Polestar's Luxury Electric SUV Has Lower Lifetime Environmental Impact Than Tiny Petrol Car
Meeting climate goals will require a substantial cut in car mileage achieved through road space reallocation, parking levies, road user charging, and massively increased investment in public transit and active travel infrastructures.
That caveat aside, it's also essential that the pared-back car fleet goes all-electric. Petrol-powered cars should be phased out in favor of electric vehicles (EVs), and it's now no longer true that a tiny car with an internal combustion engine (ICE) will have lower lifetime emissions, including the carbon emitted during manufacture, than a large luxury EV.
EVs may not have tailpipe emissions, but the carbon emitted during their manufacture, including the sourcing of the minerals for their heavy batteries, is still substantial.
However, some auto manufacturers are working hard to reduce the carbon footprint of their vehicles. Using Life Cycle Assessments (LCAs), these manufacturers publish cradle-to-gate and cradle-to-grave statistics. The cradle-to-gate measurement is an assessment of a partial product life cycle from resource extraction to the factory gate before it is transported to the consumer. Cradle-to-grave measurements add mileage of use, and the ease or otherwise of dismantling for scrap, including recycling or reusing the battery. Most EV batteries will outlast the vehicles they were installed in, and even then, they have a worthwhile second life, perhaps as grid storage, before they need to be stripped down for recycling.
Confusingly, car companies don't stick to the same LCA benchmarks. For instance, while EV makers Rivian and Tesla list their vehicle's CO2 emissions in grams per mile driven over the car's lifetime, Rivian assumes their vehicles have a 155,000-mile lifespan while Tesla has typical lifetime usage of 200,000 miles, meaning Tesla has 45,000 more miles to spread their emissions over, lowering their emissions per mile.
Polestar—which started life in 2005 as the brand name for a Volvo-tuning, gasoline-powered Swedish motorsports team, then transformed into an EV marque when Volvo bought the team 10 years later and is now owned by EV maker Geely of China—is arguably the world's most transparent auto maker. Since 2020, the company has published annual full-disclosure sustainability reports, publishing emissions data and the full Life Cycle Assessment for its cars.
The Polestar 4 SUV Coupe generates about 20 tons of CO2 to build. Charging the car on public chargers for 200,000 miles would generate a further 10 tons of CO2. So, that's 30 tons of CO2 for 200,000 miles of driving.
Running the small Kia Picanto (a city car with a pretty efficient petrol engine) for 200,000 miles generates 37 tons of CO2. And that's without the CO2 generated, the carbon debt, to build this ICE car, the stats for which Kia doesn't publish.
That Polestar's large, luxurious SUV has a lower environmental footprint over its lifetime than a tiny, gasoline-sipping city car doesn't mean sales of such vehicles should be encouraged–smaller EVs made to the same eco-conscious standards would have even lower lifetime emissions, and wouldn't pose so much danger to pedestrians and cyclists—but it's essential to bust the myth that small ICE cars are better for the planet than humoungous e-SUVs. (An argument for another article is whether any oversized cars, and their larger, particulate-shedding tires, should be allowed in cities.)
Geely makes the Polestar 4 in a factory in China, which has solar panels on the roof and gets the bulk of its electricity from a hydroelectric power station. Charging the Polestar 4 at home using the ever-greener grid or home solar panels would generate even less lifetime CO2.
Analysis from the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT) estimates that the life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of 2024 electric sedans in the US are 66%–70% lower than gasoline vehicles, depending on the average carbon intensity of the electricity grid. For SUVs, the ICCT estimates that the emissions are 71%–74% lower than gasoline vehicles, depending on the same conditions.
EVs have no tailpipe emissions. However, generating the electricity used to charge EVs may create carbon pollution. The amount varies based on how local power is generated, whether using coal or natural gas, which emit carbon pollution, versus renewable resources like wind or solar, which do not.
A significant advantage of EVs compared to gasoline vehicles is their energy efficiency. EVs use about 90% of the energy from the battery and regenerative braking to propel the car. Gasoline vehicles only convert about 16–25% of the energy from gasoline into motion.
The production of electric cars is expected to become more efficient, and the production of electricity cleaner, according to the European Environment Agency. Every year, the life-cycle emissions of a typical EV could be cut by at least 73% by 2050, says the agency.
Nevertheless, it remains that—mainly because of the large battery—making an EV is more carbon-intensive than making an ICE car. Analysis by the Argonne National Laboratory in Illinois suggests that manufacturing EVs produces about 60% more carbon emissions than making ICE cars. However, this carbon debt can be paid back swiftly.
'Essentially it takes two to three years, and then you have accounted for the climate debt that the car came with,' says Fredrika Klarén, Polestar's head of sustainability.
'Our customers want sustainability solutions,' she adds. 'They want to know they are purchasing from a company that takes responsibility. We don't greenwash. I would love for customers to be even more picky and start using the carbon footprints we deliver to them. We want people to use our data in managing a carbon budget for themselves.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tesla vs. Waymo: What is the difference between the vehicles?
Tesla's robotaxis are set to hit the streets of Austin, Texas. When it comes to self-driving vehicles, the EV giant faces stiff competition from the Alphabet-backed Waymo (GOOG, GOOGL), which already has vehicles on the roads in several cities, one of which may soon be New York City. Stifel NextGen Transport analyst Stephen Gengaro has ridden in both vehicles. He shares his key takeaways from his experiences and why, ultimately, Tesla (TSLA) may have a leg up on the rival. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination here.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why PayPal Stock Is a Screaming Buy for the Second Half of 2025
PayPal stock (PYPL) has had a bumpy ride since 2020. The stock more than doubled in 2020 and continued its good run in the first half of 2021. However, PYPL ended that year in the red, meeting the same fate for the next two years. 2024 was a welcome break for PayPal investors as the 'law of averages' finally caught up with the stock, and it gained a respectable 39%, outperforming the S&P 500 Index ($SPX) after three consecutive years of underperformance. Cut to 2025, and PYPL stock has already lost nearly 20% and is yet again massively underperforming the broader market, which has recovered from its April lows. I see the recent fall in PayPal stock as a good buying opportunity, as we'll explore in this article. Dear Tesla Stock Fans, Mark Your Calendars for June 30 The 'Golden Era' for Tesla Starts June 22. Should You Buy TSLA Stock First? This Options Tool Can Show You How to Trade Tesla Stock Ahead of Robotaxi Day Markets move fast. Keep up by reading our FREE midday Barchart Brief newsletter for exclusive charts, analysis, and headlines. PayPal started the year on a strong note but fell sharply after its Q4 2024 earnings. While the company posted better-than-expected revenues and profits for the quarter, and its guidance came in ahead of estimates, slowing growth at Braintree, its subsidiary focused on card processing, dampened sentiment. The tariff chaos did not help, as fintech companies, including Affirm (AFRM) and PayPal, slumped in April amid concerns that tariffs could lead to a recession, hurting their business. Both these stocks have not yet recovered to their 2025 highs, even as tariff worries have greatly (if not fully) subsided. While these are short-term headwinds, PayPal is facing some structural challenges in the form of higher competition across nearly all its business verticals. For instance, its branded checkout is facing intense competition from Apple Pay (AAPL) and Google Pay (GOOG), while the non-branded business faces competition from companies like Stripe. The P2P business is also facing competition from Zelle and Cash App (XYZ). The competition has negatively impacted PayPal's topline, which is now growing in single digits. With rising competition, digital payment companies have been feeling pressure on their take rate (the fees they charge for processing the transaction), and PayPal's operating margins have fallen. While I find corporate turnarounds a cliché, PayPal is a legit turnaround story under the new CEO, Alex Chriss, who is working on profitable growth. The strategy has shown results, and the company has had five consecutive quarters of profitable growth. PayPal has also made a foray into digital advertising, capitalizing on the vast consumer data that it possesses. The company is also using artificial intelligence to personalize experiences for customers. PayPal is transforming into a 'commerce company' from a mere payment company, and aspires to be a bridge connecting its over 400 million users to the merchants on the platform. During the Investor Day earlier this year, Chriss said that the pivot could help PayPal deliver annual adjusted earnings per share (EPS) growth of over 20% in the future. The investing thesis for PayPal is three part. The first is the turnaround and transformation, which is a work in progress The initial stages of this turnaround have been promising. The second is, of course, valuation, as PayPal's current forward price-earnings (P/E) multiple of 13.5x is well below the S&P 500 Index. Also, despite the slowdown, the company's bottom line is still growing, and the P/E-to-growth multiple of 1.13x looks quite attractive. Finally, PayPal is a free cash flow powerhouse despite all the challenges, and expects to generate between $6 billion-$7 billion of free cash in 2025. The company has been using the bulk of this cash flow to repurchase its shares and intends to spend $6 billion on buybacks this year. Given PayPal's current market cap of just over $66 billion, the buybacks will theoretically help boost its EPS by high single digits. PayPal's cash engine is not expected to slow down anytime soon, and it intends to use between 70%-80% of its free cash flows toward repurchases over the medium term, which should help propel its EPS growth in low-teens, if not higher. The company's balance sheet is also quite formidable, and it holds more cash and investments than the debt it owes. Overall, I find PayPal stock a no-brainer at these levels and am adding to my existing position in the company. While it is no longer the kind of growth story it was a few years back, there is a lot of comfort in these valuations, and the turnaround can help lead to a re-rating. Sell-side analysts also see decent upside in PYPL stock, and its mean target price of $80.50 is 17.4% higher than the June 18 closing price. The overall Street sentiment is mixed, though, and of the 44 analysts covering the stock, 16 have a 'Strong Buy' rating while three rate PYPL as a 'Moderate Buy.' 21 analysts rate PayPal as a 'Hold' while the remaining four rate it as a 'Strong Sell.' On the date of publication, Mohit Oberoi had a position in: PYPL, AFRM, GOOG, AAPL. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
3 of the Best Luxury Cars of 2025 Cost Less Than $45K
Luxury cars don't always come with a six-figure price tag. Acura Integra, Tesla Model 3, and Audi A4 deliver sleek styling, premium features and strong performance for under $45,000. Discover Next: Find Out: If you want an upscale ride without overspending, these three cars are worth a closer look. Price: $34,195 to $39,195 Miles Per Gallon: 26 to 29 miles in the city, 36 miles on the highway Drive Type: FWD Power: 200 hp at 6000 rpm Acura Integra is considered to be a sporty, luxury hatchback with 18-inch wheels and has an option for a six-speed manual transmission. The interior offers faux leather seats with faux suede inserts, an 8 to 12-way adjustable driver's seat with a four-way adjustable passenger seat and a generous 24 cubic-foot cargo area. Add the Technology package for a 9.0-inch infotainment display and wireless smartphone charging. The car's powertrain warranty covers six years or 70,000 miles, which is more than the Integra's competitors. Complimentary scheduled maintenance is offered at two years or 24,000 miles. Read More: Price: $44,130 Miles Per Gallon: 145 in the city, 128 on the highway Drive Type: RWD Power: 295 hp at 7000 rpm Tesla Model 3 Long Range RWD is a luxury electric compact sedan with a driver-assist system that has earned a spot on the Car and Driver Editors' Choice List for 2025. One improvement Tesla has made to the Model 3 is moving its turn signals to the steering wheel. Also, the gear shift is now on the display screen. The interior is unlike any other car on the market due to its simple design that's dominated by the extra-large touch screen secured in the middle of the dashboard, which controls almost all the functions except for those located on the steering wheel. Even with the interior being streamlined, there are many areas for storage, and the trunk space provides ample room for up to 15 carry-on suitcases. For rear passengers, there's an 8-inch touchscreen for climate control and entertainment options, including arcade games, Netflix and YouTube. The Model 3 has a Powertrain warranty that covers eight years or 100,000 miles, but no complimentary scheduled maintenance. Price: $44,100 Miles Per Gallon: 26 in the city, 36 on the highway Drive Type: AWD Power: 201 hp at 4200 rpm Audi A4 is a luxury small car that was made for the daily driver, which is now in its last year of production. The myAudiapp remote engine start is now featured on all trims of the A4. Its leather upholstered interior has a sunroof, spacious rear seating, 12 cubic feet of trunk space and a 10.1-inch touchscreen for infotainment. Adding the Premium Plus trim will allow the driver to experience many features, including a powerful Bang and Olufsen 19-speaker audio system and the Virtual Cockpit with an awesome digital gauge display. A4's Powertrain warranty covers 4 years or 50,000 miles. However, there's no complimentary scheduled maintenance included. More From GOBankingRates Are You Rich or Middle Class? 8 Ways To Tell That Go Beyond Your Paycheck This article originally appeared on 3 of the Best Luxury Cars of 2025 Cost Less Than $45K
