Authorities decide to commence land acquisition for Sabari rail

Bringing renewed hope to more than 2,000 families across central Travancore whose properties have been marked for the long-pending Sabari rail project, the Revenue department has decided to resume land acquisition for the project.
Official sources said an online high-level meeting convened by the State government on Wednesday has directed the District Collectors of Ernakulam, Idukki and Kottayam to proceed with acquiring the required land. As part of this renewed effort, the previously functional land acquisition offices at Perumbavoor and Pala will be reopened, while new offices are slated to be established in Muvattupuzha and Kanjirappally.
'Work on the project is expected to formally begin with the visit of a high-level team from the Indian Railways early next month,' sources said. The meeting also decided to retain the existing alignment of the rail line. The project is being planned in such a way that land acquisition and construction can proceed simultaneously.
24.4 hectares acquired
So far, 24.4 hectares of land have been acquired for the project in the Angamaly–Kalady stretch. However, more than 200 hectares still need to be acquired across the three districts.
In the first phase, land will be acquired from Kalady to Ramapuram. The second phase, covering the stretch from Ramapuram to Erumely, will follow completion of alignment surveys and a Social Impact Assessment (SIA).
'A special revenue team will be deployed for this purpose,' the sources added.
As the initial notification for acquiring land for the project was issued prior to the introduction of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act in 2013, the government will have to restart the entire process in accordance with the new legislation. According to officials, a new government order (GO) for the land acquisition will be issued shortly to commence the proceedings.
CM's meet
The approval for the construction of the rail line connecting Angamaly and Erumely, the gateway to Sabarimala was announced after a meeting held between Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan and Union Railway Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw in New Delhi recently. The 111.48-km line was proposed in the 1997-98 Budget.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Time of India

12 hours ago

• Time of India

Prathidhwani contributes to chief ministers distress relief fund for landslide rehabilitation

Thiruvananthapuram: Prathidhwani, the welfare and recreation forum of IT employees at Technopark, contributed over Rs 28 lakh to the chief minister's distress relief fund (CMDRF) for the rehabilitation of landslide-hit communities at Chooralmala and Mundakkai in Wayanad district. The relief fund was handed over to chief minister Pinarayi Vijayan at his office by state convenor of Prathidhwani Rajeev Krishnan. Prathidhwani president at Technopark Vishnu Rajendran and other office bearers Rahul Chandran, Saneesh KP and Prasanthi PS were also present. Prathidhwani's units in three IT Parks in Kerala — Technopark, Infopark, Kochi, and Cyberpark, Kozhikode — collected the contributions from around 1,156 techies. The amount is intended for building a house (Rs 20 lakh) and other facilities in the township project (Rs 8.67 lakh) for the communities devastated by the massive landslide last year.

Mint

a day ago

• Mint

India is missing the core elements needed to realise the AI dream

New Delhi: India's mushrooming artificial intelligence-focused startups are attracting a lot of buzz, but a lack of innovation and groundbreaking research means the country is way behind the US and China in the tussle for AI supremacy. This is a result of what the industry calls 'secondary' innovation—technologies that cannot be patented globally to influence global economics in the long run. Spending on foundational engineering, research and development (ER&D) work in AI is minuscule, at least five executives involved in AI-related work told Mint. In November, the World Intellectual Property Organization (Wipo's) annual report said that India was the sixth region in the world in terms of overall patent applications—behind China, the US, Japan, Korea and the European Union. However, the gap was stark—China filed 1.7 million patents through 2024, almost 3x more than the US, with 600,000 patents. India filed only 90,000 patents—5% of what China did. Also read: AI firms getting GPU sops may see govt at the table The gap is even more evident in generative AI, the core battlefield in global technology right now. Last year, China filed over 38,000 patents in generative AI with Wipo, the global patent authority, ahead of the US with around 6,500 patents. India ranked sixth here too with 1,350 patents in generative AI—3.5% of China's advancements, and around a fifth of the US. Ashwini Vaishnaw, Union minister for electronics and IT, promised last month that 'India's first foundational AI model is still on track to be released by the end of this year". Yet, the patent filings suggest a US-China war for AI supremacy threatens to leave India out of the league of nations that would influence global innovation and economy over the next decades. Fund scarcity Founders argue that much of this is due to the lack of large early-stage funds. US-based Essential AI, founded by Ashish Vaswani, the former Google Brain engineer who co-invented the transformer model that backs all generative AI applications, emerged from stealth in December 2023 with a $56.5-million series-A funding round. Others that have raised large capital in the US over the past three years include Adept AI's $65-million Series A funding round in April 2022, Cursor's $60-million Series A in August and more. Each of these ventures is currently investing in building foundational technologies that, in the long run, would be patented and licensed to run AI applications and services around the world. Also read: Sovereign silicon: India targets indigenous 2nm, Nvidia-level GPU by 2030 Executives leading global ventures agree that India is behind the curve in AI at the moment. There is 'definitely a lack of enough AI engineers working on core engineering in the field in India", said Pranav Mistry, founder and chief executive Mistry, former global chief of Samsung's advanced research division, spoke withMinton the sidelines of a gathering in Bengaluru earlier this month. 'There is certainly a mindset difference between India and the US in terms of how ventures approach AI engineering in the two nations. In the end, being able to hold patents is what will give geographies access to geopolitical soft power over the years to come—and India should definitely focus on this field," Mistry said. Vaswani of Essential AI said, 'There's no reason for India to not build its own AI models—and there should be more ventures focused on doing it in and for India, within India." Developing vision Investors argue that a lack of vision for the long run from founders is a key part of why core ER&D work is not being found among India's AI startups. 'Any entity pitching for undertaking foundational AI engineering comes with a five-year road map, which is the equivalent of multiple decades in the modern-day AI world. It is absolutely true that India is still working on building on top of the engineering that US and other entities are undertaking—and work that could be licensed globally and impact industries holistically are still at a very limited stage in India," said Pratip Mazumdar, co-founder and partner at early-stage venture capital firm, Inflexor Ventures. But the lack of funds is also a key reality. In India, apart from Sarvam's $41-million Series A funding round in December 2023, there have been no large early-stage investments in AI-focused startups. Noida-based and Bengaluru's two startups that, alongside Sarvam, have been the first to be backed by the Centre's $1.2-billion IndiaAI Mission, have raised $5.25 million and $4 million in funding so far, respectively. Gurugram-based Soket AI Labs, the fourth of the first government-backed startups, has yet to raise a venture capital round and only has 'around $3 million from angel investors" so far, according to its founder and chief executive, Abhishek Upperwal. Government support 'This is why the government's AI Mission reducing the cost of access to processors for training AI models is crucial, and we're happy to offer equity to the government in exchange for the access," Upperwal said. Also read: The brain behind Generative AI has his sights set on India 'Venture capital investors in India have a limited appetite for investing in deep-tech R&D, which is crucial for AI startups to build a new foundational AI architecture that can be patented and licensed out for global usage in the long run—we've been trying to raise capital for the past two years, but to no avail," he said. The issue, policy experts said, goes beyond just the startups. A startup 'is only as able as the whole ecosystem—and no single entity can alone solve a fundamental issue in an entire industry", said Rohit Kumar, founding partner of The Quantum Hub and a consultant in various government and public sector initiatives. 'Fundamentally, R&D in India is still not well-prioritized—budgets are too little, and institutions do not have the means that their US and China counterparts have to pursue fundamental innovation," said Kumar. 'Incubators in top engineering institutes are hampered by bureaucratic processes, which isn't seen internationally—India is heavily shackled in these ways." In the long run, though, investors believe that a key balance between core innovation and nifty application development would be the right way forward. Vishesh Rajaram, managing partner at deep tech-focused venture capital firm Speciale Invest, said that while India is 'a little behind the curve at the moment, we haven't missed the bus in AI yet." 'A lot of the foundational work is hard, and has multiple challenges to the tale—access to infrastructure is limited, and the kind of talent that can actually undertake work that would be foundational or be patented is also limited. As a result, there's, of course, room for startups to catch up in terms of core engineering efforts, unlike how many refer to India having missed the opportunity to influence the global electronics and semiconductor industries," Rajaram said. Prayank Swaroop, partner at venture capital firm Accel, said for startups, 'the real opportunity lies in purpose-built AI applications that solve specific problems at scale. We're seeing Indian startups creating targeted solutions using existing foundational models as building blocks—this approach allows faster innovation cycles and can deliver significant value." Others, however, believe that more weight to fundamental innovation is the need of the hour for India. The Quantum Hub's Kumar cited China's technological progress as an example. 'The high-volume, low-margin secondary innovation markets also need to be captured. But, as China has proved, gains made in innovation at scale need to be reinvested into fundamental innovation," he said. 'China is a clear example of how that works, and we need to replicate this in India more efficiently."

The Hindu

a day ago

• The Hindu

Kerala Sasthra Sahithya Parishad opposes plan to introduce uniform Kerala Studies course

The Kerala Sasthra Sahithya Parishad (KSSP) has sought the intervention of Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan and Higher Education Minister R. Bindu over the introduction of a common curriculum on Kerala Studies in universities. In a memorandum jointly issued by KSSP general secretary P.V. Divakaran and president T.K. Meerabai, the organisation opposed the proposed plan to prepare a common curriculum across all universities based on a book published by the Kerala State Higher Education Council (KSHEC). Outlining its demands, KSSP stated its opposition towards a unified curriculum or textbook-centric approach for Kerala Studies. Such a stance could undermine the academic autonomy and restrict the ability of universities to reflect regional, cultural and historical diversity of their syllabi. It also stressed that the curriculum should go beyond tracing the conventional span of the State from its prehistoric hunter-gatherer roots to the Renaissance movements, and must include narratives of progressive democratic movements, the communist movement and the formation of modern Kerala. The move to rope in a private firm to publish the textbook has also come in for criticism. Calling the decision a violation of established academic procedures, the organisation demanded the restoration of due academic processes involving the Board of Studies and Academic Councils. Citing that most universities have already developed Kerala Studies content, KSSP urged the government to allow the statutory bodies of universities to independently refine these modules in consultation with the KSHEC, rather than imposing centrally produced content.