Harvey Weinstein does not plan to testify at sex crimes retrial
That means jurors soon will get the case against the former movie studio boss who propelled the #MeToo movement against sexual misconduct.
The trial will move on to closing arguments on Tuesday without testimony from Weinstein, Arthur Aidala said on Sunday night.
The court handles other cases on Mondays.
It is unclear whether jury deliberations would begin on Tuesday afternoon or Wednesday.
It was a fraught decision for Weinstein, who has never answered questions in open court about any of the accusations women have made. He did not testify at previous trials in New York and California and was convicted in both.
He denies the allegations, and lawyer Mr Aidala has said that Weinstein was giving a lot of thought to whether to take the stand this time.
While his California appeal winds on, Weinstein won a new trial in his New York rape and sexual assault case when the state's highest court overturned his 2020 conviction.
He is charged in New York with raping Jessica Mann in 2013 and forcing oral sex on Miriam Haley and Kaja Sokola, separately, in 2006.
Ms Mann was an actor and hairstylist, Ms Haley a production assistant and producer, and Ms Sokola a model who aspired to an acting career.
All three women have testified for days at the retrial, giving emotional and graphic accounts of what they say they endured from a powerbroker who suggested he would help them achieve their show-business dreams, but then manoeuvred them into private settings and preyed on them.
His lawyers have argued that anything that happened between him and his accusers was consensual.
ADVERTISEMENT
In the US, defendants in criminal cases are not obligated to testify, and many decide not to, for various reasons.
Among them: the prospect of being questioned by prosecutors.
Weinstein has been watching the New York retrial intently from the defence table, sometimes shaking his head at accusers' testimony and often leaning over to one or another of his lawyers to convey his thoughts.
One of the lawyers, Mr Aidala, said outside court on Thursday that Weinstein thought a lot of holes had been poked in the accusers' accounts, but that he also was pondering whether jurors would feel they needed to hear from him.
The jury has heard from a few other defence witnesses — one of them via a transcript read by court employees.
That witness, Talita Maia, testified at the 2020 trial but was unavailable this time, so jurors instead got a reading Friday of her earlier testimony.
One court stenographer voiced the 2020 lawyers' questions, while another stenographer sat in the witness box and rendered Ms Maia's answers, at times with emphasis.
Ms Maia and Ms Mann were roommates and friends in 2013, but later fell out.
According to Ms Maia, Ms Mann never mentioned in those days that Weinstein had hurt her in any way.
Both Ms Maia and another witness, Thomas Richards, met up with Ms Mann and Weinstein shortly after Ms Mann has said she was raped.
Both witnesses testified that they saw nothing amiss.
Mr Richards, who was subpoenaed to appear and said he did not want to be seen as a Weinstein supporter, recalled Ms Mann and Weinstein having a 'friendly conversation' at a meal he shared with them that day.
Ms Mann testified earlier this month that she never told police or anyone else that Weinstein had sexually assaulted her because she didn't think she'd be believed, and she was scared of how he might react.
Weinstein's defence also brought in Ms Sokola's pal Helga Samuelsen, who also has friendly ties to the former producer.
Ms Samuelsen testified on Thursday that Weinstein visited Ms Sokola once and spent about a half- hour in a bedroom with her in a New York apartment the women briefly shared in 2005; Ms Sokola told jurors no such thing happened.
The Associated Press generally does not name people who say they have been sexually assaulted, but Ms Sokola, Ms Mann and Ms Haley have given their permission to be identified.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
5 days ago
- Irish Examiner
Sarah Harte: Same old crap being served up with a veneer of feminist empowerment
I was on the way back last week from moderating an event in Belfast, where we discussed the staggeringly high rates of domestic and sexual abuse north and south of the border. We also explored the obvious connection between the increasing number of increasingly younger victims and perpetrators of domestic and sexual abuse with the proliferation of porn. `Catching up with the news cycle for my column on the Belfast Enterprise train, two images in the news felt depressingly relevant to what we had been discussing at the '5 Books That Could Save Your Life' event. One was of Harvey Weinstein in a New York court last Wednesday in his wheelchair, having been found guilty of sexual assault. Weinstein was previously found guilty of rape in a separate trial in California and was sentenced to 16 years in that case. He also settled a civil case against him. At the heart of much of the testimony is the claim that, as a power player in the movie industry (he co-founded Miramax film studio), he used his "unfettered power" to abuse victims. Harvey Weinstein in state court in Manhattan for his retrial on June 5 where he was found guilty of sexual assault. Picture: Charly Triballeau via AP More generally, power and control lie at the heart of all domestic and sexual abuse cases. It is never simply a matter of the perpetrator's actions in a particular case. In the dock with him will be a deeply flawed ideology of masculinity that he has been sold from birth about his right to power and control over women. The decision by around 100 women to complain about a variety of sexual assaults and rapes by Weinstein (not all complaints ended in criminal charges) fuelled the #MeToo movement. Although it initially seemed like a watershed for the feminist movement, a backlash has been underway ever since. A counternarrative in the Weinstein case is that ambitious young women, with one eye to the main chance, took advantage of the casting couch to advance their careers. However, what that narrative does not consider is the vast power disparities between someone who is a gatekeeper and someone young, hoping to advance in their nascent film career, attending a meeting in a hotel room, crossing fingers and toes that they will emerge unscathed. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg announced last week that his office plans to retry the rape charge against Weinstein over an alleged 2013 attack on actress Jessica Mann. The cover of Sabrina Carpenter's 'Man's Best Friend' Album. This brings us to the second image of 26-year-old pop singer Sabrina Carpenter, released during the week to promote her forthcoming album, Man's Best Friend, which is set for release in August. On her knees, Carpenter is having her hair pulled by a faceless man in a suit (the suit presumably signifying power), mimicking a dog. This image upset domestic violence survivors and organisations, among others, including (hearteningly) some young fans who were savvy enough to decode and dislike the image. From Carpenter's point of view, who is trying to promote her album, it was successful, garnering plenty of attention and discourse on social media, where opinions seemed sharply divided. I stared at the picture and felt a fleeting moment of futility thinking "God, what's the point in sharing knowledge about domestic abuse, exploring solutions when marketing teams and photographers willingly pump this damaging crap out". The more traction images like this get, the more normalised they become. Carpenter in an interview with Rolling Stone magazine has spoken about how young female artists are picked apart publicly saying that 'girl power' and 'women supporting women' should be the reality but instead 'the second you see a picture of someone wearing a dress on a carpet you have to say everything mean about it in the first 30 seconds that you see it.' Hmmm. There is truth in what she says, but images are extremely powerful. We are more likely to remember information presented in images than information presented in text, a phenomenon known as the Picture Superiority Effect. We respond to and process visual data far faster than any other type of data. Sex positive Sabrina Carpenter's tours are big on 'horny choreography', sexual innuendoes complete with glittery bodysuits, garter belts and simulated sex. Fans lap it up. Her prerogative, you might say. Have fun, Sabrina. The whole sex positive idea that women should be free to express themselves sexually is both fascinating and complicated. Sex positive commentators would have it that cranks, often bitter middle-aged feminists past their sell-by date, try to police sexual expression and slut-shame other women. Women should be able to display their bodies as they wish. Somebody wrote on X (Twitter) that 'her [Carpenter] owning and doing what she wants with her body IS feminism'. There is something in this. I could never stand over the idea of promoting modesty to young women. I'm stone-cold on the concept of moral judgment and outrage. Down that way lies something we grew up with, or at its most extreme, what is being enforced by the Taliban in Afghanistan. However, questions like these are nuanced. There are often other dynamics behind a façade of sexual bravado, and 'anything goes' sex positivity is incredibly naïve without some component of critical analysis. Porn and violence against women The pornification of young people's psychosexual development is having disastrous effects. We see that vividly in the domestic and sexual abuse statistics. In January this year, Garda Commissioner Drew Harris spelt it out. Online violent pornography is driving much of the violence that gardaí are seeing in sexual assaults on women, rising levels of domestic violence, and normalising violence against women. Not all decisions we make around our sexuality are inherently empowering because not all decisions are made in a vacuum. The central question is when are choices rendered illusory by circumstances and socialisation? For example, you can say that a woman selling sex is autonomously doing so. Or you can dig deeper and say that no little girl says, 'When I grow up, I want to be a prostitute' so how did that little girl get there? And how did the guy who pays for her services get there? Carpenter's career is going gangbusters, but that image, far from satirising and subverting misogynistic tropes in a tongue-in-cheek way as some have claimed, reinforces them. It's up there with Nicole Kidman in 'Baby Girl', depicting a CEO down on her knees lapping milk from a dog bowl because a young male intern told her to. Fans argued the film advocated for middle-aged women's right to sexual pleasure. It received a standing ovation at the Venice Film Festival, accompanied by whoops and hollers. To me in both cases, a filmmaker and a photographer, try to get a rise out of us using tropes from porn. Successfully so, commercially, but you wonder at what cost culturally, because they are trafficking in a retrograde misogyny that does enormous damage, reinforcing women's submissiveness to men as the status quo. Veneer of female empowerment It's the same old sexist crap dished up in a shiny new package with a veneer of female empowerment. Fine for Carpenter and Kidman, whose success may protect them, but not so much for the regular Josephine, duped by the idea of individualist agency as a shield against exploitation. It also empowers future perpetrators to feel entitled to do to the 'bitch' what they want because an expectation is created. Messages like this is why we end up with characters like Weinstein, who was allowed to use his power in open sight to access young women's bodies in a consumerist neoliberal society that believes everything is for sale, baby, and why some young women end up finding themselves skirting a line between choice and coercion in a hotel room that ends in a courtroom.
RTÉ News
12-06-2025
- RTÉ News
Judge declares mistrial on Harvey Weinstein rape charge
The judge overseeing Harvey Weinstein's criminal case in Manhattan has declared a mistrial on a rape charge, one day after the former Hollywood movie mogul was convicted on a felony sex abuse charge. Justice Curtis Farber ended the nearly seven-week trial after the jury foreperson refused to continue deliberations, following multiple days of reported dissension among jurors that at times was aired in the courtroom. Prosecutors said they will try Weinstein a third time on the charge of third-degree rape, over his alleged mistreatment of the aspiring actress Jessica Mann in 2013. Justice Farber said the case will proceed to trial, over the objections of Weinstein's lawyer Arthur Aidala, and set a hearing for 2 July. 73-year-old Weinstein had pleaded not guilty and has denied assaulting anyone or having non-consensual sex. He faces up to 25 years in prison for his conviction on a charge of first-degree criminal sexual act, stemming from his alleged assault of former production assistant Miriam Haley in 2006. Weinstein was also acquitted of the same charge over his alleged assault in 2002 of Kaja Sokola, then a 16-year-old aspiring actress. He is separately appealing a 2022 rape conviction in California, for which he was sentenced to 16 years in prison. Weinstein's downfall began in 2017 and helped spark the #MeToo movement, which encouraged women to come forward with allegations of sexual misconduct by powerful men. A different jury in the Manhattan court had found Weinstein guilty in 2020 of raping Ms Mann and sexually assaulting Ms Haley, but New York state's highest court overturned that conviction last year. More than 100 women have accused him of misconduct. The mistrial came one day after the jury foreperson told Justice Farber that other jurors were shouting at and threatening him for refusing to change his vote on the rape count. The foreperson did not indicate publicly how he planned to vote, and Justice Farber sent jurors home to cool off. In closing arguments on 3 June, the prosecution told the 12 jurors that the evidence showed how Weinstein used his power and influence to trap and abuse women. The defence countered that the accusers lied on the witness stand out of spite after their consensual sexual encounters with the Oscar-winning producer failed to result in Hollywood stardom. Weinstein, who has had many health problems in recent years and attended the retrial in a wheelchair, co-founded the Miramax studio, whose hit movies included such Academy Award winners as "Shakespeare in Love" and "Pulp Fiction." Weinstein's own eponymous film studio filed for bankruptcy in March 2018, five months after sexual misconduct accusations against him became widely publicised.
Irish Examiner
12-06-2025
- Irish Examiner
Weinstein case judge declares mistrial on remaining rape charge amid jury issues
The judge in Harvey Weinstein's sex assaults trial declared a mistrial on the remaining rape charge after the jury foreperson said he would not continue deliberating. Deliberations ended on Thursday, a day after the jury delivered a partial verdict in Weinstein's sex crimes retrial. The jury foreperson said he would not continue deliberating after claiming he was bullied by another juror (Elizabeth Williams via AP) The jury got stuck on a third charge – a rape accusation dating to 2013. The foreperson complained on Wednesday that he felt bullied by another juror and said on Thursday he would not go back into the jury room. The panel convicted the former studio boss of one charge but acquitted him of another. Both of those charges concerned accusations of forcing oral sex on women in 2006. Those verdicts still stand. The jury of seven women and five men unanimously reached those decisions last Friday, the foreperson later told the judge. The verdict was delivered on Wednesday only because Judge Curtis Farber asked whether there was agreement on any of the charges. The third charge was a rape accusation involving a woman who also said she had a consensual relationship with the Oscar-winning producer. Under New York law, the third-degree rape charge carries a lesser penalty than the other two counts. Weinstein denies all the charges. In an unusual exchange with the judge, Harvey Weinstein told him the judge was 'endangering' him, saying 'I can't be judged by a situation that's going on like this' (Elizabeth Williams via AP) In an unusual exchange with the judge during some legal arguments before the partial verdict was disclosed on Wednesday, Weinstein insisted it was unfair to continue the trial after two jurors came forward with concerns about the proceedings. 'I can't be judged by a situation that's going on like this,' said Weinstein, 73, claiming the judge was 'endangering' him. Jury-room strains started leaking into public view on Friday when a juror asked to be excused because he felt another was being treated unfairly. Then on Monday, the foreperson complained that other jurors were pushing people to change their minds and talking about information beyond the charges. The man raised concerns again on Wednesday. In a closed-door discussion with prosecutors, defence lawyers and the judge, the foreperson said another juror was yelling at him for sticking to his opinion and at one point vowed, 'You going to see me outside.' 'I feel afraid inside there,' the foreperson told the judge and lawyers, according to a transcript. Weinstein's initial conviction five years ago seemed to cement the downfall of one of Hollywood's most powerful men in a pivotal moment for the #MeToo movement against sexual misconduct. Harvey Weinstein was convicted of one charge, was acquitted of another and a mistrial ruled on the third (Jefferson Siegel /The New York Times via AP, Pool) But that conviction was overturned last year and the case was sent back for retrial in the same Manhattan courthouse. Weinstein's accusers said he exploited his Tinseltown influence to dangle career help, get them alone and then trap and force them into sexual encounters. His defence portrayed his accusers as Hollywood wannabes and hangers-on who willingly hooked up with him to court opportunity, then later said they were victimised to collect settlement funds and #MeToo approbation. Miriam Haley, the producer and production assistant whom Weinstein was convicted – twice, now – of sexually assaulting, said outside court on Wednesday that the new verdict 'gives me hope'. Accuser Kaja Sokola also called it 'a big win for everyone,' even though Weinstein was acquitted of forcibly performing oral sex on her when she was a 19-year-old fashion model. Her allegation was added to the case after the retrial was ordered. Weinstein also was convicted of raping another woman in California. He is appealing that conviction. The Associated Press generally does not name people who say they have been sexually assaulted, unless they agree to be identified. Ms Haley and Ms Sokola did so.
