund contributions from employees' salaries but failed to remit them to the Fund. Instead, the amounts deducted were used to subsidise employee salaries, due to the Company's financial distress. The directors argued that the failure to pay was due to circumstances beyond their control and contended that they had not acted recklessly or negligently.
One director also claimed that section 13A(8) of the PFA should not apply to her, as she was not involved in the financial affairs of the Company. The directors further argued that liability under section 13(8) arises only where directors are unable to meet statutory obligations due to circumstances within their control and where there has been reckless or negligent conduct, which they denied.
The Court found that the directors were actively involved in managing the Company's financial affairs and had clearly failed to meet their statutory obligations under the PFA. The defences advanced were described as "far-fetched" and "untenable" and were summarily rejected. The Court accordingly held the directors personally liable for the unpaid contributions, ordering them to pay the outstanding amounts, together with accrued interest. The Court also dismissed the argument that the Covid-19 pandemic justified the employer's failure to remit contributions. Notably, the period in question (January to March 2020) preceded the national lockdown, which was only imposed on 26 March 2020. As the Company was fully operational during this time, the pandemic could not be used as an excuse for non-compliance. With no valid defence presented, the Court held the directors liable for the outstanding pension contributions. The Court also emphasised that a failure to issue an order in favour of vulnerable groups would constitute a dereliction of its constitutional duty.
The Court noted that the rise in withdrawal claims under the two-pot retirement system has highlighted persistent non-compliance with pension contribution obligations, a trend that threatens the financial security of retirees. This case serves as a strong reminder that enforcement of pension fund compliance is not only a legal obligation but a moral imperative to protect employee's long-term financial interests.
Obiter findings of the Court
In Engineering Industries Pension Fund v Installair (Pty) Ltd supra, prior to delivering its findings on the directors' liability, the Western Cape High Court highlighted the inherent challenges introduced by the two-pot retirement system and the practical implications of employers failing to remit pension contributions. The Court noted that such non-compliance has "cast a long shadow over this approach". The surge in withdrawal claims under the two-pot system has not only exposed serious gaps in employer compliance but also demonstrated that retirees, and those anticipating access to their retirement benefits ultimately bear the brunt of employer default.
The 'two pot impact' in this context refers to the dual consequences of non-compliance with pension fund contribution obligations. Firstly, when employers fail to remit the deducted contributions, the intended 'pot' of funds meant to safeguard employees' future financial security is compromised. This undermines retirement savings, reduces expected benefits, and erodes trust in the pension system. Secondly, the case reinforces that directors who are actively involved in a company's financial affairs cannot rely on financial distress as a defence.
The law imposes personal liability for non-remittance of contributions, holding directors directly accountable, exposing them to financial, reputational, and legal consequences. Engineering Industries Pension Fund v Installair (Pty) Ltd is not the only case in which the Courts have taken a firm view on unpaid retirement fund contributions. In Mafoko Security Patrols Pty Ltd v Kheledi and Others (2023/036840; 2023/057409; 2023/085922; 2023/086107) [2025] ZAGPJHC 252 (7 March 2025), where the employer blatantly ignored the Pension Fund Adjudicator's determinations to pay outstanding pension contributions, the Court upheld the Adjudicator's orders, confirming that the workers were entitled to the unpaid contributions and awarding costs. Furthermore, in National Fund for Municipal Workers v Tswaing Local Municipality & Another [PFA25/2020] (19 August 2020), the Financial Services Tribunal found that while section 13A of the PFA does provide for personal liability where contributions are unpaid, this liability is not primary, the employer remains primarily liable for the outstanding contributions.
Key takeaways for employers and retirement funds
In conclusion, employers, and particularly retirement funds, are urged to implement robust financial controls and regularly review compliance policies to ensure that all pension contributions are paid promptly and accurately, in accordance with the PFA and the rules of the relevant fund. This will go a long way in shielding directors and companies from severe legal penalties and reputational harm.
It bears emphasising that even in the face of financial difficulty, diverting retirement fund contributions for other uses is strictly prohibited. Directors cannot rely on financial distress as a defence to escape personal liability for unpaid contributions.
These cases underscore a crucial legal principle: employers cannot avoid their pension obligations through delay tactics or legal posturing. The courts have made it clear that accountability in fulfilling statutory duties is non-negotiable. Companies that ignore these obligations do so at their peril.
* Van Vuuren is a partner and Tshshonga is a trainee attorney at Webber Wentzel.
PERSONAL FINANCE
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
3 days ago
- Daily Maverick
AI's impact on jobs — the reality is messier than ‘humans out, robots in'
Though there are justified fears about job losses as machines replace humans, there will be gains too as new roles for people emerge. However, what comes next depends on how we respond through policy, education, upskilling and public-private collaboration. Earlier this week, I picked up a jersey from the Uniq store at my local mall. It was quick – grab, swipe, go. But as I went to pay, I was reminded of the first time I walked into a Uniq store and noticed something was different: there were no cashiers. No tills. No queue snaking towards a human behind a counter. Instead, four sleek self-checkout pods stood in one corner, humming with quiet efficiency. The checkout process at Uniq is simple: grab a paper bag, drop it on the scanner zone and toss in your items. No need to hold up each tag – a hidden barcode reader instantly picks up every barcode and rings up your total in a flash. The screen asks for your rewards card and then prompts you towards the card machine. Slick. Seamless. A little bit like magic. The first time, I walked away thinking the future is here. What I didn't think about – at least not immediately – were the people. The cashiers that might have once worked those tills. The retail staff whose roles had been trimmed down to make way for this whisper-quiet efficiency. It's easy to marvel at the tech. What's harder to spot is what's been quietly removed to make way for it. South African workplaces are changing. Not just in the visible ways (more remote meetings, fewer receptionists, less paper clutter), but in the kinds of work we're doing and how we're doing it. Spend enough time in offices, hospitals, call centres or warehouses and you'll see it for yourself. Software is doing what people used to do: algorithms are reading CVs, chatbots are answering customers and machines are filing invoices. And it's not just happening in tech startups or Silicon Valley-esque coworking spaces. It's happening in banks, factories, clinics, farms and even your local Uniq store. The robots aren't coming – they're already here. They just don't look like what we thought they would. Disruption creeping, not crashing The conversation about artificial intelligence (AI) and jobs has long been polarising. For every utopian claim that AI will unlock new kinds of meaningful work, there's a dystopian fear that it will wipe out jobs and leave millions behind. Both are technically true, but neither tells the full story. A recent McKinsey & Company report, The Future of Work in South Africa, paints a picture that's neither apocalypse nor fantasy. It estimates that AI, machine learning and advanced robotics could displace 3.3 million jobs by 2030. But – and this is the bit that rarely makes the headlines – this same report projects the creation of 4.5 million new jobs in the same timeframe. That's a net gain of 1.2 million jobs. However, there's a catch: we don't fully know what these new jobs will be. It's worth emphasising that the McKinsey report is a great document and a lot of research went into it, but the numbers it puts forward are still based on speculation. We have no real way of knowing the exact number of jobs that will be gained or lost. McKinsey is making a (highly) educated guess, so keep that in mind as you read on. Many of these new roles are expected to emerge in the tech space, but they won't all be obvious tech jobs. They may be hybrid roles like AI ethicists, automation coaches and data-enabled health workers. These are jobs that don't exist yet, but they will soon seem essential. According to the report, some sectors will see particularly strong growth. Healthcare and social assistance could (again, educated speculation) add more than 570,000 jobs by 2030, driven by South Africa's growing and ageing population. Construction, buoyed by urbanisation and infrastructure needs, is projected to create more than 260,000 jobs. But the gains won't be evenly spread. For every sector on the rise, there will be one in decline. Retail is expected to shed about 334,000 jobs as cashiers, floor staff and store managers are increasingly replaced or supplemented by smart kiosks and inventory-tracking systems. Administration-heavy sectors like government and support services may lose 309,000 jobs. Manufacturing, once seen as the engine of industrial employment, is on track to lose 231,000. Transport, warehousing, agriculture and even real estate are also on the chopping block, albeit to a lesser extent. The information sector, ironically, is projected to lose relatively few jobs (about 7,000), likely because it's the one designing the systems replacing everyone else. Not full replacement, just fewer hands It's tempting to think of job losses in binary terms: humans out, robots in. But the reality is messier. Very few jobs are 100% automatable. In fact, according to McKinsey's analysis, 60% of jobs globally have at least 30% of tasks that could be automated. In South Africa, data-heavy roles such as payroll officers and transaction processors are among the most vulnerable because about 72% of their work activities could be handed over to machines. But this doesn't mean their roles disappear entirely. It just means fewer people will be needed to do the same amount of work. In times like these it's useful to remember that this isn't the first time technology has rewritten the job script. When the personal computer arrived in the early 1970s it killed off a host of routine clerical roles, from typists and data entry clerks to messengers. But it also sparked a wave of new opportunities, creating hitherto unimagined jobs for programmers, designers, information technology support staff and network engineers. The AI shift feels similar, but there is a big difference: it's faster, more complex and harder to predict. The PC replaced typewriters whereas AI can replace thinking – at least some parts of it. The challenge that AI brings to Africa is access. AI development is expensive. It demands computing power, data infrastructure and deep technical expertise – in other words, things that are not evenly distributed across the globe. In regions like Africa, where basic connectivity and skills development still lag behind, the AI era could deepen inequalities rather than dissolve them. If AI becomes another exclusive tool in the hands of a few, it risks turning into a control mechanism rather than an empowerment engine. In a country already grappling with high unemployment, economic exclusion and vast digital divides, that's no small risk. It's the defining question. Governments will need to prioritise getting their citizens high up on the digital curve if they expect them to be able to participate in the economy of the future. Preparing for jobs with no names yet We can't fight the future with nostalgia. There are a lot of things we don't know about AI in the workplace yet, but one thing we know for sure is that legacy job models are being eroded. What comes next depends on how we respond through policy, education, upskilling and public-private collaboration. South Africa's response to AI needs less panic and more preparation – not retreat, but reinvention. As I stood at Uniq, waiting to pay for my jersey, the lady in front of me approached a self-checkout station with trepidation. She looked to her left then her right, hoping to get the attention of a human being. In a moment, a staff member unpacking stock nearby spotted her and came over. I could see the tension leaving the lady's shoulders. The staff member helped her with a smile, putting a bag on the scanner and folding her items into it gently. 'Thank you so much, young man,' I overheard her saying to him, 'these machines make me so nervous'. DM This story first appeared in our weekly Daily Maverick 168 newspaper, which is available countrywide for R35.
IOL News
13-06-2025
- IOL News
Unlocking Africa's investment potential: Why investors overlook the continent
Explore why Africa, a continent rich in resources and potential, is still overlooked by investors, and discover how changing perceptions can unlock new opportunities Image: Ai Africa is losing out as an investment destination because it is misunderstood by financial backers due to outdated perceptions based on antiquated data and broad generalisations that it is a monolith and not a continent of striking contrasts – from tourism opportunities to great mineral wealth in a renewable energy world. Stefano Resi, head of data centre sales for Middle East & Africa at Nokia, points out that the continent is huge, spanning more than 30 million square kilometres, with 1.5 billion people living in 54 countries. Africa can no longer be ignored, said Casey Sprake, economist at Anchor Capital. Its population is set to hit 2.5 billion in 2050, a quarter of humanity, it has mineral wealth with 30% of the world's critical mineral reserves and large swathes of arable land. Africa offers a rare and powerful combination of growth potential, resource depth, youthful human capital, and regional ambition in a world characterised by geopolitical fragmentation, supply chain realignment, and demographic ageing in major economies, said Sprake. 'For forward-looking investors, business leaders, and development partners, the question is no longer whether Africa matters but how best to engage with its evolving, increasingly central role in the global economy,' Sprake said. As long ago as 2010, McKinsey & Company – in its first iteration of its Lions on the Move report - argued that Africa was seeing significant economic growth, increasing urbanisation as well as rapid urbanisation and a growing commercial sector. That report, which advocated investment into the continent, has since been updated three times. Yet, when it comes to looking at Africa as a possible investment destination, Strake pointed out that insufficient and incomplete data hampers investment decisions as they rely on outdated narratives. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Investors, policymakers, business leaders, and scholars 'frequently encounter opaque or incomplete information when evaluating African markets,' said Sprake. 'A large portion of Africa's economy remains informal, meaning that economic activity is often unrecorded or difficult to track using traditional methods,' she said. For example, in 2018, McKinsey & Company could identify only 338 African companies with annual revenues or more than $1 billion, while the estimated number of micro-, small-, and medium-sized enterprises exceeded 80 million, she pointed out. Compounding the issue of trying to collect data are issues such as corruption and wars. In 2021, 18 countries in sub-Saharan Africa were experiencing active armed conflicts, 12 of which involved high-intensity warfare, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. Despite challenges, Sprake says that Africa's perception can change. 'As Africa becomes more digitally integrated and data infrastructure improves, analysts now have access to more reliable and timely information than ever before. These advancements are critical for shaping informed policy, guiding strategic investments, and correcting outdated narratives about Africa's economic potential,' she said. Resi added that South Africa is a fertile environment for large-scale data centre investment. 'Already, Johannesburg and Cape Town are hosting an expanding constellation of high-capacity facilities,' he said. IOL
IOL News
13-06-2025
- IOL News
Women leaders bring new leadership culture in male-dominated sectors
Women in leadership roles are transforming how work gets done and improving outcomes across technical industries. Image: Supplied In male-dominated sectors such as construction, engineering, and mining, women are redefining what good leadership looks like. Serisha Sirputh, director at built environment consultancy LDM, said the growing presence of women in leadership is transforming how work gets done and improving outcomes across technical industries. 'We're not trying to fit women into outdated moulds. It is about diverse thinking, emotional intelligence, and leadership styles that strengthen outcomes.' A McKinsey & Company report has shown that companies in the top quartile for gender-diverse executive teams are 25% more likely to post above-average profitability. Drawing on both industry experience and international research, Sirputh highlights several key strengths that women bring to high-performance environments. The first is enhanced problem-solving and innovation. 'This approach doesn't just fix issues, it sparks innovation and strengthens team dynamics,' says Sirputh. Diverse teams, she adds, approach challenges with broader perspectives, building consensus and seeking sustainable solutions. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Authenticity and empathy also define strong female leadership. 'Empathy is a critical leadership trait, and studies show that women often score higher in emotional intelligence competencies, including empathy.' Combined with authenticity, this fosters trust, resolves conflict, and supports high-functioning teams. Sirputh added that women also bring strategic foresight and sustainability thinking. 'Women leaders are known for their ability to think beyond immediate tasks, anticipating downstream effects and aligning projects with strategic and sustainable goals.' In industries where projects often involve complex stakeholder relationships, effective communication and persuasion are vital. 'Their inclusive and cooperative communication style and ability to connect enables them to build trust and influence stakeholders, which can reduce delays.' Resilience and adaptability are also hallmarks of women in technical environments. Having navigated industries that were not always welcoming, many have developed the ability to lead through uncertainty and drive innovation under pressure. The presence of women in leadership also helps to break stereotypes and expand opportunities for future generations. As Sirputh puts it: 'Building gender-diverse teams is not about meeting quotas. It is about enabling different styles of leadership that drive better performance across the board.' THE MERCURY
