Japan, South Korea mark 60 years of ties despite tensions, uncertainty

Japan and South Korea are marking the 60th anniversary of the normalisation of their diplomatic relations Sunday. The two Asian powers, rivals and neighbours, have often had little to celebrate, much of their rancour linked to Japan's brutal colonial rule of Korea in the early 20th century.
Things have gotten better in recent years, but both nations, each a strong ally of the United States now face political uncertainty and a growing unease about the future of their ties.
Here's a look at one of Northeast Asia's most crucial relationships, from both capitals, by two correspondents from The Associated Press.
The view from Seoul
South Korea's new liberal president, Lee Jae Myung, is determined to break sharply from the policies of his disgraced predecessor, Yoon Suk Yeol, who now faces a trial on charges of leading an insurrection over his imposition of martial law in December.
Relations with Japan, however, are one area where Lee, who describes himself as a pragmatist in foreign policy, may find himself cautiously building on Yoon's approach.
Before his removal from office in April, the conservative former president tried to repair relations with Japan. Yoon wanted to also tighten the countries' three-way security cooperation with Washington to counter North Korean nuclear threats.
In 2023, Yoon announced a South Korea-funded compensation plan for colonial-era forced laborers. That decision caused a strong backlash from victims and their supporters, who had demanded direct payments from Japanese companies and a fresh apology from Tokyo.
Yoon's outreach boosted tourism and business ties, but there's still lingering resentment in South Korea that Japan failed to reciprocate Seoul's diplomatic concession by addressing historical grievances more sincerely.
While advocating for pragmatism and problem-solving in foreign policy, Lee has also long criticized Japan for allegedly clinging to its imperialist past and blamed that for hurting cooperation between the countries.
Some experts say the stability of the countries' improved ties could soon be tested, possibly around the Aug. 15 anniversary of Korea's liberation from Japanese colonial rule at the end of World War II, when Lee is expected to publicly address the nation's painful history with Japan.
Some in Seoul want Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba to mark the anniversary with a stronger statement of remorse over Japan's wartime past to put bilateral ties on firmer ground.
While wartime history will always linger in the background of Seoul-Tokyo relations, Lee and Ishiba may face a more immediate concern: US President Donald Trump's rising tariffs and other America-first trade policies.
South Korea's Hankyoreh newspaper in an editorial this week called for South Korea and Japan to collaborate immediately on a joint response to Trump's policies, arguing that the proposed US tariffs on automobiles pose similar threats to both countries' trade-dependent economies.
The view from Tokyo
Ishiba, eager to improve ties with Seoul, has acknowledged Japan's wartime aggression and has shown more empathy to Asian victims than his recent predecessors.
His first encounter with Lee seemed positive, despite worries in Japan about South Korea's stance under a liberal leader known for attacks on Japan's wartime past.
Lee, in that meeting with Ishiba at the G7, likened the two countries to neighbours sharing the same front yard and called for building a future-oriented relationship that moves beyond their small differences and disagreements.
Ishiba and Lee agreed to closely communicate and to cooperate on a range of issues, including North Korea's nuclear and missile development.
Under a 1965 normalization treaty, Japan provided $500 million in economic assistance to South Korea, saying all wartime compensation issues were settled.
However, historical issues including forced labour and sexual abuse of Korean women during the war have disrupted ties over the decades, while South Korea has become an Asian power and a rival to Japan, and while Tokyo, especially during the late Prime Minister Shinzo Abe 's rule, has promoted revisionist views.
Japan has since offered atonement money twice for the so-called comfort women, an earlier semi-private fund and a second one unilaterally dissolved by former South Korean President Moon Jae-in's liberal government.
Things have improved in recent years, and Japan is watching to see whether Lee sticks with his conservative predecessor's more conciliatory diplomacy or returns to the confrontation that marked previous liberal governments.
Cooperation between the two sides is more essential than ever to overcome their shared problems such as worsening regional security and Trump's tariffs that have shaken free trade systems, Japan's largest-circulation newspaper Yomiuri said in a recent editorial.
At a 60th anniversary reception in Tokyo, Ishiba said that he sees a bright future in the relationship. He expressed hope also for cooperation in common challenges such as low birth rates and declining populations.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Business Standard

2 hours ago

• Business Standard

Markets may dip as US strikes on Iran stoke oil fears, global volatility

Indian markets may open lower on Monday due to fears of crude oil disruption from the West Asia though domestic institutional investors may support valuations Sundar Sethuraman Mumbai Listen to This Article Investors may have to brace for a spike in volatility on Monday following the US military's direct involvement in the Israel–Iran conflict over the weekend. Experts believe benchmark Sensex and Nifty may correct 1–1.5 per cent if oil prices surge and Asian markets fall due to the widening of the West Asia conflict. However, domestic institutional investor (DII) buying could cushion the fall. Last week, the domestic markets had gained over 1.5 per cent even as hostilities between Iran and Israel escalated. On Saturday, President Donald Trump announced targeted strikes on three of Iran's key nuclear facilities—Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan—using

India.com

2 hours ago

• India.com

Meet Noel Tata's glamorous bahu who is heir to Rs 134880000000 business empire, Ratan Tata was her…, her name is...

Meet Noel Tata's glamorous bahu who is heir to Rs 134880000000 business empire, Ratan Tata was her…, her name is... Following the death of Ratan Tata, Noel Tata was designated by the trustees as the new Chairman of Tata Trusts on October 11, 2024. This designation attracted much public scrutiny, with many inquiring about Noel Tata and taking to the internet to learn more about him. More curiosity grew on the internet about Noel Tata's background, education, and family. Interest grew around Noel's wife, Aloo Mistry, and her brother, Cyrus Mistry, especially in light of their past grievances with Ratan Tata. With this transition in leadership, the Tata family has been a topic of conversation once again. Meet Noel Tata's glamorous bahu who is heir to Rs 134880000000 business empire Noel Tata, a prominent member of the Tata family, has three children: Leah, Maya, and Neville Tata. The youngest of the three, Neville Tata, is a graduate from the Bayes Business School and is following in the footsteps of two of India's most prominent business families. Manasi Kirloskar is married to… Neville is married to Manasi Kirloskar, a dynamic business leader from the Kirloskar Group. Born on August 7, 1990, Manasi stepped into leadership after the sudden demise of her father, Vikram Kirloskar, who passed away from a heart attack at the age of 64. In November 2022, she was appointed Chairperson of Kirloskar Joint Venture Private Limited, one of the most important company members of the 130-year-old Kirloskar Group, worth ₹13,844 crore at present. Manasi Kirloskar is the daughter-in-law of Noel Tata and Aloo Mistry and thus connected to both the Tata and Kirloskar legacies of industrialists. Aloo Mistry is also the sister of Cyrus Mistry, the former chairman of the Tata Group who passed away recently. Manasi got her education from the Rhode Island School of Design in the USA, where she earned her Fine Arts degree. Manasi is married to Neville Tata, and they have two children, linking the legacies of two of India's influential business families. Manasi Kirloskar is related to Cyrus Mistry! 'Ms Manasi Tata, a graduate from the Rhode Island School of Design in the US, is well conversant in Toyota manufacturing processes and with the Japanese work culture. A fifth-generation scion of the Kirloskar empire, Ms. Manasi holds art very close to her heart and her NGO, 'Caring with Colour' leverages this passion of hers, works with Government schools in three districts of Karnataka,' reads the statement on the website of Toyotabharat. Manasi Kirloskar's mother, Geetanjali Kirloskar, serves as the Chairman and Managing Director of Kirloskar Systems Private Limited. Manasi, following her mother, has established her own path in business and in the arts. A gifted painter, she presented her first art exhibition at the age of 13. In addition to her business and creative endeavors, Manasi enjoys swimming. In addition to being an accomplished businesswoman in the capacity of head of Toyota Kirloskar Motor and Toyota Kirloskar Auto Parts, Manasi Kirloskar is well known for her sophisticated style and for being present in social and fashion circles. Noel Tata is the half-brother of Ratan Tata, having the same father, Naval Tata. Manasi Kirloskar is married to Neville Tata, who is Noel Tata's son, making Manasi Noel's daughter-in-law. While Manasi is now part of the Tata family, she does not have a direct familial connection with Ratan Tata other than being related to the extended Tata family.

Time of India

2 hours ago

• Time of India

Iran-Israel war & US bombings: Should possible Strait of Hormuz closure worry India about its oil supply? Explained in 10 points

India's reliance on crude oil imports is at approximately 90%, with Middle Eastern nations supplying more than 40% of these imports. (AI image) Iran-Israel war & Strait of Hormuz: With escalating tensions between Iran and Israel, especially after the US bombed nuclear facilities in Iran earlier today, there are rising fears of the Strait of Hormuz being closed. The Strait of Hormuz is a crucial maritime passage handling 20% of global oil and gas transportation. According to state-run media, Iran's Parliament has approved the closure of Strait of Hormuz and the final decision will be taken by Iran's Supreme National Security Council. What will be the impact of the potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz? And importantly, how will India be hit? We take a look: Why is the Strait of Hormuz important? The Strait of Hormuz serves as a crucial maritime connection between the Persian Gulf and the Arabian Sea, extending into the Indian Ocean. This vital waterway, with its narrowest section at just 21 miles (33 kilometres), has Iran to the north and the Arabian Peninsula to the south. The navigable channels are considerably restricted, extending only two miles in either direction, which creates vulnerability to potential blockades and hostile actions. The Strait of Hormuz holds immense strategic and economic significance, particularly as a mandatory route for oil vessels departing from Persian Gulf ports. This maritime passage facilitates the transportation of one-fifth of global oil and gas supplies. Statistics from the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) indicate that in 2024, the daily transport volume reached 20.3 million barrels of oil and 290 million cubic metres of LNG. The major oil-producing nations of the region - Saudi Arabia, Iraq, UAE, Qatar, Iran, and Kuwait - rely on this passage for their exports. Whilst historical concerns about disruptions to Persian Gulf energy flows majorly affected Western nations, particularly the US and Europe, in today's situation the implications would most significantly impact China and Asian countries. Based on EIA data quoted by PTI, Asian nations received 8% of crude oil and condensate shipments through the Strait of Hormuz in 2022. India, China, Japan, and South Korea collectively made up 67% of total flows during 2022 and the firstl six months of 2023. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Cuối cùng, chơi miễn phí game chiến thuật hay nhất 2025! Sea of Conquest Phát ngay Undo Also Read | 'Highest in two years': India increases oil imports from Russia, US amidst Iran-Israel war; why it's about strategic positioning, not panic India's reliance on crude oil imports is at approximately 90%, with Middle Eastern nations, whose exports pass through the Strait of Hormuz, supplying more than 40% of these imports. EIA reports indicate that during the first quarter of 2025, China's crude imports via the Strait of Hormuz reached 5.4 million bpd. India received 2.1 million bpd, whilst South Korea and Japan imported 1.7 million bpd and 1.6 million bpd respectively. The IEA has emphasised that any interference with the flow through the Strait would significantly impact global oil markets. How will the closure of Strait of Hormuz impact India? India imports 5.5 million barrels per day (bpd) of crude oil, with 2 million bpd passing through this strategic waterway. However, experts suggest that India's position remains secure due to its diversified import strategy, with alternative suppliers including Russia, the United States and Brazil available to maintain supply continuity. The Russian oil supply remains unaffected by Hormuz-related disruptions, as it uses alternative routes including the Suez Canal, Cape of Good Hope, or Pacific Ocean pathways. Similarly, supplies from the US, West Africa, and Latin America, though more expensive, serve as viable alternatives. Regarding gas supplies, India's primary supplier Qatar delivers without using the Strait of Hormuz for Indian shipments. Additional LNG sources from Australia, Russia and the US remain accessible regardless of any Strait of Hormuz closure . However, analysts predict that increasing tensions in this significant energy supply region could cause short-term price fluctuations, potentially pushing oil prices towards $80 per barrel. India relies on imports for 90% of its crude oil requirements and sources approximately half of its natural gas from international markets. The imported crude oil undergoes refining to produce petrol and diesel, while natural gas serves multiple purposes including power generation, fertiliser production, CNG for vehicles, and domestic cooking gas supply. India obtains approximately 40% of its oil requirements from Middle Eastern countries including Iraq, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Kuwait, with shipments travelling through the Strait of Hormuz. Russia has become a significant oil supplier to India, with current imports exceeding the total imports from Middle Eastern nations. According to preliminary trade data from Kpler, Indian refineries imported 2-2.2 million bpd of Russian crude oil in June, surpassing the combined imports of about 2 million bpd from Iraq, Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Kuwait, marking the highest level in two years. Additionally, imports from the United States increased to 439,000 bpd in June, showing substantial growth from 280,000 bpd in the previous month. Although current supplies remain stable, vessel movements indicate a reduction in crude loadings from the Middle East in the forthcoming period. Vessel operators are showing reluctance to dispatch empty tankers (ballasters) to the Gulf, with numbers decreasing from 69 to 40, whilst MEG-bound signals from the Gulf of Oman have reduced by half. Kpler reports quoted by PTI indicate potential tightening of MEG supplies in the immediate future, possibly necessitating adjustments to India's procurement strategy, noting significant changes in India's import patterns over the past two years. In the event of escalating tensions or temporary Hormuz disruptions, Russian oil supplies could increase, providing both availability and cost advantages. India has options to diversify its oil imports from the United States, Nigeria, Angola, and Brazil, despite higher transportation expenses. On June 13, Oil Minister Hardeep Singh Puri confirmed India's sufficient energy reserves for upcoming months, with capability to access alternative sources if needed. India can utilise its strategic petroleum reserves, which cover 9-10 days of imports, to manage any supply gaps. To control inflation during price surges, particularly for diesel and LPG, the government maintains the option of implementing price subsidies. Will oil prices rise? Global oil prices saw a sharp increase after Israel launched attacks targeting Iranian military commanders, homes, military installations and nuclear facilities on June 13. Iran retaliated by firing numerous ballistic missiles. This heightened tension caused oil prices to rise substantially, as concerns grew about geopolitical instability and potential supply chain disruptions. The benchmark Brent crude oil has reached $77 per barrel, marking a 10 per cent increase since the onset of hostilities. According to oil market specialists at Goldman Sachs, prices could potentially rise beyond $90 should the situation deteriorate further. Citigroup analysts project that Brent crude values might approach $90 per barrel in the event of a closure of the Strait of Hormuz. The credit rating organisation Icra indicated that any intensification of regional tensions could have considerable effects on oil prices. Higher oil prices would reduce the profits that state-owned retailers IOC, BPCL and HPCL have built up by maintaining stable retail prices despite previous decreases in international rates. Also Read | Iran-Israel conflict: India keeping tab on Chabahar Port, International North-South Transport Corridor; why it's important According to Jain of Yes Securities, oil markets remain adequately supplied, supported by OPEC's 4 million barrels per day spare capacity and a pre-conflict global surplus of 0.9 million bpd. Additional stability comes from US shale production. Global security analysts deem an extended blockage of the Strait of Hormuz unlikely, given the US naval forces in the region. Any such action by Iran would not only impact the oil exports of Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Kuwait and Qatar but would also hamper its own export capabilities. Despite aggressive rhetoric from Iranian conservatives and state media predictions of oil prices reaching $400 per barrel, the international trade analysis organisation Kpler suggests the probability of a complete blockade remains minimal, citing significant deterrents for Iran. Such an action would severely affect China, Iran's primary oil buyer, which sources 47 per cent of its maritime crude imports from the Middle East Gulf region. As the world's second-largest economy, China stands as the principal purchaser of Iranian oil, reportedly consuming more than three-quarters of Iran's oil exports. The fact that Iran relies heavily on the Strait of Hormuz for its oil shipments through Kharg Island, which manages 96% of its exports, makes any self-imposed blockade counterproductive to its interests. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now