Battery Revolution: Emerging Technologies to Capture 25% Market Share by 2035
DUBLIN--(BUSINESS WIRE)--May 16, 2025--
The 'Global Advanced Li-ion and Beyond Lithium Batteries Market 2025-2035" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.
The battery technology landscape is undergoing a profound transformation as the industry shifts from conventional lithium-ion solutions toward advanced chemistries and beyond-lithium alternatives.
While lithium-ion (Li-ion) technology currently dominates the global battery market with over 99% market share, emerging technologies are poised to capture approximately >25% of the market by 2035.
This report provides an in-depth analysis of both advanced Li-ion batteries and beyond-lithium technologies that will revolutionize energy storage across multiple applications from 2025 to 2035.
Report contents include:
Competitive Landscape.
The report profiles over 350 companies across the battery value chain, from established manufacturers to innovative start-ups, with detailed analysis of their technology positioning, production capabilities, and strategic partnerships.
A selection of companies mentioned in this report includes:
For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/i9sdlf
About ResearchAndMarkets.com
ResearchAndMarkets.com is the world's leading source for international market research reports and market data. We provide you with the latest data on international and regional markets, key industries, the top companies, new products and the latest trends.
View source version on businesswire.com:https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250516249094/en/
CONTACT: ResearchAndMarkets.com
Laura Wood, Senior Press Manager
[email protected]
For E.S.T Office Hours Call 1-917-300-0470
For U.S./ CAN Toll Free Call 1-800-526-8630
For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900
KEYWORD:
INDUSTRY KEYWORD: TECHNOLOGY BATTERIES
SOURCE: Research and Markets
Copyright Business Wire 2025.
PUB: 05/16/2025 08:51 AM/DISC: 05/16/2025 08:51 AM
http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250516249094/en
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News24
19 minutes ago
- News24
Private assets are on the rise - what you need to know
While private investors currently allocate only up to 5% of their portfolios to private markets, Nathalie Krekis anticipates that the gap with institutional investors will narrow significantly over time and private markets will become commonplace. Over the next few years, individual investors are expected to increase their allocation to private markets, in some cases potentially approaching levels seen by various types of institutional investors. The compelling return history for private market investment is clearly a key motivator for these allocations. Schroders Capital research shows this is the main reason institutional investors enter private markets, and we have no reason to believe individual investors think any differently. Over the past five years, smaller clients have also been offered more options to invest in private markets thanks to product development, changing regulations and technological advancements. New regulated fund structures such as the long-term asset fund (LTAF) in the UK, the European long-term investment fund (ELTIF) in Europe and UCI part II have been a game changer for accessing private markets, as well as for the increased use and further development of evergreen open-ended funds. While promoting access to private markets with these new structures, regulators around the world have also been tightening rules to protect smaller investors. For example, in the UK, clients must confirm they meet certain investment criteria, undergo a suitability review by their financial advisor, and have a 24-hour cooling-off period to reconsider their decisions. The South African regulator requires investors to meet the criteria of a qualified investor as per the definition in section 96(1)(a) of the South African Companies Act, No. 71 or 2008 as amended, and/or to have a minimum of R1 million to invest in terms of section 96(1)(b) of the South African Companies Act. Bain & Company estimates that by 2032, 30% of global assets under management could be allocated to alternatives, with a large chunk in private assets. While private investors currently allocate only up to 5% of their portfolios to private markets, we anticipate that the gap with institutional investors will narrow significantly over time and private markets will become commonplace. The growing appeal of private markets Of course, returns aren't the only reason to use private assets, even if it's high on the client agenda. Characteristics like stable income and genuine diversification, which have the potential to significantly enhance overall portfolio resilience, add to the appeal. It is also about the opportunity set. In public markets, there is an increasing concentration of stocks, with more than 30% of the S&P 500 dominated by just a handful of companies, leading to a narrower range of options. In contrast, the number of private companies, and those staying private for longer, continues to grow. Private companies in the US with revenues of $250 million or more now account for 86% of the total. Additionally, the number of public listings in the US has more than halved over the past 20 years compared to the period from 1980 to 1999, highlighting the shift towards private market opportunities (see chart below). In South Africa, the last five years have seen an average of 24 companies delist from local stock exchanges on an annual basis although 2024 showed a significant slowdown in this rate as only 11 companies exited the public market. The Johannesburg Stock Exchange is also highly concentrated with a few large companies dominating the index. And it's not just a matter of numbers. Private companies tend to be more agile and innovative in their operations compared to public companies, and they can access opportunities in sectors where public companies have limited or no reach. For example, the new US tariff policies are likely to affect both public and private companies, particularly those vulnerable to supply chain disruptions. However, private companies tend to be more flexible in restructuring their supply chains to adapt to these changes, potentially avoiding cost increases. Nevertheless, companies heavily impacted may still face higher costs, affecting profitability, and therefore valuations and deals. Public markets continue to shrink, and companies are staying private for longer Once the decision to allocate to the asset class has been made – what next? How do investors actually start their private assets journey, and what can they expect the journey to look like? Pacing is different One of the key differences with private asset investment is in the pacing of capital deployment. With no immediate secondary market to provide liquidity, allocations can and should be structured to, in a sense, create their own liquidity. Structured correctly, private asset allocations can become 'self-sustaining' over time, with distributions and income funding new investments to maintain a target allocation. What does that mean in practice? Many fund managers, or general partners (GPs), raise capital every year in what are known as 'vintages'. Each vintage represents a discrete fund that has an investment phase and a harvesting phase. The investment phase is when the capital is put to work, typically over a period of about 3-5 years depending on which part of the private assets market it's in, and what the market backdrop is like. The harvesting phase is when the invested assets are exited, generating capital that can be distributed back to investors. This is typically around 5-7 years after the investment is first made in what is known as an 'exit'. Private equity managers will use the term 'exits' because, while selling an asset is an option, it's only one of many options available. The routes to exit are varied but most commonly the company is either floated in an IPO (initial public offering), sold to another corporate buyer or private equity investor, or sold into a continuation vehicle. In private debt, the fund managers (there is often a cohort of lenders) will structure lending in such a way that the capital is returned at the end of a defined timeframe, having received the cashflows. These cashflows can then be used to refinance ('re-up' is a term often used) subsequent vintages. In recent years new exit routes have emerged, especially in the secondary market with the continuation vehicles mentioned above . That's because these deals allow the GPs to provide a liquidity mechanism to their existing investors, the limited partners (LPs), while at the same time holding onto key assets for longer to maximise value. Continuation funds have evolved to become a common strategy for GPs to hold onto high-performing assets, or pools of assets, beyond the life of the original fund. Vintage years, consistent deployment and the impact on returns A vintage year allocation approach has the benefit of mitigating the risk associated with market timing. Despite our optimism for the mid- to long-term outlook for private assets, the near term is undoubtedly going to be challenging for many investors, and keeping up a steady investment pace may be difficult. While exit and fundraising activity seemed to have bottomed out in 2024 following a prolonged slowdown since 2022, risks and uncertainty in markets have increased sharply since the start of the year. As we pointed out above, this is mainly due to the uncertainties caused by the US government policy changes and the impacts these may have on economies and markets. In addition to broader concerns over performance, when markets fall, some investors face the 'denominator effect'. Private assets tend to correct less than other more liquid asset classes due to the way they are valued, so their relative weight in an investor's portfolio tends to increase when markets fall sharply. This can limit investors' ability to make new investments into the asset class and maintain a determined percentage allocation. Nevertheless, research suggests investors don't have to shy away from new investments in periods of crisis or recession. A recent analysis from Schroders Capital shows that private equity consistently outperformed listed markets during the largest market crises of the past 25 years. Despite challenges such as high interest rates, inflation, and economic volatility, private equity outperformed public markets and experienced smaller drawdowns, with distributions becoming less volatile over time. Meanwhile, recession years tend to yield vintages that perform exceptionally well. Structurally, funds can benefit from 'time diversification', where capital is deployed over several years, rather than all in one go. This allows funds raised in recession years to pick up assets at depressed values as the recession plays out. The assets can then pursue an exit later on, in the recovery phase, when valuations are rising. For example, our analysis shows that the average internal rate of return ('IRR') of private equity funds raised in a recession year has been higher than for funds raised in the years in the run up to a recession – which, at the time, probably felt like much happier times. For private debt and real estate, there are similar effects. For infrastructure, the effects should also show a similar pattern; however, longer-term data is limited in this part of the asset class. Private equity vintage performance (average of median net IRRs) Appropriate allocations to private assets will, of course, vary by client and will always be led by overall suitability. Important factors such as a client's overall income and expenditure, time horizon, investment understanding/experience, appetite for borrowing and ability to tolerate illiquidity are all factors we consider when deciding on the exposure to private assets. For the sake of illustration though, let us assume all individual clients fall within one of four risk brackets: cautious, balanced, growth and aggressive. What would the investment pacing look like for the private asset allocation? For a client on a growth risk mandate (this would mean a typical exposure to equities of between 50-80%) who has a good understanding of investments – a target allocation of 20% might be appropriate across private debt, private equity and real estate. How private assets could fit within a portfolio It's important to note that the nature of investing in private assets means that allocations should be built up over time to ensure vintage diversification, and that we explicitly recommend diversification by investment and vintage. While we want to diversify by asset class, we also suggest spreading investments across a range of structures. This usually depends on the investable assets and the investor's ability to accept illiquidity, noting that private investors could benefit from different structure types. For example, clients with large investable asset bases and that have the ability to lock up their money for 10 years plus, can use the traditional routes, such as closed-ended structures. Otherwise, clients with lower minimum entry points and with an uncertain time horizon are able to use 'evergreen' open-ended funds: these funds do not have a pre-determined lifespan and can run in perpetuity, recycling investment proceeds and raising new capital as required. While clients investing in evergreen funds are able to access their money periodically, they need to understand these are still long-term commitments and that there are established limits and rules on when and how much they can withdraw. It's important that investors be educated and prepared for their allocation to be left untouched for an extended period. Private equity funds typically run for at least seven years, during which time the allocation will not be liquid. The realisation of the assets will also take several years, tapering down in the same way the allocation is gradually ramped up. Nathalie Krekis, portfolio director, Cazenove Capital, part of the Schroders Group News24 encourages freedom of speech and the expression of diverse views. The views of columnists published on News24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of News24. Disclaimer: News24 cannot be held liable for any investment decisions made based on the advice given by independent financial service providers. Under the ECT Act and to the fullest extent possible under the applicable law, News24 disclaims all responsibility or liability for any damages whatsoever resulting from the use of this site in any manner.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AI chatbots and TikTok reshape how young people get their daily news
Artificial intelligence is changing the way people get their news, with more readers turning to chatbots like ChatGPT to stay up to date. At the same time, nearly half of young adults now rely on platforms such as TikTok as their main source of news. The findings come from the Reuters Institute's annual Digital News Report, released this week. The Oxford University-affiliated study surveyed nearly 97,000 people across 48 countries to track how global news habits are shifting. The study found that a notable number of people are using AI chatbots to read headlines and get news updates – a shift described by the institute's director Mitali Mukherjee as a 'new chapter' in the way audiences consume information. While only 7 percent overall say they use AI chatbots to find news, that number rises among younger audiences – 12 percent of under-35s and 15 percent of under-25s now rely on tools such as OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini or Meta's Llama for their news. 'Personalised, bite-sized and quick – that's how younger audiences want their news, and AI tools are stepping in to deliver exactly that,' Mukherjee noted. Beyond reading headlines, many readers are turning to AI for more complex tasks: 27 percent use it to summarise news articles, 24 percent for translations, and 21 percent for recommendations on what to read next. Nearly one in five have quizzed AI directly about current events. (with newswires) Read more on RFI EnglishRead also:AI steals spotlight from Nobel winners who highlight Its power and risksAI showcase pays off for France, but US tech scepticism endures'By humans, for humans': French dubbing industry speaks out against AI threat
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Rolls-Royce plots market domination after ‘Turban Tufan's' turnaround
Five years after Rolls-Royce nearly collapsed under the weight of Covid, the British manufacturing giant is plotting a new era of industrial domination. Under the guidance of boss Tufan Erginbilgiç, nicknamed 'Turbo', Rolls has overcome an era of financial chaos and mismanagement to launch a renewed assault on the jet engine and nuclear power markets. As he declared the next stage of the company's strategy last week, the former BP executive said Rolls's revival will soon contribute 'the single biggest item for economic growth for the UK'. It is far from the gloomy message he told workers after landing as chief executive in 2023, when he described the engineering giant as a 'burning platform'. Speaking at the Paris Air Show last week, he said Rolls is stepping up plans to make engines for the short-haul planes that dominate air travel, after quitting the sector more than a decade ago. To some degree, the announcement encapsulated the radical turnaround at Britain's leading manufacturer, which now has a market capitalisation of £75bn, seven times higher than when Erginbilgiç took over in January 2023. He said talks with potential partners have intensified as Rolls aims to re-enter the £1.6 trillion short-haul aviation market, which will see the company building and maintaining engines for the likes of Ryanair. At the same time, its selection this month as preferred bidder to supply small modular reactors (SMRs) to the new Great British Nuclear has also given Rolls a critical first-mover advantage in the sector, according to the decision has already unleashed huge export interest as nations examine SMRs as a solution to requirements for cheaper power, energy security and 78pc of the SMR supply chain can be satisfied in Britain, he said, compared with just 60pc for offshore together, the two initiatives promise to create about 55,000 jobs across the supply chain, 40,000 of those in the aerospace sector and the rest in nuclear. Airline bosses hailed the return of Rolls to the short-haul market, particularly as it will pile pressure on the incumbents Pratt & Whitney (P&W) and General Electric (GE).József Váradi, the chief executive of low-cost carrier Wizz Air, urged Rolls to avoid teaming up with other engine manufacturers and instead go it alone. His support is perhaps unsurprising after Wizz has suffered years of disruption from defective engines made by P& said: 'I would welcome Rolls-Royce more as a third party as opposed to a joint venture party with one of the current players.'There will be a hell of a lot of growth in narrow-body planes in the future, so I definitely think it can bear more than two. A tripartite market would do a lot better for us.'Bringing a new engine to the market would cost £3bn, according to Erginbilgiç, who called on the Government to provide support matching the levels received by GE and P&W in the US. In return, he said, Rolls would deliver 'the single biggest item for economic growth for the UK'.Rolls's new short-haul turbine would need to produce about 30,000 pounds of thrust, compared with almost 100,000 for its larger A350 engine. He suggested this could be achieved by combining the core of a business jet engine with technology from the ongoing Ultrafan has said it plans to produce a demonstrator engine in two years, hopefully coinciding with Airbus and Boeing's plans to launch new single-aisle models before the end of the Váradi warned that a new engine is likely to come under intense scrutiny in light of problems suffered by the current generation of turbines, as supply chain constraints have triggered maintenance delays and safety concerns. He said: 'The regulator is going to be a lot more rigid and prudent than before, given all the issues in the industry. This is a long game with no room for shortcuts.'Erginbilgiç said he is wedded to a traditional design for the new engine, and has no plans to embrace the 'open rotor' approach being pursued by GE, which features large, curved propeller blades with no casing and aims to replicate the lower fuel burn of turboprop planes. While an open rotor might deliver a 20pc gain in efficiency compared with current engines, Rolls believes it can get within 2pc of that with a more conventional design at far less said: 'Our competitor is a very capable company. But you are changing everything: the aircraft, the engine, so the risk profile is by definition a lot greater.' Boeing has also questioned the use of an open rotor to power the next generation of single-aisle planes, while Erginbilgiç said there are concerns about the additional noise and whether people will want to look out of the window and see such an unusual said: 'I'm not sure passengers would like to see a big fan. Not everybody is comfortable with flying so you need to make it as comfortable and safe as possible.' Meanwhile, Erginbilgiç, who was formerly a partner at private equity firm Global Infrastructure Partners, said that the company's SMR venture is now ready for take off after receiving government said the biggest export market is likely to be in Europe, 'where nuclear is the only solution if you want net zero and supply security'. Rolls already has a reactor contract in the Czech Republic and expects to sign a deal in Sweden soon, though the chief executive said that Rolls must carefully manage its order book. Construction of each SMR will take five years initially, he said, with two under way at any given said: 'We need to build our reputation, then business will come. It's not a new technology, but it's a new application. While SMRs are not the same as 'big nuclear,' he said, 'this industry doesn't have a great track record and we don't want to join that group'. However, he said that Rolls-Royce, which has 42,000 staff, holds a crucial advantage in both gas turbines and modular said: 'Only three companies in the world can do [jet engines] and barriers to entry are enormous. 'And if we are not the world leader in SMRs, we did something wrong, because there is no other private company in the world with our nuclear capability.' Asked if he had considered moving on with Rolls-Royce now ready to embark on a new phase in its 120-year history, the 65-year-old said he was 'very committed' and not tempted by potential lucrative rewards elsewhere. He said: 'It's not about money. If money was important, I wouldn't have come from private equity, trust me. I'm here because I would like to be here.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. Sign in to access your portfolio
