The Future of Iran Belongs Only to its People
'Do you think I'll get to see Iran again?'
The question hangs in the air—quiet, fragile, heavy, with longing. My father asks it in the twilight of his life, as he battles the cancer that seeks to weaken him. It is not his voice alone I hear, but the echo of millions: those who fled the land they loved, and those who remain behind, still waiting for the day Iran might be Iran again.
He fled to London in the aftermath of the 1979 revolution, narrowly escaping the noose of a theocracy that replaced a fallen monarch. My father served this monarchy with loyalty, believing that for all its faults as an autocracy, it was modernizing, socially liberal, and politically reformable: the very antithesis of the Islamic Republic.
Once my father left Iran, he never returned. In exile, he bore witness to a regime that mercilessly imprisoned, tortured, and murdered. A regime that severed him from his soil, but could not break his hope.
And what of the others? Those who stayed. Our families and loved ones. Those who endured the lash of repression and five decades of near constant insecurity. They too ask: When will we reclaim our country from this long dark night?
I grew up between the nostalgia of a homeland lost, and the reality of exile. The chants outside the Islamic Republic embassy, the clatter of Persian tea glasses at gatherings of dissidents in our cramped government housing, the news of bombings and assassinations that stole friends and fellow dreamers. That haunting blend of sorrow and defiance shaped us. And now, as war darkens our skies, we feel it again: sorrow for the innocent, hope for the fall of the tormentors.
When speaking with civil society leaders inside Iran, it seems few Iranians squarely blame foreign hands for this war. Although there is a diversity of voices in any country, many Iranians ultimately believe that the Islamic Republic was never a guardian of the nation, but a keeper of its own revolution. Even its Revolutionary Guards bear no name of Iran—only of a violent ideology that devours its children and invites war upon them.
In a joint statement, Iran's Nobel laureates Narges Mohammadi and Shirin Ebadi, filmmakers Jafar Panahi and Mohammad Rasoulof, and civil society voices urged world leaders to halt uranium enrichment and end the bloodshed of innocents in Iran and Israel.
Inside the country, optimism and dread wrestle for the soul of a people.
For decades, many of us pleaded with world leaders: reject both appeasement and war with the Islamic Republic. There was another path—to strangle the regime and empower the people. Few chose it. Too many asked the question, ' Do the people of Iran really want change?' as if they did not hear waves of Iranian protestors chant, 'Death to the dictator' and 'Death to Khamenei' on the streets. Perhaps now—as these cries echo from the rooftops of Tehran, even under the specter of war—they will finally listen.
Since the fighting began, several of the regime's architects of terror have been killed in their bunkers and beds. But with them have perished a poet, an athlete, and children —the bright promise of tomorrow extinguished alongside the darkness of the old guard. Many of us watch in anguish as our compatriots abandon their homes, desperate for a safe haven beyond the reach of oppression and destruction.
As dissident rap artist Toomaj Salehi asks: 'How are over 9 million people—without fuel, often without enough savings to relocate, and with no second home in another city—supposed to evacuate Tehran?'
Iranians see through the hollow outrage of regime officials who weep for civilians today, yet spilled the blood of 1,500 protesters in 2019, over 500 more during the Woman, Life, Freedom uprising of 2022, and countless others over four decades of tyranny.
And yet, the regime clings to its authoritarian script: shutting down the internet, censoring its news. Instead of offering citizens protection or safe harbor in the midst of war, it forces university students to take their exams as if nothing has changed, and intensifies its crackdown on free speech.
The Islamic Republic's illegitimacy is laid bare not only in its horrific human rights record but in its strategic failures. In the words of Kylie Moore-Gilbert, 'Repressing dissent, putting innocent people in prison, flubbing operations abroad—Iran just can't seem to get out of its own way.' And recently, Israeli spies and pilots have managed to cripple Iranian counterstrike capabilities.
True advocates of peace reject both wars of aggression and terror in all its forms. Indifference to the latter undermines any genuine commitment to the former.
No external power will rescue Iran. The age of foreign saviors is over. We do not live in a world of singular empires or simple alliances. Every nation must tend its own garden. But no soil stands apart. For nearly half a century, the regime in Iran has poisoned more than its own land—its blight has spread to Yemen, Syria, Iraq, Gaza, Lebanon.
Iran's fate will, and should, be written by Iranians—not in foreign capitals or closed rooms, but on their own streets, with their own voices, and through their own struggle. And as long as those who dream of liberal democracy remain divided, as long as personal ambitions, old wounds, and ideological divides stand in the way of common purpose—I fear the answer to my father's question.
For the sake of a free Iran, a stable region and a world at peace—as we urge restraint and adherence to international law—we must also ensure the sovereignty of the Iranian people, not their oppressors.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Iran questions US ‘trust' in nuclear talks as negotiations remain stalled amid Islamic Republic's conflict with Israel
Iran is questioning its 'trust' in the US to engage in nuclear talks as Tehran has refused to restart negotiations until Israel halts its attacks. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi accused the Trump administration of using nuclear negotiations as a cover for Israel's airstrikes on the country's nuclear program, claiming the attacks came just two days before a new round of talks between US and Iranian officials were set to start. 'So they had perhaps this plan in their mind, and they just needed negotiations perhaps to cover it up,' Araqchi said Friday in an interview with NBC News. Advertisement 4 Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi accused the Trump administration of using nuclear negotiations as a cover for Israel's airstrikes on the country's nuclear program. NBC News 'We don't know how we can trust them anymore. What they did was, in fact, a betrayal of diplomacy.' He vowed that negotiations would cease as long as Israel's 'aggression continues,' flatly rejecting Trump's demands to scrap its uranium enrichment and balking at his 'two week' deadline to reach a deal. Advertisement 4 Satellite image of the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant in Iran. © 2025 PLANET LABS PBC/AFP via Getty Images 'I told him several times zero enrichment is impossible,' Araqui said of his meetings with special envoy Steve Witkoff, who he accused of contributing to a 'lack of confidence' between the two nations. He later called Tehran's nuclear program a scientific 'achievement' and a source of 'pride and dignity,' insisting that even if it were bombed and destroyed, Iran would rebuild it using the knowledge and technology it has amassed over the years. But Araqchi said US officials could resolve the issue with a single phone call to Tel Aviv to halt the attacks. Advertisement 4 Iranian foreign minister expressing distrust of the U.S. following Israeli attacks. NBC News 'They can stop this process very quickly, and then we will consider diplomacy again,' he told reporter Andrea Mitchell during the sit-down. 'They have asked us to negotiate, but we negotiate only when it is negotiation and not dictation.' Israel began its attack on Iran last Friday by taking out its top nuclear scientists and military officials responsible for the country's nuclear enrichment program. Advertisement 4 President Trump gave Iran a two-week deadline to restart negotiations to reach a deal. Ron Sachs/CNP / President Trump earlier this week spent days behind closed doors vacillating between negotiating a deal with Iran to limit its uranium enrichment and potentially joining Israel in bombing Tehran's nuclear facilities. The president said Thursday he'd make a final decision within the 'next two weeks' as he still holds out hope for renewed negotiations over Tehran's nuclear program. Araqchi warned that if the US joins Israel in launching an attack on Iran, the country will strike back. 'When there is a war, both sides attack each other. That's quite understandable. And self-defense is a legitimate right of every country,' he said. 'If the US joins Israel in these attacks, we will do the same.'
Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
A potential strike on Iran tests Trump's propensity to play to both sides
Since his first campaign for president 10 years ago, Trump has excelled at appearing to favor both sides of the same issue, allowing supporters to hear what they want to hear, whether he's talking about tariffs, TikTok, abortion, tax cuts, or more. But the prospect that the United States might join Israel in bombing Iran is testing his ability to embrace dueling positions with little to no political cost. Some of Trump's most ardent supporters — those who defended him during multiple investigations and ultimately returned him to the White House — are ripping one another to shreds over the idea and at times lashing out at Trump as well. Advertisement The war in Iran is exactly the kind of Middle East entanglement that Trump's anti-interventionist base believed he was bitterly opposed to, because he repeatedly said he was. But he is also the same president who, in his first term, authorized missile strikes in Syria, after its leadership used chemical weapons on citizens, and the assassination of a top Iranian general, Qassem Soleimani — two actions he took pride in. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up To Trump, the contradictions are not actually contradictions. 'I think I'm the one that decides that,' he told The Atlantic recently in response to criticism from one of his most vocal anti-interventionist supporters, Tucker Carlson, who said the president's support for Israel's fight in Iran ran against his 'America First' message. Trump was propelled to victory in the Republican primary in 2016 as an outsider, in part because he forcefully condemned the invasion of Iraq, authorized by the last Republican president more than a decade before, and the seemingly endless war that followed. Yet he said the United States should have taken the country's oil, and ran radio ads saying he would 'bomb the hell' out of the Islamic State group. Advertisement He has said he wants to renew the tax cuts he put into effect in his first term, which saved some of the wealthiest earners millions, while also suggesting that congressional Republicans should implement a new tax on the wealthiest. He has said he supports businesses and also wants to deport the immigrant workforce that fuels parts of the economy. He wants to engage in mass deportation and also wants to sell visas for $5 million. He has celebrated the Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v. Wade as a point of pride while also condemning Republican governors who signed bills banning most abortions after six weeks of pregnancy. He has both celebrated and criticized his own criminal justice reform bill of 2018. Despite the contradictions, Republicans for years have been united in support of Trump and what he says he wants, giving him a benefit of the doubt that few, if any, career politicians have ever received. Even when most elected Republicans held Trump at a distance after the deadly attack on the Capitol by a pro-Trump mob on Jan. 6, 2021, Trump still had a tight grip on Republican primary voters. Trump, a celebrity known to the electorate for decades, has obscured long-standing and unresolved foreign policy divisions within the party dating back to the aftermath of President George W. Bush's push to invade Iraq. Advertisement But as Trump decides whether to plunge the United States into the heart of the Israel-Iran conflict, his core supporters are splintering. Trump's announcement Thursday that he could take up to two weeks to decide did not sit well with some of his most hawkish supporters. On social media, Fox News host Mark Levin began a lengthy post by suggesting that the president was being pulled back from what he actually wants to do. 'LET TRUMP BE TRUMP!' Levin wrote. 'We got our answer. Iran says no unconditional surrender. Again. And again. And again. They cheat and lie and kill. They're TERRORISTS!' His anti-interventionist supporters, meanwhile, have been equally alarmed by what he might decide to do. 'Anyone slobbering for the U.S. to become fully involved in the Israel/Iran war is not America First/MAGA,' Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, Republican of Georgia, posted on social media over the weekend. Trump's advisers say that on the Israel-Iran conflict in particular, the president is dealing with a fast-moving, complicated situation that does not lend itself to simple, black-and-white solutions, despite the fact that he has consistently campaigned that way. 'President Trump considers the nuances of every issue but ultimately takes decisive action to directly benefit American families,' said Anna Kelly, a White House spokesperson. 'The American people trust this president to make the right decisions,' she said, adding that he 'started the Make America Great Again movement because he represents a new leadership that puts Americans first.' But in 2025, Trump is not the only one who can command media attention. Carlson is no longer on Fox News, but he has a show that streams on the social platform X and is a leading voice among foreign policy 'restrainers' who have argued that Trump would be acting against his own movement should he strike Iran. Advertisement Steve Bannon, an adviser who was exiled from the White House in the first year of Trump's first term, has become one of the dominant voices among the MAGA faithful with his 'War Room' podcast, delivering the same message as Carlson. Yet Trump has found that many of his allies will ultimately come back to him, despite unhappiness with some of his decisions.
New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
Trump's heavy Iran choice: Letters to the Editor — June 21, 2025
The Issue: President Trump deliberation on whether to take military action against Iran's last nuke site. President Trump has raised concerns that a post-regime Iran might resemble Libya after Moammar Khadafy — fractured, chaotic and unstable ('Don fears Daffy decision,' June 20). But the comparison between Iran and Libya is deeply flawed. Advertisement Libya's Khadafy, though brutal, never possessed the strategic capabilities Iran now holds. Iran is already a regional power, capable of threatening Israel — and far beyond — through its ballistic-missile arsenal and emerging nuclear capabilities. Moreover, post-Khadafy Libya lacked a unifying opposition or a credible heir, which fueled its descent into civil war. Advertisement Iran is different. Exiled Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi has emerged as a potential transitional figure, and reports suggest some elements within Iran's military are in quiet contact with his camp. Kim Ezra Shienbaum New Milford, Pa. Advertisement Iran has trained, armed, financed, encouraged and applauded terrorists who have killed American citizens. For almost half a century, Iran's leaders have preached 'Death to America.' There will never be a better opportunity to remove these leaders than now. This will go a long way to promoting peace in the Middle East. Advertisement The people in Iran, especially the women, will thank us. Joe Zeloof Hamilton, NJ Launching attacks on Iran, a nation of more than 90 million, risks an uncontrollable regional war with catastrophic consequences. It is not only immoral — it is insanity. Such escalation would bring mass suffering and global economic instability and further fuel anti-American sentiment. This is not America's war. It must not become one. Advertisement Congress must act now to prevent an unauthorized war and assert its constitutional war powers. We cannot bomb our way out of failed policies. More war will not bring peace or security — it will only deepen chaos. Say no to war with Iran. Advertisement Jagjit Singh Los Altos, Calif. Iran is not Libya. There is a large, oppressed population that is pro-Israel, pro-democracy and pro-United States. Advertisement We should not allow irrational fears of Iran turning into another Libya stop us from standing up for the oppressed Iranians. That would be like the allies in World War II not overthrowing the Nazis because of fear that Germany would descend into chaos. Iran was once a friendly country with a friendly regime that was overthrown by radical Muslims, who might have been stopped if it hadn't been for Carter administration pressure on the shah. We share in the responsibility that led to the regime change from a shah who loved his people and American values, to a regime that oppresses Iranians and hates the United States. Advertisement Gamaliel Isaac Manhattan This nation needs to pull in its swords overseas and attend to the war going on within our own country. It seems as if our government cannot get enough of spending our time and money to meddle in other nations' domestic affairs. Having been a part of these intrusions at one time, I can say most of our various expenditures have been most wasteful and negative. There is absolutely nothing heroic about 'loving war as long as we take few casualties.' This country of ours in now at war with itself and the opposing factions are becoming more polarized. We have enough on our hands right here. Michael G. Merhige Miami, Fla. After decades of failed global negotiations and agreements toward delaying and denying Iran's acquisition of nuclear weapons, Israel has systematically and spectacularly attacked Iran's nuclear sites. However, destruction of the deeply buried Fordow uranium-enrichment site remains a serious challenge, likely resolvable only by American bunker buster bombs. Will America rise to this challenge? History surely will not be kind should this rarest of moments to finally eliminate this long overhanging threat not be firmly seized. Richard D. Wilkins Syracuse Want to weigh in on today's stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to letters@ Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.
