Synthetic Minds: How AI Is Creating Its Own Reality Without Consciousness
Gowtham Chilakapati is a Director at Humana. He is an expert in enterprise data and AI systems with a focus on real-time analytics.
getty
As a technologist specializing in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) models and AI-driven decision systems, I have observed a critical paradox: AI models are now capable of constructing coherent realities that mimic human perception, yet they remain fundamentally unconscious and unaware of the realities they generate.
From my experience developing AI-driven assistants and enterprise automation solutions, I have witnessed firsthand how AI systems synthesize multi-modal data, hallucinate responses and simulate intelligence, often convincing enough to be mistaken for true cognition. Let's explore whether these synthetic minds actually perceive the world they build or if they are simply statistical illusionists.
Throughout my career working with enterprise AI systems, one of the biggest challenges has been ensuring AI-generated insights are grounded in reality rather than fabricated extrapolations. Unlike human cognition, which derives meaning from lived experiences and sensory interaction, AI constructs reality by assembling fragmented data into a probabilistic representation.
Multi-modal AI models—such as OpenAI's CLIP, Google's Gemini and Meta's SeamlessM4T—combine text, images and even audio to create internally consistent narratives. However, their perception is hollow—they recognize patterns but lack intentionality or subjective awareness.
For instance, when I worked on streamlining real-time AI-driven customer interactions, I found that AI-generated responses were convincing but often lacked deeper contextual awareness. The model could mimic human dialogue patterns but failed to recognize emotional subtleties or unspoken intent, making its responses feel robotic despite their surface-level coherence.
A major pitfall in AI-driven analytics is hallucination—the phenomenon where models generate plausible but false information. I encountered this while developing fraud detection algorithms for financial services, where AI models often flagged non-existent risks based on overfitting historical anomalies, rather than true emergent fraud patterns.
Hallucinations are a form of synthetic reality construction, where AI fills gaps in its data with statistically likely but fabricated content. However, there is a fundamental distinction between AI hallucination and human imagination:
• Human imagination is rooted in emotions, past experiences and abstract reasoning.
• AI hallucination is driven by probabilistic associations without underlying comprehension.
This difference became clear when working with AI-powered knowledge retrieval systems. The AI-generated reports looked factually sound, yet deeper inspection revealed inconsistencies due to missing context. AI's ability to generate a convincing but flawed version of reality makes it an impressive tool—but also a dangerous one when unchecked.
One of the most fascinating applications I've worked on is decision intelligence AI—systems that provide strategic insights to executives by analyzing vast amounts of structured and unstructured data. The challenge is that while AI can make incredibly sophisticated correlations, it lacks strategic intent and adaptive reasoning.
For example, in portfolio management automation, I saw AI models predict market trends with high accuracy. Yet, when faced with unprecedented economic events, they failed to reassess core assumptions—an ability that defines true human strategic thinking. The AI was unable to redefine its own reality the way humans do in response to new paradigms.
If AI is to move beyond being a synthetic illusionist into something more autonomous and self-aware, it will likely require an embodied cognition framework. This means AI must:
• Interact physically with the real world (beyond data streams and simulations).
• Develop self-referential memory that shapes future decisions (instead of just iterative tuning).
• Recognize the implications of its outputs beyond pattern matching.
In my experience developing AI-powered automation, I have seen that true decision making requires more than just data synthesis—it demands an understanding of cause and effect, moral weight and subjective valuation. Current AI lacks this awareness, meaning that while it can construct compelling versions of reality, it cannot truly perceive them.
As AI continues to advance, the lines between statistical simulation and synthetic cognition will blur even further. However, AI remains a reflection of human intelligence rather than an independent entity. It builds synthetic realities, but it does not live within them.
My work in AI deployment for finance, healthcare and enterprise automation has reinforced a crucial truth: AI amplifies human decision making, but it does not replace the intuitive, strategic and morally grounded perception of reality that humans possess. While AI will continue to generate highly complex synthetic minds, true cognitive perception remains a uniquely human frontier.
Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
36 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
The $14 Billion AI Google Killer
A new AI darling is making waves in Silicon Valley. It's called Perplexity, and according to reports, both Meta and Apple have quietly explored acquiring it. Valued at a staggering $14 billion following a May funding round, the startup is being hailed as a revolutionary threat to Google Search's search dominance. But here's the thing: it mostly just summarizes web results and sends you links. So why the frenzy? Perplexity billed itself an 'answer engine.' You ask a question, and it uses large language models to spit out a human-sounding summary, complete with footnotes. It's essentially ChatGPT with a bibliography. You might ask for the best books about the French Revolution or a breakdown of the Genius Act. In seconds, it generates a paragraph with links to Wikipedia, news outlets, or Reddit threads. Its pitch is a cleaner, ad-free, chatbot-driven search experience. No SEO junk, no scrolling. But critics say it's little more than a glorified wrapper around Google and OpenAI's APIs, with minimal proprietary tech and lots of smoke. It's fast, clean, and slick. But, they argue, at its core, it's mostly just reorganizing the internet. Big Tech's Obsession That hasn't stopped the hype. In May 2025, the San Francisco, California based company closed another $500 million funding round, pushing its valuation to $14 billion, a sharp increase from its $9 billion valuation in December 2024. Jeff Bezos, via the Jeff Bezos Family Fund, and Nvidia are among its notable backers And now, tech giants are circling. According to Bloomberg, Apple has held talks about acquiring Perplexity. Meta has also reportedly considered the move, though no formal offers have been confirmed. The logic is clear. Perplexity is fast-growing and increasingly seen as a 'Google killer,' especially among tech influencers and X power users. Traffic to its site has exploded in recent months. The company now offers a Chrome extension, mobile app, and a Pro version that gives users access to top-tier AI models like GPT-4 and Claude. Still, it's unclear what exactly makes Perplexity worth $14 billion, other than the fact that it's riding the AI wave. Why AI Skeptics Are Rolling Their Eyes For AI skeptics, Perplexity's rise is yet another example of hype outpacing substance. The site doesn't train its own models. It's not building new infrastructure. It's not revolutionizing search. It's just offering a polished interface to ask questions and get AI-generated summaries pulled from public websites. There are also growing concerns about how Perplexity sources its information. A number of news organizations, including The New York Times, Forbes, and Wired, have accused the company of plagiarizing and scraping content without permission or proper attribution. Journalists and publishers warn that this kind of AI-powered search experience threatens to cannibalize news traffic while giving little back to content creators. On June 20, the BBC became the latest outlet to threaten legal action against Perplexity AI, alleging that the company is using BBC content to train its 'default AI model,' according to the Financial Times. Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas has defended the company as an 'aggregator of information.' In July 2024, the startup launched a revenue-sharing program to address the backlash. 'We have always believed that we can build a system where the whole Internet wins,' Srinivas said at the time. So Why the Gold Rush? Simple. Search is money. Google earned $50.7 billion from search ads in the first quarter, a 9.8% increase year over year. If Perplexity can convince even a small share of users to switch, and then monetize that experience, it becomes a real threat. Apple and Meta, both increasingly wary of relying on Google, see Perplexity as a fast track into the AI search race. But the stakes go even deeper. Whoever controls the next search interface controls the user. Just as Google replaced Yahoo, Perplexity could theoretically replace Google. That's why Big Tech wants in, even if it's not entirely clear what they're buying.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
AI chatbots and TikTok reshape how young people get their daily news
Artificial intelligence is changing the way people get their news, with more readers turning to chatbots like ChatGPT to stay up to date. At the same time, nearly half of young adults now rely on platforms such as TikTok as their main source of news. The findings come from the Reuters Institute's annual Digital News Report, released this week. The Oxford University-affiliated study surveyed nearly 97,000 people across 48 countries to track how global news habits are shifting. The study found that a notable number of people are using AI chatbots to read headlines and get news updates – a shift described by the institute's director Mitali Mukherjee as a 'new chapter' in the way audiences consume information. While only 7 percent overall say they use AI chatbots to find news, that number rises among younger audiences – 12 percent of under-35s and 15 percent of under-25s now rely on tools such as OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini or Meta's Llama for their news. 'Personalised, bite-sized and quick – that's how younger audiences want their news, and AI tools are stepping in to deliver exactly that,' Mukherjee noted. Beyond reading headlines, many readers are turning to AI for more complex tasks: 27 percent use it to summarise news articles, 24 percent for translations, and 21 percent for recommendations on what to read next. Nearly one in five have quizzed AI directly about current events. (with newswires) Read more on RFI EnglishRead also:AI steals spotlight from Nobel winners who highlight Its power and risksAI showcase pays off for France, but US tech scepticism endures'By humans, for humans': French dubbing industry speaks out against AI threat
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Does Meta Platforms' Massive $14.3 Billion Artificial Intelligence (AI) Bet Make the Stock a Buy Now?
Meta Platforms added $14.3 billion to its investment in Scale AI, adding key personnel to its payroll. After a disappointing Llama 4 release, Meta is playing catch-up with the leading AI companies. AI has more potential to add value at Meta than almost any other company in the world. 10 stocks we like better than Meta Platforms › Meta Platforms (NASDAQ: META) is shaking up its artificial intelligence (AI) efforts and the industry as a whole. Earlier this month, it invested a total of $14.3 billion in Scale AI to take a 49% non-voting stake in the company and bring key personnel into Meta's laboratories. Despite the significant changes this brings to Meta and the industry, it's not what makes the stock a buy today. Artificial intelligence is extremely important to the future of Meta Platforms, and the potential impact of the technology still seems to be underappreciated by the market. Meta's stock price is attractive, and it would be a buy whether it made the move to invest in Scale AI or not. Scale AI provides curated and labeled data sets to frontier model developers for AI training. It can also provide evaluation and help improve reasoning models with the help of human experts. It works with many of the biggest names in artificial intelligence, providing key services to ensure they can put out the best products. Meta's investment includes a commercial agreement to spend $450 million per year on Scale's platform. Meta will likely gain access to proprietary data sets in an industry where good data has become incredibly important. More importantly, though, it brings Scale's founder and CEO Alexandr Wang onto Meta's payroll, where he'll head up a new AI "superintelligence" lab. Meta has struggled to attract top talent to its AI labs, and the disappointing results of its latest Llama AI model release have made the talent gap more clear. It reportedly offered huge incentive packages to poach OpenAI employees in an effort to win over talent to catch back up with the competition, but most rejected it. With its investment in Scale, Meta is hoping it can correct that issue. Building a leading-edge model is important for Meta, even though it provides its Llama models to the open-source community, albeit with restrictions for commercial use. CEO Mark Zuckerberg is more interested in the potential the most advanced AI systems could bring to Meta's existing products instead of making a product out of the AI model itself. But to build the best model with the most capabilities, it needs wide adoption from the developer community, and that won't happen if its performance is subpar. So, adding Wang to the AI team is a great start, but Meta would've likely found a way to attract talent one way or another. The potential value of AI to the company is just too high for it to remain a barrier forever. Meta is already working on a service that could be the start of a long runway of AI growth. On Meta's most recent earnings call, Zuckerberg described an AI agent that could take a marketing objective and a budget and take care of creating and running an entire ad campaign by itself. It would design the creative, figure out who to target, and optimize images, videos, copy, and targeting to meet those objectives. It could potentially create individualized ads for Facebook and Instagram users to help marketers meet their objectives with minimal costs. That's not some far-off dream, either. The company aims to offer the service by the end of next year, according to a report from The Wall Street Journal. Such a service would not only lead to marketers' willingness to pay for ads increasing (since they won't have to spend time or money on developing ad creatives), but it would expand the number of advertisers. Lowering the barrier to entry should lead more businesses to advertise on Meta's platform, which should support higher pricing for its ads due to higher demand. On top of that, Meta's ability to generate paid content for its users with artificial intelligence would also mean it can generate highly personalized and engaging entertainment content as well. That could lead to higher engagement rates and more time spent on the platform, increasing the number of ads shown and their value. Few companies are in as good of a position to capitalize on the potential of AI compared to Meta. Not only does it have a massive platform to deploy its AI capabilities, but it has the capital to invest in the future of AI. Its investment in Scale and move to bring Wang and other personnel in-house is the company using its competitive advantage to its benefit, which is what makes it a great investment. And with the stock trading for roughly 27 times forward earnings, it could prove a bargain at the current price. Before you buy stock in Meta Platforms, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Meta Platforms wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $664,089!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $881,731!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Adam Levy has positions in Meta Platforms. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Meta Platforms. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Does Meta Platforms' Massive $14.3 Billion Artificial Intelligence (AI) Bet Make the Stock a Buy Now? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
