Defence budget may increase manifold
Listen to article
Pakistan may further increase the proposed defence budget for the next fiscal year to deal with the Indian aggression and spend more on indigenous research and development, in a move that may also require the provincial governments to share the additional cost.
Official sources told The Express Tribune that due to rapid security-related developments, the authorities concerned have started considering whether the earlier agreed 18% increase in the defence budget for fiscal year 2025-26 will be sufficient.
The issue has been discussed at the level of the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Defence and also with the International Monetary Fund, said the sources.
While responding to a question whether Pakistan requested the IMF to allow further increase in defence budget and to compensate it downward adjust the agreed primary budget surplus target, Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb replied that "we remain committed to stay the course both in terms of structural reform agenda and meeting all quantitative and structural benchmarks".
Pre-May 10, the federal government had decided to give an 18% increase in the defence budget over last year's allocation of Rs2.1 trillion. This has also been agreed between the Pakistan Peoples Party and the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz during a meeting chaired by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif.
However, the IMF had indicated Rs2.42 trillion for defence spending for the next fiscal year, which was higher by only 12%.
The sources said that the IMF did not have an issue with the increase in the defence budget, provided the government has a fiscal room to fund it without compromising the primary budget surplus target of around Rs2.2 trillion or 1.7% of GDP.
The discussions are taking place at a time when the IMF's top man for the region, Jihaz Azour, was in Islamabad. Jihad held important meetings on Wednesday, including with the Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb and some with other high profile state dignitaries, said the sources.
Jihad is also scheduled to meet with the Prime Minister today (Thursday).
The sources said in order to meet the heightened security situation, there was a need to increase the defence budget by at least one-fourth. This would require around Rs500 billion jump over this fiscal year, which was necessary to replenish the arsenals. The sources said that the additional money was also needed for the armed forces development programme and clearing some past defence-related liabilities.
For this fiscal year, Rs270 billion had been allocated for the armed forces development programme, which may have to be significantly increased in the light of regional developments, said the sources.
The additional financial needs to cement the country's defence have to be shouldered by the provinces. In a meeting with the Prime Minister a few days ago, Petroleum Minister Ali Pervaiz Malik had proposed that the provincial governments should bear at least half of the additional defence cost. The provinces are rich and have huge cash surpluses while the federal government is running in deficit.
India attacked Punjab and Sindh provinces and there is a need that also the provinces now should come forward to bear the cost, remarked the government officials.
The Finance Ministry was also considering diverting some of the unproductive subsidies towards meeting the nation's additional defence budget needs.
During one of recent meetings, the IMF's Mission Chief pointed towards allocating over Rs1 trillion for power sector subsidies despite the fact that electricity prices have come down. But the Power Division was asking for more money, said the sources.
The Finance Ministry can also divert some of the unproductive subsidies given for various banking sector schemes towards meeting the defence needs.
The coalition partners were battling for more development budget while terming the proposed Rs921 billion worth Public Sector Development Programme insufficient for the next fiscal year. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has already constituted a committee to review the possibility of further increasing the development budget.
The government was contemplating increasing the development budget to over Rs1 trillion but the Finance Ministry wanted to restrict it and instead put money for the defence purposes.
The FBR remains the weakest link and a reason for the lower than the required allocations for the defence and the development. The FBR has been missing its tax targets by wide margins and it's almost all initiatives have backfired. Some of the IMF-FBR meetings this week did not go well due to the FBR's inability to fulfill its commitments.
Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Wednesday constituted a committee to address the issue of stuck-up refunds of the refineries due to bad taxation policies and to inflate collection. It was decided that the Petroleum Division will consult with the Finance Division and Revenue Division to finalize the proposal regarding adjustment mechanism of sales tax on refinery products, according to the decision.
There is also a need to end the unjustified 1% advance income tax on exports in the budget after the normal tax regime has taken effect from this fiscal year.
Pakistan on Wednesday blamed India for a deadly attack on a school bus.
The Prime Minister's Office stated on Wednesday that in a reprehensible and cowardly act of terrorism, a school bus carrying innocent children was targeted today in Khuzdar, Balochistan by state sponsored proxies (Fitna Al Hindustan) of India which the world has largely come to know as epicenter of instability in the region.
Sequel to gross failure to intimidate Pakistan through overt military means, dastardly terrorist incidents are being orchestrated through their proxies at an intensified scale in Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, deliberately targeting civilians in a futile attempt to destabilize the Pakistan, according to the Prime Minister's Office.
The dastardly incident led to martyrdom of three innocent children and two soldiers along with 53 injured including 39 innocent children of which 8 are critical, according to the government.
Given the heightened tensions, the authorities said that the next year's defence budget has to be exceptionally increase one-time to strengthen the capabilities of the army, navy and the air force.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
40 minutes ago
- Business Recorder
Pakistan condemns India's rejection of Indus Waters Treaty, warns of dangerous precedent
Pakistan's Foreign Office issued a strongly worded statement today condemning Indian Home Minister Amit Shah's declaration that New Delhi would 'never restore' the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), calling it a blatant violation of international law and a threat to regional stability. The rebuke comes amid escalating tensions between the two nuclear-armed neighbors over water-sharing rights, a long-standing flashpoint in their fraught relationship. India says it will never restore Indus water treaty with Pakistan In its official response, the Foreign Office spokesperson emphasized the treaty's legal sanctity, stating, 'The Indus Waters Treaty is not a political arrangement, but an international treaty with no provision for unilateral action.' The statement accused India of 'brazen disregard' for its obligations under the 1960 World Bank-brokered agreement, which governs the sharing of the Indus River system's waters between the two countries. 'India's illegal announcement to hold the Treaty in abeyance constitutes a clear violation of international law, the provisions of the Treaty itself, and the fundamental principles governing inter-state relations,' the spokesperson asserted. The statement further warned that such conduct 'sets a reckless and dangerous precedent' and undermines global trust in treaty-based diplomacy. The Foreign Office also condemned what it termed the 'weaponization of water for political ends,' a pointed reference to Shah's remarks, which were made ahead of elections in India's Bihar state, where water-sharing disputes have long been a contentious issue. 'This irresponsible behavior contradicts established norms of responsible state behavior,' the spokesperson added, demanding that India 'immediately rescind its unilateral and unlawful stance.' Pakistan reaffirmed its commitment to the treaty and vowed to 'take all necessary measures' to safeguard its water rights, hinting at potential diplomatic or legal recourse. The Indus Waters Treaty, signed in 1960, has survived multiple wars and crises but has faced mounting strain in recent years.
Express Tribune
4 hours ago
- Express Tribune
India rules out restoring Indus Waters Treaty, vows to divert water from Pakistan
Listen to article India will never restore the Indus Waters Treaty with Islamabad, and the water flowing to Pakistan will be diverted for internal use, Home Minister Amit Shah said in an interview with Times of India on Saturday. India put into "abeyance" its participation in the 1960 treaty, which governs the usage of the Indus river system, after 26 civilians in Indian Ilegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir were killed in what Delhi described as an act of terror. The treaty had guaranteed water access for 80% of Pakistan's farms through three rivers originating in India. Pakistan has denied involvement in the incident, but the accord remains dormant despite a ceasefire agreed upon by the two nuclear-armed neighbours last month following their worst fighting in decades. "No, it will never be restored," Shah told the daily. "We will take water that was flowing to Pakistan to Rajasthan by constructing a canal. Pakistan will be starved of water that it has been getting unjustifiably," Shah said, referring to the northwestern Indian state. Last month, Reuters reported that India plans to dramatically increase the water it draws from a major river that feeds Pakistani farms downstream, as part of retaliatory action. Pakistan's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to Reuters' request for comments. But it has said in the past that the treaty has no provision for one side to unilaterally pull back and that any blocking of river water flowing to Pakistan will be considered "an act of war". Islamabad is also exploring a legal challenge to India's decision to hold the treaty in abeyance under international law.
Express Tribune
4 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Indian media claims about ceasefire request rejected
Listen to article Pakistan has categorically denied Indian media reports claiming it requested a ceasefire following recent hostilities with India. In a statement issued Friday, the Foreign Office spokesperson dismissed the reports as 'entirely baseless,' asserting that Pakistan responded to Indian aggression in line with its right to self-defence. Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister, Senator Mohammad Ishaq Dar, had in multiple media appearances stated that Pakistan's military response was a direct reaction to Indian provocations. The Foreign Office clarified that at no point did Pakistan initiate or request a ceasefire. The spokesperson detailed that the ceasefire was arranged through third-party diplomatic channels, specifically involving the United States and Saudi Arabia. Read: Rubio praises Pakistan's regional peace efforts in call with PM According to the statement, on May 10 2025 at approximately 8:15 am, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio called Senator Dar to convey that India was ready to ceasefire if Pakistan agreed. Dar confirmed Pakistan's agreement, following which Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal also contacted him around 9:00 am with a similar message and received the same confirmation. The Foreign Office labelled the Indian media reports as a 'distortion of facts' and reiterated that Pakistan agreed to a ceasefire only after India's willingness was conveyed via diplomatic channels. Islamabad reaffirmed that its position was based on sovereignty and self-defence, and external facilitation helped bring about the cessation of hostilities. Read more: Trump claims credit for India-Pakistan ceasefire despite Modi's denial India and its Prime Minister Narendra Modi, on the other hand, have consistently contradicted Washington and Islamabad by claiming that the May ceasefire between India and Pakistan resulted from direct communication between the two countries' militaries, not third-party mediation. The White House has not yet responded to India's latest remarks.
