Fake News And Nationalism: India's Media War On Truth
NEW DELHI, June 8: India's mainstream news media, once celebrated for their fearless reporting and democratic spirit, are now facing a crisis of credibility that has drawn concern from international observers, rights organizations, and even their journalists. The decline is not just a matter of perception but is playing out in real time, with recent events exposing deep-rooted issues of sensationalism, political alignment, and the unchecked spread of misinformation. The latest wave of misinformation occurred against the backdrop of escalated India–Pakistan military tensions. Indian mainstream media like Aaj Tak, Zee News, NDTV, and Times Now were accused of disseminating unverified videos, AI-generated images, and false casualty figures. A report by a fake‑news watchdog exposed multiple instances of such errors—old or unrelated images being misrepresented as evidence of the Pahalgam tragedy
A Shifting Landscape: From Watchdog to Megaphone
Over the past decade, India's largest news channels and newspapers have come under fire for aligning too closely with propaganda narratives and sidelining dissenting voices. The shift has raised alarms about the erosion of press freedom in the world's largest democracy. According to Reporters Without Borders, India now ranks 159 out of 180 countries in the World Press Freedom Index—its lowest position ever. 'India's media has gradually turned into an echo chamber for the state,' a senior RSF analyst observed, highlighting the growing skepticism both domestically and abroad.
Behind this transformation lies a media industry dominated by powerful conglomerates with deep political and financial stakes. Critics argue that this ownership structure has compromised editorial independence, replacing investigative journalism with polarizing debates, celebrity coverage, and sensational rhetoric. The result is a press that increasingly prioritizes loyalty over accountability, as noted by a foreign correspondent based in New Delhi.
The Misinformation Maelstrom: When Newsrooms Become Amplifiers
The dangers of this new media reality were laid bare during a recent military standoff between India and Pakistan. In the early hours of May 9, a WhatsApp alert from the Indian public broadcaster falsely claimed that Pakistan's army chief had been arrested in a coup. The message was quickly picked up by an Indian journalist, broadcast across major news channels, and began trending on social media. The entire story was fabricated; no coup had occurred, and the supposed 'arrested' general was soon promoted.
This incident was not an isolated lapse. During the crisis, Indian newsrooms became saturated with unverified claims and outright fabrications, shaping public perception at a time of heightened national security tensions. Channels broadcast images from unrelated conflicts, repurposed visuals from plane crashes and video games, and reported dramatic victories without evidence. Former Foreign Secretary Nirupama Rao described the environment as one of 'hypernationalism and abnormal triumphalism,' fueled by a lack of official information and a rush to fill the vacuum with spectacle.
Media critic Manisha Pande of Newslaundry called it 'the most dangerous version of what a section of TV news channels have been doing for a decade … completely unchecked.' Journalists admitted to airing stories based on unverified WhatsApp messages and influencer posts, while anchors declared dramatic developments with no factual basis.
A Crisis of Trust—and a Glimmer of Hope
The fallout from these episodes has been profound. The unchecked spread of misinformation and the willingness to prioritize sensationalism over verification have eroded public trust in mainstream media, both in India and internationally. Even as Pakistani media engaged in its own misinformation campaigns, the Indian press's lapses were particularly glaring given its democratic heritage.
Yet, amid the spectacle, a core group of Indian journalists and independent platforms—such as The Wire, Scroll.in, and Article 14 —continue to uphold the values of rigorous, ethical reporting, often at great personal and professional risk. Global outlets like The New York Times, BBC, and Al Jazeera have also expanded their India coverage, offering alternative perspectives and counter-narratives.
Looking Ahead: Can Indian Media Reclaim Its Role?
As India approaches future elections and navigates complex domestic and global challenges, the question remains: Can its mainstream media reassert its independence and restore public trust, or will it continue its drift into partisanship and spectacle? The answer may well determine not just the fate of the press, but the health of Indian democracy itself.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Kuwait Times
an hour ago
- Kuwait Times
Pakistan to nominate Trump for Nobel
Analysts say move could make US president think again about Iran strikes ISLAMABAD: Pakistan said on Saturday it would recommend US President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize, an accolade that he has said he craves, for his work in helping to resolve the recent conflict between India and Pakistan. Some analysts in Pakistan said the move might persuade Trump to think again about potentially joining the Zionist entity in striking Iran's nuclear facilities. Pakistan has condemned the Zionist entity's action as a violation of international law and a threat to regional stability. In May, a surprise announcement by Trump of a ceasefire brought an abrupt end to a four-day conflict between nuclear-armed foes India and Pakistan. Trump has since repeatedly said that he averted a nuclear war, saved millions of lives and grumbled that he got no credit for it. Pakistan agrees that US diplomatic intervention ended the fighting, but India says it was a bilateral agreement between the two militaries. 'President Trump demonstrated great strategic foresight and stellar statesmanship through robust diplomatic engagement with both Islamabad and New Delhi, which de-escalated a rapidly deteriorating situation,' Pakistan said. 'This intervention stands as a testament to his role as a genuine peacemaker.' Governments can nominate people for the Nobel Peace Prize. There was no immediate response from Washington. A spokesperson for the Indian government did not respond to a request for comment. Trump has repeatedly said that he's willing to mediate between India and Pakistan over the disputed Kashmir region, their main source of enmity. Islamabad, which has long called for international attention to Kashmir, is delighted. But his stance has upended US policy in South Asia, which had favored India as a counterweight to China, and put in question previously close relations between Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. In a social media post on Friday, Trump gave a long list of conflicts he said he had resolved, including India and Pakistan and the Abraham Accords in his first term between the Zionist entity and some Muslim-majority countries. He added: 'I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do.' Pakistan's move to nominate Trump came in the same week its army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, met the US leader for lunch. It was the first time that a Pakistani military leader had been invited to the White House when a civilian government was in place in Islamabad. Trump's planned meeting with Modi at the G7 summit in Canada last week did not take place after the US president left early, but the two later spoke by phone, in which Modi said 'India does not and will never accept mediation' in its dispute with Pakistan, according to the Indian government. Mushahid Hussain, a former chair of the Senate Defense Committee in Pakistan's parliament, suggested nominating Trump for the peace prize was justified. 'Trump is good for Pakistan,' he said. 'If this panders to Trump's ego, so be it. All the European leaders have been sucking up to him big time.' But the move was not universally applauded in Pakistan, where Trump's support for the Zionist entity's war in Gaza has inflamed passions. '(The Zionist entity's) sugar daddy in Gaza and cheerleader of its attacks on Iran isn't a candidate for any prize,' said Talat Hussain, a prominent Pakistani television political talk show host, in a post on X. 'And what if he starts to kiss Modi on both cheeks again after a few months?' — Reuters
Arab Times
3 days ago
- Arab Times
India, Canada to restore diplomatic services nearly two years after killing of Sikh separatist
NEW DELHI, June 18, (AP): India and Canada agreed to restore diplomatic services nearly two years after Ottawa accused New Delhi of alleged involvement in the killing of a Sikh separatist leader, which turned into a row straining relations between the two countries. The announcement was made after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his Canadian counterpart, Mark Carney, met Tuesday on the sidelines of the Group of Seven summit in Kananaskis, Alberta. "The leaders agreed to designate new high commissioners, with a view to returning to regular services to citizens and businesses in both countries,' a statement from Carney's office said. High commissioners are senior diplomats, representing their country's interests and fostering relationships with the host nation. Modi and Carney reiterated the importance of a bilateral relationship based on mutual respect and a commitment to the principle of territorial sovereignty, according to the statement. They also discussed further collaboration in several sectors, including technology, digital transition, food security, and critical minerals. Meanwhile, India's foreign ministry underscored the importance of restarting senior ministerial engagements to "rebuild trust and bring momentum to the relationship.' Carney's predecessor, Justin Trudeau, shocked the world in September 2023 after announcing in Parliament there were credible allegations about India's link to the killing of Hareep Singh Nijjar near Vancouver. New Delhi vehemently denied the allegations and accused Trudeau's government of harboring extremists. The Indian government had declared Nijjar a terrorist in 2020 under a law meant to suppress dissent. The Sikh independence advocate was a prominent member of the Khalistan movement, banned in India, to create an independent Sikh homeland. H e was seen as a human rights activist by Sikh organizations. Ties between the two countries continued to worsen and in October, India expelled Canadian diplomats and withdrew its high commissioner and other officials from Canada. Ottawa retaliated by dismissing Indian diplomats and accusing the Indian government of an intensifying campaign against Canadian citizens, a charge New Delhi denied. India's anxieties about Sikh separatist groups have long strained its relationship with Canada, where some 2% of the population is Sikh.
Kuwait Times
4 days ago
- Kuwait Times
'Hidden treasure': Rare Gandhi portrait up for UK sale
A rare oil painting of Indian independence leader Mahatma Gandhi, which is believed to have been damaged by a Hindu nationalist activist, is to be auctioned in London in July. Gandhi, one of the most influential figures in India's history, led a non-violent movement against British rule and inspired similar resistance campaigns across the world. He is the subject of tens of thousands of artworks, books and films. But a 1931 painting by British-American artist Clare Leighton is believed to be the only oil portrait he sat for, according to the painter's family and Bonhams, where it will be auctioned online from July 7 to 15. "Not only is this a rare work by Clare Leighton, who is mainly known for her wood engravings, it is also thought to be the only oil painting of Mahatma Gandhi which he sat for," said Rhyanon Demery, Bonhams Head of Sale for Travel and Exploration. The painting is a "likely hidden treasure", Caspar Leighton, the artist's great-nephew, told AFP. Going under the hammer for the first time next month, the painting is estimated to sell for between £50,000 and £70,000 ($68,000 and $95,000). Clare Leighton met Gandhi in 1931, when he was in London for talks with the British government on India's political future. She was part of London's left-wing artistic circles and was introduced to Gandhi by her partner, journalist Henry Noel Brailsford. "I think there was clearly a bit of artistic intellectual courtship that went on," said Caspar, pointing out that his great-aunt and Gandhi shared a "sense of social justice". Painting attacked The portrait, painted at a crucial time for India's independence struggle, "shows Gandhi at the height of his power", added Caspar. It was exhibited in London in November 1931, following which Gandhi's personal secretary, Mahadev Desai, wrote to Clare: "It was such a pleasure to have had you here for many mornings doing Mr Gandhi's portrait." "Many of my friends who saw it in the Albany Gallery said to me that it was a good likeness," reads a copy of the letter attached to the painting's backing board. The painting intimately captures Gandhi's likeness but it also bears reminders of his violent death. Gandhi was shot at point-blank range in 1948 by disgruntled Hindu nationalist activist Nathuram Godse, once closely associated with the right-wing paramilitary organisation RSS. Godse and some other Hindu nationalist figures accused Gandhi of betraying Hindus by agreeing to the partition of India and the creation of Muslim-majority Pakistan. According to Leighton's family, the painting was attacked with a knife by a "Hindu extremist" believed to be an RSS activist, in the early 1970s. Although there is no documentation of the attack, a label on the back of the painting confirms that it was restored in the United States in 1974. Under UV light, Demery pointed out the shadow of a deep gash running across Gandhi's face where the now-restored painting was damaged. "It feels very deliberate," she said. 'Real home' The repairs "add to the value of the picture in a sense... to its place in history, that Gandhi was again attacked figuratively many decades after his death", said Caspar. The only other recorded public display of the painting was in 1978 at a Boston Public Library exhibition of Clare Leighton's work. After Clare's death, the artwork passed down to Caspar's father and then to him. "There's my family's story but the story in this portrait is so much greater," he said. "It's a story for millions of people across the world," he added. "I think it'd be great if it got seen by more people. Maybe it should go back to India -- maybe that's its real home." Unlike countless depictions of the man known in India as the "father of the nation" -- in stamps, busts, paraphernalia and recreated artwork -- "this is actually from the time", said Caspar. "This might be really the last truly significant picture of Gandhi to emerge from that time."--AFP
